Applications of supraorbital keyhole craniotomy in pediatric cranial trauma: illustrative series of two cases and systematic literature review.

Minimally invasive (MIS) approaches to neurosurgical diseases continue to increase in popularity due to their association with decreased infection risk, shorter recovery time, and improved cosmesis. Cosmesis and lower morbidity are especially important for pediatric patients. The supraorbital keyhole craniotomy (SOKC) is one MIS approach shown to be effective for both neoplastic and vascular pathologies in pediatric patients. However, it is limited data on its use in pediatric trauma patients. Two cases employing SOKC in pediatric trauma patients are presented here along with a systematic review of the literature. We queried PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception to August 2022 using the Boolean search term: (supraorbital OR eyebrow OR transeyebrow OR suprabrow OR superciliary OR supraciliary) AND (craniotomy OR approach OR keyhole OR procedure) AND (pediatric OR children OR child OR young) AND "trauma". Studies that discussed the use of an SOKC in a pediatric patient having sustained trauma to the frontal calvarium and/or anterior fossa/sellar region of the skull base were included. Details were extracted on patient demographics, trauma etiology, endoscope use, and surgical and cosmetic outcomes. We identified 89 unique studies, of which four met inclusion criteria. Thirteen total cases were represented. Age and sex were reported for 12 patients, 25% of whom were male; the mean age was 7.5 years (range: 3-16). Pathologies included acute epidural hematoma (9), orbital roof fracture with dural tear (1), blowout fracture of the medial wall of the frontal sinus with supraorbital rim fracture (1), and compound skull fracture (1). Twelve patients were treated with a conventional operating microscope, while one underwent endoscope-assisted surgery. Only one significant complication (recurrent epidural hematoma) was reported. There were no reported cosmetic complications. The MIS SOKC approach is a reasonable option for select anterior skull base trauma in the pediatric population. This approach has been used previously for successful frontal epidural hematoma evacuation, which is often treated by a large craniotomy. Further study is merited.

Surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma.

Objective: Recent studies of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) have found a positive association between cytoreductive surgery and survival, challenging the traditional notion that surgery is not beneficial and potentially harmful. However, no studies have examined the potential added benefits of adjuvant treatment in the post-operative setting. Here, we investigate survival in PCNSL patients treated with surgery plus radiation therapy (RT).Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results Program was used to identify patients with PCNSL from 1995-2013. We retrospectively analyzed the relationship between treatment, prognostic factors, and survival using case-control design. Treatment categories were compared to biopsy alone.Results: We identified 5417 cases. Median survival times for biopsy alone (n = 1824, 34%), biopsy + RT (n = 1460, 27%), surgery alone (n = 1222, 27%), and surgery + RT (n = 911, 17%) were 7, 8, 20, and 27 months, respectively. On multivariable analysis, surgery + RT was associated with improved survival over surgery alone (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.58 [95% confidence interval = 0.53-0.64] vs. HR = 0.71 [0.65-0.77]). Adjuvant RT was associated with improved survival, regardless of the extent of resection. HR's for subtotal resection, gross-total resection, subtotal resection + RT, and gross-total resection + RT were 0.77 (0.66-0.89), 0.66 (0.57-0.76), 0.62 (0.52-0.72), and 0.54 (0.46-0.63), respectively. Survival improved after adjuvant RT in patients under and over 60 years old. All findings were confirmed by multivariable analysis of cause-specific survival.Conclusion: Adjuvant RT was associated with improved survival in PCNSL patients who underwent surgery. Although these data are hypothesis-generating, additional information on neurotoxicity, dosing, and concurrent chemotherapy will be necessary to validate these findings. Cytoreductive surgery for PCNSL is common in the general population, and more studies are needed to assess optimal treatment in the post-operative setting.

Spinal location is prognostic of survival for solitary-fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma of the central nervous system.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have highlighted infratentorial tumor location as a prognostic factor for solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) and hemangiopericytoma (HPC) of the central nervous system (CNS), and spinal location is considered a positive prognostic factor for other tumors of the CNS. While SFT/HPC of the CNS is known to frequently arise from the spinal meninges, there are no case series that report outcomes for spinally located CNS tumors, and their prognosis in relation to intracranial and other CNS-located tumors is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate outcomes for patients with SFT/HPC of the spinal meninges. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results Program was used to identify patients with SFT/HPC within the CNS from 1993-2015. We retrospectively analyzed the relationship between tumor location (spinal vs. Brain and other CNS) and survival. RESULTS: We identified 551 cases of CNS SFT/HPC, 64 (11.6%) of which were primary tumors of the spinal meninges. Spinal tumors were more likely than brain and other CNS tumors to be SFT vs. HPC (37.5 vs. 12%, p < 0.001), benign (42.2 vs. 20.3%, p < 0.001), and less than 5 cm (53.1 vs. 35.7%, p < 0.001). The 10-year survival rates for spinal and brain/other CNS tumors were 85 and 58%, respectively. Median survival time was significantly longer for spinal tumors (median survival not reached vs. 138 months, p = 0.03, HR = 0.41 [95% CI 0.18-0.94]). On multivariable analysis, spinal tumor location was associated with improved survival over tumors located in the brain and other CNS (HR = 0.36 [95% CI 0.15-0.89], p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Spinal tumor location is associated with improved survival in patients with SFT/HPC of the CNS. Larger institutional studies are necessary to characterize the relationship between tumor location and other relevant factors such as presentation and amenability to gross-total resection and adjuvant radiotherapy. Future studies exploring optimal management of spinally located tumors are also needed.

Extent of resection and survival for oligodendroglioma: a U.S. population-based study.

BACKGROUND: National guidelines recommend maximal safe resection of low-grade and high-grade oligodendrogliomas. However, there is no level 1 evidence to support these guidelines, and recent retrospective studies on the topic have yielded mixed results. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between extent of resection (EOR) and survival for oligodendrogliomas in the general U.S. METHODS: Cases diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results (SEER) Program and retrospectively analyzed for treatment, prognostic factors, and survival times. Cases that did not undergo tumor de-bulking surgery (e.g. no surgery or biopsy alone) were compared to subtotal resection (resection) and gross-total resection (GTR). The primary end-points were overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS). An external validation cohort with 1p/19q-codeleted tumors was creating using the TCGA and GSE16011 datasets. RESULTS: 3135 Cases were included in the final analysis. The 75% survival time (75ST) and 5-year survival rates were 47 months and 70.8%, respectively. Subtotal resection (STR, 75ST = 50 months) and GTR (75ST = 61 months) were associated with improved survival times compared to cases that did not undergo surgical debulking (75ST = 20 months, P < 0.001 for both), with reduced hazard ratios (HRs) after controlling for other factors (HR 0.81 [0.68-0.97] and HR 0.65 [0.54-0.79], respectively). GTR was associated with improved OS in both low-grade and anaplastic oligodendroglioma subgroups (HR 0.74 [0.58-0.95], HR 0.60 [0.44-0.82], respectively) while STR fell short of significance in the subgroup analysis. All findings were corroborated by multivariable analysis of CSS and externally validated in a cohort of patients with 1p19q-codeleted tumors. CONCLUSION: Greater EOR is associated with improved survival in oligodendrogliomas. Our findings in this U.S. population-based cohort support national guidelines.

Solitary-fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma of the central nervous system: a population-based study.

The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) was recently updated, restructuring solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) and hemangiopericytoma (HPC) into one combined entity. This is the first population-based study to examine outcomes of SFT/HPC based on the new WHO guidelines. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1998-2013) was queried to examine age-adjusted incidence and prognostic factors associated with overall survival in 416 surgically resected cases. Age-adjusted incidence was calculated to be 3.77 per 10,000,000 and was rising. Median survival was 155 months, with 5- and 10-year survival rates of 78 and 61%, respectively. Younger age, Asian/Pacific Islander versus white race, benign histology, tumor location, gross-total resection (GTR), and GTR plus radiation (RT) versus subtotal resection were significantly associated with survival. In multivariable analysis, older age (HR = 1.038, p < 0.0001), infratentorial location (HR = 2.019, p = 0.038), GTR (HR = 0.313, p = 0.041), and GTR + RT (HR = 0.215, p = 0.008) were independent prognostic factors. In the HPC and borderline/malignant subgroups, GTR + RT was associated with significantly increased survival compared with GTR alone (HR = 0.537, p = 0.039 and HR = 0.525, p = 0.038). After eliminating patients that died within 3 months of diagnosis, GTR + RT was still associated with an incremental increase in survival (HR = 0.238, p = 0.031) over GTR alone (HR = 0.280, p = 0.054). GTR + RT may be optimal in the management CNS HPC and SFT/HPC tumors with borderline/malignant features. This study, in combination with existing literature, warrants further investigation of adjuvant radiation through a prospective clinical trial.

A Meta-Analysis of Medication Reduction and Motor Outcomes After Awake Versus Asleep Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson Disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There remains significant debate regarding the performance of deep brain stimulation (DBS) procedures for Parkinson disease (PD) under local or general anesthesia. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the clinical outcomes between "asleep" DBS (general anesthesia) and "awake" DBS (local anesthesia) for PD. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive literature review of all published studies on DBS for PD following PRISMA guideline on PubMed and Cochrane library from January 2004 to April 2023. Inclusion criteria included cohort ≥15 patients, clinical outcomes data which included Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) score and levodopa equivalent daily dosage (LEDD), and ≥3 months of follow-up. Analysis was conducted using Stata software. RESULTS: There were 18 articles that met inclusion criteria. On meta-analysis, there were no significant differences between awake or asleep DBS with regard to percent change in UPDRS III "off" med/"on" DBS condition ( P = .6) and LEDD score ( P = .99). On subgroup analysis, we found that the choice of target had no significant effect on improvement of UPDRS III ( P = 1.0) or LEDD ( P = .99) change for the asleep vs awake operative approach. There were also no statistically significant differences between microelectrode recording (MER) use and no MER use in postoperative UPDRS III ( P = 1.0) or LEDD improvement ( P = .90) between awake and asleep surgery. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in the primary motor outcomes and LEDD improvement between asleep vs awake DBS. The variables of target selection and MER use had no statistically significant impact on outcome. We find that asleep techniques are both safe and effective compared with the awake technique.

Challenges to Early Detection of Brain Tumors in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: While early diagnosis of brain tumors is essential for improving prognoses, several challenges prevent early diagnosis of these illnesses in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The objective of this systematic review is to identify and evaluate the barriers and challenges to early detection of brain tumors in LMICs, as well as to propose potential solutions. METHODS: A thorough search of the literature was carried out with the aid of multiple databases, including Google Scholar, CINAHL, PubMed, and Scopus. Studies focusing on the early detection of brain tumors in low- and middle-income countries met the inclusion criteria for this review. Articles were screened independently by 2 reviewers. National Surgical, Obstetric, and Anesthesia plan framework was used to extract relevant data and develop themes. Microsoft Excel was then used to arrange and analyze these themes. RESULTS: Out of 21 articles included in the final analysis, notable challenges to early detection of brain tumors included healthcare providers' lack of awareness of early signs and symptoms of brain tumors (21%), limited diagnostic facilities (38%), misdiagnosis by healthcare providers (33%), and financial constraints (46%). Potential strategies for addressing these barriers and challenges include educating healthcare providers on early warning signs (50%), improving the early referral system (25%) and establishing local clinical guidelines (19%). CONCLUSIONS: Significant barriers to early detection persist in LMICs. Collaboration between stakeholders, legislators, health ministries, and governmental organizations is essential for developing and implementing focused interventions, such as establishment of referral pathways and specialized centers, adapting guidelines to local cultural contexts and raising public and professional awareness.

Information Management for the Neurosurgical Care of Brain Tumors: A Scoping Review of Literature from Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

BACKGROUND: Health care in developing countries often lacks adequate bookkeeping and national cancer registries, means of information that have proven to impact disease research and care. The true burden of brain tumors therefore remains unchecked and so does the extent of the problem. Therefore, this study aims to explore the challenges and potential strategies related to information management of brain tumors in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS: A comprehensive literature search conducted using databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cumulated Index in Nursing and Allied Health Literature, without any language restrictions, from inception to October 20, 2022. Following screening and extraction of data, themes were generated using the information management domain of the National Surgical, Obstetric, and Anesthesia Plan framework. RESULTS: The final analysis includes 23 studies that highlighted the challenges to managing information to the surgical care given to brain tumors in LMICs, including lack of proper hospital record system (43%), lack of national brain tumor registry (67%), lack of local management guidelines (10%), and low research output (33%). Some of the proposed strategies in the literature to address these barriers include improving data management systems (45%), developing a population-based brain tumor registry (64%), and formulating local treatment guidelines (9%) for the management of brain tumors. CONCLUSIONS: In LMICs, improving patient outcomes and quality of life postneurosurgical intervention for brain tumors requires coordinated efforts to enhance information systems. The support of the government and public health professionals is vital in implementing strategies to achieve this goal.

Follow-Up Care for Brain Tumors in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Existing Challenges and Strategies for the Future.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Brain tumors have a poor prognosis and a high death rate. Sufficient aftercare is necessary to enhance patient results. But follow-up care provision is fraught with difficulties in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where a variety of variables can impede access to care. Therefore, our systematic review aimed to identify challenges to follow-up care for brain tumors and possible solutions in LMICs. METHODS: A thorough search of the literature was performed from the beginning until October 20, 2022, using Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL. Studies focusing on the aftercare of brain tumors in LMICs met the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers used the National Surgical, Obstetric, and Anesthesia Plan categories to identify themes, extract relevant data, and evaluate individual articles. After being discovered, these themes were arranged in Microsoft Excel to make reporting and comprehension simpler. RESULTS: A total of 27 studies were included in the review. Among the studies included, the most frequently cited barriers to follow-up care were financial constraints (54%), long-distance travel (42%), and a lack of awareness about the importance of follow-up care (25%). Other challenges included preference for traditional or alternative medications (4%) and high treatment costs (8%). Proposed strategies included implementing mobile clinics (20%), establishing a documentation system (13%), and educating patients about the importance of follow-up care (7%). CONCLUSION: In LMICs, several issues pertaining to personnel, infrastructure, service delivery, financing, information management, and governance impede the provision of follow-up treatment for patients with brain tumors. As established by the suggested techniques found in the literature, addressing these issues will necessitate concurrent action by stakeholders, legislators, health ministries, and government agencies.

Adjuvant therapy for brain tumors in LMICs: A systematic review of barriers and possible solutions.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant therapy is an important tool in the arsenal of brain tumor management and can improve patients' outcomes significantly but low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) often face challenges in provision. Therefore, our study aims to highlight barriers and strategies to adjuvant therapy of brain tumors in low-resource settings. METHOD: A comprehensive search of literature was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and Scopus, from inception to October 20, 2022. The review included studies on adjuvant therapy for brain tumors in LMICs and identified themes using the National Surgical, Obstetric, and Anesthesia Plan (NSOAP) domains. RESULTS: 32 studies were included in the review. The most reported barriers to adjuvant care were limited access to healthcare (14 %), limited access to chemotherapy and radiation equipment (25 %), and traditional or alternative medications (11 %). Strategies for improvement include improving the availability of specialized radiation oncology training (8 %) and improving access to neuro-diagnostics and neurotherapeutics (12 %). In addition, efforts to subsidize treatment (4 %) and provide financial coverage through the Ministry of Health (4 %) can help to address the high cost of care and improve access to funding for chemotherapy. Finally, establishing documentation systems and registries (16 %), implementing standardized national treatment guidelines (8 %) can help to improve overall care for brain tumor patients in LMICs. CONCLUSION: A multimodal approach of strategies targeting workforce, infrastructure, service delivery, financing, and information management is needed to improve adjuvant care for brain tumors. International collaboration and partnerships can also play a key role in addressing barriers and improving care in LMICs.

Barriers to Neurosurgical Care of Brain Tumors in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of the Service Delivery Challenges.

INTRODUCTION: Brain tumors pose a major challenge in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to limited resources and high costs, resulting in hampered service delivery of neurosurgical care and significant disparities in patient outcomes compared to high-income nations. Therefore, our systematic review aims to identify barriers to service delivery in providing adequate surgical care for the management of brain tumors in LMICs. METHODS: We searched Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar, and CINAHL, from inception to October 20, 2022. The data from the eligible studies were extracted and analyzed qualitatively. RESULTS: The final analysis included 35 articles, which highlighted significant challenges in providing adequate surgical care for brain tumors in LMICs. Among the cited studies, 10% reported lack of multidisciplinary team structures, 61% noted delayed patient presentation, 16% highlighted delays in neuroimaging, 10% reported delays in scheduling surgery, lack of training for specialized surgery (3%), lack of intra-operative facilities (19%), power supply interruption (6%), and lack of advanced diagnostic and specialized surgery facilities (19%). Strategies for addressing these challenges include cross-border collaboration (7%), public education, and awareness (13%), establishing multidisciplinary teams (20%), utilizing alternative surgical techniques (13%), 7% intraoperative ultrasound, 13% intraoperative cytology smear), and establishing satellite hospitals for low-risk care (7%), standard operating procedure and infection control (13%). CONCLUSION: Targeted interventions considering economic constraints are essential to improve the availability, affordability, and quality of neuro-oncologic services in developing countries. International collaborations and building capacity are vital for improving patient outcomes and service delivery, as well as forming multidisciplinary teams and utilizing resource-saving, innovative methods.

Governance Challenges to the Neurosurgical Care of Brain Tumors in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) often struggle to provide adequate neurosurgical care due to poor governance and institutional efforts, making access to care difficult. Therefore, our review of literature aims to identify gaps in government, national, and institutional efforts to combat barriers to neurosurgical care of brain tumors in LMICs, to inform future policy and action planning. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and CINAHL without language restrictions from inception to October 20, 2022. After screening and data extraction, a thematic analysis based on the National Surgical, Obstetric, and Anesthesia Plan (NSOAP) systematically identified and classified notable themes, which were then quantified and presented as percentages. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies were included in the final analysis. The review highlighted some of the barriers to providing surgical care of brain tumors in LMICs, including political instability (14%), inadequate national budget for health care (43%), poor government support (14%), lack of support of hospital management (14%), and no coverage under national insurance plans (14%). Strategies that can be implemented to address the barriers include strengthening the local health system (17%), advocating for health ministry support (33%), developing national treatment guidelines (17%), making neurosurgery a part of the national surgical plan (17%), fostering collaborations across various levels of government (17%), changing national insurance policy to include neurosurgical care (17%), and advocating for more resources and changes in global care (33%). CONCLUSIONS: Effective governance plays a critical role in addressing challenges as it shapes the availability of resources and policies that affect the quality of care provided. Our study outlines key challenges and strategies reported within literature in an attempt to drive government attention and thereby policy to support the neurosurgical care of brain tumors, particularly in the developing world.

Financing of Neurosurgical Care for Brain Tumors in Low- and Middle-Income Countries : A Scoping Review of Barriers and Strategies.

BACKGROUND: Making neurosurgical care accessible to a larger portion of the population in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is integral due to the high mortality and morbidity associated with brain tumors. However, the high cost of care often makes it financially out of reach for many individuals. Therefore, this review aims to identify barriers to neurosurgical care of brain tumors in terms of financing in LMICs. METHODS: Without restriction to language, a search of the literature was undertaken in a number of databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and CINAHL, in order to find the most pertinent research involving financing of brain tumors in LMICs. The last day of the search was October 20, 2022. Following screening and data extraction, significant themes were found and categorized using thematic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 28 studies were analyzed in this review. The review highlighted some of the barriers to providing surgical care of brain tumors in LMICs. In the cited studies, surgical expenses (41%), neuroimaging costs (30%), and care-related expenses (33%) were the primary concerns. Addressing these challenges involves cross-border collaboration (23%), transparent financing systems (46%), awake craniotomy (15%), cost-effective/reusable intra-operative supplies (8%), and optimizing resources in healthcare systems (8%). CONCLUSIONS: This study explored barriers and challenges to financing neurosurgical care of brain tumors in LMICs. Government support and transparency in healthcare financing should be prioritized to ensure that all individuals have access to surgical care of brain tumors.

Workforce Challenges for the Neurosurgical Care of Brain Tumors in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.

Limited neurosurgical workforces remain one of the critical problems experienced in low resource settings. Therefore, our study aims to explore and summarize the key challenges to neurosurgical care of brain tumors in terms of workforce in LMICs. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar from inception to October 20, 2022. All extracted data were screened independently by 2 reviewers and thematically analyzed. We found and screened 3764 articles, of which 33 studies were included in our final analysis as per our inclusion criteria. Among the studies included, 33% highlighted the limited number of neurosurgeons, 39% emphasized the absence of specialized surgical teams, 7% pointed out a shortage of nursing staff, and 4% noted suboptimal anesthesia teams. The study uncovered the need for improved training programs in neuro-oncology (32%) and neuro-anesthesia (3%), as well as improved collaboration (32%), and multidisciplinary team structures (15%), are essential for tackling these workforce challenges and improving patient outcomes. It is crucial to implement targeted interventions and policy changes to address the barriers to the workforce in providing effective neurosurgical care to patients with brain tumors in developing countries. This might entail capacity building and training programs for healthcare professionals. Policymakers should consider allocating resources and funding for workforce development and making neurosurgical care a priority in healthcare plans.

Obesity and meningioma: a US population-based study paired with analysis of a multi-institutional cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Whether obesity is associated with meningioma and the impact of obesity by gender has been debated. The primary objective of this study was to investigate differences in BMI between male and female patients undergoing craniotomy for meningioma and compare those with patients undergoing craniotomy for other intracranial tumors. The secondary objective was to compare meningioma location and progression-free survival (PFS) between obese and nonobese patients in a multi-institutional cohort. METHODS: National data were obtained from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Male and female patients were analyzed separately. Patients undergoing craniotomies for meningioma were compared with patients of the same sex undergoing craniotomies for other intracranial tumors. Institutional data from two academic centers were collected for all male and an equivalent number of female meningioma patients undergoing meningioma resection. Multivariate regression controlling for age was used to determine differences in meningioma location. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were computed to investigate differences in PFS. RESULTS: From NSQIP, 4163 male meningioma patients were compared with 24,266 controls, and 9372 female meningioma patients were compared with 21,538 controls. Male and female patients undergoing meningioma resection were more likely to be overweight or obese compared with patients undergoing craniotomy for other tumors, with the odds ratio increasing with increasing weight class (all p < 0.0001). In the multi-institutional cohort, meningiomas were more common along the skull base in male patients (p = 0.0123), but not in female patients (p = 0.1246). There was no difference in PFS between obese and nonobese male (p = 0.4104) or female (p = 0.5504) patients. Obesity was associated with increased risk of pulmonary embolism in both male and female patients undergoing meningioma resection (p = 0.0043). CONCLUSIONS: Male and female patients undergoing meningioma resection are more likely to be obese than patients undergoing craniotomy for other intracranial tumors. Obese males are more likely to have meningiomas in the skull base compared with other locations, but this association was not found in females. There was no significant difference in PFS among obese patients. The mechanism by which obesity increases meningioma incidence remains to be determined.

Low-Cost Wound Healing Protocol Reduces Infection and Reoperation Rates After Cranioplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cranioplasty infections are a common and expensive problem associated with significant morbidity. Our objective was to determine whether a wound healing protocol after cranioplasty reduced the rate of infections and to determine the value of this intervention. METHODS: This is a single-institution retrospective chart review of 2 cohorts of cranioplasty patients over 12 years. The wound healing protocol, consisting of vitamin and mineral supplementation, fluid supplementation, and oxygen support, was instituted for all patients aged older than 15 years undergoing cranioplasty. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients over the study period and compared outcomes before and after protocol institution. Outcomes included surgical site infection, return to operating room within 30 days, and cranioplasty explant. Cost data were collected from the electronic medical record. We included 291 cranioplasties performed before the wound healing protocol and 68 postprotocol. RESULTS: Baseline demographics and comorbidities were comparable between preprotocol and postprotocol groups. Odds of takeback to operating room within 30 days were the same before and after the wound healing protocol (odds ratio [OR] 2.21 [95% CI 0.76-6.47], P = .145). Odds of clinical concern for surgical site infection were significantly higher in the preprotocol group (OR 5.21 [95% CI 1.22-22.17], P = .025). Risk of washout was higher in the preprotocol group (HR 2.86 [95% CI 1.08-7.58], P = .035). Probability of cranioplasty flap explant was also significantly higher in the preprotocol group (OR 4.70 [95% CI 1.10-20.05], P = .036). The number needed to treat to prevent 1 cranioplasty infection was 24. CONCLUSION: A low-cost wound healing protocol was associated with reduced rate of infections after cranioplasty with concomitant reduction in reoperations for washout, saving the health care system more than $50,000 per 24 patients. Prospective study is warranted.

Risk Stratification for Management of Solitary Fibrous Tumor/Hemangiopericytoma of the Central Nervous System.

INTRODUCTION: Solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma (SFT/HPC) of the central nervous system (CNS) is a rare meningeal tumor. Given the absence of prospective or randomized data, there are no standard indications for radiotherapy. Recently, the NRG Oncology and EORTC cooperative groups successfully accrued and completed the first prospective trials evaluating risk-adapted adjuvant radiotherapy strategies for meningiomas. Using a similar framework, we sought to develop prognostic risk categories that may predict the survival benefit associated with radiotherapy, using two large national datasets. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases for all newly diagnosed cases of SFT/HPC within the CNS. Risk categories were created, as follows: low risk-grade 1, with any extent of resection (EOR) and grade 2, with gross-total resection; intermediate risk-grade 2, with biopsy/subtotal resection; high risk-grade 3 with any EOR. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to determine the association of risk categories with overall and cause-specific survival. We then determined the association of radiotherapy with overall survival in the NCDB, stratified by risk group. RESULTS: We identified 866 and 683 patients from the NCDB and SEER databases who were evaluated, respectively. In the NCDB, the 75% survival times for low- (n = 312), intermediate- (n = 239), and high-risk (n = 315) patients were not reached, 86 months (HR 1.60 (95% CI 1.01-2.55)), and 55 months (HR 2.56 (95% CI 1.68-3.89)), respectively. Our risk categories were validated for overall and cause-specific survival in the SEER dataset. Radiotherapy was associated with improved survival in the high- (HR 0.46 (0.29-0.74)) and intermediate-risk groups (HR 0.52 (0.27-0.99)) but not in the low-risk group (HR 1.26 (0.60-2.65)). The association of radiotherapy with overall survival remained significant in the multivariable analysis for the high-risk group (HR 0.55 (0.34-0.89)) but not for the intermediate-risk group (HR 0.74 (0.38-1.47)). Similar results were observed in a time-dependent landmark sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION: Risk stratification based on grade and EOR is prognostic of overall and cause-specific survival for SFT/HPCs of the CNS and performs better than any individual clinical factor. These risk categories appear to predict the survival benefit from radiotherapy, which is limited to the high-risk group and, potentially, the intermediate-risk group. These data may serve as the basis for a prospective study evaluating the management of meningeal SFT/HPCs.

Association of MGMT Promoter Methylation With Survival in Low-grade and Anaplastic Gliomas After Alkylating Chemotherapy.

Importance: O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT [OMIM 156569]) promoter methylation (mMGMT) is predictive of response to alkylating chemotherapy for glioblastomas and is routinely used to guide treatment decisions. However, the utility of MGMT promoter status for low-grade and anaplastic gliomas remains unclear due to molecular heterogeneity and the lack of sufficiently large data sets. Objective: To evaluate the association of mMGMT for low-grade and anaplastic gliomas with chemotherapy response. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study aggregated grade II and III primary glioma data from 3 prospective cohort studies with patient data collected from August 13, 1995, to August 3, 2022, comprising 411 patients: MSK-IMPACT, EORTC (European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer) 26951, and Columbia University. Statistical analysis was performed from April 2022 to January 2023. Exposure: MGMT promoter methylation status. Main Outcomes and Measures: Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to assess the association of mMGMT status with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after adjusting for age, sex, molecular class, grade, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Subgroups were stratified by treatment status and World Health Organization 2016 molecular classification. Results: A total of 411 patients (mean [SD] age, 44.1 [14.5] years; 283 men [58%]) met the inclusion criteria, 288 of whom received alkylating chemotherapy. MGMT promoter methylation was observed in 42% of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wild-type gliomas (56 of 135), 53% of IDH-mutant and non-codeleted gliomas (79 of 149), and 74% of IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-codeleted gliomas (94 of 127). Among patients who received chemotherapy, mMGMT was associated with improved PFS (median, 68 months [95% CI, 54-132 months] vs 30 months [95% CI, 15-54 months]; log-rank P < .001; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] for unmethylated MGMT, 1.95 [95% CI, 1.39-2.75]; P < .001) and OS (median, 137 months [95% CI, 104 months to not reached] vs 61 months [95% CI, 47-97 months]; log-rank P < .001; aHR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.11-2.46]; P = .01). After adjusting for clinical factors, MGMT promoter status was associated with chemotherapy response in IDH-wild-type gliomas (aHR for PFS, 2.15 [95% CI, 1.26-3.66]; P = .005; aHR for OS, 1.69 [95% CI, 0.98-2.91]; P = .06) and IDH-mutant and codeleted gliomas (aHR for PFS, 2.99 [95% CI, 1.44-6.21]; P = .003; aHR for OS, 4.21 [95% CI, 1.25-14.2]; P = .02), but not IDH-mutant and non-codeleted gliomas (aHR for PFS, 1.19 [95% CI, 0.67-2.12]; P = .56; aHR for OS, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.54-2.12]; P = .85). Among patients who did not receive chemotherapy, mMGMT status was not associated with PFS or OS. Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that mMGMT is associated with response to alkylating chemotherapy for low-grade and anaplastic gliomas and may be considered as a stratification factor in future clinical trials of patients with IDH-wild-type and IDH-mutant and codeleted tumors.

Utilization of Vertebroplasty/Kyphoplasty in the Management of Compression Fractures: National Trends and Predictors of Vertebroplasty/Kyphoplasty.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to examine the utilization of kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty procedures in the management of compression fractures. With the growing elderly population and the associated increase in rates of osteoporosis, vertebral compression fractures have become a daily encounter for spine surgeons. However, there remains a lack of consensus on the optimal management of this patient population. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 91 million longitudinally followed patients from 2016 to 2019 was performed using the PearlDiver Patient Claims Database. Patients with compression fractures were identified using International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision codes, and a subset of patients who received kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty were identified using Common Procedural Terminology codes. Baseline demographic and clinical data between groups were acquired. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of receiving kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty. RESULTS: A total of 348,457 patients with compression fractures were identified with 9.2% of patients receiving kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty as their initial treatment. Of these patients, 43.5% underwent additional kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty 30 days after initial intervention. Patients receiving kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty were significantly older (72.2 vs. 67.9, p < 0.05), female, obese, had active smoking status and had higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index scores. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that female sex, smoking status, and obesity were the 3 strongest predictors of receiving kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty (odds ratio, 1.27, 1.24, and 1.14, respectively). The annual rate of kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty did not change significantly (range, 8%-11%). CONCLUSION: The majority of vertebral compression fractures are managed nonoperatively. However, certain patient factors such as smoking status, obesity, female sex, older age, osteoporosis, and greater comorbidities are predictors of undergoing kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty.