Elbow Arthroplasty Utilization in 2060: Projections of Utilization of Primary and Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty in United States in the Next 40 years.

BACKGROUND: In the past decade the prevalence of end stage inflammatory elbow arthritis has declined with consequential changes in indications and utilization of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). Current literature lacks future projections for the utilization of TEA. This aim of this study is to review the trends in utilization of TEA in last two decades and determine the projections of utilization for TEA (primary and revision) through 2060. METHODS: This analysis utilized the publicly available 2000-2019 data from the CMS Medicare Part-B National Summary. Procedure volumes including TEA, and revision TEA, were determined using current procedural terminology (CPT) codes and were uplifted to account for the growing number of Medicare eligible patients covered under Medicare Advantage. Using these volumes log-linear, Poisson, negative binomial regression, and autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models were applied to generate projections from 2020-2060. The Poisson model was chosen to display the data based on error analysis and prior literature. RESULTS: The projected annual growth rate from 2020 to 2060 for primary and revision TEA are 1.03% growth (95% CI 0.82% - 1.25%) and 5.17% growth (95% CI 3.02%-6.97%), respectively. By 2060, the demand for primary TEA and revision TEA is projected to be 2084 procedures (95% FI 1995 - 2174) and 3161 procedure (95% FI 3052 - 3272), respectively. The procedure volume for revision TEA is estimated to outnumber primary TEA by year 2050. CONCLUSION: The overall procedural volume of primary TEA, and revision TEA continues to be low. Although it is estimated that the incidence of primary and revision TEA will continue to increase in next 40 years, the utilization trends only show mild increase, which is five times higher for revision TEA compared to primary TEA.

Racial and Ethnic Disparity in Shoulder Surgery: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare disparity exists in utilization and delivery of musculoskeletal care and continues to be an obstacle for orthopedic healthcare providers to mitigate. Racial and ethnic disparities exist within various surgical fields including orthopedic surgery and are expected to continue to rise in upcoming years. The aim of this systematic review is to analyze the racial and ethnic disparities on utilization and outcomes after common shoulder surgical procedures. QUESTIONS/PURPOSE: Are there racial or ethnic disparities in outcomes and utilization of shoulder surgeries? Is there evidence to explain the etiology underlying the differences in outcomes among racial and ethnic groups after shoulder surgery? PATIENTS/METHODS: A primary literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases using comprehensive Medical Subject Headings and subject-heading search terms. Studies were included if they reported utilization and or outcomes across two or more racial/ethnic groups in patients (age >16) who underwent shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), rotator cuff repair (RCR), arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR), Latarjet (LP) and internal fixation (ORIF) of PHF. Baseline demographics, data on procedure utilization, perioperative measures including mortality, operative time, length of stay (LOS), readmission and complications were extracted from included studies, and descriptive statistical analysis performed. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were identified for full text review of which 13 found race and ethnicity as factors affecting utilization and outcomes in TSA, RCR, ABR, LP and ORIF of PHF. Compared to White patients, Black patients were found to have decreased utilization, longer LOS, and greater operative time and mortality after TSA; Black patients also had longer operative times and time to discharge, and lower levels of reported satisfaction after RCR. Hispanic/Latino ethnicity was reported as an independent risk factor for post operative falls following TSA. Hispanic/Latino and Black patients have a higher risk of delayed surgery and greater risk of readmission after surgical treatment of PHF compared to patients of White race. CONCLUSION: This systematic review highlights the limited literature reporting the existence of racial and ethnic disparities in utilization and outcomes after common shoulder surgical procedures. Additionally, there is paucity of studies exploring the underlying etiology of racial and ethnic disparity in outcomes after shoulder surgery. More research is necessary to pave the way for evidence-based action plans to mitigate healthcare disparities after shoulder surgeries, but this review serves as a baseline for where efforts in direct improvement can begin.

Can we do better at measuring patient-reported outcomes after cranioplasty? A systematic review.

Measuring quality of life (QOL) after cranioplasty is increasingly evident as a necessary component of patient-centered care. For data to be useful in clinical decision-making and approval of new therapies, studies must utilize valid and reliable instruments. Our objective was to critically appraise studies evaluating QOL in adult cranioplasty patients and determine validity and relevance of the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used. Electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsychINFO were used to identify PROMs measuring QOL in adult patients with cranioplasty. The methodological approach, cranioplasty outcomes, and domains measured by the PROMs were extracted and summarized descriptively. A content analysis of the identified PROMs was completed to identify the concepts measured. From 2236 articles identified, 17 articles containing eight QOL PROMs met the inclusion criteria. None of the PROMs was specifically validated or developed for adults undergoing cranioplasty. The QOL domains included physical health, psychological health, social health, and general QOL. These four domains encompassed 216 total items among the PROMs. Appearance was only assessed in two PROMs. To our knowledge, there are currently no validated PROMs that comprehensively measure appearance, facial function, and adverse effects in adults undergoing cranioplasty. There is an urgent need to develop PROMs to measure QOL outcomes rigorously and comprehensively in this patient population to inform clinical care, research, and quality improvement initiatives. Findings from this systematic review will be used to derive an outcome instrument containing important concepts related to QOL in patients who undergo cranioplasty.

Fixation failure and early loss of reduction with the use of suture anchors for surgical repair of acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a case series.

Background: Suture anchors have been used in surgical repair of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation. While some reports indicate favorable results, others emphasize less promising outcomes. This case series reports our experience with suture anchors for surgical treatment of ACJ dislocation. Methods: Clinical and radiographic outcomes in three patients treated operatively for ACJ dislocations were reviewed. In all patients, two suture anchors were inserted in the coracoid (unicortical) and #5 nonabsorbable suture from the suture anchor was shuttled through drill holes in the clavicle and tied over two button devices. The coracoclavicular ligaments were reconstructed using a figure of eight semitendinosus allograft around the coracoid and clavicle. Postoperatively, sling immobilization was used for 6 weeks, and physical therapy was initiated at 6 weeks with contact activity allowed at 6 months. Results: Three male patients underwent treatment for Rockwood type 3 (chronic; n = 1) and type 5 (n = 2) ACJ dislocations. Loss of reduction was noted within 6 weeks postoperatively. Two patients exhibited failure due to complete suture anchor pullout and the third patient had partial pull out of one of the anchors. Additionally, the third patient also suffered a coracoid fracture adjacent to the anchor's placement after sustaining direct trauma to his shoulder, one-year postoperatively. Conclusion: In our case series, we found a high rate of fixation failure and early loss of reduction with the use of suture anchors for the treatment of ACJ dislocation. These findings should be taken into consideration when selecting an appropriate implant for fixation of ACJ dislocation.