Identification of risk factors and prediction models for secondary malignant neoplasms (SMNs)-free survival and SMNs-specific survival in testicular cancer survivors.

OBJECTIVE: This research endeavored to determine the key demographic and pathological factors tied to secondary malignant neoplasms (SMNs) in survivors of testicular cancer and to develop a predictive model. METHOD: A total of 53,309 testicular cancer patients from the SEER national database (1975-2016) were included in our analysis. The primary outcome measured was SMNs-free survival, defined as the duration from testicular cancer diagnosis to the detection of a non-testicular malignancy. The secondary outcome was SMN-specific survival, defined as the period from testicular cancer diagnosis until the patient's death due to SMNs. FINDINGS: Of the patients in the SEER cohort, 2978 (5.6%) developed non-testicular cancer SMNs. Higher age, receipt of chemotherapy, and radiation treatment were all significantly associated with the development of SMNs in survivors of testicular cancer (all p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a worse SMNs-free survival and poor SMN-specific survival in patients who underwent radiation therapy (both p < 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis found non-Hispanic Black ethnicity, higher age, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy to be significantly associated with worse SMNs-free survival (p = 0.002, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively), while lymphoma histology was associated with better SMNs-free survival (p < 0.001). The most common SMN types in patients receiving radiation therapy were prostate, lung, and bladder cancers. Predictive nomograms for SMNs-free survival and SMNs-specific survival were developed, with a C-index of 0.776 and 0.824, respectively. CONCLUSION: The age of diagnosis, non-Hispanic Black ethnicity, lymphoma histology, and treatment history with chemotherapy and radiation therapy were identified as prognostic factors for SMNs-free survival.

A Survey of Usage of Penile Prosthesis.

BACKGROUND: Implantation of an inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) has high success and satisfaction rates, but there remains a paucity of evidence examining non-usage of IPP and reasons for discontinuation. AIM: To identify how frequent patients use their prosthesis and their personal reasons for no longer using it. METHODS: We conducted a survey of all patients who underwent an IPP implantation by a single surgeon over a 6-year period, between 2012 and 2018. After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 114 patients formed the final cohort. Patients were initially surveyed via mail with a questionnaire; those who did not respond were surveyed via telephone. The factors determining patient selection for IPP implantation included suitability for general anesthesia, manual dexterity to use the device by the patient or their partner on a demonstration device, and presence of refractory erectile dysfunction, HbA1C lower than 8.5, or need for a revision of a previously placed IPP. Universally, a 3-piece AMS 700 Series implant was placed via the penoscrotal approach. Data were analyzed with Pearson chi square test, and survivability of the device was assessed with Kaplan-Meier survival curve. OUTCOMES: The main outcomes of this study are the frequency of IPP usage and reasons for discontinuation. RESULTS: The survey participation rate was 97%. The mean age of patient was 64 years (range 34-83 years), and the mean time between surgery and completion of survey was 2.98 years (range 0.25-7.4 years). Kaplan-Meier curve demonstrated that 68% of the patients were using the IPP at 5 years after implantation. Using the age 70 years as a cutoff, 18 (22%) patients younger than 70 years and 14 (42%) patients older than 70 years discontinued using the IPP (P = .029). The commonest reasons for discontinuation were poor health to engage in sexual activity (2.6%), loss of companion (19%), loss of interest in sex (2.6%), and device malfunction with no further interest in revision of prosthesis (14%). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The clinical implication of this study was improved patient selection for device implantation. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: To our knowledge, no other study has investigated reasons for patients no longer using their prosthesis. Our study has several limitations including that it is a cross-sectional analysis, our survey is not validated, this is a single-surgeon experience, we have a small sample size, and we did not differentiate between virgin implant and reimplantation. CONCLUSION: Our study shows a high rate (28%) of non-usage of IPP, more so in men older than the age of 70 years in the first 5 years of implantation. Knoll P, Rai S, Talluri S, et al. A Survey of Usage of Penile Prosthesis. J Sex Med 2020;17:2287-2290.

Perioperative outcomes and complication predictors associated with open and minimally invasive nephroureterectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive nephroureterectomy (MINU) and open nephroureterectomy (ONU) have similar oncological outcomes for treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). We investigated perioperative outcomes and predictors of complications associated with MINU and ONU. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, 912 patients were identified that underwent radical nephroureterectomy for UTUC between 2005 and 2013. Logistic regression and contingency table methods used preoperative covariates to predict rates of major (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3) and 16 common perioperative complications. Additional comparisons between treatment groups were performed using unpaired t-tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, or Fisher's Exact tests. P values were adjusted to maintain an experiment-wise p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 625 (69%) and 287 (31%) patients underwent MINU and ONU, respectively. ONU was associated with a higher rate of major complications (OR: 2.5, CI: 1.2-5.1, p < 0.03). The incidence of pulmonary embolism (bias adjusted OR: 24, CI: 1.3-441, p < 0.003), postoperative pneumonia (OR: 4.9, CI: 1.7-16, p < 0.0016), and transfusion (OR: 2.7, CI: 1.8-4.0, p < 0.0001) was higher for ONU compared to MINU. There were no significant differences in the incidence of other complications. MINU took longer on average (median 223 versus 213 mins, p < 0.02). Time to discharge was longer for ONU (median 5 versus 4 days, p < 0.0001). No other covariates were independent predictors of major complications regardless of surgical approach. CONCLUSIONS: Occurrence of major complications were higher for ONU compared to MINU. These data suggest that MINU is an acceptable surgical option with lower morbidity compared to ONU for the management of UTUC.

Advances in imaging the neurovascular bundle.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Much of the progress in improving potency outcomes after radical prostatectomy has been achieved due to a better visualization of the neurovascular bundle responsible for erectile function. We review the current literature evaluating the existing imaging modalities to image the neurovascular bundle around the prostate pre, intra, and postoperatively, thereby enabling development of surgical techniques for better preservation of nerve function. RECENT FINDINGS: Imaging modalities like multiphoton microscopy, optical coherence tomography, Coherent anti-Raman spectroscopy, exogenous fluoroscopy using prostate-specific membrane antigen, and so on have led to a better appreciation of the neurovascular bundle, thus encouraging novel techniques in nerve preservation during radical prostatectomy. SUMMARY: In an age of heightened patient expectations and increasing life expectancy, better visualization of the neurovascular bundle around the prostate using novel imaging modalities may provide breakthroughs in improving potency outcomes after radical prostatectomy.

Prognostic value of preoperative albumin-to-fibrinogen ratio (AFR) in patients with bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prognostic role of albumin-to-fibrinogen ratio (AFR) for the prediction of oncological outcomes in a multi-institutional cohort of bladder cancer (BC) patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a multicenter cohort of patients treated with upfront RC for localized (cT1-4aN0M0) BC. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the ability of AFR to predict non-organ confined (NOC) disease and lymph-node involvement (LNI) at time of RC. Multivariable Cox' regression models were performed to evaluate the prognostic effect of AFR on Time-to-Progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). RESULTS: A cut-off value to discriminate between low and high AFR was determined by calculating the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The area under the curve was 0.73 with an optimal cut-off at 9.53. Data were available for 246 patients (91 with low AFR, 155 with high AFR). Low AFR was associated with characteristics of tumor aggressiveness and independently predicted NOC (OR 2.11, P = 0.02) and LNI (OR 1.58, P = 0.04) at final pathological report. On multivariable Cox' regression analyses, preoperative low AFR was independently associated with worse TTP (HR 2.21, P = 0.02), OS (HR 2.24, P = 0.03), and CSS (HR 2.70, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Preoperative low AFR is a prognostic biomarker for worse TTP, OS, CSS, and is independently associated with adverse tumor pathological features in BC patients undergoing RC. Our results suggest that especially patients with low AFR may be considered for neoadjuvant treatment.

Combination of androgen receptor inhibitor and cisplatin, an effective treatment strategy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

PURPOSE: The role of androgen receptor (AR) signaling in bladder cancer (BCa) is not fully characterized. This study aimed to delineate the role of AR signaling in BCa and to determine whether the combination of AR inhibitor, Enzalutamide (Enz), and Cisplatin (Cis) efficiently inhibit the growth of BCa cells. METHODS: AR expression was determined in 89 human urothelial BCa specimens by immunohistochemistry. A panel of BCa cell lines was treated with Cis, Enz, or a combination of both (Enz + Cis). We determined the expression of AR, changes in apoptotic signaling, DNA damage, and analyzed effect on epithelial mesenchymal transformation markers. RESULT: AR expression was detected in 61.4% of tumors from male BCa patients. Inhibition of AR signaling by Enz effectively inhibited the growth of AR+ BCa cells by inducing apoptosis (26%) in AR+ TCCSUP (P = 0.0201) and J82 (15%, P = 0.0386) cells. Interestingly, Enz + Cis synergistically inhibited the proliferation of BCa cells even at low concentrations by inducing proapoptotic signaling in AR+ BCa cells. Invasive and migratory potential of TCCSUP and J82 cells were reduced with Enz + Cis treatment, and associated with down-regulation of mesenchymal markers. CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of the bladder tumors from male patients in our cohort expressed AR. The combination of Enz and Cis synergistically inhibited growth of BCa cells more efficiently than single agent alone. This supports the rationale for future investigation of AR antagonists in combination with standard chemotherapy in MIBC.

Rete Testis Invasion Is Consistent With Pathologic Stage T1 in Germ Cell Tumors.

OBJECTIVES: Rete testis invasion by germ cell tumors is frequently concomitant with lymphovascular or spermatic cord invasion (LVI/SCI); independent implications for staging are uncertain. METHODS: In total, 171 seminomas and 178 nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCTs; 46 had 1%-60% seminoma component) came from five institutions. Metastatic status at presentation, as a proxy for severity, was available for all; relapse data were unavailable for 152. Rete direct invasion (ReteD) and rete pagetoid spread (ReteP) were assessed. RESULTS: ReteP and ReteD were more frequent in seminoma than NSGCT. In seminoma, tumor size bifurcated at 3 cm or more or less than 3 cm predicted metastatic status. Tumors with ReteP or ReteD did not differ in size from those without invasions but were less than with LVI/SCI; metastatic status or relapse did not show differences. In NSGCT, ReteP/ReteD did not correlate with size, metastatic status, or relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support retaining American Joint Committee for Cancer pathologic T1 stage designation for rete testis invasion and pT1a/pT1b substaging of seminoma.