Topical use of phytotherapic cream (Capilen® cream) to prevent radiodermatitis in breast cancer: a prospective historically controlled clinical study.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of a topical phytotherapic product (Capilen® cream) to limit acute radiodermitis and delay the use of corticosteroids in patients with breast cancer (BC). METHODS: From January 2012 to August 2012, 30 consecutive patients, undergoing radiotherapy with adjuvant intent, were invited to use Capilen® cream two times daily two weeks before and during radiotherapy. An historical group was used as an external control. Acute skin toxicity was scored weekly according to RTOG/EORTC criteria. Time of occurrence of acute skin toxicity was taken as endpoint. RESULTS: Compliance was good. Overall, no significative statistical difference was observed in rate of acute radiation dermatitis, 46.7% in experimental arm versus 63.3% in the historical control group, although only 3.3% of Capilen® cream treated patients had a G3 acute radiation dermatitis versus 10% of the control group. A delay in the onset of radition dermatitis in patients treated with Capilen® cream (P=0.04) was showed. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggested that Capilen® cream plays a role in reducing acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy. Further evidence is needed to confirm these results.

Can we decrease the acute proctitis in prostate cancer patients using hyaluronic acid during radiation therapy: a prospective historically controlled clinical study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of rectal suppository of hyaluronic acid to limit symptoms of acute radiation proctitis in patients with prostate cancer (PC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2011 to October 2011, 50 consecutive patients, undergoing radiotherapy with radical or adjuvant intent for PC, were invited to use rectal suppository of hyaluronic acid (HA: Cicatridina suppository, Farma-Derma s.r.l., Sala Bolognese, BO, Italy) daily, before radiation delivering. An historical group was used as an external control. Acute rectal toxicity was scored weekly according to RTOG criteria. Time to occurrence of acute rectal toxicity was taken as endpoint. RESULTS: Compliance was good. Only 2% of HA treated patients had a G2 acute proctitis versus 7% of historical group, globally a difference was observed in rate of acute proctitis between the experimental arm and the control group: 32% in experimental arm versus 45% in control group (p = 0.08). A delay in the onset of acute rectal toxicity in patients treated with HA (p = 0.04) was showed. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested the role of HA in reducing acute proctitis in prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. Further trials are needed to confirm these results.