Expert Consensus on Screening and Assessment of Cognition in Psychiatry.

During the past two decades, it has been amply documented that neuropsychiatric disorders (NPDs) disproportionately account for burden of illness attributable to chronic non-communicable medical disorders globally. It is also likely that human capital costs attributable to NPDs will disproportionately increase as a consequence of population aging and beneficial risk factor modification of other common and chronic medical disorders (e.g., cardiovascular disease). Notwithstanding the availability of multiple modalities of antidepressant treatment, relatively few studies in psychiatry have primarily sought to determine whether improving cognitive function in MDD improves patient reported outcomes (PROs) and/or is cost effective. The mediational relevance of cognition in MDD potentially extrapolates to all NPDs, indicating that screening for, measuring, preventing, and treating cognitive deficits in psychiatry is not only a primary therapeutic target, but also should be conceptualized as a transdiagnostic domain to be considered regardless of patient age and/or differential diagnosis.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study of the augmentation of a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor partial agonist in depression: is there a relationship to leptin levels?

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of CP-601,927, an α4ß2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor partial agonist and an augmenting agent of antidepressants in major depressive disorder patients with insufficient response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). After open-label treatment with an SSRI for 8 weeks, subjects with a Hamilton Depression Scale 17 score greater than or equal to 16 were entered into a double-blind phase and randomized to CP-601,927 2 mg twice daily or placebo for 6 weeks. The primary end point was the change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score from double-blind baseline to week 14. There was no significant difference in change from baseline to week 14 in the MADRS score for CP-610,927 versus placebo (least square mean difference [80% confidence interval], -1.30 [-3.32-0.71]). Post hoc analyses revealed that the drug-placebo difference in change from baseline (SE) to week 14 in MADRS score was greater in subjects with body mass index (BMI) less than or equal to 35 kg/m (-3.43 [1.87], P = 0.069) than those with BMI greater than 35 kg/m (3.37 [2.8], P = 0.230). Analysis of biomarkers associated with increased BMI suggests that baseline leptin had a significant effect on treatment outcome. P values for the effect of treatment on mean change in MADRS score for subjects with baseline leptin levels below and above the median were 0.055 and 0.0055, respectively. CP-601,927 was equivalent to placebo as an augmenting agent of antidepressants in major depressive disorder patients with insufficient response to SSRIs. However, post hoc analyses suggest that BMI, particularly elevated leptin levels, may have affected the response to CP-601,927; however, further study may be needed to confirm these results.

Abrupt discontinuation compared with a 1-week taper regimen in depressed outpatients treated for 24 weeks with desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d.

The objective of this study was to determine whether the occurrence of discontinuation symptoms was equivalent for abrupt discontinuation versus 1-week taper to desvenlafaxine 25 mg/d after a 24-week treatment with desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d (administered as desvenlafaxine succinate) for major depressive disorder. Adult outpatients with major depressive disorder who completed the 24 weeks of open-label treatment with desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d were randomly assigned to no discontinuation (desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d), taper (desvenlafaxine 25 mg/d), or abrupt discontinuation (placebo) groups for the double-blind (DB) taper phase. The primary end point was Discontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) scale total score during the first 2 weeks of the DB phase. The null hypothesis that the absolute difference of greater than 2.5 in DESS scores between taper and abrupt discontinuation groups was tested by calculating the 95% 2-sided confidence interval on the mean difference between the 2 groups. Of the 480 patients enrolled in the open-label phase, 357 (≥1 postrandomization DESS record) were included in the primary analysis. Adjusted mean ± SE DESS scores were 4.1 ± 0.72 for no discontinuation (n = 72), 4.8 ± 0.54 for taper (n = 139), and 5.3 ± 0.52 for abrupt discontinuation (n = 146) groups. The difference in adjusted mean DESS total scores between the abrupt discontinuation and taper groups was 0.50 (95% confidence interval, -0.88 to 1.89) within the prespecified margin (±2.5) for equivalence. The number of patients who discontinued because of adverse events or discontinuation symptoms during the DB period was similar between the taper (2.8%) and abrupt discontinuation (2.1%) groups. These findings indicate that an abrupt discontinuation of desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d produces statistically equivalent DESS scores compared with the 1-week taper using 25 mg/d.

Open-label, 2-period sequential drug interaction study to evaluate the effect of a 100-mg dose of desvenlafaxine on the pharmacokinetics of tamoxifen when coadministered in healthy postmenopausal female subjects.

BACKGROUND: Potential drugdrug interactions are a concern for patients taking tamoxifen. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to determine the effect of coadministering desvenlafaxine on tamoxifen pharmacokinetics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This open-label, 2-period inpatient and outpatient study enrolled healthy, postmenopausal women. Period 1, day 1, subjects were administered tamoxifen 40 mg followed by 23 days of blood sampling for pharmacokinetic analyses. During period 2, subjects received desvenlafaxine 100 mg/d for 28 days; a single dose of tamoxifen 40 mg was administered with desvenlafaxine 100 mg on day 7, followed by 23 days of blood sampling. Pharmacokinetics of tamoxifen and its metabolites (AUC over infinite time (AUC(inf)), AUC to the last measurable concentration (AUC(last)), peak plasma concentration (C(max)) were compared for monotherapy vs. combination therapy using the ratio of adjusted mean differences. A superposition method was used in the statistical analysis of N-desmethyl-tamoxifen and endoxifen to address the carry-over observed for those metabolites. The test for interaction was considered negative if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratios were within 80 - 125%. RESULTS: Coadministration of tamoxifen with steady-state desvenlafaxine did not alter tamoxifen AUC(inf), AUC(last), and C(max), as reflected by the ratio of adjusted geometric means (90% CIs) of 100.7% (96.7%, 104.9%), 103.5% (100.2%, 106.9%), and 99.4% (94.0%, 105.2%), respectively. Similarly, coadministration did not alter 4-hydroxy- tamoxifen and N-desmethyl-amoxifen pharmacokinetics. The 11.8% (88.2% (82.6%, 94.2%)) and 8.0% (92.0% (84.7%, 100.0%)) decreases in endoxifen AUC(last) and C(max), respectively, were not significant (90% CIs fell wholly within the prespecified acceptance range). CONCLUSIONS: Steady-state desvenlafaxine 100 mg did not affect tamoxifen pharmacokinetics. For women treated with tamoxifen, desvenlafaxine may represent a safe and effective treatment unlikely to alter tamoxifen efficacy.

Effects of varenicline on smoking cessation in adults with stably treated current or past major depression: a randomized trial.

UNLABELLED: Chinese translation BACKGROUND: Depression is overrepresented in smokers. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate smoking abstinence and changes in mood and anxiety levels in smokers with depression treated with varenicline versus placebo. DESIGN: Phase 4, multicenter, parallel, 1:1 allocation, double-blind, randomization trial. Randomization, stratified by antidepressant use and depression score at baseline, was blocked in sizes of 4. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01078298). SETTING: 38 centers in 8 countries. PARTICIPANTS: 525 adult smokers with stably treated current or past major depression and no recent cardiovascular events. INTERVENTION: Varenicline, 1 mg twice daily, or placebo for 12 weeks, with 40-week nontreatment follow-up. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome was carbon monoxide-confirmed continuous abstinence rate (CAR) for weeks 9 to 12. Other outcomes included CARs assessed during nontreatment follow-up and ratings of mood, anxiety, and suicidal ideation or behavior. RESULTS: 68.4% versus 66.5% of the varenicline and placebo groups, respectively, completed the study. Varenicline-treated participants had higher CARs versus placebo at weeks 9 to 12 (35.9% vs. 15.6%; odds ratio [OR], 3.35 [95% CI, 2.16 to 5.21]; P < 0.001), 9 to 24 (25.0% vs. 12.3%; OR, 2.53 [CI, 1.56 to 4.10]; P < 0.001), and 9 to 52 (20.3% vs. 10.4%; OR, 2.36 [CI, 1.40 to 3.98]; P = 0.001). There were no clinically relevant differences between groups in suicidal ideation or behavior and no overall worsening of depression or anxiety in either group. The most frequent adverse event was nausea (varenicline, 27.0%; placebo, 10.4%). Two varenicline-group participants died during the nontreatment phase. LIMITATIONS: Some data were missing, and power to detect differences between groups was low in rare events. Smokers with untreated depression, with co-occurring psychiatric conditions, or receiving mood stabilizers and antipsychotics were not included. CONCLUSION: Varenicline increased smoking cessation in smokers with stably treated current or past depression without exacerbating depression or anxiety. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Pfizer.

Development and clinical feasibility study of a brief version of an addiction-focused phenotyping battery in females receiving buprenorphine for opioid use disorder.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to streamline the NIDA Phenotyping Assessment Battery (PhAB), a package of self-report scales and neurobehavioral tasks used in substance use disorder (SUD) clinical trials, for clinical administration ease. Tailoring the PhAB to shorten administration time for a treatment setting is critical to expanding its acceptability in SUD clinical trials. This study's primary objectives were to develop a brief version of PhAB (PhAB-B) and assess its operational feasibility and acceptability in a female clinical treatment sample. METHODS: Assessments of the original PhAB were evaluated along several criteria to identify a subset for the PhAB-B. Non-pregnant females (N=55) between ages 18-65, stabilized on buprenorphine for opioid use disorder (OUD) at an outpatient addiction clinic, completed this abbreviated battery remotely or after a provider visit in clinic. Participant satisfaction questions were administered. REDCap recorded the time to complete PhAB-B measures. RESULTS: The PhAB-B included 11 measures that probed reward, cognition, negative emotionality, interoception, metacognition, and sleep. Participants who completed the PhAB-B (N =55) were 36.1 ± 8.9 years of age, White (54.5%), Black (34.5%), and non-Latinx (96.0%). Most participants completed the PhAB-B remotely (n = 42, 76.4%). Some participants completed it in-person (n = 13, 23.6%). PhAB-B mean completion time was 23.0 ± 12.0 min. Participant experiences were positive, and 96% of whom reported that they would participate in the study again. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the clinical feasibility and acceptability of the PhAB-B among a female opioid use disorder outpatient addiction treatment sample. Future studies should assess the PhAB-B psychometric properties among broader treatment samples.

Craving and opioid use disorder: A scoping review.

INTRODUCTION: The subjective experience of drug craving is a prominent and common clinical phenomenon for many individuals diagnosed with opioid use disorder (OUD), and could be a valuable clinical endpoint in medication development studies. The purpose of this scoping review is to provide an overview and critical analysis of opioid craving assessments located in the published literature examining OUD. METHOD: Studies were identified through a search of PubMed, Embase, and PsychInfo databases and included for review if opioid craving was the focus and participants were diagnosed with or in treatment for OUD. RESULTS: Fifteen opioid craving assessment instruments were identified across the 87 studies included for review. The most common were the Visual Analog Scale (VAS, 41 studies), Desires for Drug Questionnaire (DDQ, 12 studies), Heroin Craving Questionnaire (HCQ, 10 studies), and Obsessive-Compulsive Drug Use Scale (OCDUS, 10 studies). Craving assessments varied considerably in their format, content, time frame, and underlying subscales, and only 6 of 15 had been psychometrically evaluated. DISCUSSION: This review identified a variety of opioid craving assessments, but few had been evaluated for their psychometric properties making it difficult to ascertain whether craving is being assessed optimally in studies of OUD. Thus, the development of a reliable and valid opioid craving assessment would be worthwhile and could be guided by recently published Food and Drug Administration Clinical Outcome Assessment (COA) guidelines. Importantly, a COA focused on opioid craving could be a valuable addition to research studies designed to evaluate novel treatments for OUD.

Incidence and Timing of Taper/Posttherapy-Emergent Adverse Events Following Discontinuation of Desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this post hoc analysis was to evaluate the incidence and timing of taper/posttherapy-emergent adverse events (TPAEs) following discontinuation of long-term treatment with desvenlafaxine (administered as desvenlafaxine succinate). METHOD: This was a phase 4, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted at 38 research centers within the United States between March 2010 and February 2011. Adult outpatients with major depressive disorder (MDD; DSM-IV-TR criteria) who completed 24 weeks of open-label treatment with desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups for the double-blind taper phase: desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d for 4 weeks (no discontinuation), desvenlafaxine 25 mg/d for 1 week followed by placebo for 3 weeks (taper), or placebo for 4 weeks (abrupt discontinuation). The primary endpoint, Discontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms Scale (DESS) score over the first 2 weeks of the taper phase, was described previously. Secondary assessments included incidence and timing of TPAEs (any adverse event that started or increased in severity during the double-blind phase) and the percentage of patients who could not continue the taper phase due to discontinuation symptoms. The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS-SR16) assessed MDD status. RESULTS: A total of 480 patients enrolled in the open-label phase; the full analysis set included 357 patients (taper, n = 139; abrupt discontinuation, n = 146; no discontinuation, n = 72). TPAEs occurred in all groups through week 4. The incidence of any TPAE was lower for taper versus abrupt discontinuation at week 1 (P < .001), similar at week 2, and lower for taper versus abrupt discontinuation at weeks 3 and 4 (P ≤ .034). The most common TPAEs (incidence ≥ 3%) in the taper group were nausea and headache (3% each) at week 1 and dizziness (5%) and headache (4%) at week 2. The most common TPAEs in the abrupt discontinuation group were dizziness (8%), headache (8%), nausea (4%), irritability (3%), and diarrhea (3%) at week 1 and headache (3%) at weeks 2 and 3. The most common TPAE in the no discontinuation group was nausea (6%) at week 2. CONCLUSION: The overall incidence of any TPAE was lower in the taper versus abrupt discontinuation groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01056289.

Efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d in a randomized, placebo-controlled study of perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with major depressive disorder.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the 8-week efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine at the recommended dose of 50 mg/d in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with major depressive disorder (MDD) based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision. METHOD: This phase 4, multicenter, parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted from June 30, 2010, to June 8, 2011. Patients received placebo or desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d (1:1 ratio; n = 217 in each group). The primary outcome measure was the change at week 8 in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS17) total score. Secondary outcome measures included change in the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale (CGI-I), the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and the Visual Analog Scale-Pain Intensity (VAS-PI). RESULTS: At end point, compared to placebo, desvenlafaxine was associated with a significantly greater decrease in HDRS17 total scores (last-observation-carried-forward analysis; adjusted mean change from baseline -9.9 vs -8.1, respectively; P = .004) and significant improvements on the CGI-I (P < .001), MADRS (P = .002), SDS (P = .038), and VAS-PI (P < .001). Improvements on the SDS and VAS-PI reached significance by week 2. Desvenlafaxine was generally safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term treatment with desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d was effective for the treatment of MDD in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women, with significant benefits on pain and functional outcomes evident as early as week 2. The safety and tolerability of desvenlafaxine were consistent with data in other populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01121484.

Adjunctive therapy with pregabalin in generalized anxiety disorder patients with partial response to SSRI or SNRI treatment.

This study evaluated the efficacy of adjunctive pregabalin versus placebo for treatment of patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) who had not optimally responded to previous or prospective monotherapies. This was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients diagnosed with GAD who had a historical and current lack of response to pharmacotherapy [Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) of ≥ 22 at screening] were randomized to adjunctive treatment with either pregabalin (150-600 mg/day) or placebo. The primary outcome measure was the change in HAM-A total scores after 8 weeks of combination treatment. Adverse events were regularly monitored. Randomized patients (N=356) were treated with pregabalin (n=180) or placebo (n=176). Mean baseline HAM-A scores were 20.7 and 21.4, respectively. After treatment, the mean change in HAM-A was significantly greater for pregabalin compared with placebo (-7.6 vs. -6.4, respectively; P<0.05). HAM-A responder rates (≥ 50% reduction) were significantly higher for pregabalin (47.5%) versus placebo (35.2%; P=0.0145). The time-to-sustained response favored pregabalin over placebo (P=0.014). Adverse events were consistent with previous studies and discontinuations were infrequent for pregabalin (4.4%) and placebo (2.3%). The study was discontinued early after an interim analysis. The results indicate that adjunctive pregabalin is an efficacious therapy for patients with GAD who experience an inadequate response to established treatments.