The Impact of Atopic Dermatitis on Sexual Function and Reproductive Desires in Women.

Atopic dermatitis is a prevalent skin condition that affects up to 17% of adult population. It can lead to itching, pain, and other symptoms such as sleep disturbance, anxiety, and depression. Due to its high prevalence and limiting symptoms, atopic dermatitis often has a great impact on patients' quality of life but there is scarce information regarding how atopic dermatitis affects women's sexual health and reproductive desires. The purpose of this article was to assess the impact of atopic dermatitis on sexual function and reproductive wishes in women. A cross-sectional study was conducted from February to March 2022. A total of 102 women with atopic dermatitis were recruited through online questionnaires sent through the Spanish Atopic Dermatitis Association; 68.6% of the patients acknowledged impairment in sexual function, especially those with more severe disease and those with genital and gluteal involvement. In addition, 51% of the women considered that atopic dermatitis may have an influence on their gestational desire, particularly those with gluteal involvement. In conclusion, atopic dermatitis has a great impact on sexual function and reproductive desires in women.

Generational differences in perceived severity of atopic dermatitis.

INTRODUCTION: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis that affects all age groups. The impact of AD on patients' lives could differ across generations. Understanding the differences in objective and subjective severity of AD between generations may support more personalized care for the AD patients. Thus, this study aimed to compare the clinical severity and subjective impact of AD between generation Z (GZ) and the millennial generation (MG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out a cross-sectional observational study in patients diagnosed with moderate to severe AD born between 1993-2001 (GZ) and 1978-1992 (MG) who attended an AD specialist care unit for the first time. We collected severity indices evaluated by the dermatologist, such as the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) or the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), and severity scales that included patient assessment, such as the SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) or the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM). RESULTS: A total of 73 patients were included, of which 56.2% (41/73) were women. 52.86% (37/73) of the patients belonged to the MG, and 43.8% (33/73) belonged to GZ. Patients belonging to GZ presented lower severity of their AD compared to the MG (EASI: 9.75 ± 11.68 vs. 16.63 ± 14.66; P < 0.05). However, their perception of disease severity was similar to the MG (SCORAD: 43.54 ± 28.99 vs. 32.98 ± 21.91; P = 0.96; POEM: 13.21 ± 8.98 vs. 15.48 ± 6.69; P = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: GZ presents a higher subjective perception of severity than millennials. Understanding these generational disparities contributes to creating more effective treatment strategies and provides a more targeted approach to care that addresses each generational group's unique needs and expectations.

Response to biological drugs and JAK inhibitors following cyclosporine in patients with atopic dermatitis.

The therapeutic arsenal for atopic dermatitis (AD) has increased in recent years. The use of biologics or Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) is advocated following failure or contraindication to cyclosporine (CSA), however, it is not known whether treatment with CSA can impact the response to biologics or JAKi. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of previous treatment with CSA on response to biologics or JAKi in patients with AD. This was a retrospective observational study including patients with AD treated for 16 weeks with a biologic or JAKi, who had previously received cyclosporine for at least four weeks. Thirty patients with AD, with a mean age of 25.07±9.91 years, of whom 18 (60%) were women, were included. The mean duration of CSA treatment was 43.39±31.32 weeks. After 16 weeks of biologic or JAKi treatment, 17 (56.7%) patients achieved EASI75. These patients had a higher cumulative dose of CSA (3,6815 vs.76,993.33 mg; p=0.022) and a longer treatment duration (24.5 vs.57.4 weeks; p=0.003). Additionally, a negative correlation was observed between cumulative dose of CSA and EASI or SCORAD at 16 weeks. Previous cumulative dose and longer duration of CSA treatment does not appear to have a negative impact on response to biologics and JAKi in patients with AD.