Combined inhibition of neutral endopeptidase and angiotensin-converting enzyme by sampatrilat in essential hypertension.

BACKGROUND: The antihypertensive response to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors may be attenuated by a compensatory decrease in atrial natriuretic factor production. If so, inhibition of atrial natriuretic factor breakdown by neutral endopeptidase (NEP) may enhance the antihypertensive effects of ACE inhibition. We compared effects of the combined ACE-NEP inhibitor sampatrilat, lisinopril, and placebo on blood pressure, plasma ACE, and renin activity and urinary cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) of patients with hypertension. METHODS AND RESULTS: After a 4-week placebo run-in period, 124 patients with a mean blood pressure of 162/102 mm Hg were randomized in a double-blind parallel-group design to 1 of 5 treatments, given once daily for 10 days: 50 mg, 100 mg, or 200 mg sampatrilat; 20 mg lisinopril; or placebo. The first dose of sampatrilat did not lower clinic or ambulatory blood pressure. Lisinopril had an immediate antihypertensive effect that differed significantly from all doses of sampatrilat. After 10 days of treatment, sampatrilat lowered clinic and ambulatory blood pressure significantly at all doses, with a trend toward a dose response for systolic ambulatory blood pressure. Sampatrilat inhibited plasma ACE in a dose-dependent fashion but significantly less so than lisinopril on days 1 and 10 of treatment. Lisinopril but not sampatrilat significantly increased plasma renin activity, whereas sampatrilat but not lisinopril significantly increased urinary cGMP excretion. CONCLUSION: The increasing efficacy of sampatrilat compared with lisinopril over 10 days could not be attributed to an increase in plasma ACE inhibition, suggesting that the NEP inhibitor activity of sampatrilat may have contributed to its antihypertensive action. NEP inhibition may enhance the antihypertensive effect of ACE inhibition.

Amiloride, spironolactone, and potassium chloride in thiazide-treated hypertensive patients.

Dose-response curves for amiloride and spironolactone were defined in 15 hypertensive patients treated with bendroflumethiazide (bendrofluazide). The relative potency amiloride:spironolactone in correcting hypokalemia was 2.8:1, an estimate significantly lower than the 5:1 potency currently accepted. The relative potency for reduction of plasma sodium was 3.9:1 (amiloride:spironolactone). Amiloride was disproportionately potent in lowering serum bicarbonate, and the data do not suggest that these drugs elevate plasma potassium simply by correcting metabolic alkalosis. Changes in blood pressure were confounded by the presence of carryover effect between treatment phases. Both drugs increased plasma angiotension II and aldosterone, but the rise in aldosterone with spironolactone was smaller than expected from concurrent plasma angiotension II and potassium concentrations. This was consistent with a partial block of aldosterone biosynthesis by spironolactone. The activity of spironolactone did not require the presence of hyperaldosteronism. In a smaller study potassium chloride induced a significant log dose-response on plasma potassium, but the effect was small in absolute terms. At least 64 mmole potassium chloride was needed to match the effect of 20 mg amiloride or 56 mg spironolactone.

Protein binding of aspirin and salicylate measured by in vivo ultrafiltration.

OBJECTIVE: Methods for measuring protein binding of drugs generally require direct measurement of the concentration of unbound drug and thus may require a highly sensitive assay. In vivo ultrafiltration has been used to determine protein binding of endogenous substances. We have examined its value for measuring protein binding of drugs because it requires measurement of only the concentration of total drug, not unbound drug, in plasma. METHODS: The protein binding of aspirin and its metabolite salicylate was measured in 29 healthy subjects 20 minutes after a single oral dose of 600 mg soluble aspirin, by the new method, in vivo ultrafiltration, as well as by a standard method, in vitro ultracentrifugation. RESULTS: The data for salicylate were examined systematically to determine the optimal method of determining estimates of protein binding by in vivo ultrafiltration. Estimates of protein binding of salicylate were 81.7% +/- 10.1% (mean +/- SD) by the in vivo method and 81.6% +/- 11.3% by in vitro ultracentrifugation. Bland-Altman analysis of agreement showed that within-individual differences in percentage of protein binding determined by the two methods did not differ significantly from zero (mean difference, 0.07%; 95% confidence interval, -2.33 to +2.46). There was a highly significant correlation between estimates of protein binding by the two methods (r = 0.82; p = 0.001). Protein binding of aspirin was estimated of protein binding by the two methods (r = 0.82; p = 0.001). Protein binding of aspirin was estimated at 58.3% +/- 9.6% by in vivo ultrafiltration and could not be estimated by in vitro ultracentrifugation because the concentration of unbound aspirin in plasma was below the limit of detection for the assay. CONCLUSION: In vivo ultrafiltration can be used to measure protein binding of drugs and has potential advantages over conventional methods. A sensitive assay may not be required because the unbound drug need not be measured, measurement in vivo may maintain more physiologic conditions, and it may be useful in measuring protein binding of drugs that are degraded rapidly in vitro.

Amelioration of bendrofluazide-induced hypokalemia by timolol.

The beta adrenergic blocking drug, timolol, tended to correct the hypokalemia of short-term bendrofluazide treatment in 6 healthy male subjects and although the effect was small it was significant. Timolol also reduced the rise in plasma aldosterone and urine potassium excretion following bendrofluazide and increased the urine sodium/potassium ratio. There was no evidence of a shift of potassium from the intracellular to the extracellular space.

Serum and urine phosphate during short-term beta-adrenergic blockade in healthy men.

Treatment of 6 healthy adult men with a beta-blocker, timolol, resulted in a rise in serum phosphate which was maintained for the 5 days of therapy. This rise was accompanied by a transient fall in urine phosphate and a rise in the tubular maximum for phosphate reabsorption per unit glomerular filtration rate (TmPO4/GFR). No change in circulating parathyroid hormone or growth hormone could be demonstrated.

Activity of sulfur-containing intermediate metabolites of spironolactone.

The renal antimineralocorticoid activity of single administration of 2 sulfur-containing compounds, which are thought to be intermediate metabolites of spironolactone, was assessed in healthy subjects. They were each active in reversing the urinary electrolyte changes indiced by fludrocortisone for 2 to 10 hr after dosing, but only the 7 alpha-thiomethyl derivative exhibited activity in the period 12 to 16 hr after treatment. The activity of both drugs was less than of spironolactone. Taking urinary log 10 Na/K as the best index of antimineralocorticoid activity, the potencies of the intermediates relative to spironolactone were 0.26 (95% confidence limits, 0.12 to 0.49) for 7 alpha-thio-spirolactone and 0.33 (95% confidence limits, 0.15 to 0.62) for 7 alpha-thiomethyl-spirolactone in the period 2 to 10 hr after medication. We conclude that these minor sulfur-containing intermediate metabolites of spironolactone are unlikely to contribute significantly to the renal antimineralocorticoid activity of spironolactone.

Bioassay of a new aldosterone antagonist and evaluation of a simple method of quantitative comparison.

The renal antimineralocorticoid activity of single oral doses of a new aldosterone antagonist OH OPC(ME)-K was compared to that of spironolactone in two studies in healthy men. OH OPC(ME)-K reversed the urinary electrolyte response to fludrocortisone in the period up to 16 hr after treatment, but it was less potent than spironolactone on a weight basis. The best estimate of the relative potency of OH OPC(ME)-K: spironolactone (derived from a simple protocol using equal single doses of the two drugs) was 0.60:1 (95% confidence limits 0.24:1 to 1.42:1), in good agreement with the estimate from a more complex three-dose parallel-line bioassay (0.61:1, 95% confidence limits 0.48:1 to 0.79:1). The results of simple single-dose studies can be used, with certain assumptions, to provide a useful estimate of the relative potency of new aldosterone antagonists at an early stage of development.

Differential stereoselective metabolism of metoprolol in extensive and poor debrisoquin metabolizers.

The hypothesis that variability in metoprolol metabolism stereoselectivity is related to debrisoquin oxidation phenotype was tested in six extensive (EM) and six poor (PM) debrisoquin metabolizers. In EM, plasma AUCs for (S)-metoprolol were 35% higher than for (R)-metoprolol, whereas in PM, AUCs for (S)-metoprolol were lower than for (R)-metoprolol. AUCs for total metoprolol correlated with the ratio of (S)- to (R)-metoprolol AUC. The renal clearance of metoprolol was also stereoselective but to the same extent in both EM and PM. Findings suggest that the enzyme system responsible for polymorphic oxidation of the debrisoquin-type is stereoselective. The relation between log total metoprolol plasma concentration and response (beta-blockade) was shifted to the right in PM relative to EM, which is compatible with a difference in pharmacologic activity of metoprolol enantiomers. Kinetic predictions based on total drug measurements will tend to overestimate dynamic differences between EM and PM, but the magnitude of the error is relatively small, and, in absolute terms, there is a large difference in pharmacologic activity between the phenotypes (beta-blockade at 24 hr: EM = 5.3 +/- 5.6%; PM = 18.9 +/- 3.8%).

Furosemide and bumetanide: a study of responses in normal English and German subjects.

Diuretic responses to oral administration of 1 mg bumetanide and 40 mg furosemide were determined in double-blind, crossover balanced trials in 10 normal English subjects and 6 normal German subjects. In each experiment the 0- to 8-hr urine volume and sodium excretion were significantly higher after bumetanide, potassium excretion did not differ, and the Na/K ratio, although higher after bumetanide, was not significantly different by analysis of variance. In German subjects the diuretic and natriuretic responses to both drugs were greater and the potassium excretion less than in English subjects. In the English, the pretreatment 24-hr urinary Na/K ratio correlated with the urinary Na/K ratio response to both drugs and with the potassium excretion after furosemide. The mean plasma uric acid before treatment correlated with the Na/K ratio and potassium excretion after furosemide. Aldosterone excretion did not correlate with response to either diuretic. The mean pretreatment 24-hr log10 Na/K ratio in the two treatment periods of the English and German subjects correlated with the mean sodium excretion, potassium excretion, and log10 Na/K after the two diuretics, thus providing a partial explanation for intersubject and interstudy variation. Pretreatment log10 Na/K could also explain intrasubject variation, justifying its use as a covariate in covariance analysis. This demonstrated that at this dose ratio the urinary log10 Na/K ratio response to bumetanide was significantly higher than that to furosemide.

Effect of coffee and cigarette smoking on the blood pressure of untreated and diuretic-treated hypertensive patients.

Patients with mild hypertension who habitually smoked cigarettes and consumed caffeine were examined after they abstained from caffeine and cigarettes overnight. Their mean blood pressure (147/89 mm Hg) was substantially lower than values recorded in the clinic (164/102 mm Hg) and remained so when they continued to abstain (149/94 mm Hg at two hours). Smoking two cigarettes (3.4 mg nicotine) elevated blood pressure by 10/8 mm Hg, but for only 15 minutes. Drinking coffee (200 mg caffeine) elevated blood pressure by up to 10/7 mm Hg between one and two hours. Combined coffee ingestion and cigarette smoking caused a sustained rise in blood pressure from 5 to 120 minutes to levels similar to those measured in the clinic (162/102 mm Hg at two hours). Similar results were obtained in thiazide-treated patients. The interaction of coffee and cigarettes on blood pressure, but not on pulse rate, was significant. The pressor effect of cigarette smoking and caffeine ingestion in combination may be important in the evaluation of patients with mild hypertension.

Association of panic disorder and panic attacks with hypertension.

PURPOSE: Previous studies of the association between hypertension and panic disorder were uncontrolled or involved small numbers of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared the prevalence of panic disorder and panic attacks in 351 patients with documented hypertension who were randomly selected from all hypertensive patients registered in one primary care practice with age- and gender-matched normotensive patients from the same practice and with hypertensive patients attending a hospital clinic. All three groups completed questionnaires for panic disorder based on standard criteria, as well as the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale. RESULTS: The prevalence of current (previous 6 months) panic attacks was significantly greater in primary care patients with hypertension (17%, P <0.05) and hospital-based hypertensive patients (19%, P <0.01) than in normotensive patients (11%). Similar results were seen for lifetime panic attacks (35% versus 39% versus 22%; both P for comparisons with normotensive patients <0.001). The prevalence of panic disorder was significantly greater in primary care patients with hypertension (13%) than normotensive patients (8%, P <0.05). Anxiety scores were significantly higher in both hypertensive groups than in normotensive patients. Depression scores were significantly higher in hospital-based hypertensive patients than in the other two groups. The reported diagnosis of hypertension antedated the onset of panic attacks in a large majority of patients (P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians caring for patients with hypertension should be aware of the significantly greater prevalence of panic attacks in these patients.

Treatment of hypertension in the elderly.

PURPOSE: The outcome of treatment in elderly hypertensives is examined in six major randomized controlled trials. Thiazide diuretics were first- or second-line drugs in each, and beta-blockers were first- or second-line drugs in four. DATA IDENTIFICATION: All compared immediate active treatment, with drugs added stepwise until blood pressure was controlled, versus withholding antihypertensive treatment unless blood pressure exceeded predetermined safety levels. RESULTS OF DATA ANALYSIS: Because placebo-treated patients required active treatment and actively treated patients required more than one drug, benefits were underestimated and the comparisons were not of single drugs with each other or with placebo. The incidence of fatal stroke was reduced by 33%, of fatal coronary events by 26% and cardiovascular mortality by 22%. Because cardiovascular risk varied among the trial populations, the absolute benefit from treatment varied markedly. CONCLUSIONS: In trials representative of unselected patients, treatment of diastolic hypertension might prevent cardiovascular complications in 1.4-2.2% of patients each year and fatal cardiovascular complications in 0.5-1.3% each year. In isolated systolic hypertension, treatment might prevent cardiovascular complications in 1.1% of patients each year. Generally, diuretic treatment proved superior to treatment with beta-blocker, and drugs of both types were well tolerated. There is a strong case for treating elderly hypertensives with a diuretic-based regimen.

Is coronary risk an accurate surrogate for cardiovascular risk for treatment decisions in mild hypertension? A population validation.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between coronary (CHD) and cardiovascular (CVD) risk in patients with uncomplicated mild hypertension and to determine the accuracy of using CHD risk > or = 15% over 10 years to identify for antihypertensive treatment those patients with CVD risk > or = 20% over 10 years as advised in recent British guidelines. DESIGN: Comparison of decisions made using CHD risk > or = 15% over 10 years calculated by the Framingham risk function and estimated using a simple table with CVD risk > or = 20% over 10 years. SETTING: British population. SUBJECTS: People aged 35-64 years with uncomplicated mild systolic hypertension (SBP 140-159 mmHg, n = 624) from the 1995 Scottish Health Survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Relationship between CHD and CVD risk. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV). RESULTS: CHD risk 15% over 10 years was equivalent to CVD risk 21% over 10 years. Exact CHD risk > or = 15% over 10 years had sensitivity 79%, specificity 98%, PPV 94% and NPV 93% in detecting CVD risk > or = 20% over 10 years. Use of the table to estimate CHD risk > or = 15% over 10 years gave sensitivity 88%, specificity 90%, PPV 76% and NPV 95%. CONCLUSION: CHD risk appears acceptably accurate for targeting treatment in mild hypertension. The risk assessment table, which slightly overestimates CHD risk, was more sensitive in identifying patients with CVD risk > or = 20% over 10 years and may be preferable to using exact CHD risk. European guidelines which suggest targeting treatment for mild hypertension at CHD risk > or = 20% over 10 years are over-conservative compared with British guidelines.

Implication of recent trials with b-hydroxy-b-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors for hypertension management.

BACKGROUND: There is broad agreement that statin treatment should be targeted at absolute coronary heart disease (CHD) risk but no consensus on the level of risk to target. We have examined the implications of adopting three different treatment policies for the management of hypertensive patients in the UK using data from treated hypertensives aged 35-69 years included in the Health Survey for England (1993). METHODS: We calculated the proportion of hypertensive patients with existing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease requiring statin treatment for secondary prevention of CHD. For those without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (primary prevention), we estimated CHD risk from the Framingham equation and examined the proportion with CHD risk exceeding thresholds of 4.5, 3 and 1.5% per year. RESULTS: Twenty-one percent of treated hypertensives would require statin treatment for secondary prevention of CHD. When the CHD event threshold for statin treatment was set at > or =4.5% per year [equivalent to a number needed to treat (NNT) in 5 years of 13] a further 0.6% of hypertensive patients were identified for treatment; at a threshold of 3.0% per year (NNT = 20) 5.5% of patients were identified for primary prevention; and at a threshold of 1.5% per year (NNT = 40) 28.5% of patients were identified for primary prevention. CONCLUSIONS: Those needing secondary prevention are first priority for statins and 21% of hypertensive patients will require treatment Formulation of guidelines for primary prevention should take into account the NNT; the proportion of patients targeted for treatment; the cost-effectiveness and the total cost of treatment. Current British guidance will entail treating an additional 5.5% of hypertensive patients for primary prevention and therefore 27% of hypertensive patients.

Panic disorder, anxiety and depression in resistant hypertension--a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that panic disorder can cause or contribute to hypertension or resistance to antihypertensive drugs. OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalences of panic disorder, panic attacks, anxiety and depression between patients with resistant hypertension and age- and sex-matched patients with non-resistant hypertension. DESIGN: A case-control study of patients attending the Sheffield Hypertension Clinic, using self-completed postal questionnaires to assess panic disorder, anxiety and depression. PATIENTS CASES: With resistant hypertension were defined as patients who presently or previously had systolic blood pressure above 160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure above 90 mmHg despite the use of three or more antihypertensive agents at full dose. For each of 136 cases, one control with non-resistant hypertension, defined as controlled to < or = 160/90 mmHg by one or two antihypertensive agents, was identified by a bias-free method. Cases and controls were matched for age and sex. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Lifetime and current prevalence of panic attacks, the prevalences of panic disorder, anxiety and depression by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores, and the severity and frequency of panic attacks. RESULTS: Of the resistant hypertensive patients, 33% had experienced a panic attack compared with 39% of the control non-resistant hypertensives (resistant-non-resistant -6%, 95% confidence interval -19 to +7%). Twelve per cent of the resistant patients and 14% of controls fulfilled the criteria for a current or previous diagnosis of panic disorder (resistant-non-resistant -2%, 95% confidence interval -11% to +7%). There were also no significant differences between the groups in the prevalences of current panic attacks, panic attacks rated as moderate or worse, spontaneous panic attacks and in the frequency of panic attacks. There remained no significant difference between the groups for panic attacks and panic disorder when the analysis was limited to those patients who had idiopathic hypertension. The two groups did not differ significantly in scores for anxiety and depression measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. CONCLUSION: We observed no differences in the prevalences of panic, anxiety and depression between patients with resistant hypertension and non-resistant controls. These factors are probably not implicated in resistance to drug treatment. However, the prevalences of panic disorder and panic attacks were remarkably high in both groups of patients attending a hospital hypertension clinic. The relationship between panic disorder and hypertension deserves further study in a general hypertensive population.

Effects of modulators of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system on cough. Losartan Cough Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of cough in patients with a history of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor-related cough who received losartan [a type 1 angiotensin II (Ang II) receptor antagonist], lisinopril (an ACE inhibitor) or hydrochlorothiazide (a diuretic). DESIGN: An international, multicentre, randomized double-blind, parallel-group controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient clinics at 20 tertiary care medical centres in 11 countries. PATIENTS: One hundred and thirty-five patients with uncomplicated primary hypertension with a history of ACE inhibitor-related cough were randomly assigned to the double-blind treatment phase and completed the study. INTERVENTION: After confirming that the cough was ACE inhibitor-related by a single-blind rechallenge, followed by a placebo washout period, patients were randomly assigned to receive 50mg losartan, 20mg lisinopril or 25mg hydrochlorothiazide once a day for 8 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cough incidence, severity and frequency were assessed by a self-administered questionnaire and a visual analogue scale. RESULTS: The percentage of patients who complained of cough was significantly higher with lisinopril than with losartan or hydrochlorothiazide. The mean visual analogue scale scores for patients treated with lisinopril demonstrated that these patients coughed more frequently than those who received losartan or hydrochlorothiazide. CONCLUSION: The incidence of cough related to the type 1 Ang II receptor antagonist losartan is significantly lower than that observed with lisinopril, and similar to that observed with hydrochlorothiazide in patients with a rechallenged ACE inhibitor cough. Type 1 Ang II receptor antagonists represent a potential new treatment for hypertensive patients in whom ACE inhibitors are indicated, but who develop a cough with these agents.

The influence of sodium and potassium supplements on the diuretic responses to frusemide administration in normal subjects.

1 Twelve normal subjects received (1) normal diet, (2) normal diet with 100 mmol supplementary sodium chloride and (3) normal diet with 96 mmol supplementary potassium chloride, each for 10 days, in a balanced cross-over study according to a Latin Square design. At the end of each study period, the subjects received 80 mg frusemide orally. Each study period was separated from the other by 10 days. 2 Changes in urinary electrolyte excretion occurred within the first four days of each dietary period then remained constant, with significant differences in urinary Na/K ratio between the dietary regimes. 3 Between-subject correlations, using the mean values over the three study periods, demonstrated significant associations between plasma uric acid and urinary Na/K ratio and between plasma prolactin and urinary potassium excretion. 4 Urinary potassium excretion and Na/K ratio following frusemide were influenced significantly by alteration of diet but there was no change in sodium excretion. 5 Between-subject correlations of pretreatment variables with diuretic response, using the mean values over the three study periods, demonstrated significant associations between both pretreatment urinary Na/K ratio and plasma uric acid and respectively the urinary potassium excretion and urinary Na/K ratio in response to frusemide. 6 While the response to frusemide was altered by short-term changes in dietary sodium and potassium, the difference was less than expected from observations in two populations with customary diets differing in similar manner.

The rationale for differing national recommendations for the treatment of hypertension.

This article examines the rationale for the differences in the guidelines for hypertension management of four national or international bodies: the Joint National Committee (JNC-V), The World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension (WHO-ISH), the British Hypertension Society (BHS), and the New Zealand guidelines. These guidelines agree on many aspects of management, but differ on two very important points-the drugs of first choice for hypertension, and the indications for drug treatment of uncomplicated mild hypertension. JNC-V recommends treatment routinely of all people with a sustained blood pressure of 140/90 mm Hg, whereas the BHS guidelines advise treatment routinely at 160/100 mm Hg. Such differences in the threshold for treatment have a major impact on the proportion of the adult population to be treated, and on the benefit from treatment. JNC-V was heavily influenced by the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program (HDFP), which appeared to show a large benefit from the treatment of uncomplicated mild hypertension, whereas the BHS guidelines were influenced by the Medical Research Council (MRC) Trial, which showed a very small benefit. However, the apparent differences in absolute benefit between these, and other, randomized controlled trials is related entirely to differences in the absolute cardiovascular risk of the populations studied. In populations and in individual patients the benefit from antihypertensive treatment is determined by the absolute cardiovascular risk. Blood pressure by itself is a very weak predictor of risk or benefit from treatment. In uncomplicated mild hypertension the need for drug therapy should be based on the absolute risk of cardiovascular complications, estimated by considering age, sex, serum cholesterol level, diabetes mellitus status, and smoking habits, in addition to blood pressure. Doctors cannot estimate absolute risk accurately informally or intuitively, and the next generation of guidelines should incorporate a simple but accurate method for estimating cardiovascular risk, similar to that in the New Zealand guidelines. The decision to treat, or not treat, uncomplicated mild hypertension should be based on a formal estimate of absolute cardiovascular risk and not on an arbitrary blood pressure threshold. As regards drugs of first choice, the available evidence supports strongly the stance of JNC-V and JNC VI that diuretics and beta-blockers should be preferred unless they are contraindicated, or unless there are positive indications for other drug classes.

Prediction of coronary risk for primary prevention of coronary heart disease: a comparison of methods.

Most recent guidelines advise targeting of lipid lowering for primary prevention at those at high absolute coronary (CHD) risk. We compared the accuracy of five CHD risk assessment methods in identifying such patients: one based on total cholesterol > or = 6.5 mmol/l plus two risk factors, and four based on the Framingham risk function (the European Task Force chart and Sheffield table, both using total cholesterol and the New Zealand chart and modified Sheffield table, both using total: HDL cholesterol ratio) for predicting CHD event risk > or = 2% per year, calculated by an independent risk function, PROCAM, in 126 treated hypertensive men. Cholesterol threshold plus two risk factors had sensitivity 59% and specificity 63%, did not identify some very high-risk patients, and identified very low-risk patients. Framingham-based methods using total cholesterol alone had sensitivity 90-98% and specificity 37-43%, and identified high-risk patients well, but identified some patients at very low risk. Methods based on total: HDL cholesterol ratio had sensitivity 90-98% and specificity 60-63%, and did not identify incorrectly patients at very low CHD risk. Methods based on cholesterol threshold and counting of risk factors are too inaccurate for targeting drug therapy for primary prevention of CHD. Framingham-based methods should incorporate HDL-cholesterol as the total: HDL cholesterol ratio.

Effect of micronization on the bioavailability and pharmacologic activity of spironolactone.

The bioavailability and pharmacologic activity of tablets containing micronized spironolactone chemical (median particle size 2.21 micrometers) were compared to those of tablets made from standard spironolactone chemical (median particle size 78.8 micrometers) in healthy men. Apart from particle size, all features of these tablets were identical. After 200-mg single doses, the bioavailability of micronized tablets was significantly higher than that of standard tablets. Furthermore, as assessed by 24-hour urine log10 10 Na/K ratio, the pharmacologic activity of micronized spironolactone was significantly greater than that of the standard formulation. The significant influence on renal antimineralocorticoid activity of raised plasma and urinary levels of canrenone, quantitatively the major active metabolite of spironolactone in man, emphasizes the clinical importance of the bioavailability of spironolactone preparations. Since this study, the process used in the manufacture of spironolactone (Aldactone) tablets has been under review.