RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In yellow fever (YF) endemic areas, measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR), and YF vaccines are often co-administered in childhood vaccination schedules. Because these are live vaccines, we assessed potential immune interference that could result from co-administration. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, randomized non-inferiority trial among healthy 1-year-olds in Misiones Province, Argentina. Children were randomized to one of three groups (1:1:1): Co-administration of MMR and YF vaccines (MMR1YF1), MMR followed by YF vaccine four weeks later (MMR1YF2), or YF followed by MMR vaccine four weeks later (YF1MMR2). Blood samples obtained pre-vaccination and 28 days post-vaccination were tested for immunoglobulin G antibodies against measles, mumps, and rubella, and for YF virus-specific neutralizing antibodies. Non-inferiority in seroconversion was assessed using a -5% non-inferiority margin. Antibody concentrations were compared with Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: Of 851 randomized children, 738 were correctly vaccinated, had ≥ 1 follow-up sample, and were included in the intention-to-treat population. Non-inferior seroconversion was observed for all antigens (measles seroconversion: 97.9% in the MMR1YF1 group versus 96.3% in the MMR1YF2 group, a difference of 1.6% [90% CI -1.5, 4.7]; rubella: 97.9% MMR1YF1 versus 94.7% MMR1YF2, a difference of 3.3% [-0.1, 6.7]; mumps: 96.7% MMR1YF1 versus 97.9% MMR1YF2, a difference of -1.3% [-4.1, 1.5]; and YF: 96.3% MMR1YF1 versus 97.5% YF1MMR2, a difference of -1.2% [-4.2, 1.7]). Rubella antibody concentrations and YF titers were significantly lower following co-administration; measles and mumps concentrations were not impacted. CONCLUSION: Effective seroconversion was achieved and was not impacted by the co-administration, although antibody levels for two antigens were lower. The impact of lower antibody levels needs to be weighed against missed opportunities for vaccination to determine optimal timing for MMR and YF vaccine administration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03368495) on 11/12/2017.
Assuntos
Sarampo , Caxumba , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão) , Vacina contra Febre Amarela , Febre Amarela , Humanos , Criança , Lactente , Caxumba/prevenção & controle , Argentina , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola , Anticorpos Antivirais , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Imunidade , Vacinas CombinadasRESUMO
Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is an uncommon but serious and potentially fatal condition, mainly affecting infants. In 2017, Argentina introduced a vaccination program against serogroups A, C, W and Y (MenACWY) for infants aged 3, 5 and 15 months and adolescents aged 11 years. The objective of this study was to review the burden of IMD in Argentina in 2010-2019. Data were obtained from national surveillance databases, and the study estimated IMD incidence, mortality, case-fatality rates, and serogroup distributions across age groups. A total of 1,972 IMD cases were reported in the study period, with the highest incidence in infants aged < 1 year. Incidence peaked in 2013 and subsequently declined. Mortality rates were 18 times higher in infants than in other age groups, reflecting the high impact of IMD in this age group. The case-fatality rate was 8.5% on average and increased with age. The proportion of notified cases with serogroup identification increased over the period, reaching 91% in 2019. The most common serogroups over the study period were serogroup B (48%) and serogroup W (42%), with an increase in B relative to W since 2015. In infants aged < 1 year, the proportion of serogroup B increased in recent years, reaching around 70% of characterized cases in 2018-2019. These results show the dynamism of IMD and indicate the importance of vaccination at an early age and offering protection against predominant serogroups. These data are valuable to support evidence-based decision-making in healthcare.
Assuntos
Infecções Meningocócicas , Adolescente , Lactente , Humanos , Argentina/epidemiologia , Infecções Meningocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Meningocócicas/prevenção & controle , Bases de Dados Factuais , Instalações de Saúde , Efeitos Psicossociais da DoençaRESUMO
This article presents attitudes and practices regarding COVID-19 vaccination in the South American population. The study collected data from a self-administered survey distributed through social media platforms between February and April 2022 (N = 6555). The survey included questions related to participants' sociodemographic background, flu vaccination practices, sources of information about COVID-19, and opinions regarding pandemic management and vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. The respondents agreed with the statement that COVID-19 vaccines were necessary (86.4%), effective (79.8%), safe (79.1%), and should be mandatory (64%). Overall, 83.4% accepted vaccination and 12.3% refused it completely. Main rejection reasons were safety (65.8%) and efficacy (54.9%) issues, and rushed development and approvals (49.1%). Vaccine uptake was associated with being ≥60 years, being a healthcare worker, previous influenza vaccine uptake, adherence to preventive measures, the death of ≥1 close people from COVID-19, and being informed through mass media or health authorities' channels. Vaccine uptake inversely correlated with male gender, low educational level, and use of closed social networks for COVID-19 information purposes. This study provides valuable insights into COVID-19 vaccination attitudes and practices in South America that may be used to promote vaccine uptake in the region. Higher COVID-19 vaccination acceptance among people with previously acquired prevention habits reinforces the importance of routine health promotion strategies.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pertussis disease is a growing concern for developing countries. In Argentina, rates of illness and death peaked in 2011. More than 50% of fatalities due to pertussis occurred in infants younger than two months of age, too young for vaccination. In 2012, the government offered immunization with a vaccine containing Tdap to all pregnant women after 20weeks of gestation with the intent of reducing morbidity and mortality in young infants. METHODS: Maternal acellular pertussis vaccine impact on reducing infant disease burden was estimated based on data from the Argentinean Health Surveillance System. We divided Argentinean states in two groups experiencing high (>50) and low (⩽50) Tdap vaccine coverage and compared these two groups using a Bayesian structural time-series model. Low coverage regions were used as a control group, and the time series were compared before and after the implementation of the Tdap program. FINDINGS: We observed a relative reduction of 51% (95% CI [-67%, -35%]; p=0.001) in pertussis cases in high coverage states in comparison with the low coverage areas. Analysis of infants between two and six months showed a 44% (95% CI [-66%, -24%]; p=0.001) reduction in illness. Number of deaths was highest in 2011 with 76 fatalities, for an incidence rate of 2.9 per 100,000. Comparing with 2011, rates decreased by 87% to 10 subjects, or 0.9 per 100,000 in 2013. INTERPRETATION: We show an age-dependent protective effect of maternal Tdap immunization in a developing country for infants younger than six months.