Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 13: 5, 2013 Jan 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23289357

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There are no data available on human papillomavirus (HPV) infections in women living in the Mississippi Delta, where cervical cancer incidence and mortality among African American women is among the highest in the United States. The aim of this analysis was to report the age-specific prevalence of HPV in this population. METHODS: We recruited 443 women, 26-65 years of age, from the general population of women living in the Mississippi Delta to participate; 252 women had been screened for cervical cancer within the last 3 years while 191 had not. Women underwent a pelvic exam and had clinician-collected Pap sample taken for the routine cervical cancer screening by cytology. Women were asked to collect a self-collected specimen at home and return it to the clinic. Both specimens were tested for HPV genotypes. RESULTS: Four hundred and six women (91.6%) had HPV genotyping results for the clinician-collected and self-collected specimens. The prevalence of carcinogenic HPV was 18.0% (95% CI: 14.4%-22.1%) for clinician-collected specimens and 26.8% (95% CI: 22.6%-31.4%) for self-collected specimens. The concordance for the detection of carcinogenic HPV between clinician-collected and self-collected specimens was only fair (kappa = 0.54). While the prevalence of carcinogenic HPV in either sample decreased sharply with increasing age (ptrend< 0.01), the prevalence of non-carcinogenic HPV did not, especially the prevalence of HPV genotypes in the alpha 3/4/15 phylogenetic group. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of carcinogenic HPV in our sample of women living in the Mississippi Delta was greater than the prevalence reported in several other U.S. studies. The high carriage of HPV infection, along with lack of participation in cervical cancer screening by some women, may contribute to the high cervical cancer burden in the region.


Assuntos
Genótipo , Papillomaviridae/genética , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Feminino , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mississippi , Papillomaviridae/classificação , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Manejo de Espécimes , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/virologia , Esfregaço Vaginal
2.
J Clin Microbiol ; 49(12): 4185-9, 2011 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21998422

RESUMO

To explore alternative cervical cancer screening approaches in an underserved population, we compared the performance of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA assays in combination with different sample collection methods for primary cervical screening in the Mississippi Delta region. Three specimens were collected from women aged 26 to 65 years who were either routinely undergoing screening (n = 252) or not (n = 191): clinician-collected cervical specimens, clinician-collected cervicovaginal specimens, and self-collected cervicovaginal specimens taken at home. A novel collection device and medium were used for cervicovaginal sampling. Specimens were tested by three HPV DNA assays: hybrid capture 2 (HC2; Qiagen Corp., Gaithersburg, MD), Linear Array (LA; Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, CA), and Amplicor (Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, CA). Liquid-based cytology was performed on cervical specimens. We compared the overall positivity (a proxy for clinical specificity) for any carcinogenic HPV genotype and calculated the agreement across assay and specimen type using McNemar's test for differences in test positivity. Across all three assays there were no significant differences between clinician-collected and self-collected cervicovaginal specimens (P > 0.01 for all comparisons). For both cervicovaginal specimens (clinician collected and self-collected), fewer women tested positive by HC2 than by LA or Amplicor (P < 0.01 for all comparisons). HC2 had the best agreement between specimens for all assays. HC2 is likely more clinically specific, although possibly less sensitive, than either PCR test. Thus, use of HC2 on cervicovaginal specimens for screening could result in fewer referrals compared to LA and Amplicor.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Papillomaviridae/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Colo do Útero/virologia , Técnicas Citológicas/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Autoexame/métodos , Vagina/virologia , Virologia/métodos
3.
Prev Med ; 52(6): 452-5, 2011 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21497619

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to increase participation in cervical cancer screening of under-screened women living in the Mississippi Delta, a U.S. population at high risk for cervical cancer. METHODS: We conducted a door-to-door feasibility study of women living in the Mississippi Delta to increase participation in cervical cancer screening in 2009-10. Women (n=119) aged 26-65 years who had not been screened in last 3 years or more, were not pregnant, and had a cervix were offered a cost-free choice: clinic-based Pap testing or home self-collection with HPV DNA testing. RESULTS: Seventy-seven women (64.7%) chose self-collection with HPV testing, of which sixty-two (80.5%) returned their self-collected specimen. By comparison, 42 women (35.3%) chose Pap testing, of which 17 (40.5%) attended their clinic appointment. Thus there was an almost 4-fold greater participation of under-screened women in self-collection with HPV testing than in free Pap testing (78.4% vs. 21.5%). CONCLUSIONS: We found that offering self-collection will increase participation in cervical cancer screening among under-screened populations living in the Mississippi Delta. Based on these preliminary results, we suggest that self-collection with HPV DNA testing might complement current Pap testing programs to reach under-screened populations of women, such as those living in the Mississippi Delta.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Esfregaço Vaginal/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Relações Comunidade-Instituição , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento , Área Carente de Assistência Médica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mississippi , Papillomaviridae/isolamento & purificação , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle
4.
J Infect Dis ; 185(12): 1729-35, 2002 Jun 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12085318

RESUMO

Host human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) integrated into the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 envelope could theoretically determine, as in tissue transplants, whether HIV-1 is "rejected" by exposed susceptible persons, preventing transmission. HLA discordance (mismatch) was examined among 45 heterosexual partner pairs in which at least 1 partner was HIV-1 infected and exposure or transmission between partners had occurred. Immunologic discordance at class II HLA-DRB3 (present in the HIV donor partner but absent in the recipient partner) was associated with lack of transmission of HIV-1. Eight (35%) of 23 partner pairs in which HIV-1 transmission did not occur were immunologically discordant at HLA-DRB3, compared with 0 of 11 partner pairs in which HIV-1 transmission did occur (P=.027). Further investigation of the roles of class II HLAs in HIV-1 transmission and as possible components of HIV-1 vaccines should be pursued.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV/transmissão , HIV-1 , Antígenos HLA-DR/fisiologia , Adulto , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/imunologia , Cadeias HLA-DRB3 , Heterossexualidade , Humanos , Masculino
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA