Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol ; 64(Pt 9): 3264-3275, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24981324

RESUMO

Phylogenetic analyses of the genus Glaciecola were performed using the sequences of the 16S rRNA gene and the GyrB protein to establish its taxonomic status. The results indicated a consistent clustering of the genus Glaciecola into two clades, with significant bootstrap values, with all the phylogenetic methods employed. Clade 1 was represented by seven species, Glaciecola agarilytica, G. aquimarina, G. arctica, G. chathamensis, G. mesophila, G. polaris and G. psychrophila, while clade 2 consisted of only three species, Glaciecola nitratireducens, G. pallidula and G. punicea. Evolutionary distances between species of clades 1 and 2, based on 16S rRNA gene and GyrB protein sequences, ranged from 93.0 to 95.0 % and 69.0 to 73.0 %, respectively. In addition, clades 1 and 2 possessed 18 unique signature nucleotides, at positions 132, 184 : 193, 185 : 192, 230, 616 : 624, 631, 632, 633, 738, 829, 1257, 1265, 1281, 1356 and 1366, in the 16S rRNA gene sequence and can be differentiated by the occurrence of a 15 nt signature motif 5'-CAAATCAGAATGTTG at positions 1354-1368 in members of clade 2. Robust clustering of the genus Glaciecola into two clades based on analysis of 16S rRNA gene and GyrB protein sequences, 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity of ≤95.0 % and the occurrence of signature nucleotides and signature motifs in the 16S rRNA gene suggested that the genus should be split into two genera. The genus Paraglaciecola gen. nov. is therefore created to accommodate the seven species of clade 1, while the name Glaciecola sensu stricto is retained to represent species of clade 2. The species of clade 1 are transferred to the genus Paraglaciecola as Paraglaciecola mesophila comb. nov. (type strain DSM 15026(T) = KMM 241(T)), P. agarilytica comb. nov. (type strain NO2(T) = KCTC 12755(T) = LMG 23762(T)), P. aquimarina comb. nov. (type strain GGW-M5(T) = KCTC 32108(T) = CCUG 62918(T)), P. arctica comb. nov. (type strain BSs20135(T) = CCTCC AB 209161(T) = KACC 14537(T)), P. chathamensis comb. nov. (type strain E3(T) = CGMCC 1.7001(T) = JCM 15139(T)), P. polaris comb. nov. (type strain ARK 150(T) = CIP 108324(T) = LMG 21857(T)) and P. psychrophila comb. nov. (type strain 170(T) = CGMCC1.6130(T) = JCM 13954(T)). The type species of the genus Paraglaciecola is Paraglaciecola mesophila. An emended description of the genus Glaciecola is provided. In addition, a novel strain, 162Z-12(T), was isolated from seawater collected as part of an iron fertilization experiment (LOHAFEX) conducted in the Southern Ocean in 2009 and was subjected to polyphasic taxonomic characterization. Cells of 162Z-12(T) were Gram-negative, aerobic, motile, ovoid to short rod-shaped, obligatorily halophilic and possessed all the characteristics of the genus Paraglaciecola. Strain 162Z-12(T) shared the highest 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity with the type strains of P. agarilytica (99.7 %), P. chathamensis (99.7 %), P. mesophila (98.5 %) and P. polaris (98.3 %). However, it exhibited DNA-DNA relatedness of less than 70.0 % with its nearest phylogenetic relatives, well below the threshold value for species delineation. Further, strain 162Z-12(T) differed from the nearest species in several phenotypic characteristics, in addition to the occurrence of unique nucleotides G, T, T and T at positions 1194, 1269, 1270 and 1271 of the 16S rRNA gene. Based on the cumulative differences it exhibited from its nearest phylogenetic neighbours, strain 162Z-12(T) was identified as a novel member of the genus Paraglaciecola and assigned to the novel species Paraglaciecola oceanifecundans sp. nov. The type strain of Paraglaciecola oceanifecundans is 162Z-12(T) ( = KCTC 32337(T) = LMG 27453(T)).


Assuntos
Alteromonadaceae/classificação , Filogenia , Água do Mar/microbiologia , Alteromonadaceae/genética , Alteromonadaceae/isolamento & purificação , Técnicas de Tipagem Bacteriana , Composição de Bases , DNA Girase/genética , DNA Bacteriano/genética , Ácidos Graxos/química , Dados de Sequência Molecular , Hibridização de Ácido Nucleico , Oceanos e Mares , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Análise de Sequência de DNA
2.
Prep Biochem Biotechnol ; 44(8): 805-10, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24279712

RESUMO

Protein recovery from gel electrophoresis plays a significant role in functional genomics and proteomics. To assist in this, a simple, cost-effective, and efficient apparatus for electroelution of proteins has been designed. The performance of the apparatus was demonstrated using the proteins bovine serum albumin (BSA), phosphorylase, ovalbumin, pepsin, and trypsinogen. In all the cases the yield of elution was found to be consistently greater than 85% and the proteins could be eluted without degradation in less than 15 min. The utility of this method can be extended to protein elution from denatured and native polyacrylamide gels, DNA purification from agarose gels, and oligomeric primers purification from polyacrylamide gels. In addition to this, the method offers an effortless purification and characterization of microbial extracellular proteins. The eluted proteins can be directly used in N-terminal amino acid sequencing, and in amino acid and proteomics analyses.


Assuntos
Resinas Acrílicas/química , Eletroforese em Gel de Poliacrilamida/instrumentação , Proteínas/isolamento & purificação , Animais , Bovinos , Eletroforese em Gel de Poliacrilamida/economia , Eletroforese em Gel de Poliacrilamida/métodos , Desenho de Equipamento , Proteômica/economia , Proteômica/instrumentação , Proteômica/métodos
3.
Gut Pathog ; 9: 15, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28392838

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Escherichia coli, the gastrointestinal commensal, is also known to cause ocular infections such as conjunctivitis, keratitis and endophthalmitis. These infections are normally resolved by topical application of an appropriate antibiotic. But, at times these E. coli are resistant to the antibiotic and this could be due to formation of a biofilm. In this study ocular E. coli from patients with conjunctivitis, keratitis or endophthalmitis were screened for their antibiotic susceptibility and biofilm formation potential. In addition DNA-microarray analysis was done to identify genes that are involved in biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance. RESULTS: Out of 12 ocular E. coli isolated from patients ten isolates were resistant to one or more of the nine antibiotics tested and majority of the isolates were positive for biofilm formation. In E. coli L-1216/2010, the best biofilm forming isolate, biofilm formation was confirmed by scanning electron microscopy. Confocal laser scanning microscopic studies indicated that the thickness of the biofilm increased up to 72 h of growth. Further, in the biofilm phase, E. coli L-1216/2010 was 100 times more resistant to the eight antibiotics tested compared to planktonic phase. DNA microarray analysis indicated that in biofilm forming E. coli L-1216/2010 genes encoding biofilm formation such as cell adhesion genes, LPS production genes, genes required for biofilm architecture and extracellular matrix remodeling and genes encoding for proteins that are integral to the cell membrane and those that influence antigen presentation are up regulated during biofilm formation. In addition genes that confer antimicrobial resistance such as genes encoding antimicrobial efflux (mdtM and cycA), virulence (insQ, yjgK), toxin production (sat, yjgK, chpS, chpB and ygjN), transport of amino-acids and other metabolites (cbrB, cbrC, hisI and mglB) are also up regulated. These genes could serve as potential targets for developing strategies for hacking biofilms and overcoming antibiotic resistance. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study on global gene expression in antibiotic resistant ocular E. coli with a potential to form biofilm. Using native ocular isolates for antibiotic susceptibility testing, for biofilm formation and global gene expression is relevant and more acceptable than using type strains or non clinical strains which do not necessarily mimic the native isolate.

4.
J Microbiol ; 53(1): 6-13, 2015 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25557476

RESUMO

A Gram-negative, aerobic, non spore-forming, non-motile, rod-shaped, yellow pigmented bacterium CP155-2(T) was isolated from a biological soil crusts sample collected in the Colorado plateau, USA and subjected to polyphasic taxonomic characterization. Strain CP155-2(T) contained summed feature 3 (C(16:1)ω5c/C(16:1)ω7c) and C(18:1)ω7c as major fatty acids and diphosphatidylglycerol (DPG) along with phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and phosphatidylglycerol (PG) as major polar lipids. Based on these characteristics CP155-2(T) was assigned to the genus Pseudomonas. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequence further confirmed the affiliation of CP155-2(T) to the genus Pseudomonas and showed a 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity of less than 98.7% with already described species of the genus. Pseudomonas luteola, Pseudomonas zeshuii, and Pseudomonas duriflava were identified as the closest species of the genus Pseudomonas with 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities of 98.7%, 98.6%, and 96.9%, respectively. The values for DNA¨CDNA relatedness between CP155-2(T) and Pseudomonas luteola and Pseudomonas zeshuii were 23% and 14% respectively a value below the 70% threshold value, indicating that strain CP155-2(T) belongs to a novel taxon of the genus Pseudomonas lineage. The novel taxon status was strengthened by a number of phenotypic differences wherein CP155-2(T) was positive for oxidase, negative for gelatin hydrolysis, could utilize D-cellobiose, D-raffinose, L-rhamnose, D-sorbitol but not L-aspartic acid and L-glutamic acid. Based on the collective differences strain CP155-2(T) exhibited, it was identified as a novel species and the name Pseudomonas asuensis sp. nov. was proposed. The type strain of Pseudomonas asuensis sp. nov. is CP155-2(T) (DSM 17866(T) =ATCC BAA-1264(T) =JCM13501(T) =KCTC 32484(T)).


Assuntos
Pseudomonas/isolamento & purificação , Pseudomonas/metabolismo , Microbiologia do Solo , Técnicas de Tipagem Bacteriana , Composição de Bases , Colorado , DNA Bacteriano/genética , DNA Ribossômico/genética , Ácidos Graxos/análise , Dados de Sequência Molecular , Hibridização de Ácido Nucleico , Fosfolipídeos/análise , Filogenia , Pseudomonas/classificação , Pseudomonas/crescimento & desenvolvimento , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Análise de Sequência de DNA , Solo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA