Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
J Magn Reson Imaging ; 42(3): 818-27, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25515676

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To investigate whether additional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) improves therapy response evaluation by Gd-EOB magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after radioembolization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with radioembolization for HCC underwent gadobutrol and Gd-EOB MRI with DWI prior to and 30, 90, and 180 days after radioembolization. A combination of gadobutrol MRI, alpha-fetoprotein, and imaging follow-up served as the reference standard. Two radiologists reviewed Gd-EOB alone (Gd-EOB), DWI alone (DWI), and the combination of both (Gd-EOB+DWI) separately and in consensus using a 4-point-scale: 1 = definitely no tumor progression (TP), 2 = probably no TP, 3 = probably TP, 4 = definitely TP. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and kappa analysis were performed. RESULTS: Kappa values for Gd-EOB, DWI, and Gd-EOB+DWI ranged between 0.712 and 0.892 (P < 0.001). 30 days after radioembolization three out of 38 patients showed TP, which was missed by DWI in one case. No significant area under the curve (AUC) difference between Gd-EOB (1.0, P = 0.004), DWI (0.881, P = 0.030), and Gd-EOB+DWI (1.0, P = 0.004) was found (P = 0.320). 90 days after radioembolization six out of 28 patients showed TP, which was detected in one patient only by DWI and Gd-EOB+DWI. The AUC did not differ significantly (P = 0.319) between Gd-EOB (0.890, P = 0.004), DWI (1.0, P < 0.001), and Gd-EOB+DWI (1.0, P < 0.001). 180 days after radioembolization five patients showed TP, which in one case was missed by DWI. The AUC did not differ significantly (P1 = 0.322, P2 = 0.369, P3 = 0.350) between Gd-EOB (1.0, P = 0.003), DWI (0.913, P = 0.016), and Gd-EOB+DWI (0.963, P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Additional DWI does not substantially improve therapy response evaluation by Gd-EOB MRI in HCC after radioembolization but proved helpful in single cases.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Ablação por Cateter , Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética , Gadolínio DTPA/química , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patologia , Meios de Contraste/química , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Compostos Organometálicos/química , Curva ROC , Resultado do Tratamento , alfa-Fetoproteínas/química
2.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 26(7): 972-9, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25937296

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare the utility of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA), a liver-specific magnetic resonance (MR) imaging contrast agent, versus gadobutrol for treatment response evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after radioembolization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included 50 patients with HCC undergoing radioembolization. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and MR imaging with gadobutrol and Gd-EOB-DTPA on 2 consecutive days before radioembolization and 30 days, 90 days, 180 days, and 270 days after radioembolization. The standard of reference indicating tumor progression was CT combined with either α-fetoprotein or γ-glutamyltransferase. Gadobutrol-enhanced MR imaging, Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging without late phase imaging (Gd-EOB-DTPA-), and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging with late phase imaging (Gd-EOB-DTPA+) were evaluated by 2 radiologists in consensus using a 4-point scale: 1 = definitely no tumor progression; 2 = probably no tumor progression; 3 = probably tumor progression; 4 = definitely tumor progression. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed with receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: Tumor progression was detected in 14 of 82 study visits according to the reference standard. Pairwise comparison of the area under the curve showed a tendency toward a larger area under the curve for Gd-EOB-DTPA+ compared with gadobutrol (P = .056). Sensitivity and specificity were higher in Gd-EOB-DTPA+ (0.929 and 0.971) than in Gd-EOB-DTPA- (0.786 and 0.941) or gadobutrol (0.643 and 0.956). In 2 cases, tumor progression was detected by Gd-EOB-DTPA+ and by an increase in α-fetoprotein, but not by CT, gadobutrol, or Gd-EOB-DTPA-. CONCLUSIONS: Gd-EOB-DTPA+ MR imaging was not inferior to gadobutrol-enhanced MR imaging in therapy response evaluation after radioembolization and may allow a more accurate detection of early HCC recurrence in single cases.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patologia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/radioterapia , Meios de Contraste , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Gadolínio DTPA , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Compostos Organometálicos , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Área Sob a Curva , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/sangue , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Tempo , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento , alfa-Fetoproteínas/metabolismo , gama-Glutamiltransferase/sangue
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA