Pain Scales: What Are They and What Do They Mean.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: It is essential to have validated and reliable pain measurement tools that cover a wide range of areas and are tailored to individual patients to ensure effective pain management. The main objective of this review is to provide comprehensive information on commonly used pain scales and questionnaires, including their usefulness, intended purpose, applicability to different patient populations, and associated advantages and disadvantages. RECENT FINDINGS: Acute pain questionnaires typically focus on measuring the severity of pain and the extent of relief achieved through interventions. Chronic pain questionnaires evaluate additional aspects such as pain-related functional limitations, psychological distress, and psychological well-being. The selection of an appropriate pain scale depends on the specific assessment objectives. Additionally, each pain scale has its strengths and limitations. Understanding the differences among these pain scales is essential for selecting the most appropriate tool tailored to individual patient needs in different settings. CONCLUSION: Medical professionals encounter challenges in accurately assessing pain. Physicians must be familiar with the different pain scales and their applicability to specific patient population.

Review: Discogenic Back Pain: Update on Treatment.

Purpose of Review: Lower back pain (LBP) has a lifetime prevalence of 80% in the United States population. Discogenic back pain (DBP), a subcategory of LBP, occurs as a result of the interverbal disc degeneration without disc herniation. Diagnosis relies on history, physical exam, and imaging such as MRI, provocative discography, or CT discography. Recent Findings: Treatment of DBP involves a multifaceted approach with an emphasis on conservative measures including behavioral modification, pharmacologic management, and other non-pharmacologic interventions with invasive therapy reserved for select patients. Due to the paucity of data on the treatment of DBP, treatment also relies on data derived from treatment of chronic LBP (CLBP). Summary: Despite the scarcity of data for the treatment of DBP, treatments do exist with varying efficacy for DBP. Novel techniques such as the use of biologics may provide another avenue for treatment though further studies are needed to better evaluate the most efficacious regimen for both novel and existing treatments.

The efficacy of ketamine for postoperative pain control in adolescent patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery for idiopathic scoliosis.

The use of ketamine in conjunction with morphine to reduce postoperative pain has been explored in several different surgery subtypes with conflicting results. Ketamine has shown promise to have both opioid sparing and analgesic effects in the postoperative setting. This study aimed to elucidate ketamine's ability to reduce morphine equivalent consumption and improve patient satisfaction after spinal fusion surgery for the correction of idiopathic scoliosis. This surgery is known to be associated with significant postoperative pain which impedes the ability to improve patient satisfaction, and may complicate the recovery timeline. Currently, the standard therapeutic regimen consists of patient-controlled analgesia morphine and the use of other opioids such as hydromorphone. A prospective, randomized double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial was performed to compare the standard morphine equivalent therapy alone against a standard therapy in conjunction with ketamine. Fifty adolescent patients were enrolled and randomized. Results yielded a significant reduction in postoperative morphine equivalent consumption (p = 0.042), adjusted postoperative pain scores (p < 0.001), and incidence of nausea and vomiting (p = 0.045). The application of ketamine as an analgesic in conjunction with the current standard of morphine equivalent therapy may serve as a superior pain control regimen for spinal surgeries in young population. This regimen enhancement may be generalizable to other surgery subtypes within similar populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I.