Evolution of laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy without the Pringle maneuver: through resection of benign and malignant tumors to living liver donation.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LLS) has gained popularity in its use for benign and malignant tumors. This report describes the evolution of the authors' experience using laparoscopic LLS for different indications including living liver donation. METHODS: Between January 2004 and January 2009, 37 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic LLS for benign, primary, and metastatic liver diseases, and for one case of living liver donation. Resection of malignant tumors was indicated for 19 (51%) of the 37 patients. RESULTS: All but three patients (deceased due to metastatic cancer disease) are alive and well after a median follow-up period of 20 months (range, 8-46 months). Liver cell adenomas (72%) were the main indication among benign tumors, and colorectal liver metastases (84%) were the first indication of malignancy. One case of live liver donation was performed. Whereas 16 patients (43%) had undergone a previous abdominal surgery, 3 patients (8%) had LLS combined with bowel resection. The median operation time was of 195 min (range, 115-300 min), and the median blood loss was of 50 ml (range, 0-500 ml). Mild to severe steatosis was noted in 7 patients (19%) and aspecific portal inflammation in 11 patients (30%). A median free margin of 5 mm (range, 5-27 mm) was achieved for all cancer patients. The overall recurrence rate for colorectal liver metastases was of 44% (7 patients), but none recurred at the surgical margin. No conversion to laparotomy was recorded, and the overall morbidity rate was 8.1% (1 grade 1 and 2 grade 2 complications). The median hospital stay was 6 days (range, 2-10 days). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic LLS without portal clamping can be performed safely for cases of benign and malignant liver disease with minimal blood loss and overall morbidity, free resection margins, and a favorable outcome. As the ultimate step of the learning curve, laparoscopic LLS could be routinely proposed, potentially increasing the donor pool for living-related liver transplantation.

Split liver transplantation with extended right grafts under patient-oriented allocation policy. Single center matched-pair outcome analysis.

BACKGROUND: Split liver transplantation (SLT) is an established technique developed to optimize the number of available grafts. Few data are available on SLT with extended right liver grafts (eRLG) in the context of patient-oriented allocation policy. METHODS: Between July 1, 2001 and December 31, 2005, 12 whole liver graft (WLG) recipients were matched with 12 eRLG recipients according to their clinical status, indication and year of liver transplantation. RESULTS: There were no differences according to recipient Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, total serum bilirubin, creatinine levels and international normalized ratio in both groups. Fifty percent of donors in eRLG group presented 2 or more extended criteria. Liver transplantation was performed in UNOS status 1/2A in 58% of cases in both groups. Vascular and biliary complications were observed in three patients in the eRLG group. The median follow-up was 25.3 months (range 0.4-63). Early mortality (

ABO-mismatch adult living donor liver transplantation using antigen-specific immunoadsorption and quadruple immunosuppression without splenectomy.

ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) liver transplantation is a controversial issue because of the generally less favorable outcome as compared to compatible transplants. Encouraging results have been shown by the introduction of new strategies to reduce posttransplant-specific hemagglutinin (HA) titers with plasmapheresis, reinforced immunosuppression (IS), and the use of splenectomy. We describe a new protocol consisting of daclizumab (DAC) induction, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/tacrolimus (TAC)/steroids without splenectomy. Five recipients (mean age of 47 +/- 14 yr) undergoing ABO-I living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) were included in this protocol. Immunoadsorbent columns (Glycosorb ABO) were used for antigen-specific immunoadsorption (ASI). The median follow-up was 18.5 +/- 10.5 months. ASI was very efficient in lowering HA titers (mean log(2) immunoglobulin [Ig] M [IgM] and IgG values before and after ASI were 5.9 +/- 2.8 and 1.2 +/- 1.4 [P= 0.0038] and 6.5 +/- 2.3 and 1.1+/- 1.9, respectively [P= 0.0001]). Persisting low HA titers were observed over time. No sepsis nor cytomegalovirus infection episodes were recorded. Acute cellular rejection (ACR) occurred in 1 recipient responding to steroid pulse therapy. Two grafts were lost in 2 patients due to technical failure during the first postoperative month. We conclude that ASI using Glycosorb ABO, quadruple immunosuppression including DAC and MMF provide high efficiency to lower HA titers over time, avoiding the need for splenectomy. ABO-I LDLT can be performed with this adapted IS protocol.

Early immunosuppression withdrawal after living donor liver transplantation and donor stem cell infusion.

Long-term results of organ transplantation are still limited by serious side effects of immunosuppressive drugs. A major issue, therefore, is to elaborate novel therapeutic protocols allowing withdrawal or minimization of immunosuppressive therapy after transplantation. We report on 3 patients prospectively enrolled in an original protocol designed to promote graft acceptance in living donor liver transplantation, using posttransplant conditioning with high doses of antithymocyte globulin followed by injection of donor-derived stem cells. In 2 patients, early immunosuppression withdrawal was possible, without subsequent graft deterioration. In these 2 cases, in vitro studies showed indices of immunological tolerance as assessed by specific hyporesponsiveness to donor alloantigens in mixed lymphocytes culture. In the third patient, acute rejection rapidly occurred after discontinuation of immunosuppression, and minimal immunosuppression has to be maintained during long-term follow-up. In this case, a clearly distinct immunoreactive profile was observed as compared to tolerant patients, as no specific modulation of the antidonor response was observed in vitro. Of note, no macrochimerism could be detected in any of the 3 patients during the follow-up. In conclusion, these clinical observations demonstrated that, despite the absence of macrochimerism, donor stem cells infusion combined with recipient conditioning may allow early immunosuppression withdrawal or minimization after liver transplantation.

Effects of hemi-portocaval shunts for inflow modulation on the outcome of small-for-size grafts in living donor liver transplantation.

Graft hyperperfusion in small-for-size grafts (SFSG) is considered the main causal factor of small-for-size syndrome (SFSS). We compared SFSG with a graft-to-recipient body ratio < or =0.8, with and without graft inflow modulation (GIM) by means of a hemi-portocaval shunt (HPCS). Thirteen patients underwent adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (AALDLT): G1, n = 5 [4 right livers (RL) and 1 left liver (LL)] without GIM, and G2, n = 8 (4 RL and 4 LL) with GIM. In G2 patients, portal vein flow (PVF) was significantly reduced by HPCS: 190 +/- 70 mL/min/100 g liver in G2 vs. 401 +/- 225 ml/min in G1 (p = 0.002). One- and 6-month post-transplantation graft volume/standard liver volume (GV/SLV) ratio was of 72% and 79.5% in G1; 80% and 101% in G2 (p = ns). SFSS was observed in three G1 recipients (who were retransplanted), but in none of the G2 patients. At 1-year, patient and graft survival was respectively of 40% and 20% in G1, 87.5% and 75% in G2 (p = 0.024 and 0.03). It is concluded that drastic reduction of PVF by means of HPCS improves overall patient and graft survival by averting the occurrence of SFSS. Graft inflow modulation through HPCS reduces the risk of complications when transplanting SFSG in adult recipients.