Nutrition practices in critically ill adults receiving noninvasive ventilation: A quantitative survey of Australian and New Zealand intensive care clinicians.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is frequently used in the intensive care unit (ICU), yet there is a paucity of evidence to guide nutrition management during this therapy. Understanding clinicians' views on nutrition practices during NIV will inform research to address this knowledge gap. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe Australian and New Zealand clinicians' views and perceptions of nutrition management during NIV in critically ill adults. METHODS: A cross-sectional quantitative online survey of Australian and New Zealand medical and nursing staff with ≥12 months ICU experience was disseminated through professional organisations via purposive snowball sampling from 29 August to 9 October 2022. Data collection included demographics, current practices, and views and perceptions of nutrition during NIV. Surveys <50% complete were excluded. Data are represented in number (%). RESULTS: A total of 152 surveys were analysed; 71 (47%) nursing, 69 (45%) medical, and 12 (8%) not specified. There was limited consensus on nutrition management during NIV; however, most clinicians (n = 108, 79%) reported that nutrition during NIV was 'important or very important'. Oral intake was perceived to be the most common route (n = 83, 55%), and 29 (21%) respondents viewed this as the safest. Most respondents (n = 106, 78%) reported that ≤50% of energy targets were met, with gastric enteral nutrition considered most likely to meet targets (n = 55, 40%). Reported nutrition barriers were aspiration risk (n = 87, 64%), fasting for intubation (n = 84, 62%), and nutrition perceived as a lower priority (n = 73, 54%). Reported facilitators were evidence-based guidelines (n = 77, 57%) and an NIV interface compatible with enteral nutrition tube (n = 77, 57%). CONCLUSION: ICU medical and nursing staff reported nutrition during NIV to be important; however, there was a lack of consensus on the route of feeding considered to be the safest and most likely to achieve nutrition targets. Interventions to minimise aspiration and fasting, including an interface with nasoenteric tube compatibility, should be explored.

Muscularity of older trauma patients at intensive care unit admission, association with functional outcomes, and relationship with frailty: A retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Older individuals are at an increased risk of delayed recovery following a traumatic injury. Measurement of muscularity and frailty at hospital admission may aid with prognostication and risk stratification. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe muscularity at intensive care unit (ICU) admission in patients admitted following trauma and assess the relationship between muscularity and clinical, long-term functional outcomes and frailty at ICU admission. METHODS: This retrospective study utilised data from a prospective observational study investigating frailty in patients aged ≥50 years, admitted to the ICU following trauma. Patients were eligible if they had a Computed Tomography (CT) scan including the third lumbar vertebra at ICU admission. Specialist software was used to quantify CT-derived skeletal muscle cross-sectional area. Muscularity status was classified as normal or low using published sex-specific cut-points. Demographic data, frailty, clinical, and long-term functional outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended and EQ-5DL-5L Visual analogue scale and utility score) were extracted from the original study. RESULTS: One hundred patients were screened; 71 patients had a CT scan on admission with 66 scans suitable for muscle assessment. Patients with low muscularity (n = 25, 38%) were older and had a higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score and lower body mass index than patients with normal muscularity. Low muscularity was associated with frailty at admission (32% vs 5%, p = 0.005) but not with long term outcomes at 6 or 12 months. As a continuous variable, lower muscle cross-sectional area was associated with a poorer outcome on the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended at 6 months (mean [standard deviation]: 150 [43] and 180 [44], respectively; p = 0.014), no association was observed after adjustment for age p = 0.43). CONCLUSION: In a population of older adults hospitalised following trauma, low muscularity at ICU admission was prevalent. Low muscularity was associated with frailty but not long-term functional outcomes. Larger studies are warranted to better understand the relationship between muscularity and long-term functional outcomes.

Six-month outcomes after traumatic brain injury in the Augmented versus Routine Approach to Giving Energy multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled Trial (TARGET).

BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients with a traumatic brain injury (TBI) may require prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) admission and hence receive greater exposure to hospital enteral nutrition. It is unknown if augmented energy delivery with enteral nutrition during ICU admission impacts quality of life in survivors or gastrointestinal tolerance during nutrition delivery in the ICU. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare health-related quality of life, using the EuroQol five-dimensions five-level visual analogue scale at 6 months, in survivors who presented with a TBI and received augmented energy (1.5 kcal/ml) to those who received routine energy (1.0 kcal/ml). Secondary objectives were to explore differences in total energy and protein delivery, gastrointestinal tolerance, and mortality between groups. METHODS: Secondary analysis of participants admitted with a TBI in the Augmented versus Routine Approach to Giving Energy Trial (TARGET) randomised controlled trial. Data are represented as n (%) or median (interquartile range). RESULTS: Of the 3957 patients in TARGET, 231 (5.8%) were admitted after a TBI (augmented = 124; routine = 107). Patients within TARGET who were admitted with a TBI were relatively young (42 [27, 61] years) and received TARGET enteral nutrition for an extended period (9 [5, 15] days). At 6 months, EuroQol five-dimensions five-level quality-of-life scores were available for 166 TBI survivors (72% of TBI cohort randomised, augmented = 97, routine = 69). There was no evidence of a difference in quality of life (augmented = 70 [52, 90]; routine = 70 [55, 85]; median difference augmented vs routine = 0 [95% confidence interval: -5, 10]). TBI participants assigned to augmented energy received more energy with a similar protein than the routine group. Gastrointestinal tolerance was similar between groups. CONCLUSION: While patients admitted after a TBI received enteral nutrition for an extended period, an increased exposure to augmented energy did not affect survivors' quality-of-life scores.

Nutrition intake, muscle thickness, and recovery outcomes for critically ill patients requiring non-invasive forms of respiratory support: A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in the intensive care unit (ICU) is increasing, yet reporting of nutrition intake, muscle thickness, or recovery outcomes in this population is limited. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to quantify muscle thickness, nutrition intake, and functional recovery outcomes for patients receiving HFNC/NIV within the ICU. METHODS: A single-centre, prospective, observational study in adult ICU patients recruited within 48 hrs of commencing HFNC/NIV. Change in quadriceps muscle layer thickness using ultrasound (primary outcome) and 24 hr nutrition intake from study inclusion to day 7 (D7), functional capacity (Barthel Index), and quality of life (EuroQol five-dimension five-level utility index) at D90 were assessed. Data are n (%), mean ± standard deviation or median [interquartile range], are compared using paired sample t-test, and a P value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Primary outcome data were available for n = 28/42: 64 ± 13 y, 61% male, body mass index: 29.1 ± 9.0 kg/m2, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score: 17 ± 5. Quadriceps muscle layer thickness reduced from 2.41 ± 0.87 to 2.12 ± 0.73 cm; mean difference: -0.29 cm (95% confidence interval: -0.44, -0.13). Nutrition intake increased from study inclusion to D7: 1735 ± 1283 to 5448 ± 2858 kJ and 17.4 ± 16.6 to 60.9 ± 36.8g protein. Barthel Index was 87 ± 20 at baseline and 91 ± 15 at D90 (out of 100). Quality of life was impaired at D90: 0.64 ± 0.23 (health = 1.0). CONCLUSION: Critically ill patients receiving HFNC/NIV experienced muscle loss and impaired quality of life.

Nutrition delivery and the relationship with changes in muscle mass in adult patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Adverse changes in muscle health (size and quality) are common in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Nutrition delivery may attenuate such changes, yet the relationship with muscle health remains poorly understood. This study explored the association between energy and protein delivery and changes in muscle health measured using ultrasound from baseline to day 10 and 20 in patients receiving ECMO. METHODS: A secondary analysis of data from a prospective study quantifying changes in muscle health using ultrasound in adults receiving ECMO was completed. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were prescribed artificial nutrition within 3 days of enrolment and had >1 ultrasound measurement. The primary outcome was the association between protein delivery (grams delivered and percentage of targets received) and change in rectus femoris cross-sectional area (RF-CSA) till day 20. Secondary outcomes were the association between energy and protein delivery and change in RF-CSA till day 10, RF-echogenicity, and quadriceps muscle layer thickness to day 10 and 20. Associations were assessed using Spearman's rank correlation. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (age: 48 [standard deviation {SD}: 14], 44% male) were included. Mean energy and protein delivery were 1633 kcal (SD: 374 kcal) and 70 g (SD: 17 g) equating to 79% (SD: 19%) of energy and 73% (SD: 17%) of protein targets. No association was observed between protein delivery (r = 0.167; p = 0.495) or the percentage of targets received (r = 0.096; p = 0.694) and change in RF-CSA till day 20. No other significant associations were found between energy or protein delivery and change in RF-CSA, echogenicity, or quadriceps muscle layer thickness at any time point. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory study observed no association between nutrition delivery and changes in muscle health measured using ultrasound in patients receiving ECMO. Larger prospective studies are required to investigate the association between nutrition delivery and changes in muscle health in patients receiving ECMO.

Dietitian and nutrition-related practices and resources in Australian and New Zealand PICUs: A clinician survey.

BACKGROUND: Recommendations to facilitate evidence-based nutrition provision for critically ill children exist and indicate the importance of nutrition in this population. Despite these recommendations, it is currently unknown how well Australian and New Zealand (ANZ) paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) are equipped to provide nutrition care. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this project were to describe the dietitian and nutrition-related practices and resources in ANZ PICUs. METHODS: A clinician survey was completed as a component of an observational study across nine ANZ PICUs in June 2021. The online survey comprised 31 questions. Data points included reporting on dietetics resourcing, local feeding-related guidelines and algorithms, nutrition screening and assessment practices, anthropometry practices, and indirect calorimetry (IC) device availability and local technical expertise. Data are presented as frequency (%), mean (standard deviation), or median (interquartile range). RESULTS: Survey responses were received from all nine participating sites. Dietetics staffing per available PICU bed ranged from 0.01 to 0.07 full-time equivalent (median: 0.03 [interquartile range: 0.02-0.04]). Nutrition screening was established in three (33%) units, all of which used the Paediatric Nutrition Screening Tool. Dietitians consulted all appropriate patients (or where capacity allowed) in six (66%) units and on a request or referral basis only in three (33%) units. All units possessed a local feeding guideline or algorithm. An IC device was available in two (22%) PICUs and was used in one of these units. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to describe the dietitian and nutrition-related practices and resources of ANZ PICUs. Areas for potential improvement include dietetics full-time equivalent, routine nutrition assessment, and access to IC.

Nutrition delivery across hospitalisation in critically ill patients with COVID-19: An observational study of the Australian experience.

BACKGROUND: Data on nutrition delivery over the whole hospital admission in critically ill patients with COVID-19 are scarce, particularly in the Australian setting. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to describe nutrition delivery in critically ill patients admitted to Australian intensive care units (ICUs) with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), with a focus on post-ICU nutrition practices. METHODS: A multicentre observational study conducted at nine sites included adult patients with a positive COVID-19 diagnosis admitted to the ICU for >24 h and discharged to an acute ward over a 12-month recruitment period from 1 March 2020. Data were extracted on baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes. Nutrition practice data from the ICU and weekly in the post-ICU ward (up to week four) included route of feeding, presence of nutrition-impacting symptoms, and nutrition support received. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were included (71% male, age: 58 ± 14 years, body mass index: 30±7 kg/m2), of whom 41.7% (n = 43) received mechanical ventilation within 14 days of ICU admission. While oral nutrition was received by more patients at any time point in the ICU (n = 93, 91.2% of patients) than enteral nutrition (EN) (n = 43, 42.2%) or parenteral nutrition (PN) (n = 2, 2.0%), EN was delivered for a greater duration of time (69.6% feeding days) than oral and PN (29.7% and 0.7%, respectively). More patients received oral intake than the other modes in the post-ICU ward (n = 95, 95.0%), and 40.0% (n = 38/95) of patients were receiving oral nutrition supplements. In the week after ICU discharge, 51.0% of patients (n = 51) had at least one nutrition-impacting symptom, most commonly a reduced appetite (n = 25; 24.5%) or dysphagia (n = 16; 15.7%). CONCLUSION: Critically ill patients during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia were more likely to receive oral nutrition than artificial nutrition support at any time point both in the ICU and in the post-ICU ward, whereas EN was provided for a greater duration when it was prescribed. Nutrition-impacting symptoms were common.

Personalized nutrition therapy in critical care: 10 expert recommendations.

Personalization of ICU nutrition is essential to future of critical care. Recommendations from American/European guidelines and practice suggestions incorporating recent literature are presented. Low-dose enteral nutrition (EN) or parenteral nutrition (PN) can be started within 48 h of admission. While EN is preferred route of delivery, new data highlight PN can be given safely without increased risk; thus, when early EN is not feasible, provision of isocaloric PN is effective and results in similar outcomes. Indirect calorimetry (IC) measurement of energy expenditure (EE) is recommended by both European/American guidelines after stabilization post-ICU admission. Below-measured EE (~ 70%) targets should be used during early phase and increased to match EE later in stay. Low-dose protein delivery can be used early (~ D1-2) (< 0.8 g/kg/d) and progressed to ≥ 1.2 g/kg/d as patients stabilize, with consideration of avoiding higher protein in unstable patients and in acute kidney injury not on CRRT. Intermittent-feeding schedules hold promise for further research. Clinicians must be aware of delivered energy/protein and what percentage of targets delivered nutrition represents. Computerized nutrition monitoring systems/platforms have become widely available. In patients at risk of micronutrient/vitamin losses (i.e., CRRT), evaluation of micronutrient levels should be considered post-ICU days 5-7 with repletion of deficiencies where indicated. In future, we hope use of muscle monitors such as ultrasound, CT scan, and/or BIA will be utilized to assess nutrition risk and monitor response to nutrition. Use of specialized anabolic nutrients such as HMB, creatine, and leucine to improve strength/muscle mass is promising in other populations and deserves future study. In post-ICU setting, continued use of IC measurement and other muscle measures should be considered to guide nutrition. Research on using rehabilitation interventions such as cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to guide post-ICU exercise/rehabilitation prescription and using anabolic agents such as testosterone/oxandrolone to promote post-ICU recovery is needed.

Dietary assessment methods for measurement of oral intake in acute care and critically ill hospitalised patients: a scoping review.

Quantification of oral intake within the hospital setting is required to guide nutrition care. Multiple dietary assessment methods are available, yet details regarding their application in the acute care setting are scarce. This scoping review, conducted in accordance with JBI methodology, describes dietary assessment methods used to measure oral intake in acute and critical care hospital patients. The search was run across four databases to identify primary research conducted in adult acute or critical care settings from 1st of January 2000-15th March 2023 which quantified oral diet with any dietary assessment method. In total, 155 articles were included, predominantly from the acute care setting (n = 153, 99%). Studies were mainly single-centre (n = 138, 88%) and of observational design (n = 135, 87%). Estimated plate waste (n = 59, 38%) and food records (n = 43, 28%) were the most frequent assessment methods with energy and protein the main nutrients quantified (n = 81, 52%). Validation was completed in 23 (15%) studies, with the majority of these using a reference method reliant on estimation (n = 17, 74%). A quarter of studies (n = 39) quantified completion (either as complete versus incomplete or degree of completeness) and four studies (2.5%) explored factors influencing completion. Findings indicate a lack of high-quality evidence to guide selection and application of existing dietary assessment methods to quantify oral intake with a particular absence of evidence in the critical care setting. Further validation of existing tools and identification of factors influencing completion is needed to guide the optimal approach to quantification of oral intake in both research and clinical contexts.

Economic evaluations for intensive care unit randomised clinical trials in Australia and New Zealand: Practical recommendations for researchers.

OBJECTIVES: Economic evaluations of intensive care unit (ICU) interventions have specific considerations, including how to cost ICU stays and accurately measure quality of life in survivors. The aim of this article was to develop best practice recommendations for economic evaluations alongside future ICU randomised controlled trials (RCTs). REVIEW METHODS: We collated our experience based on expert consensus across several recent economic evaluations to provide best-practice, practical recommendations for researchers conducting economic evaluations alongside RCTs in the ICU. Recommendations were structured according to the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) Task Force Report. RESULTS: We discuss recommendations across the components of economic evaluations, including: types of economic evaluation, the population and sample size, study perspective, comparators, time horizon, choice of health outcomes, measurement of effectiveness, measurement and valuation of quality of life, estimating resources and costs, analytical methods, and the increment cost-effectiveness ratio. We also provide future directions for research with regard to developing more robust economic evaluations for the ICU. CONCLUSION: Economic evaluations should be built alongside ICU RCTs and should be designed a priori using appropriate follow-up and data collection to capture patient-relevant outcomes. Further work is needed to improve the quality of data available for linkage in Australia as well as developing costing methods for the ICU and appropriate quality of life measurements.

Nutrition care processes across hospitalisation in critically ill patients with COVID-19 in Australia: A multicentre prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted major challenges with usual nutrition care processes, leading to reports of malnutrition and nutrition-related issues in these patients. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe nutrition-related service delivery practices across hospitalisation in critically ill patients with COVID-19 admitted to Australian intensive care units (ICUs) in the initial pandemic phase. METHODS: This was a multicentre (nine site) observational study in Australia, linked with a national registry of critically ill patients with COVID-19. Adult patients with COVID-19 who were discharged to an acute ward following ICU admission were included over a 12-month period. Data are presented as n (%), median (interquartile range [IQR]), and odds ratio (OR [95% confidence interval {CI}]). RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were included. Oral nutrition was the most common mode of nutrition (93 [93%]). In the ICU, there were 53 (52%) patients seen by a dietitian (median 4 [2-8] occasions) and malnutrition screening occurred in 51 (50%) patients most commonly with the malnutrition screening tool (50 [98%]). The odds of receiving a higher malnutrition screening tool score increased by 36% for every screening in the ICU (1st to 4th, OR: 1.39 [95% CI: 1.05-1.77] p = 0.018) (indicating increasing risk of malnutrition). On the ward, 51 (50.5%) patients were seen by a dietitian (median time to consult: 44 [22.5-75] hours post ICU discharge). The odds of dietetic consult increased by 39% every week while on the ward (OR: 1.39 [1.03-1.89], p = 0.034). Patients who received mechanical ventilation (MV) were more likely to receive dietetic input than those who never received MV. CONCLUSIONS: During the initial phases of the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia, approximately half of the patients included were seen by a dietitian. An increased number of malnutrition screens were associated with a higher risk score in the ICU and likelihood of dietetic consult increased if patients received MV and as length of ward stay increased.

Nutrition before, during and after critical illness.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review describes considerations preintensive care unit (ICU), within ICU and in the post-ICU period regarding nutrition management and the current state of the literature base informing clinical care. RECENT FINDINGS: Within ICU, studies have focussed on the first 5-7 days of illness in mechanically ventilated patients who are heterogeneous and with minimal consideration to premorbid nutrition state. Many evidence gaps in the period within ICU remain, with the major ones being the amount of protein to provide and the impact of longer-term nutrition interventions. Personalised nutrition and nutrition in the post-ICU period are becoming key areas of focus. SUMMARY: Nutrition for the critically ill patient should not be viewed in isolated time periods; what happens before, during and after ICU is likely important to the overall recovery trajectory. It is critical that the impact of nutrition on clinical and functional outcomes across hospitalisation is investigated in specific groups and using interventions in ways that are biologically plausible to impact. Areas that show promise for the future of critical care nutrition include interventions delivered for a longer duration and inclusion of oral nutrition support, individualised nutrition regimes, and use of emerging bedside body composition techniques to identify patients at nutritional risk.

Obesity and critical care nutrition: current practice gaps and directions for future research.

BACKGROUND: This review has been developed following a panel discussion with an international group of experts in the care of patients with obesity in the critical care setting and focuses on current best practices in malnutrition screening and assessment, estimation of energy needs for patients with obesity, the risks and management of sarcopenic obesity, the value of tailored nutrition recommendations, and the emerging role of immunonutrition. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) increasingly present with overweight and obesity that require individualized nutrition considerations due to underlying comorbidities, immunological factors such as inflammation, and changes in energy expenditure and other aspects of metabolism. While research continues to accumulate, important knowledge gaps persist in recognizing and managing the complex nutritional needs in ICU patients with obesity. Available malnutrition screening and assessment tools are limited in patients with obesity due to a lack of validation and heterogeneous factors impacting nutrition status in this population. Estimations of energy and protein demands are also complex in patients with obesity and may include estimations based upon ideal, actual, or adjusted body weight. Evidence is still sparse on the role of immunonutrition in patients with obesity, but the presence of inflammation that impacts immune function may suggest a role for these nutrients in hemodynamically stable ICU patients. Educational efforts are needed for all clinicians who care for complex cases of critically ill patients with obesity, with a focus on strategies for optimal nutrition and the consideration of issues such as weight stigma and bias impacting the delivery of care. CONCLUSIONS: Current nutritional strategies for these patients should be undertaken with a focus on individualized care that considers the whole person, including the possibility of preexisting comorbidities, altered metabolism, and chronic stigma, which may impact the provision of nutritional care. Additional research should focus on the applicability of current guidelines and evidence for nutrition therapy in populations with obesity, especially in the setting of critical illness.

Nutrition adequacy, gastrointestinal, and hepatic function during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in critically ill adults: A retrospective observational study.

AIMS: To identify clinical and biochemical markers associated with nutrition adequacy and gastrointestinal and liver dysfunction in adults on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). METHODS: A retrospective, observational, study was conducted at 2 centres in Australia. Adult patients who received ECMO from July 2011 to June 2015 were included. Mode of ECMO used, fluid balance, number of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria present, vasoactive-inotropic scores (VIS) and liver function tests (LFTs) were collected for the duration of ECMO until 7 days after ECMO cessation. Multiple regression models were used to determine if the collected variables were associated with nutrition adequacy. The mean LFTs during ECMO were also compared to mean LFTs post ECMO cessation. RESULTS: During the first 5 days of ECMO commencement, mean nutrition adequacy was 10% higher in the veno-venous (VV) ECMO group than in the veno-arterial (VA) group (95% confidence interval [CI], 2% to 17%). For every 5000 ml increase of fluid balance, an associated decrease in nutrition adequacy was observed (-8%, 95% CI: -15% to -2%). A doubling of bilirubin and VIS were associated with a mean reduction in nutrition adequacy of -5% (95% CI -8% to -2%) and - 2% (95% CI: -3% to -1%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the first 5 days of ECMO commencement, higher nutrition adequacy was associated with the VV mode of ECMO and reduced nutrition adequacy with increased fluid balance, more vasopressor and inotropic support and raised bilirubin. Prospective investigation is required to confirm whether these associations have a causal relationship.

Micronutrient intake from enteral nutrition in critically ill adults: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to compare the intake of important micronutrients provided from enteral nutrition to critically ill patients with the Australia and New Zealand recommended dietary intakes. A secondary objective was to compare the upper levels of intake and investigate prespecified subgroups. REVIEW METHOD USED: A systematic literature review was performed. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL were used. REVIEW METHODS: Databases were searched for randomised controlled trials that investigated an enteral nutrition intervention as the sole source of nutrition, were published in English between January 2000 and January 8th, 2021, and provided data to calculate micronutrient intake. The primary outcome was the % recommended dietary intake. The quality of individual trials was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Outcomes are presented as either mean ± standard deviation or median [interquartile range], with a p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Thirteen trials were included (n = 1538 patients). Trials investigating hypocaloric nutrition were excluded from the primary outcome assessment (conducted in nine trials (n = 1220)). All nine trials delivered ≥104% of the recommended dietary intakes and <100% of the upper level of intakes of all micronutrients. In subgroup analyses, trials with ≥80% target energy delivered a higher % of the recommended dietary intake of vitamin B12, thiamine, zinc, and vitamin C. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation scores ≥20 delivered a higher % of the recommended dietary intake of vitamin B12 and vitamin A. Antioxidant formulas compared with standard formulas delivered a higher % recommended dietary intake of vitamin C and thiamine. In the four trials that investigated hypocaloric feeding compared with control, there was no difference in micronutrient intake. The quality was low. CONCLUSIONS: Enteral nutrition delivery frequently met the recommended dietary intakes for all micronutrients investigated and did not exceed the upper levels of intake set for health. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42020178333.

Energy-Dense versus Routine Enteral Nutrition in the Critically Ill.

BACKGROUND: The effect of delivering nutrition at different calorie levels during critical illness is uncertain, and patients typically receive less than the recommended amount. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial, involving adults undergoing mechanical ventilation in 46 Australian and New Zealand intensive care units (ICUs), to evaluate energy-dense (1.5 kcal per milliliter) as compared with routine (1.0 kcal per milliliter) enteral nutrition at a dose of 1 ml per kilogram of ideal body weight per hour, commencing at or within 12 hours of the initiation of nutrition support and continuing for up to 28 days while the patient was in the ICU. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 90 days. RESULTS: There were 3957 patients included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (1971 in the 1.5-kcal group and 1986 in the 1.0-kcal group). The volume of enteral nutrition delivered during the trial was similar in the two groups; however, patients in the 1.5-kcal group received a mean (±SD) of 1863±478 kcal per day as compared with 1262±313 kcal per day in the 1.0-kcal group (mean difference, 601 kcal per day; 95% confidence interval [CI], 576 to 626). By day 90, a total of 523 of 1948 patients (26.8%) in the 1.5-kcal group and 505 of 1966 patients (25.7%) in the 1.0-kcal group had died (relative risk, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.16; P=0.41). The results were similar in seven predefined subgroups. Higher calorie delivery did not affect survival time, receipt of organ support, number of days alive and out of the ICU and hospital or free of organ support, or the incidence of infective complications or adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing mechanical ventilation, the rate of survival at 90 days associated with the use of an energy-dense formulation for enteral delivery of nutrition was not higher than that with routine enteral nutrition. (Funded by National Health and Medical Research Institute of Australia and the Health Research Council of New Zealand; TARGET ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02306746 .).

Parenteral nutrition in critical illness: total, supplemental or never?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The current review summarizes recent evolutions in knowledge and discusses the concept of whom and when parenteral nutrition should be considered in critically ill patients as a total form of nutrition, in a supplemental form, or never. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent developments in our understanding of the application of parenteral nutrition in critical care include the phases of illness, avoidance of overfeeding and the population in whom parenteral nutrition may be appropriate for. Importantly, one of the greatest lessons of recent times may be who not to provide parenteral nutrition to; however, a blanket approach of increased risk with parenteral nutrition is too simple for the modern context. SUMMARY: When providing total or supplemental parenteral nutrition, avoidance of overfeeding with total calories and/or glucose alone is critical, as is consideration to the phase of illness the patient is in, the population in whom it is to be applied, premorbid nutrition status and the setting (including adequacy of line management and expertise in parenteral nutrition provision). The appropriateness of parenteral nutrition should be considered in those where death is imminent or who are well nourished, likely to commence oral and/or enteral nutrition imminently and have a short-stay in intensive care, or are in a high-risk setting.

Outcomes Six Months after Delivering 100% or 70% of Enteral Calorie Requirements during Critical Illness (TARGET). A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Rationale: The long-term effects of delivering approximately 100% of recommended calorie intake via the enteral route during critical illness compared with a lesser amount of calories are unknown.Objectives: Our hypotheses were that achieving approximately 100% of recommended calorie intake during critical illness would increase quality-of-life scores, return to work, and key life activities and reduce death and disability 6 months later.Methods: We conducted a multicenter, blinded, parallel group, randomized clinical trial, with 3,957 mechanically ventilated critically ill adults allocated to energy-dense (1.5 kcal/ml) or routine (1.0 kcal/ml) enteral nutrition.Measurements and Main Results: Participants assigned energy-dense nutrition received more calories (percent recommended energy intake, mean [SD]; energy-dense: 103% [28] vs. usual: 69% [18]). Mortality at Day 180 was similar (560/1,895 [29.6%] vs. 539/1,920 [28.1%]; relative risk 1.05 [95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.16]). At a median (interquartile range) of 185 (182-193) days after randomization, 2,492 survivors were surveyed and reported similar quality of life (EuroQol five dimensions five-level quality-of-life questionnaire visual analog scale, median [interquartile range]: 75 [60-85]; group difference: 0 [95% confidence interval, 0-0]). Similar numbers of participants returned to work with no difference in hours worked or effectiveness at work (n = 818). There was no observed difference in disability (n = 1,208) or participation in key life activities (n = 705).Conclusions: The delivery of approximately 100% compared with 70% of recommended calorie intake during critical illness does not improve quality of life or functional outcomes or increase the number of survivors 6 months later.

Surge capacity for critical care specialised allied health professionals in Australia during COVID-19.

Significant investment in planning and training has occurred across the Australian healthcare sector in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, with a primary focus on the medical and nursing workforce. We provide a short summary of a recently published article titled "Surge capacity of Australian intensive care units associated with COVID-19 admissions" in the Medical Journal of Australia and, importantly, highlight a knowledge gap regarding critical care specialised allied health professional (AHP) workforce planning in Australia. The unique skill set provided by critical care specialised AHPs contributes to patient recovery long after the patient leaves the intensive care unit, with management targeted at reducing disability and improving function, activities of daily living, and quality of life. Allied health workforce planning and preparation during COVID-19 must be considered when planning comprehensive and evidence-based patient care. The work by Litton et al. has highlighted the significant lack of available data in relation to staffing of critical care specialised AHPs in Australia, and this needs to be urgently addressed.

Nutrition management of obese critically ill adults: A survey of critical care dietitians in Australia and New Zealand.

BACKGROUND: Guideline recommendations for nutrition therapy in critically ill obese adults are inconsistent. This study aimed to describe how dietitians working in an intensive care unit (ICU) in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ) approach managing the nutritional needs of an obese, critically ill adult. METHODS: Invitations to participate were via personal email communication. The survey was also disseminated through a research email list and a dietitian-based newsletter. The multiple-choice case-based survey consisted of 12 questions relating to nutrition prescription and were based on international nutrition guideline recommendations including (i) weight used in energy and protein predictive equations; (ii) energy and protein prescription at ICU admission and day 7, (iii) commencement of enteral nutrition, and; (iv) use of supplemental protein. Data are reported as n (%). RESULTS: Sixty-three dietitians participated in the survey. Most commonly, adjusted body weight calculated as 'weight at BMI 25 kg/m2 + 25% excess weight' was used in equations to guide energy (44 respondents, 70%) and protein (39 respondents, 62%) prescription. At day 1, energy and protein prescription was most commonly based on the European Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ESPEN) guideline recommendation of 20-25 kcal/kg (39 respondents, 62%) and 1.3 g protein/kg adjusted body weight (36 respondents, 57%). Thirteen (21%) respondents had an indirect calorimetry device in their ICU to measure energy expenditure. On day 7, the ESPEN recommendations were again the most common method used for prescribing energy (30 respondents, 48%) and protein (23 respondents. 48%) needs. Thirty-eight dietitians (60%) reported they would use early supplemental protein to meet protein requirements. CONCLUSIONS: ICU dietitians in ANZ who responded to the survey most commonly report using the ESPEN ICU guideline recommendations (20-25 kcal/kg and 1.3 g protein/kg adjusted body weight) to guide nutrition prescription in an obese critically ill adult. Prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.