Posterior lumbar fixation in a kidney transplant recipient: logistics and perioperative challenges.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation has become the ideal and successful treatment for medically suitable patients with established kidney disease. This results in increased likelihood of these patients developing unrelated conditions requiring surgery, including spinal surgery. There are only a few publications available regarding spinal patients with renal transplants. CASE REPORT: A 67-year-old patient presented with recurrent sciatica. Four years prior to this, he received a living donor kidney transplant. He was diagnosed with right L4 radiculopathy due to recurrent foraminal stenosis as a result of the grade I L4/5 spondylolisthesis. He was offered a reoperation including microdecompression and postero-lateral fixation and fusion. The renal transplant necessitated specific pre- and intraoperative considerations. The knee-chest position with extra padding was used to maintain the region of the renal transplant free from any pressure. The renal care was planned in detail by the transplant surgeons and nephrologists and shared with the ward doctors and on-call teams. The procedure was uneventful; there were no signs of intraoperative or postoperative acute renal injury. The patient was discharged 5 days postoperatively; all renal parameters remained within normal ranges and the postoperative plain films demonstrated satisfactory surgical results. CONCLUSIONS: The key to success was a multidisciplinary approach and detailed planning regarding pre-, intra- and postoperative care. The presented scheme of care might be useful when considering the posterior approach and prone positioning in kidney transplant recipients with spinal pathologies requiring surgical treatment.

Incentives for organ donation: proposed standards for an internationally acceptable system.

Incentives for organ donation, currently prohibited in most countries, may increase donation and save lives. Discussion of incentives has focused on two areas: (1) whether or not there are ethical principles that justify the current prohibition and (2) whether incentives would do more good than harm. We herein address the second concern and propose for discussion standards and guidelines for an acceptable system of incentives for donation. We believe that if systems based on these guidelines were developed, harms would be no greater than those to today's conventional donors. Ultimately, until there are trials of incentives, the question of benefits and harms cannot be satisfactorily answered.

Conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in patients with gastrointestinal side effects: case studies.

BACKGROUND: The potential benefit of the current mycophenolic acid, mycophenolate mofetil, has not yet been fully achieved in clinical transplantation because of its gastrointestinal side effects. Dose splitting, dose reduction, and drug discontinuation are strategies that are used to manage gastrointestinal symptoms. However, recently reported registry data suggest these alterations result in inadequate graft protection, leading to increased late acute rejection rates and decreased longterm graft survival. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential use of the new enteric-coated formulation of mycophenolic acid therapy, mycophenolate sodium, and its suggested improved side effects profile. PARTICIPANTS: Five patients who previously had or were currently experiencing gastrointestinal side effects while taking mycophenolate mofetil were selected at random. These patients were initially switched to an equimolar dose of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium. An increase in mycophenolate sodium doses was attempted according to symptoms. Changes in kidney function and gastrointestinal symptom scores were recorded before and after conversion. RESULTS: No episodes of acute rejection were observed in any patients during or after conversion. All patients experienced an overall improvement in gastrointestinal symptom scores following conversion, and an increase in mycophenolate sodium dose was achieved in 1 patient.

Campath, calcineurin inhibitor reduction and chronic allograft nephropathy (3C) study: background, rationale, and study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation is the best treatment for patients with end-stage renal failure, but uncertainty remains about the best immunosuppression strategy. Long-term graft survival has not improved substantially, and one possible explanation is calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity. CNI exposure could be minimized by using more potent induction therapy or alternative maintenance therapy to remove CNIs completely. However, the safety and efficacy of such strategies are unknown. METHODS/DESIGN: The Campath, Calcineurin inhibitor reduction and Chronic allograft nephropathy (3C) Study is a multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled trial with 852 participants which is addressing two important questions in kidney transplantation. The first question is whether a Campath (alemtuzumab)-based induction therapy strategy is superior to basiliximab-based therapy, and the second is whether, from 6 months after transplantation, a sirolimus-based maintenance therapy strategy is superior to tacrolimus-based therapy. Recruitment is complete, and follow-up will continue for around 5 years post-transplant. The primary endpoint for the induction therapy comparison is biopsy-proven acute rejection by 6 months, and the primary endpoint for the maintenance therapy comparison is change in estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline to 2 years after transplantation. The study is sponsored by the University of Oxford and endorsed by the British Transplantation Society, and 18 centers for adult kidney transplant are participating. DISCUSSION: Late graft failure is a major issue for kidney-transplant recipients. If our hypothesis that minimizing CNI exposure with Campath-based induction therapy and/or an elective conversion to sirolimus-based maintenance therapy can improve long-term graft function and survival is correct, then patients should experience better graft function for longer. A positive outcome could change clinical practice in kidney transplantation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01120028 and ISRCTN88894088.

Severe peri-renal sepsis in established renal failure masquerading as an acute abdominal catastrophe.

Severe worsening lactic acidosis in an elderly patient following an episode of atrial fibrillation, who is not haemodynamically compromised, usually indicates an intra-abdominal vascular catastrophe. We describe a unique case of severe peri-renal sepsis in a patient with long-standing dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease unrelated to urolithiasis that masqueraded as an acute abdominal condition requiring emergency laparotomy and nephrectomy.