RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Nurses are identified as having higher work stress and poor mental health risk among health care workforce globally. It remains unclear which modifiable stress factors pose the greatest risk for poor psychological health among nursing workforce and needed to inform targeted practice and policy change. To determine which occupation-related or personal stress factors precipitate higher risk for burnout, depression, anxiety, job satisfaction or intention to leave one's position among nurses globally. DESIGN: A cross-sectional anonymous survey was administered via email using a snowball recruitment strategy. METHODS: Academic researchers and clinical industry leaders across 3 global regions collaborated to generate an email listserv of professional nursing contacts for survey distribution. The survey included valid and reliable measures to scale stress factors (Work Stress Questionnaire), and screen for burnout (single item), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-2), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2), resilience (Brief Resilience Scale) and intention to leave one's job (single item). We used logistic regression, first unadjusted and then adjusted for personal and professional characteristics, to determine associations between stress factors and psychological health risk. RESULTS: The final sample consisted of responses from 2864 nurses working across 13 countries. Most respondents reported working as a clinical nurse in the Philippines (n = 2275), United States (n = 424) and Saudi Arabia (n = 104). One third of nursing respondents endorsed high burnout and intention to leave their job. Those reporting work conflict had significantly higher odds of burnout (odds ratio 3.18; 95% CI 2.22-4.54) and three times more likely to screen positive for depression (odds ratio 3.02; 95% CI 1.36-6.72) and anxiety (odds ratio 2.92; 95% CI 1.57-5.43). Those endorsing difficulty sleeping were 15 times more likely to screen positive for depression (odds ratio 15.63; 95% CI 2.09-117.06). Lack of social support was significantly associated to higher risk for burnout, job dissatisfaction, depression, anxiety, and intention to leave one's position. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses remain at risk for burnout and poor psychological health stemming from work stress. Factors such as clear workplace goals and assignments, increased engagement, good sleep health and social support may serve as protective factors against suboptimal psychological health, and in-turn poor workforce retention. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Nurses reporting conflict in the workplace are three times more likely to screen positive for burnout, depression, and anxiety. Nurses reporting difficulty sleeping are 15 times more likely to screen positive for depression. Several modifiable factors can be targeted to reduce poor psychological health and high workforce turnover among nurses across countries.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The therapeutic relationship serves as a cornerstone in psychiatric mental health nursing practice, providing a basis for implementing various interventions. AIMS: This study aimed to explore the perspectives of psychiatric mental health nurses regarding factors that facilitate and impede the therapeutic nurse-patient relationship. METHODS: A descriptive study was conducted among psychiatric mental health nurses employed at two community psychiatric hospitals in the northeast area of the United States. A list of facilitators and barriers was developed based on an extensive literature review and subsequently validated by three experts in the field of psychiatric mental health nursing. Participants rated these factors on a 10-point scale. RESULTS: The study included 74 registered nurses from two psychiatric hospitals, yielding a 24% response rate. The highest-ranked facilitator was awareness that the relationship enables collaborative goal setting with patients. The most significant barrier was insufficient time due to administrative tasks. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance of understanding facilitators and barriers in the therapeutic nurse-patient relationship. Replicating the study nationally on a larger scale among psychiatric mental health nurses is recommended.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify and prioritize research topics for nursing administration and leadership science. BACKGROUND: Nursing administration and leadership research priorities should provide a framework for building the science needed to inform practice. METHODS: The Association for Leadership Science in Nursing (ALSN) and American Organization for Nursing Leadership (AONL) Foundation (AONL-F) for Nursing Leadership and Education collaborated on a Delphi study. Initial input on research priority items were received from ALSN and AONL members. National experts participated in a 3-round Delphi study. RESULTS: Top-ranked priorities included: 1) nurses' health, well-being, resiliency, and safety in the workplace; 2) developing and managing a nursing workforce to meet current and future healthcare needs; 3) healthy work/practice environments for direct care nurses; 4) healthy work/ practice environments for nurse leaders; 5) quantification of nursing's value across the healthcare delivery system; and 6) nurse leader development and essential competencies. CONCLUSIONS: Researchers and funders should use these priorities to guide future studies.
Assuntos
Liderança , Supervisão de Enfermagem , Técnica Delphi , Humanos , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Differentiating activities that are research or quality improvement (QI) is challenging. PURPOSE: Compare tools that distinguish research from QI and evaluate the utility of tools to determine whether institutional review board (IRB) approval is required for a test-project. METHODS: Scoping review of the literature to identify tools that distinguish QI from research. Two reviewers independently screened records in PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science and Google Scholar and extracted information from tools. Inclusion criteria were English language peer-reviewed publications or publicly available tools with scoring systems to differentiate between research and QI. The reporting of this review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. We then applied a test-project to evaluate the utility of the tools. FINDINGS: One-hundred forty sources were reviewed; 13 met inclusion criteria. Tools consistently used project intent/purpose, design and intervention as differentiating criteria; additional criteria varied. Five studies described tool development, and one reported that the tool had been tested. Our application of a test-project proved challenging as tools commonly presented research and QI as discrete activities. DISCUSSION: Based on the core criteria common across tools to distinguish research from QI, we propose a simple four-criteria decision tool for assessing the need for IRB submission.
Assuntos
Bolsas de Estudo , Melhoria de Qualidade , Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Projetos de PesquisaRESUMO
Nurse leaders seek effective strategies to engage nurses in decision-making when striving for clinical excellence. When leaders cultivate safe environments, nurses are encouraged to discover new knowledge and innovations. In our institution, nurse leaders designed a systematic guide using Liberating Structures to empower nurses to develop a professional practice model.
Assuntos
Liderança , Modelos de Enfermagem , Enfermeiros Administradores , Cultura Organizacional , Prática Profissional , Desenvolvimento de Pessoal/organização & administração , Competência Clínica , Humanos , Enfermeiros Administradores/organização & administração , Enfermeiros Administradores/psicologiaRESUMO
AIM: Describe the programmatic details and outcomes of a competitive, two-year Academic-Practice Research Fellowship for clinical nurses. BACKGROUND: Numerous barriers challenge clinical nurses in their ability to conduct and disseminate research. We describe and evaluate a competitive, semi-structured, two-year Academic-Practice Research Fellowship in which clinical nurse 'fellows' accepted into the program are paired with a faculty mentor at a school of nursing to conduct and disseminate a research study that addresses a clinical problem identified by the fellow. The fellowship is facilitated by the Director of Academic-Practice Partnerships jointly appointed between a school of nursing and affiliated acute care hospitals, and with resources provided by both. The vast majority of didactic training is provided outside the classroom. METHODS: We reviewed administrative records to describe the programmatic details and outcomes of the program. RESULTS: Thirteen nurses were accepted into the first three cohorts of the Academic-Practice Research Fellowship. Among the five fellows in the graduating first cohort, all successfully completed their research, presented their findings at national or international conference(s) and four have submitted manuscripts for publication, with two being accepted for publication. The eight current fellows are meeting all delineated milestones and timelines. Evaluations demonstrate the effectiveness of the fellowship in enhancing the professional development and research capacity of clinical nurses. CONCLUSIONS: The Academic-Practice Research Fellowship program integrates expertise and resources across academia and practice and has resulted in the successful conduct and dissemination of clinically relevant research by fulltime practicing nurses in the acute care setting.
Assuntos
Bolsas de Estudo , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros , Humanos , MentoresRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Mapped with the guiding principles of academic-practice partnerships (APPs) outlined by the American Association of Colleges of Nursing and the American Organization for Nursing Leadership, a joint nurse scientist role between a nursing school and acute care facility at a large academic health center was developed and characterized by a PhD-prepared nurse appointed in a research role across organizations. To date, eight faculty are now appointed across the School and four health systems. PURPOSE: Describe outcomes, facilitators and vulnerabilities of the joint nurse scientist role. METHODS: Review of administrative records. DISCUSSION: Outcomes include the 1) conduct and dissemination of joint research, 2) translation of evidence into practice, 3) development of educational programs for health system nurses, 4) scholarly activities among health system nurses, and 5) improved visibility and valuation of the PhD-prepared nurse. Role facilitators include those previously reported for APPs, the joint nurse scientists' ability to broker opportunities across settings, and the evolving nature of the role. Role vulnerabilities pertain to the negotiation of workload, promotion, and institutional priorities. CONCLUSION: The joint nurse scientist role fosters shared scholarly successes across academia and service.
Assuntos
Papel do Profissional de Enfermagem , Pesquisa em Enfermagem/organização & administração , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/organização & administração , Humanos , Relações Interinstitucionais , Escolas de Enfermagem/organização & administração , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to describe and evaluate the impact of the Linking to Improve Nursing Care and Knowledge (LINK) project on increasing nurse-led clinical research. BACKGROUND: Nurse-generated research is the cornerstone of evidence-based practice and continues to be a marker of nursing excellence. However, the dearth of PhD-prepared nurses creates a challenge for creating an environment to promote clinical nursing research. We evaluated the LINK project, an academic-clinical partnership, to assess its impact and feasibility, for fostering nurse-led clinical research. METHODS: The LINK project created a formal command and control structure bringing together existing academic resources, including a PhD-prepared nurse researcher, a biostatistician, and a development of a formal research consultation request process. Measures tracked over a 12-month period included average response time, request volume, client satisfaction, institutional review board (IRB)-submitted protocols, and work products. RESULTS: All measures exceeded expectations with an average 1-day request response time, 35 requests, 98% client satisfaction, a 367% increase in nurse-led IRB approved protocols from the previous 12-month period, and 2 publications in peer-reviewed journals. CONCLUSIONS: The process and outcome measures indicate that the LINK project is feasible, sustainable, and reproducible. We were able to meet and, in many cases, exceed measurement goals. In addition, implementation science literature indicates that the most valid measure of a successful project rollout is user satisfaction and usefulness. The LINK project received consistently positive feedback.
Assuntos
Pesquisa em Enfermagem Clínica/métodos , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências , Cuidados de Enfermagem , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/organização & administração , Parcerias Público-Privadas , Pesquisa em Enfermagem Clínica/organização & administração , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Educação em Enfermagem , Eficiência Organizacional , Estudos de Viabilidade , HumanosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to assist nurse leaders in developing innovative structures to foster a culture of inquiry among professional nurses. BACKGROUND: Critical to nurse's engagement in evidence-based practice (EBP) is a culture of inquiry, in which nurses critically evaluate patient care activities and actively review existing evidence to address identified clinical issues. A bundle of structural interventions was implemented across a large, multisite hospital to advance a culture of inquiry. We measured the impact of these interventions on nurses' library use and on nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards EBP. METHODS: Structural interventions included: 1) EBP and Research Committee meetings, in which nurses were educated on how to formulate a clinical question and critically appraise a research article; 2) Academic Partners Program, in which nurse academicians provided scholarly mentorship and guidance during monthly committee meetings; 3) hiring of clinical nurse scientists who provided 1-on-1 education and mentorship to clinical nurses in EBP and research; and 4) a Nurse Residency Program partnership, in which newly graduated nurses were required to complete an EBP project. We examined the impact of these structural interventions on nurses' use of library resources and nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward EBP. RESULTS: The implementation of structural interventions to support nurses' engagement in EBP was associated with a significant increase in the number of nurse-generated library consultative requests over time. Results showed high levels of nurse knowledge, attitudes, and practices in EBP. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse leaders may advance a culture of inquiry by providing the infrastructure to support EBP activities and by empowering nurses to question and seek answer to identified practice questions. Infrastructures should include access to scientific articles and partnerships with schools of nursing. Additional research is needed to validate nurse library use as a measure of nurse engagement in EBP.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Educação Continuada em Enfermagem/métodos , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências/métodos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/educação , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/psicologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
Nurses' active involvement in clinical scholarship is necessary to advance the nursing profession and improve patient outcomes. Yet, definitional confusion and numerous barriers exist to clinical scholarship in and across academic and patient care settings. We discuss factors that pose barriers to the continuum of clinical scholarship and suggest opportunities for clinician-researcher collaborations that promote nurses' engagement in evidence-based practice, quality improvement, and research.
Assuntos
Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências/organização & administração , Papel do Profissional de Enfermagem , Pesquisa em Enfermagem/organização & administração , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Pesquisadores , Humanos , Relações Interprofissionais , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Efforts to improve child survival in lower-income countries typically focus on fundamental factors such as economic resources and infrastructure provision, even though research from post-industrial countries confirms that family instability has important health consequences. We tested the association between maternal union instability and children's mortality risk in Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean, and Asia using children's actual experience of mortality (discrete-time probit hazard models) as well as their experience of untreated morbidity (probit regression). Children of divorced/separated mothers experience compromised survival chances, but children of mothers who have never been in a union generally do not. Among children of partnered women, those whose mothers have experienced prior union transitions have a higher mortality risk. Targeting children of mothers who have experienced union instability-regardless of current union status-may augment ongoing efforts to reduce childhood mortality, especially in Africa and Latin America where union transitions are common.
Assuntos
Mortalidade da Criança/tendências , Divórcio/estatística & dados numéricos , Casamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Casamento/tendências , Mortalidade Materna/tendências , Adolescente , Adulto , África , Ásia , Região do Caribe , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Previsões , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , América LatinaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Exploratory studies establishing how well nurses have integrated genomics into practice have demonstrated there remains opportunity for education. However, little is known about educational gaps in multi-ethnic minority nurse populations. The purpose of this study was to determine minority nurses' beliefs, practices, and competency in integrating genetics-genomics information into practice using an online survey tool. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey with registered nurses (RNs) from the participating National Coalition of Ethnic Minority Organizations (NCEMNA). Two phases were used: Phase one had a sample of 27 nurses who determined the feasibility of an online approach to survey completion and need for tool revision. Phase two was a main survey with 389 participants who completed the revised survey. The survey ascertained the genomic knowledge, beliefs, and practice of a sample of multi-ethnic minority nurses who were members of associations comprising the NCEMNA. METHODS: The survey was administered online. Descriptive survey responses were analyzed using frequencies and percentages. Categorical responses in which comparisons were analyzed used chi square tests. FINDINGS: About 40% of the respondents held a master's degree (39%) and 42% worked in direct patient care. The majority of respondents (79%) reported that education in genomics was important. Ninety-five percent agreed or strongly agreed that family health history could identify at-risk families, 85% reported knowing how to complete a second- and third-generation family history, and 63% felt family history was important to nursing. Conversely, 50% of the respondents felt that their understanding of the genetics of common disease was fair or poor, supported by 54% incorrectly reporting they thought heart disease and diabetes are caused by a single gene variant. Only 30% reported taking a genetics course since licensure, and 94% reported interest in learning more about genomics. Eighty-four percent believed that their ethnic minority nurses' organizations should have a visible role in genetics and genomics in their communities. CONCLUSIONS: Most respondents felt genomics is important to integrate into practice but demonstrated knowledge deficits. There was strong interest in the need for continuing education and the role of the ethnic minority organizations in facilitating the continuing education efforts. This study provides evidence of the need for targeted genomic education to prepare ethnic minority nurses to better translate genetics and genomics into practice. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Genomics is critical to the practice of all nurses, most especially family health history assessment and the genomics of common complex diseases. There is a great opportunity and interest to address the genetic-genomic knowledge deficits in the nursing workforce as a strategy to impact patient outcomes.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Etnicidade/psicologia , Genética , Genômica , Grupos Minoritários/psicologia , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros/psicologia , Padrões de Prática em Enfermagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde/etnologia , Estudos Transversais , Coleta de Dados , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Genética/educação , Genômica/educação , Humanos , Internet , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Grupos Minoritários/estatística & dados numéricos , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisa em Avaliação de Enfermagem , Adulto JovemRESUMO
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.mnl.2020.08.001.].
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study focused on the relationship between RNs' perceptions of drivers of engagement and their workplace engagement. BACKGROUND: In multiple studies, mostly not in healthcare, researchers found that employees engaged in their work are in the minority. This phenomenon is referred to as the engagement gap. METHODS: Drivers of engagement and levels of nurse engagement were measured among 510 RNs from a large urban academic university center. RESULTS: The greatest difference between engaged and not-engaged nurses was in the manager action index; the smallest difference was in the salary and benefits index. The passion-for-nursing index was the only significant driver related to RN levels of engagement when controlling for all the other drivers. CONCLUSION: Nurse managers play a critical role in promoting employee engagement. The nurses' passion for nursing is an important dimension of engagement. Salary and benefits were not primary drivers in employee engagement.
Assuntos
Motivação , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/psicologia , Cultura Organizacional , Administração de Recursos Humanos em Hospitais , Análise Fatorial , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Análise Multivariada , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Even before the current pandemic, the nurse leader (NL) role was demanding of time, energy, and resources. These demands often cause stress, fatigue, and burnout. The focused-on outcome metrics, increased regulations, and economic downturn are challenges that NLs have continued to face. This study, undertaken before the pandemic, provides understanding of the professional quality of life and work engagement among NLs. Findings revealed that experienced NLs with doctorates have higher levels of compassion satisfaction and engagement, and have lowest levels of burnout and secondary traumatic stress. Minimizing compassion fatigue among NLs is imperative as they foster organizational cultures of compassion and engagement. Future research post-pandemic is recommended, especially as the demands have increased significantly.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Prevalence, incidence, and factors associated with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms at follow-up among healthcare workers after the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic are unknown. METHODS: A web survey invitation was sent to healthcare worker listservs at a NYC medical center (April, 2020). The Primary Care (PC)-PTSD questionnaire was used to screen for PTSD symptoms at baseline and then every 2 weeks for 10 weeks. Incidence and prevalence of PTSD symptoms were determined at each time point. Multivariable generalized estimating equation models were performed to investigate the factors associated with a positive PC-PTSD screen at follow-up. RESULTS: Median age (interquartile range) of N = 230 participants was 36 (31-48) years; 79.6% were women; 82.6% worked in COVID-19-focused settings. The prevalence of PTSD symptoms decreased from 55.2% at baseline to 25.0% at 10 weeks (p < 0.001). Among participants who had a baseline negative screen for PTSD symptoms, the incidence of PTSD at 10 weeks was 12.2% (p-trend 0.034). In multivariable-adjusted analyses, being a nurse (odds ratio [OR]: 1.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-2.71), female (OR: 3.00, 95% CI: 1.59, 5.72), and working in a COVID-19-focused location (OR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.02, 2.21) were associated with increased odds of PTSD symptoms at 10-weeks. CONCLUSIONS: PTSD symptoms improved over 3 months following the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, one out of four NYC healthcare workers still had an increased risk for PTSD at 10-weeks. Screening healthcare workers for PTSD symptoms should be considered during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Incidência , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Prevalência , SARS-CoV-2 , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The mental health toll of COVID-19 on healthcare workers (HCW) is not yet fully described. We characterized distress, coping, and preferences for support among NYC HCWs during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional web survey of physicians, advanced practice providers, residents/fellows, and nurses, conducted during a peak of inpatient admissions for COVID-19 in NYC (April 9th-April 24th 2020) at a large medical center in NYC (n = 657). RESULTS: Positive screens for psychological symptoms were common; 57% for acute stress, 48% for depressive, and 33% for anxiety symptoms. For each, a higher percent of nurses/advanced practice providers screened positive vs. attending physicians, though housestaff's rates for acute stress and depression did not differ from either. Sixty-one percent of participants reported increased sense of meaning/purpose since the COVID-19 outbreak. Physical activity/exercise was the most common coping behavior (59%), and access to an individual therapist with online self-guided counseling (33%) garnered the most interest. CONCLUSIONS: NYC HCWs, especially nurses and advanced practice providers, are experiencing COVID-19-related psychological distress. Participants reported using empirically-supported coping behaviors, and endorsed indicators of resilience, but they also reported interest in additional wellness resources. Programs developed to mitigate stress among HCWs during the COVID-19 pandemic should integrate HCW preferences.