Lidocaine spray vs mepivacaine local infiltration for suturing 1st/2nd grade perineal lacerations: a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Perineal lacerations are a very common complication of post-partum. Usually, the repair of 1st and 2nd-grade lacerations is performed after the administration of local anesthesia. Despite the great relevance of the problem, there are only a few studies about the best choice of local anesthetic to use during suturing. We performed a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the use of a local anesthetic spray during the suturing of perineal lacerations in the post-partum. METHODS: We compared the spray with the standard technique, which involves the infiltration of lacerated tissues, using the NRS scale. 136 eligible women who had given birth at University Hospital of Udine were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive nebulization of Lidocaine hydrochloride 10% spray (experimental group) or subcutaneous/submucosal infiltration of mepivacaine hydrochloride (control group) during suturing of perineal laceration. RESULTS: The lacerations included 84 1st-grade perineal traumas (61.7%) and 52 2nd-grade perineal traumas (38.2%). All the procedures were successfully completed without severe complications or serious adverse reactions. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of blood losses or total procedure time. Moreover, there were no statistically significant differences in terms of NRS to none of the intervals considered. Regarding the application of the spray in the B group, in 36 cases (52.9%) it was necessary to improve the number of puffs previously supposed to be sufficient (5 puffs). Just in 3 cases, an additional injection was necessary (4.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that lidocaine spray alone can be used as a first line of local anesthetic during the closure of I-II-grade perineal lacerations, as it has comparable efficacy to mepivacaine infiltration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was recorded on https://clinicaltrials.gov . Identification number: NCT05201313. First registration date: 21/01/2022. Unique Protocol ID: 0042698/P/GEN/ARCS.

Is antiarrhythmic therapy safe in twin pregnancies?

AIM: The optimal treatment for foetal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in twin pregnancies is unclear because of the possible impact on the second twin. This review compared a foetus we treated with antiarrhythmic drugs with the previous case studies. METHODS: Our case was a dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy, where one twin developed foetal hydrops secondary to SVT at 22 weeks of gestation. We searched PubMed to look for previous cases of SVT in twin pregnancies. RESULTS: Treatment with transplacental antiarrhythmic therapy from 22 to 36 weeks of gestation successfully resolved the SVT in our affected twin without any impact on the healthy twin or mother. We only found seven similar cases of SVT in twin pregnancies from 1999 to 2017. Although there was no consensus on the treatment that should be provided, none of the studies reported side effects in the twins or the mothers. CONCLUSION: Despite a lack of data on SVT in twin pregnancies, our case, and the previous cases we identified, allowed us to conclude that transplacental antiarrhythmic treatment can successfully achieve cardioversion in the affected twin. It can do this without side effects for the healthy foetus or the mother, even if the treatment lasts for a long period of time.