Simplification and Multidimensional Adaptation of the Stratification Tool for Pharmaceutical Care in People Living With HIV.

BACKGROUND: People living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) require specific pharmaceutical care (PC). Although the 2017 Capacity-Motivation-Opportunity (CMO) PC model allows a multidisciplinary approach that focuses on patient needs, it is too complex and presents room for improvement. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to simplify and adapt the previous 2017 PC tool through a multidimensional approach to improve HIV patient care, to prove the validity of the model in real-life patients. METHODS: The new PC tool was generated by keeping some of the variables of the 2017 document and conducting a literature search. Content validity was determined by a 2-round Delphi methodology with an expert panel of 42 pharmacists. Consensus for the first and second rounds was defined as ≥70% agreement. The tool generated was validated in 407 real-life patients. RESULTS: Thirty-seven experts completed the first round of the Delphi survey and 36 the second. No consensus was reached for 3 variables, any of the frequency options and 4 interventions, while the experts agreed not to include 1 intervention in round 1. Consensus to include them was found for all but 1 variable and 1 intervention in round 2. The final tool obtained to select and stratify HIV-positive patients was composed of 9 dimensions divided into 17 variables. The new tool was validated with real-life patients and 3 priority levels were defined. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: We created a new pyramid of score thresholds to classify patients into priority levels. The new tool simplifies the 2017 model and improves its utility to help HIV-positive patients, owing to its multidimensional approach.

Post-COVID-19 syndrome. SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in plasma, stool, and urine in patients with persistent symptoms after COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of knowledge on the long-term outcome in patients diagnosed with COVID-19. We describe a cohort of patients with a constellation of symptoms occurring four weeks after diagnosis causing different degrees of reduced functional capacity. Although different hypothesis have been proposed to explain this condition like persistent immune activation or immunological dysfunction, to date, no physiopathological mechanism has been identified. Consequently, there are no therapeutic options besides symptomatic treatment and rehabilitation. METHODS: We evaluated patients with symptoms that persisted for at least 4 weeks after COVID-19. Epidemiological and clinical data were collected. Blood tests, including inflammatory markers, were conducted, and imaging studies made if deemed necessary. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in plasma, stool, and urine were performed. Patients were offered antiviral treatment (compassionate use). RESULTS: We evaluated 29 patients who reported fatigue, muscle pain, dyspnea, inappropriate tachycardia, and low-grade fever. Median number of days from COVID-19 to positive RT-PCR in extra-respiratory samples was 55 (39-67). Previous COVID-19 was mild in 55% of the cases. Thirteen patients (45%) had positive plasma RT-PCR results and 51% were positive in at least one RT-PCR sample (plasma, urine, or stool). Functional status was severely reduced in 48% of the subjects. Eighteen patients (62%) received antiviral treatment. Improvement was seen in most patients (p = 0.000) and patients in the treatment group achieved better outcomes with significant differences (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of COVID-19 patients with persistent symptoms, 45% of them have detectable plasma SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Our results indicate possible systemic viral persistence in these patients, who may benefit of antiviral treatment strategies.

Dolutegravir-Based Dual Therapies in HIV Pretreated Patients: A Real-Life Study in Madrid.

BACKGROUND: Few studies describe the use of dolutegravir (DTG)-based dual therapies under routine clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: To report real-life data on the use of DTG-based dual therapies in treatment-experienced patients. METHODS: This was an observational, retrospective study. It included all treatment-experienced HIV patients starting a DTG-based dual therapy from 2014 to 2018. The primary end point was to identify the incidence and reasons for the switch. The secondary end points were to assess the effectiveness, safety, adherence, and costs after 48 weeks of treatment (W48). RESULTS: The incidence of the switch to a DTG-based dual therapy increased from 1.6 patients per 1000 patient-years in 2014 to 38.6 in 2018. A total of 241 patients initiated this therapy: 113 (46.9%) patients started DTG plus rilpivirine (RPV), 72 (29.9%), DTG plus lamivudine (3TC), and 68 (28.2%), DTG plus boosted-darunavir (b-DRV). A total of 170 patients completed W48 of follow-up. By intention-to-treat analysis, 89.3% of virologically suppressed (VS) patients (94.3% with DTG plus b-DRV, 91.3% with DTG plus 3TC, and 87.2% with DTG plus RPV) and 56.7% of non-VS patients (71.4% with DTG plus RPV and 52.2% with DTG plus b-DRV) achieved a viral load <50 copies/mL at W48. The protocol-defined virological failure was 6.5%. Overall, 8.8% of patients had early discontinuation. The annual cost increased by €800 per patient ($916). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The use of DTG-based dual therapies has increased in real life, showing a favorable effectiveness and safety profile. Treatment costs increased, except for the switch to DTG plus 3TC.

A retrospective cohort of invasive fusariosis in the era of antimould prophylaxis.

Mould-active prophylaxis is affecting the epidemiology of invasive mycoses in the form of a shift toward less common entities such as fusariosis. We analyze the characteristics of invasive fusariosis and its association to antifungal prophylaxis in a retrospective cohort (2004-2017) from a tertiary hospital in Madrid, Spain. Epidemiological, clinical, microbiological, and antifungal consumption data were retrieved. Isolates were identified to molecular level, and antifungal susceptibility was tested. Eight cases of invasive fusariosis were diagnosed. Three periods were identified according to incidence: <2008 (three cases), 2008-2013 (zero cases), >2014 (five cases). All except one case involved breakthrough fusariosis. During the earliest period, the episodes occurred while the patient was taking itraconazole (two) or fluconazole (one); more recently, while on micafungin (three) or posaconazole (one). Early cases involved acute leukemia at induction/consolidation, recent cases relapsed/refractory disease (P = .029). Main risk factor for fusariosis (62.5%) was prolonged neutropenia (median 44 days). Galactomannan and beta-D-glucan were positive in 37.5% and 100% of cases, respectively. All isolates except F. proliferatum presented high minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) against the azoles and lower MIC to amphotericin B. Most patients received combined therapy. Mortality at 42 days was 62.5%. Resolution of neutropenia was associated with survival (P = .048). Invasive fusariosis occurs as breakthrough infection in patients with hematologic malignancy, prolonged neutropenia, and positive fungal biomarkers. Recent cases were diagnosed in a period of predominant micafungin use in patients who had more advanced disease and protracted neutropenia and for whom mortality was extremely high. Resolution of neutropenia was a favorable prognostic factor.

Effectiveness, Safety, and Costs of Dolutegravir/Abacavir/Lamivudine Single-Tablet Regimen in a Real-Life Cohort of HIV-1 Adult Infected Patients.

Background: Real-life data on single-tablet regimen (STR) dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine (DTG/ABC/3TC) is scarce, and concerns about DTG neuropsychiatric adverse events (NP-AEs) have recently arisen. Objective: To explore the effectiveness and safety, in particular NP-AEs, of DTG/ABC/3TC in a cohort of HIV-1 adult infected patients. Pill burden, adherence to this STR, and the impact of switching on costs were also evaluated. Methods: This was an observational, retrospective study. The study population included antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive and treatment-experienced (TE) patients who started DTG/ABC/3TC between February 1, 2016, and October 31, 2016. Effectiveness and safety were analyzed at week 48 (W48) by intention-to-treat analysis. The Cox regression model was used to investigate predictors of DTG/ABC/3TC discontinuation. Results: A total of 253 patients were included (44 ART naïve, 209 TE). At W48, the proportion of patients with virological suppression was 72.7% (95% CI = 58.4-87.0) in ART-naive patients, 85.6% (95% CI = 80.3-90.9) in previously suppressed TE patients, and 86.4% (95% CI = 65.1-97.1) in previously not suppressed TE patients. The rate of protocol-defined virological failure was 4.3%. The incidence of AEs was higher in the subgroup of ART-naive patients (56.1% vs 39.0%), with a rate of interruptions for this reason of 13.6% and 7.6%, respectively. The incidence of NP-AEs was 20.6%, with 3.9% of patients requiring discontinuation. Patients who had switched from a raltegravir-containing regimen discontinued DTG/ABC/3TC because of AEs more frequently (relative risk = 2.83; 95% CI = 1.04-7.72; P = 0.041) in the multivariate analysis. After switching to DTG/ABC/3TC, the median pill burden was reduced from 3 to 1 and the proportion of patients with an adherence <90%, from 20.1% to 12.0%. The annual per-patient ART costs increased by €48 (0.6% increase). Conclusion and Relevance: DTG/ABC/3TC is an effective strategy as first-line and switching ART. Our data suggest a worse tolerance in ART-naive patients, although the rate of discontinuation resulting from NP-AEs was relatively low. In the short-term, the adherence was slightly improved without significant changes in costs.

Repeated antifungal use audits are essential for selecting the targets for intervention in antifungal stewardship.

A previous audit to assess the quality of antifungal use was performed in our hospital in 2011. After 5 years of antifungal stewardship program (AFS), we performed a follow-up audit in order to describe the long-term effect of such program. Using a predefined score, we evaluated the antifungal use in 100 consecutive adult inpatients receiving systemic antifungals. Results of the present audit were compared with those of a previous one, performed in 2011, before the implementation of our AFS. After 5 years, AFS program has induced a change in the population who received antifungal drugs in our hospital with a reduction in medical patients and a relative higher prescription among hematological ones. As for indications, empirical use decreased very significantly (from 62 to 30%, p < 0.001), while tailored treatment (from 20 to 41%, p = 0.001) and prophylaxis (from 15 to 27%, p = 0.03) increased. Compared to 2011, we also observed an improvement in the optimal choice of antifungal drug, route of administration, and microbiological adjustment. However, no significant improvement was observed regarding adequacy of length of therapy or optimal dosage or administration route. Although we observed an increase in the number of optimal DOTs used, the potential estimated savings continued to be high (~ €44,199 for every 100 patients receiving antifungals). Our study is the first to show the impact on the use of antifungal drugs exerted by a prolonged non-coercive AFS program. We also demonstrate the utility of a periodic audit of antifungal use in order to point out new goals for future interventions.

Effectiveness, Safety, and Costs of a Treatment Switch to Dolutegravir Plus Rilpivirine Dual Therapy in Treatment-Experienced HIV Patients.

BACKGROUND: Evidence about the use of dolutegravir (DTG) and rilpivirine (RPV) as an antiretroviral therapy (ART) in treatment-experienced patients is scarce. OBJECTIVE: To explore the effectiveness, safety, and costs of switching to a DTG plus RPV regimen in this population. METHODS: This observational, prospective study included all treatment-experienced patients who switched to DTG plus RPV between November 2014 and July 2016. Patients were excluded if resistance mutations to integrase inhibitors or RPV were found. The effectiveness endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved virological suppression (viral load [VL] <50 copies/mL) at week 48 (W48). Safety (incidence of adverse events leading to discontinuation and laboratory abnormalities), adherence, and costs were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients were included, and 91.4% were virologically suppressed at baseline. Patients were treated with ART for a median of 14 years (interquartile range = 7-20). At W48, 91.4% of patients were virologically suppressed (95% CI = 77.0-98.2). Two of the 3 patients not suppressed at baseline achieved undetectable VL at W48, and 2 patients discontinued DTG plus RPV (intolerance and a drug-drug interaction). None of the virologically suppressed patients at baseline showed virological rebound through W48. There were no significant changes in lipid, liver, and renal profiles. The proportion of patients with an ART adherence >90% increased from 65.6% to 93.8% ( P = 0.004). The annual per-patient ART costs dropped by €665 ( P = 0.265). CONCLUSIONS: Switching to DTG plus RPV seems to be an effective and safe strategy. Significant improvements in patients' adherence and costs were achieved.

Improving pharmacotherapy outcomes in patients with hepatitis C virus infection treated with direct-acting antivirals: The GRUviC project.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Pharmaceutical care is needed in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients treated with direct-acting antivirals (DAA). We describe the implementation of a comprehensive pharmaceutical care programme (CPCP) for HCV-infected patients treated with DAA in a tertiary-care hospital and provide data about health outcomes and costs. METHODS: Quasi-experimental study between 1 April 2015 and 30 June 2016. A group of hospital pharmacists collaborating on HCV infection implemented interventional measures for validation of drug prescriptions, detection of clinically relevant drug-drug interactions and adverse drug events (ADEs), and patient education. Quality, health and cost-effectiveness outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 1070 patients were enrolled. Pharmacists made 327 interventions that led to the prevention of 299 (91.4%) medication errors, 16 of which were grade G-H (NCC MERP classification). The main reasons for the pharmacist's intervention were management of 143 drug-drug interactions. The overall sustained virologic response at week 12 posttreatment (SVR12) rate was 93.0% (95% CI 91.4-94.6). The SVR12 was higher than 90.0% in all populations, except in genotype 3 patients (86.0%, 95% CI 78.7-93.9), decompensated cirrhotic patients (81.1%, 95% CI 69.7-92.6) and transplant recipients (86.8%, 95% CI 76.7-96.9). ADEs occurred in 85.5% of the study patients, but only 1.0% (11 patients) experienced an ADE that led to premature discontinuation. The total cost of treatment was €18 279 225 (€17 083 per patient). The most cost-effective treatment was selected in 93.1% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a CPCP developed by hospital pharmacists in patients treated with DAAs for HCV infection is an effective approach that improves patient safety and education. The active involvement of the pharmacist in improving adherence to local guidelines promoted the selection of the most cost-effective treatment in the majority of cases.

Switching to a rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir single-tablet regimen in RNA-suppressed patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus 1: Effectiveness, safety and costs at 96 weeks.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates the effectiveness, safety and costs of switching to a rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (RPV/FTC/TDF) regimen in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients with sustained virological suppression. METHODS: Observational, prospective study. Study population included all treatment-experienced patients with sustained virological suppression who switched to RPV/FTC/TDF during 2013 in a tertiary hospital. Patients were followed until they completed 96 weeks of treatment. The effectiveness end-point was defined as the proportion of patients who maintained virological suppression at week 96 by intention-to-treat analysis (discontinuation=failure). The safety of RPV/FTC/TDF (incidence of adverse events leading to discontinuation and laboratory abnormalities) and adherence to this regimen were evaluated, and the cost of switching was analysed. RESULTS: One-hundred forty-six patients were included. At week 96, 71.9% of patients remained virologically suppressed; 6.8% experienced virological failure. During follow-up, 25.3% of patients discontinued RPV/FTC/TDF (14.4% because of adverse events, mainly renal impairment). Throughout the 96 weeks, there were significant decreases in total cholesterol (TC) (14.0 mg/dL, P<.001), TC/HDL cholesterol ratio (0.4 mg/dL, P=.019) and triglycerides (42.0 mg/dL, P<.001). A slight decrease in glomerular filtration rate was observed (4.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 , P<.001). Switching to RPV/FTC/TDF improved adherence in the subgroup of patients whose previous treatment was based on a twice-daily schedule, although differences did not reach statistical significance. Switching to RPV/FTC/TDF reduced the annual per-patient antiretroviral cost by €1744 (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: In virologically suppressed patients, the switch to a RPV/FTC/TDF regimen was associated with a mild but maintained improvement in lipid parameters and a significant reduction in costs. However, the relatively high rates of virological failure and treatment discontinuation because of adverse events make this combination a less favourable choice over other regimens currently available.

Effectiveness and Safety of Ombitasvir-Paritaprevir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir With or Without Ribavirin for HCV Genotype 1 Infection for 12 Weeks Under Routine Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: No previous studies exist examining the effectiveness and safety in real clinical practice of the combination of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir (OBV/PTV/r+DSV). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety in real clinical practice of the combination of OBV/PTV/r+DSV with or without ribavirin for 12 weeks in treatment-naïve and previously treated adult patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection. METHODS: This was an observational study of a prospective cohort of treatment-naïve and pretreated adult patients who received 12 weeks of OBV/PTV/r (25/150/100 mg once daily) and DSV (250 mg twice daily) with or without ribavirin. The primary effectiveness outcome was sustained virological response 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12). Safety outcomes were presented by the incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 116 of 121 patients achieved a SVR12 (95.9%, 95% CI = 90.6-98.6). The SVR12 rate was 93.8% (95% CI = 86.0-97.9) in cirrhotic patients and 100% (95% CI = 91.4-100.0) in noncirrhotic patients. Adverse events occurred in 91.7% of patients, of which 81.8% were grade 1/2, and none led to premature discontinuation. Grade 3 adverse events were reported in 9.9% of patients. The most frequent adverse event was anemia (52.1%), although only 1.6% had a hemoglobin level below 8 g/dL. The incidence of any adverse event was higher in the group of patients who received ribavirin (96.5% vs 80.0%, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of OBV/PTV/r+DSV with or without ribavirin for 12-week settings achieved a high rate of SVR12, with an acceptable safety profile in routine clinical care.

Prevalence of Hypothyroidism and Its Association with Diabetes Mellitus in Patients of an Ambulatory Clinic.

Hypothyroidism is the most common thyroid disorder in the adult population. Studies have found a higher prevalence of overt hypothyroidism in type 2 diabetic population than in the general population, but the relationship between subclinical hypothyroidism and diabetes mellitus 2 is still controversial. The aim of this study is to estimate the prevalence rate of hypothyroidism in the adult population receiving services in an ambulatory clinic and to determine if there is an association between hypothyroidism and diabetes mellitus. From the database of all adult patients who attended the outpatient clinic at Family Medicine Center Policlínica Bella Vista in Mayagüez, P.R. during 2014, a random sample of 200 subjects was obtained and the medical records were reviewed. The prevalence rate of diabetes mellitus in this group was 22% and the prevalence rate of hypothyroidism was 17%. The prevalence rate of hypothyroidism in diabetic patients was 10/44 (22.7%). The prevalence rate of hypothyroidism in non-diabetic patients was 24/156 (15.4%). The prevalence ratio was 1.48 (95% CI: 0.77, 2.85; X2 = 1.31, p = 0.25). The results of this cross-sectional study showed a non-statistically significant tendency for a higher prevalence of hypothyroidism in diabetic patients, which suggest that screening for hypothyroidism among patients with diabetes should be considered. More studies with more patients are necessary to investigate the association between thyroid dysfunction and diabetic patients.

Training should be the first step toward an antifungal stewardship program.

The frequency of use of systemic antifungal agents has increased significantly in most tertiary centers. However, antifungal stewardship has received very little attention. The objective of this article was to assess the knowledge of prescribing physicians in our institution as a first step in the development of an antifungal stewardship program. Attending physicians from the departments that prescribe most antifungals were invited to complete a questionnaire based on current guidelines on diagnosis and therapy of invasive candidiasis and invasive aspergillosis (IA). The survey was completed by 60.8% (200/329) of the physicians who were invited to participate. The physicians belonged to the following departments: medical (60%), pediatric (19%), intensive care (15.5%), and surgical (5.5%). The mean (±SD) score of correct responses was 5.16±1.73. In the case of candidiasis, only 55% of the physicians clearly distinguished between colonization and infection, and 17.5% knew the local rate of fluconazole resistance. Thirty-three percent knew the accepted indications for antifungal prophylaxis, and 23% the indications for empirical therapy. However, most physicians knew which antifungals to choose when starting empirical therapy (73.5%). As for aspergillosis, most physicians (67%) could differentiate between colonization and infection, and 34.5% knew the diagnostic value of galactomannan. The radiological features of IA were well recognized by 64%, but only 31.5% were aware of the first line of treatment for IA, and 36% of the recommended duration of therapy. The usefulness of antifungal levels was known by 67%. This simple, easily completed questionnaire enabled us to identify which areas of our training strategy could be improved.

[Cost-effectiveness and safety of telaprevir and boceprevir for chronic hepatitis C in real-world clinical practice]. / Coste-efectividad y seguridad de telaprevir y boceprevir para el tratamiento de la hepatitis C crónica en la práctica clínica.

INTRODUCTION: Triple therapy with telaprevir or boceprevir has proven to be effective in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C with response rates of up to 88%. However, the treatment may be associated with important adverse effects and a high economic impact. OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness and safety of triple therapy with telaprevir or boceprevir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: Retrospective observational study. We included all patients who had started treatment with protease inhibitors before July 31(st), 2013. We evaluated sustained virological response, the cost per patient achieving sustained virological response, and the cost of the supportive treatment for adverse events associated with triple therapy. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were included; 35 had been treated with telaprevir (59.3%) and 24 with boceprevir (40.7%). Sustained virological response was achieved by 38 (64.4%) patients: 24 (68.6%) patients in the telaprevir treatment arm and 14 (58.3%) patients in the boceprevir treatment arm. The cost per patient with sustained virological response was 43,555 € (95% CI 35,389-51,722 €). There were no statistically significant differences between the overall costs of therapy with telaprevir, 43,494 € (95% CI 34,795 €-55,092 €) versus boceprevir, 42,005 € (95% CI 32,122-64,243€). The mean cost of supportive care per patient was 1,500 €, while the maximum cost was 11,374 €. Due to adverse events, 8 (13.6%) patients required hospital admission, 22 (37.3%) patients attended the accident and emergency department, and 26 (44.1%) patients needed additional medical consultations. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of triple therapy with telaprevir or boceprevir resulted in high cost per patient with sustained virological response. Due to adverse events, a high number of patients required supportive care, whose costs should be added to those of triple therapy.

Evaluation of antifungal use in a tertiary care institution: antifungal stewardship urgently needed.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the quality of antifungal use, to propose a point score for this evaluation and to estimate the potential economic savings of an antifungal stewardship programme. METHODS: From December 2010 to January 2011, we identified 100 adult inpatients receiving systemic antifungals. Antifungal use was evaluated by means of a predefined score that considered indication, drug selection, dosage, adjustments after microbiology results, switching to an oral agent and length of treatment. Total antifungal prescriptions [in defined daily doses (DDDs) and days of therapy (DOTs)] and potential cost savings were calculated. RESULTS: Overall, 43% of prescriptions came from medical departments, 25% from haematology/oncology and 17% from intensive care units. The main reasons for starting antifungals were empirical (42%), pre-emptive (20%) and targeted treatment (20%). Antifungals were unnecessary in 16% of cases. Inadequacies in other aspects of antifungal prescription were: drug selection, 31%; dosing, 16%; no switch from intravenous to oral administration, 20%; no adjustment after microbiological results, 35%; and length of therapy, 27%. The number of antifungal DDDs per 1000 patient-days was 65.1. The total number of DOTs was 1556, which added a direct cost of €219 364. Only 51.3% of DOTs were considered optimal. The potential estimated savings would be €50 536. CONCLUSIONS: Major efforts should be made to improve the selection and duration of antifungal therapy. Our study demonstrated the potential cost savings that could be achieved by optimizing antifungal therapy. A stewardship programme should include an instrument to objectively evaluate the adequacy of antifungal use.

Effects of a pharmacist designed clinical decision support system on antimicrobial stewardship.

Background Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are computer applications, which can be applied to give guidance to practitioners in antimicrobial stewardship (AS) activities, however, further information is needed for their optimal use. Objectives To analyze the implementation of a CDSS program in a primary-care hospital, describing alerts, recommendations, and the effect on consumption and clinical outcomes. Methods In October 2020, a pharmacist-driven CDSS designed for AS was implemented in a second-level hospital. The program provides a list of alerts related to antimicrobial treatment and microbiology, which were automatized for revision by the AS professionals. To analyze the implementation of the CDSS, a pre-post intervention, retrospective study was designed. AS triggered alerts and recommendations (total number and rate of acceptance) were compiled. The effect of the CDSS was measured using antimicrobial consumption, duration of antimicrobial treatments, in-hospital mortality and length of stay (LOS) for patients admitted for infectious causes. Results The AS team revised a total of 7,543 alerts and 772 patients had at least one recommendation, with an acceptance rate of 79.3%. Antimicrobial consumption decreased from 691.1 to 656.8 daily defined doses (DDD)/1,000 beds-month (P = 0.04) and the duration of antimicrobial treatment from 3.6 to 3.3 days (P <0.01). In-hospital mortality decreased from 6.6% to 6.2% (P=0.46) and mean LOS from 7.2 to 6.2 days (P<0.01) Conclusion The implementation of a CDSS resulted in a significant reduction of antimicrobial DDD, duration of antimicrobial treatments and hospital LOS. There was no significant difference in mortality.

Agreement between pharmacists and physicians on the assessment of appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing.

INTRODUCTION: Audits for monitoring the quality of antimicrobial prescribing are a main tool in antimicrobial stewardship programs; however, interobserver reliability has not been conclusively assessed. Our objective was to measure the level of agreement between pharmacists and physicians on the appropriateness of antimicrobials prescribing in hospitals. METHODS: A national multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted of patients who were receiving antimicrobials one day of April 2021. Hospital participation was voluntary, and the study population was randomly selected. Pharmacists and physicians performed a simultaneous, independent assessment of the quality of antimicrobial prescriptions. The observers used an assessment method by which all indicators of the quality of antimicrobial use were considered. Finally, an algorithm was used to rate overall antimicrobial prescribing as appropriate, suboptimal, inappropriate, or not assessable. Gwet's AC1 coefficient was used to assess interobserver agreement. RESULTS: In total, 101 hospitals participated, and 411 hospital antimicrobial prescriptions were reviewed. The strength of agreement was moderate regarding the overall quality of prescribing (AC1=0.51; 95%CI=[0.44-0.58]). A very good level of agreement (AC1>0.80) was observed between pharmacists and physicians in all indicators of the quality, except for duration of treatment, rated as good (AC1=0.79; 95%CI=[0.75-0.83]), and registration on the medical record, rated as fair (AC1=0.34; 95%CI=[0.26-0.43]). The agreement was greater in critical care, onco-hematology, and pediatric units than in medical and surgery units. CONCLUSIONS: In this point prevalence study, a moderate level of agreement was observed between pharmacists and physicians in the evaluation of the appropriateness of antimicrobials prescribing in hospitals.

Remdesivir and SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies to prevent COVID-19 progression in hematological patients: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hematological malignancies (HM) are at high risk of COVID-19 progression. Hence, early treatments to prevent progression are needed. The aim of our work was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of remdesivir (RDV) and SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) in patients with HM and mild-to-moderate disease in real clinical practice. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in a tertiary hospital in 55 HM patients with mild-to-moderate SARS-CoV-2 disease diagnosed between August 2021 and July 2022 and who received RDV or mAb to prevent COVID-19 progression (related death or hospitalization). The primary endpoint was COVID-19 progression on day 28. Other outcomes were COVID-19 progression beyond day 28 and viral load evolution. RESULTS: RDV was administered to 44 (80.0%) patients and mAb to 11 (20.0%) patients. Death occurred in 1 (1.8%) patient and hospitalization in 9 (16.4%) patients by day 28, respectively; 3 patients (5.5%) required intensive care and 8 (14.5%), oxygen support. Of note, 5 additional patients [15, (27.3%) in total] died or required hospitalization after day 28. Two hazard Cox regression models yielded the absence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, age over 65 years, and ECOG-performance status ≥ 2 as the main risk factors for COVID-19-related death or hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Our results from clinical practice suggest that RDV and SARS-CoV-2 mAb therapies elicit worse outcomes in hematological patients than those reported for high-risk population in clinical trials.