An examination of negative one-star patient reviews for foot and ankle orthopedic surgery: A retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Despite the questionable validity of online-based physician review websites (PRWs), negative reviews can adversely affect a provider's practice. Several investigations have explored the effect of extremely negative "one-star" reviews across subspecialties such as adult reconstruction, sports medicine, and orthopaedic traumatology; however, to date, no study has explored one-star reviews in foot and ankle surgery. The goal of this study was to characterize factors that contribute to extremely negative, one-star reviews for foot and ankle surgeons on Vitals.com. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of negative one-star reviews with corresponding patient complaints for foot and ankle surgeons (both orthopaedic surgeons as well as podiatrists) in the United States. Physicians included were selected within a 10-mile radius of the top ten largest cities in the United States. Data was stratified by patient type (e.g., those receiving surgery and those not undergoing surgical intervention) and binned according to type of patient complaint, as previously described. RESULTS: Of the 2645 foot and ankle surgeons identified in our initial query, 13.8% of surgeons contained one-star reviews eligible for analysis. Patient complaints related to bedside manner and patient experience are the causative factors accounting for 41.5% of the one-star reviews of foot and ankle surgeons for nonsurgical-related complaints. Surgical complications and other outcomes-related factors comprised roughly 50% of the complaints related to surgical patients. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, complaints related to bedside manner and patient experience are the causative factors accounting for 41.5% of the one-star reviews of foot and ankle surgeons for nonsurgical-related complaints. Surgical complications and other outcomes-related factors comprised roughly half of the complaints related to surgery. This data serves to inform practicing foot and ankle surgeons as to the influences behind patients leaving extremely negative reviews on PRWs. LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE: IV.

Efficacy of manual therapy for sacroiliac joint pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

INTRODUCTION: This study examined the efficacy of manual therapy for pain and disability measures in adults with sacroiliac joint pain syndrome (SIJPS). METHODS: We searched six databases, including gray literature, on 24 October 2023, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining sacroiliac joint (SIJ) manual therapy outcomes via pain or disability in adults with SIJPS. We evaluated quality via the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale and certainty via Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Standardized mean differences (SMDs) in post-treatment pain and disability scores were pooled using random-effects models in meta-regressions. RESULTS: We included 16 RCTs (421 adults; mean age = 37.7 years), with 11 RCTs being meta-analyzed. Compared to non-manual physiotherapy (i.e. exercise ± passive modalities; 10 RCTs) or sham (1 RCT) interventions, SIJ manual therapy did not significantly reduce pain (SMD: -0.88; 95%-CI: -1.84; 0.08, p = 0.0686) yet had a statistically significant moderate effect in reducing disability (SMD: -0.67; 95% CI: -1.32; -0.03, p = 0.0418). The superiority of individual manual therapies was unclear due to low sample size, wide confidence intervals for effect estimates, and inability to meta-analyze five RCTs with a unique head-to-head design. RCTs were of 'good' (56%) or 'fair' (44%) quality, and heterogeneity was high. Certainty was very low for pain and low for disability outcomes. CONCLUSION: SIJ manual therapy appears efficacious for improving disability in adults with SIJPS, while its efficacy for pain is uncertain. It is unclear which specific manual therapy techniques may be more efficacious. These findings should be interpreted cautiously until further high-quality RCTs are available examining manual therapy against control groups such as exercise. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42023394326).

Comparing Outcomes After Referral to Physical Therapy for Patients With Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis Based on the Radiographic Osteoarthritis Severity: A Retrospective Analysis.

Introduction Glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) is a common cause of musculoskeletal pain (MSP) that can frequently lead to pain and functional disability in patients throughout the world. GHOA can be managed with conservative or surgical interventions, although conservative interventions, such as physical therapy (PT), are generally first-line interventions depending on the severity of GHOA. The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to examine how conventional PT impacts outcomes for patients with GHOA based on the severity of radiographic GHOA findings. Methods This study is a retrospective chart review of patients who were referred to PT for MSP and received PT in the outpatient setting between 2016 and 2022. Inclusion criteria were patients who received PT in the outpatient setting, received PT for MSP, had shoulder radiograph imaging within two years of initial PT evaluation, had more than one PT visit (i.e. attended a follow-up session after initial evaluation), and did not have a history of shoulder surgery. Primary outcome measures were pain, abduction active range-of-motion (AROM), and disability via the quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH). Patients were divided into the No GHOA group (n=104), Mild GHOA group (n=61), and Moderate/Severe GHOA group (n=55) based on the radiographic GHOA severity. Results All included patients (n=220) had a mean age of 62.2 ± 12.4 years old with a mean number of PT visits of 7.8 ± 4.5 visits. There was initially a significant difference in the magnitude of pain improvement between the three groups based on radiographic severity of GHOA (Kruskal-Wallis H=6.038; p=0.049); however, post hoc testing revealed no significant difference between any of the three groups for pain improvement (p=0.061 to p=1.000). There was also no significant difference in the magnitude of abduction AROM improvement between the three groups based on the radiographic severity of GHOA (Kruskal-Wallis H=2.887; p=0.236). Finally, there was no significant difference in the magnitude of disability improvement via the Quick DASH between the three groups based on the radiographic severity of GHOA (Kruskal-Wallis H=0.156; p=0.925). Conclusion Patients with GHOA referred to PT experience small but statistically significant short-term improvements in pain, abduction AROM, and disability regardless of GHOA radiographic severity. There is no significant association between the magnitude of clinical improvement and the severity of radiographic GHOA. However, despite statistically significant improvements in pain, only patients with mild GHOA experienced clinically significant improvements in pain. Patients with GHOA, regardless of severity, may or may not experience clinically significant improvements in disability after PT.

The McKenzie Method Is an Effective Rehabilitation Paradigm for Treating Adults With Moderate-to-Severe Neck Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

Neck pain is a common musculoskeletal condition frequently managed with numerous conservative interventions. The McKenzie method of mechanical diagnosis and therapy (MMDT) is a form of physical therapy evaluation and treatment that aims to improve pain and disability in patients with musculoskeletal pain, including neck pain. To date, no systematic review with meta-analysis has examined the use of the McKenzie MMDT for neck pain. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of the McKenzie MMDT in adult patients with neck pain. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using PubMed, ScienceDirect, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Full search terms were "McKenzie method" OR "McKenzie approach" OR "McKenzie treatment" AND "neck pain." Inclusion criteria were the use of the McKenzie MMDT, level I randomized control trials (RCTs), adults, and outcomes of pain (0-10 scale) and disability (neck disability index). A total of 11 RCTs met the final selection criteria from 1,955 articles on initial search with 289 patients receiving the McKenzie MMDT out of 677 total patients. For meta-analysis, there was a clinically insignificant but statistically significant improvement in pain (1.14/10 points) in patients receiving the McKenzie MMDT versus control interventions (p<0.02). There was no significant improvement in the neck disability index score between the McKenzie MMDT versus control interventions (p=0.19). For severity of pain, there was a clinically and statistically significant improvement in moderate or severe pain (2.06/10 points; p<0.01), but not in mild-to-moderate pain (p=0.84) when comparing the McKenzie MMDT to control interventions. Overall, the McKenzie MMDT provides very small but statistically significant improvements in neck pain of all severity compared to control interventions. However, the McKenzie MMDT does provide clinically and statistically significant pain improvement in moderate-to-severe neck pain. Use of the McKenzie MMDT did not provide any significant improvement in disability compared to control interventions. This study is the first systematic review with meta-analysis on the effectiveness of the McKenzie MMDT for adult patients with neck pain.

Clinical Outcomes Associated With the Addition of a Physical Therapist Assistant to a Rehabilitation Team When Treating Musculoskeletal Shoulder Pain in the Outpatient Setting: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Introduction Musculoskeletal shoulder pain (MSP) is a common condition frequently treated in an outpatient setting by a physical therapy rehabilitation team. Treatment teams can consist of physical therapists (PTs) with or without physical therapist assistants (PTAs). It is currently unknown how different physical therapy team compositions can impact patient outcomes in the outpatient setting. The purpose of this study is to examine how the addition of PTAs to a physical therapy treatment team would impact clinical outcomes when treating patients with MSP in the outpatient setting. Methods This study is a retrospective cohort analysis comparing clinical outcomes for pain, active range of motion (AROM), and disability for patients with MSP when treated by physical therapy treatment teams with or without the presence of PTAs. Inclusion criteria were patients treated for MSP in an outpatient physical therapy clinic without a history of shoulder surgery. Depending on the rehabilitation team composition, patients were divided into a PT-only group or a PTA group. Results Total patients (n = 238) had a mean age of 62.6 ± 12.6 years (median: 64 years) with a mean total number of physical therapy visits of 7.8 ± 4.9 visits (median: 7.0 visits). Of the entire cohort, the PT-only group had 100 patients and the PTA group had 138 patients. There was no significant difference in the magnitude of pain improvement (mean: 1.5 versus 1.9 points, p = 0.177), the magnitude of abduction AROM improvement (mean: 17.6 versus 13.9 degrees, p = 0.173), and the magnitude of disability improvement (mean: 18.9 versus 13.4 percentage points, p = 0.221) between the PT-only group and the PTA group. However, the PT-only group had significantly fewer total visits as compared to the PTA group (6.7 versus 8.6 visits, p < 0.001). Conclusion The addition of PTAs to a rehabilitation team when treating patients with MSP in the outpatient setting does not appear to adversely impact pain, AROM, or disability outcomes. However, patients treated only by PTs had significantly less visits with similar outcomes. More research is needed to determine the interplay between cost, healthcare utilization, and patient outcomes to maximize quality care.

Examining the Dimensions of the Bicipital Groove: A Human Cadaveric Study.

Introduction Understanding the mechanisms and risk factors associated with bicipital groove (BG) morphology is essential for optimizing patient outcomes. Despite interest in the topic of BG morphology, there remains a lack of clarity and consensus on the parameters of BG morphology due to significant methodological limitations in the existing research. The purpose of this study is to explore the dimensions of BG morphology with a methodology rooted in recent research findings to better understand the human anatomy, potentially underpinning various shoulder pathologies.  Methods The right shoulders of seventeen cadavers (nine male and eight female; median age of death: 88.0 years; age of death range: 66.0 - 97.0 years) were included in this cadaveric study. Dissection was done by removing the deltoid musculature and reflecting the long head of the biceps tendon to expose the BG. Measurements for BG morphology included BG width (millimeters, mm), depth (mm), and length (mm). Statistical comparisons were done between male and female measurements using the independent-samples Mann-Whitney U test due to the small sample size.  Results The median width of the BG at the narrowest point was 4.3 mm (mean: 4.7 ± 1.4 mm; range: 3.0 - 7.7 mm) with male cadavers having a significantly wider BG as compared to female cadavers (median: 5.0 mm versus 3.7 mm; p=0.006). The median depth of the BG was 5.1 mm (mean: 5.0 ± 0.7 mm; range: 3.8 - 6.3 mm) with no statistically significant difference between male and female cadavers (median: 4.8 mm versus 5.3 mm; p=0.370). The median length of the BG was 25.1 mm (mean: 25.1 ± 3.3 mm; range: 18.1 - 31.3 mm) with no statistically significant difference between male and female cadavers (median: 25.4 mm versus 23.9 mm; p=0.673). Conclusion The width of the BG at the narrowest point was significantly larger in male cadavers as compared to female cadavers in this study. However, there was no difference between male and female cadavers in terms of depth and length of the BG. This study contributes to the understanding of BG morphology by exploring the dimensions for width, depth, and length of the BG, which may contribute to biceps tendon pathology in clinical practice. Future research should focus on reducing measurement variability and exploring the possible relationship between BG morphology and biceps tendon conditions to further enhance the understanding of this complex relationship.

Merkel cell carcinoma in situ.

BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a dermal small blue-cell tumor that occurs in the elderly on the sun damaged head and neck. Epidermal involvement is unusual and MCC limited to the epidermis is very rare. CASE REPORT: A slightly tender pink hyperkeratotic papule was noted on the dorsal right hand of a 76-year-old man with a history of multiple skin cancers. An intraepidermal proliferation of small blue cells distributed in nests and single units at all levels of the epidermis was found within a solar keratosis and adjacent to an area of squamous cell carcinoma in situ. Cytokeratin 20 and neuron specific enolase highlighted these cells and failed to reveal dermal involvement. There was no residue on re-excision. CONCLUSION: We report the third case of MCC in situ. These lesions have only been reported in association with squamous neoplasms on the extremities.