In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Adult Patients Admitted to a Quaternary Children's Center.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe baseline and event characteristics and outcomes for adult patients who experience in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) in a quaternary children's hospital and compare IHCA outcomes in younger (18-24 years) versus older (≥25 years) adults. We hypothesized that the rate of survival to hospital discharge would be lower in the older adult group. METHODS: We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study of inpatient areas of a quaternary children's center. Adult patients (≥18 years of age) with an index pulseless IHCA requiring at least 1 minute of cardiopulmonary resuscitation or defibrillation were included. RESULTS: Thirty-three events met the inclusion criteria with a median patient age of 23.9 years (interquartile range, 20.2-33.3 years). Twenty-one (64%) patients had congenital heart disease, and 25 (76%) patients had comorbidities involving ≥2 organ systems. The most common prearrest interventions were invasive mechanical ventilation (76%) and vasoactive infusions (55%). Seventeen patients (52%) survived to hospital discharge.Survival to discharge was lower in patients 25 years or older compared with patients aged 18 to 24 years old (3 of 15 [20%] vs 14 of 18 [78%], respectively; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of adult patients with IHCA in our pediatric hospital had preexisting multisystem comorbidities, the most common of which was congenital heart disease. Overall survival to discharge after IHCA was 52%, similar to that reported for the general pediatric population. Survival to discharge was significantly lower in the subgroup of patients 25 years or older when compared with those between the ages of 18 and 24 years.

A Standardized Process to Determine Appropriate and Effective Placement of Automated External Defibrillators.

The new tool is an innovative, standardized method of determining the most effective placement of these necessary devices.

The implementation of PEARS training: supporting nurses in non-critical care settings to improve patient outcomes.

Children's Hospital Boston's Life Support Program began offering the newly developed American Heart Association Pediatric Emergency Assessment, Recognition and Stabilization (PEARS) course for nurses working in non-critical care settings in December of 2007. The goal was to provide an appropriate alternative to pediatric advanced life support (PALS) training for clinical staff caring for the general pediatric population. To date, more than 900 nurses have completed the course with feedback from the participants being extremely positive. Even more impressive is a more appropriate use of the hospital's emergency medical response system promoting early intervention and the significant reduction in cardiac arrests on inpatient units. During a 12-month period, nurses involved in activations of the response system were asked to rate their ability to assess, categorize, decide and act after each event. The overwhelming majority agreed they were able to apply the PEARS systematic approach of assessment and early intervention to the situation. This article describes the planning and implementation of PEARS training for non-critical care nursing staff and provides data that demonstrates improved patient outcomes. Supporting activities and strategies promoting early recognition and interventions contributing to the successful reduction of cardiac arrests on inpatient units are also discussed.