Potential Benefit of Rituximab in Rhupus Patients From a Single-Center: A Series of 16 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Rhupus syndrome is better characterized, but uncertainties remain, and therapeutic management must be defined. The objective was to analyze therapeutic procedures with a focus on biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). METHODS: This 10-year medical records review was based on diagnosis codes (rheumatoid arthritis [RA] and systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE]) and biological data (anti-CCP testing, anti-dsDNA, and anti-RNP antibodies). Patients fulfilling 2010 ACR/EULAR and 2012 SLICC and/or 2019 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for RA and SLE, respectively, were included. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were identified. Rheumatoid arthritis most often preceded rhupus, with predominant articular pattern; 11 of them had erosive arthropathy. Skin involvement was the most frequent associated manifestation (n = 12). Serious events were reported, including active glomerulonephritis (n = 3), ischemic stroke (n = 1), and myocardial infarction (n = 1). Immunological profiles showed positivity for antinuclear (n = 16), anti-dsDNA (n = 9), and anti-CCP (n = 9). Ten patients required bDMARDs. All types of RA-approved bDMARDs were used. Abatacept was considered effective in 3 of the 4 patients, with 1 primary failure, 1 secondary escape, and 2 therapeutic maintenances, whereas primary or secondary failure was observed under tocilizimub and TNF-blocking agents. Rituximab was the most prescribed (n = 9) and the most effective with a sustained response in 6 patients. CONCLUSIONS: In rhupus refractory to conventional treatment, T or B lymphocytes targeted therapies, and particularly rituximab, seem to be a relevant therapeutic option unlike anticytokine biologics.

Anti-Carbamylated Fibrinogen Antibodies Might Be Associated With a Specific Rheumatoid Phenotype and Include a Subset Recognizing In Vivo Epitopes of Its γ Chain One of Which Is Not Cross Reactive With Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibodies.

To identify the targets recognized by anti-carbamylated protein antibodies (anti-CarP) in patients with early Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), to study the cross-reactivity between anti-CarP and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) and to evaluate their prognostic value. 331 patients (184 RA and 147 other rheumatisms) from the Very Early Arthritis (VErA) French cohort were analyzed. We performed mass spectrometry analysis of RA sera displaying anti-CarP activity and epitope mapping of the carbamylated fibrinogen γ chain to identify immunodominant peptides. The specificity of these targets was studied using competition assays with the major antigens recognized by ACPA. The prognostic value of anti-carbamylated fibrinogen IgG antibodies (ACa-Fib IgG) was compared to that of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-CCP) and anti-CarP using an in-house ELISA. Besides the α chain, the γ chain of fibrinogen, particularly one immunodominant epitope that has a specific reactivity, was identified as a circulating carbamylated target in sera. The prevalence of ACa-Fib was 37% at baseline and 10.9% for anti-CCP-negative RA. In anti-CCP-negative patients, ACa-Fib positivity was associated with a more inflammatory and erosive disease at baseline but not with rapid radiological progression, which remains strongly related to anti-CCP antibodies. Fibrinogen seems to be one of the antigens recognized in vivo by the anti-CarP response, particularly 2 epitopes of the γ chain, one of which is not cross reactive with ACPA. This specificity might be associated with a distinct clinical phenotype since ACa-Fib IgG were shown to be linked to systemic inflammation in very early RA but not to rapid radiological progression.

Predictors of treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis.

The expanding array of drugs available for treating rheumatoid arthritis is creating challenges in drug selection for the individual patient. The identification of biomarkers that predict the treatment response prior to drug exposure is therefore a current priority. This new approach, known as theranostics, is a component of personalized medicine, which involves selecting the management strategies that are most effective for a given patient at a given point in time. Antibodies to citrullinated peptides, rheumatoid factor, and the interferon signature are the most robust and best validated biomarkers identified to date. Matrices containing clinical or laboratory parameters of diagnostic or prognostic relevance may help to select the best treatment for the individual patient. Furthermore, the development of large-scale approaches requiring no a priori knowledge, such as functional genomics and metabolomics, hold considerable promise, despite persistent difficulties in replicating findings. The complexity of the treatment response in a given patient and substantial variability across patients suggest that biomarkers may be more helpful in combination than singly. The objectives of this review article are to discuss the approaches used to identify theranostic biomarkers and to present an overview of currently available biomarkers and of their performance in everyday clinical practice. However, the range of biomarkers suitable for use in daily practice remains extremely narrow.

Relapse in rheumatoid arthritis patients undergoing dose reduction and withdrawal of biologics: are predictable factors more relevant than predictive parameters? An observational prospective real-life study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine predictive/predictable factors of relapse in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients undergoing biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs) dose reduction/discontinuation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: RA patients receiving the same bDMARD for more than 1 year, in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission, were selected in an observational monocentric real-life study. The 18-month follow-up included spacing (6 months) and withdrawal (12 months) periods of bDMARD. Clinical, biological and ultrasonographic (US) parameters were collected regularly. Relapse was defined by SDAI>11. RESULTS: Fifty-three RA patients (mean age: 58 years; 72% women; median duration: 11 years) were enrolled. Forty-two received anti-cytokinic bDMARD targeting tumour necrosis factor (n=39) or interleukin-6R (n=3) and 11 were treated by abatacept. The number of relapses during the spacing and discontinuation periods were 19 and 20, respectively. After 18 months of follow-up, among the 53 patients, 12 maintained bDMARD-free remission, 39 had relapsed and 2 were lost of follow-up. Median time to relapse was 11.8 months. In multivariate analysis, baseline factors predictive of relapse were corticosteroid intake, female gender, longer disease duration and no methotrexate intake with bDMARD. Concerning the survival analysis, also taking into account the factors of predictability, the main risk factor of relapse after discontinuation was an increase of SDAI >0 during the spacing period (p=0.03). US findings were not contributive. CONCLUSION: In the context of RA in remission under bDMARDs, variation of SDAI during the dose-reduction phase is more relevant than baseline parameters to predict success of drug withdrawal.