Atención farmacéutica en pacientes con inmunodeficiencia adquirida y/o tuberculosis en el área ambulatoria de un hospital pediátrico / Pharmacovigilance in patients with acquired immunodeficiency and/or tuberculosis in the outpatient area of a pediatric hospital

La Atención farmacéutica (AF) ayuda a los pacientes a alcanzar objetivos terapéuticos reduciendo los problemas relacionados al medicamento (PRM). Objetivos: analizar los PRM en la práctica de la AF a pacientes con inmunodeficiencia adquirida (IDA) y/o tuberculosis (TBC) y evaluar su impacto. Método: estudio, descriptivo, observacional, en el área ambulatoria de Farmacia. Se incluyeron pacientes con IDA y/o TBC con: inicio de tratamiento, polifarmacia, reinternaciones frecuentes, regular/mala adherencia, reacciones adversas a medicamentos (RAM) previas y/o comorbilidades. Se entrevistaron pacientes o cuidadores y se registraron PRM, errores, grados de adherencia y conocimiento farmacoterapéutico, retiro oportuno de medicamentos y parámetros clínicos. Se registró la intervención farmacéutica y entregó material educativo. Se repitieron las mediciones en una segunda entrevista. Resultados: Se estudiaron 54 pacientes (28 con IDA y 26 con TBC). Se realizaron 93 intervenciones (29.9% dirigidas al prescriptor, 27.8% a otros profesionales) y se detectaron 8 RAM y 53 errores (28 IDA y 25 TBC), el principal PRM fue la mala/regular adherencia con bajo porcentaje de conocimiento farmacoterapéutico completo. Después de la AF, en IDA el grado de adherencia tuvo una mejora estadísticamente significativa (p= 0.012), también fue significativa la mejora en el retiro oportuno de la medicación (28.6% a 71.4% p=0.005 IDA). Se obtuvieron resultados favorables de carga viral (CV) en 72% pacientes con IDA y aumento de peso en 92% pacientes con TBC, aunque no fueron estadísticamente significativos. Conclusiones: mediante AF se mejoró la adherencia y la comunicación en pacientes pediátricos con IDA y/o TBC (AU)

Pharmacovigilance (PV) helps patients achieve therapeutic goals by reducing drug-related problems (DRP). Objectives: to analyze DRPs in the practice of PV in patients with acquired immunodeficiency (AIDS) and/or tuberculosis (TB) and to evaluate its impact. Methods: A descriptive, observational study was conducted in the outpatient pharmacy area. Patients with AIDS and/or TB with: treatment initiation, polypharmacy, frequent readmissions, regular/poor adherence, previous adverse drug reactions (ADR) and/or comorbidities were included. Patients or caregivers were interviewed, and DRP, errors, adherence and pharmacotherapeutic knowledge, timely drug withdrawal, and clinical parameters were recorded. The pharmaceutical intervention was recorded and educational material was delivered. Measurements were repeated in a second interview. Results: We studied 54 patients (28 with AIDS and 26 with TB). Ninety-three interventions were performed (29.9% addressed to the drug prescriber, 27.8% to other professionals) and 8 ADRs and 53 errors were detected (28 AIDS and 25 TB). The main DRP was poor/regular adherence together with a low level of complete pharmacotherapeutic knowledge. After PV, in patients with AIDS the degree of adherence statistically significantly improved (p= 0.012). The improvement in timely medication withdrawal was also significant (28.6% vs. 71.4% p=0.005 AID). Favorable viral load results were obtained in 72% of patients with AIDS and weight gain in 92% of patients with TB, although they were not statistically significant. Conclusions: PV improved adherence and communication in pediatric patients with AIDS and/or TB (AU)

[Pharmacovigilance in a paediatric intensive care unit]. / Original Breve Farmacovigilancia en una unidad de cuidados intensivos pediátricos.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze suspected drug-related adverse events as reported by pharmacists in a pediatric intensive care unit. METHOD: Suspected drug-related adverse events were recorded as reported by pharmacists in an intensive care unit during hospital rounds (these were neither systematic nor continued) or patient visits to our clinic (April 2004-May 2005). Later on, the pharmacovigilance subcommittee prospectively analyzed such suspected events in order to confirm them and classify them according to their rules. RESULTS: Nineteen suspected adverse events were reported for 17 patients; 15 were confirmed (78%). In six cases the pharmacist suggested the way the adverse event was eventually treated. Three cases required admission to an ICU. Drug classes most commonly involved included antimicrobials, anti-epileptic drugs, and immunosuppressants. Severity was: fatal 20%, serious 34%, moderate 13%, mild 33%. Causality was definitely established for 13%, probable for 54%, and possible for 33% of patients; 20% of events were considered avoidable. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse events reported by pharmacists were few, as they could not attend hospital rounds on a regular basis. Imputability was difficult due to critical patient conditions. Most suspected events were later confirmed. Treatment involved therapy adjustments according to individual patient characteristics.

Human papillomavirus genotype distribution and cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions among high-risk women with and without HIV-1 infection in Burkina Faso.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) were studied in 379 high-risk women. Human papillomavirus DNA was detected in 238 of 360 (66.1%) of the beta-globin-positive cervical samples, and 467 HPV isolates belonging to 35 types were identified. Multiple (2-7 types) HPV infections were observed in 52.9% of HPV-infected women. The most prevalent HPV types were HPV-52 (14.7%), HPV-35 (9.4%), HPV-58 (9.4%), HPV-51 (8.6%), HPV-16 (7.8%), HPV-31 (7.5%), HPV-53 (6.7%), and HPV-18 (6.4%). Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) seroprevalence was 36.0%. Human papillomavirus prevalence was significantly higher in HIV-1-infected women (87 vs 54%, prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.4-1.8). High-risk HPV types (71 vs 40%, PR = 1.79, 95% CI: 1.5-2.2), in particular HPV-16+18 (22 vs 9%, PR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.4-4.0), and multiple HPV infections (56 vs 23%, PR = 2.45, 95% CI: 1.8-3.3) were more prevalent in HIV-1-infected women. High-grade SIL (HSIL) was identified in 3.8% of the women. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection was strongly associated with presence of HSIL (adjusted odds ratio = 17.0; 95% CI 2.2-134.1, P = 0.007) after controlling for high-risk HPV infection and other risk factors for HSIL. Nine of 14 (63%) HSIL cases were associated with HPV-16 or HPV-18 infection, and might have been prevented by an effective HPV-16/18 vaccine.

Patterns of resistance mutations to antiretroviral drugs in extensively treated HIV-1-infected patients with failure of highly active antiretroviral therapy.

Resistance-mutation patterns in the reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease genes of HIV-1 were analyzed in 22 patients who had been extensively pretreated and who failed to respond to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). The number of mutations ranged from 8 to 19 (median, 13): 4 to 12 (median, 6) mutations in the RT gene, and 4 to 8 (median, 7) mutations in the protease gene. In the RT gene, the most frequent resistance mutations were found at codons 215 (100%), 41 (95%), 67 (91%), and 210 (77%). Multidrug-resistant mutation patterns including Q151M and insertion mutations at codon 69, which confer cross-resistance to the different nucleoside analogue RT inhibitors were detected in 1 and 3 patients, respectively; 1 patient with insertion mutation displayed a NGQGV [corrected] sequence at codons 67 to 70. In the protease gene, the most frequent mutations were found at codons 63 (95%), 10 (86%), 90(86%), 71(77%), 46 (50%), 36 (45%), and 84 (45%). Genotypic resistance to zidovudine, saquinavir, and indinavir was found in 100% of the patients. All patients showed also resistance or possible resistance to stavudine, abacavir, ritonavir, and nelfinavir. Mutations conferring genotypic resistance to nonnucleoside analogue RT inhibitors (NNRTIs) were found in 12 (80%) of the NNRTI-experienced patients and 1 of 7 NNRTI-naive patients. Our results indicate that failure of HAART in the patients extensively pretreated results from the multiplicity of RT and protease mutations that confer genotypic resistance to almost all available antiretroviral drugs. In these patients, genotypic resistance tests confirm the lack of alternative salvage therapy strategies based on the currently available antiretroviral drugs.