RESUMO
We recently conducted an exploratory study that indicated that several direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), highly effective medications for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, were also associated with improvement in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among a national cohort of US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) patients treated between October 1, 1999, and September 30, 2019. Limiting the same cohort to patients with PTSD and HCV, we compared the associations of individual DAAs with PTSD symptom improvement using propensity score weighting. After identifying patients who had available baseline and endpoint PTSD symptom data as measured with the PTSD Checklist (PCL), we compared changes over the 8-12 weeks of DAA treatment. The DAAs most prescribed in conjunction with PCL measurement were glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB; n = 54), sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL; n = 54), and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF; n = 145). GLE/PIB was superior to LDV/SOF, with a mean difference in improvement of 7.3 points on the PCL (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1, 13.6). The mean differences in improvement on the PCL were smaller between GLE/PIB and SOF/VEL (3.0, 95% CI: -6.3, 12.2) and between SOF/VEL and LDV/SOF (4.4, 95% CI: -2.4, 11.2). While almost all patients were cured of HCV (92.5%) regardless of the agent received, PTSD outcomes were superior for those receiving GLE/PIB compared with those receiving LDV/SOF, indicating that GLE/PIB may merit further investigation as a potential PTSD treatment.
Assuntos
Hepatite C Crônica , Hepatite C , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos , Veteranos , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Genótipo , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatite C/complicações , Hepatite C/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Sofosbuvir/uso terapêutico , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/tratamento farmacológico , Resposta Viral Sustentada , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether direct-acting antivirals (DAA) for hepatitis C viral infection (HCV): glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB), ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF), and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) are associated with reduced alcohol consumption among veterans with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and co-occurring post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). METHODS: We measured change in Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test-Consumption Module (AUDIT-C) scores in a retrospective cohort of veterans with PTSD and AUD receiving DAAs for HCV. RESULTS: One thousand two hundred and eleven patients were included (GLE/PIB n = 174, LDV/SOF n = 808, SOF/VEL n = 229). Adjusted frequencies of clinically meaningful improvement were 30.5% for GLE/PIB, 45.5% for LDV/SOF, and 40.5% for SOF/VEL. The frequency was lower for GLE/PIB than for LDV/SOF (OR = 0.59; 95% CI [0.40, 0.87]) or SOF/VEL (OR = 0.66; 95% CI [0.42, 1.04]). CONCLUSIONS: DAA treatment for HCV was associated with a substantial reduction in alcohol use in patients with AUD and co-occurring PTSD. Further exploration of the role of DAAs in AUD treatment is warranted.
Assuntos
Alcoolismo , Hepatite C Crônica , Hepatite C , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos , Humanos , Sofosbuvir/efeitos adversos , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/complicações , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/epidemiologia , Hepatite C Crônica/complicações , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite C Crônica/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Alcoolismo/complicações , Alcoolismo/tratamento farmacológico , Alcoolismo/epidemiologia , Hepacivirus , Hepatite C/complicações , Hepatite C/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite C/epidemiologia , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a highly prevalent and often debilitating condition associated with high morbidity and mortality. Current AUD medications have limited efficacy and uptake. Alternative pharmacological options are needed. METHODS: We constructed a mechanistic tree of all US Food and Drug Administration approved medications and used a tree-based scan statistic, TreeScan, to identify medications associated with greater than expected improvements in alcohol consumption. Our cohort included all United States (US) Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) patients with a diagnosis of AUD between 10/1/1999 and 9/30/2019 with multiple Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption Module scores within the VA electronic health record data. RESULTS: Medications statistically associated with decreased alcohol consumption had, at large, minor effect sizes. Medications used in the treatment of chronic or life-threatening conditions like diabetes, chronic kidney disease, hepatitis C virus, or cancer produced larger effect sizes. Asenapine, an atypical antipsychotic, had a large effect with an observed to expected ratio of 1.78 (p = 0.003). Our findings were replicated in a propensity score matched population. CONCLUSION: Most medications significantly associated with decreased alcohol consumption in our analysis were either contraindicated with alcohol or likely attributable to patients abstaining from alcohol due to severe illness. However, the large effect of asenapine is notable, and a worthwhile candidate for more careful analysis.
Assuntos
Alcoolismo , Mineração de Dados , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Humanos , Alcoolismo/tratamento farmacológico , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Veteranos , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos de Coortes , Consumo de Bebidas AlcoólicasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite the prevalence and negative impact of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), there are few medications approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for treatment, and approved medications do not work well enough. We leveraged large-scale electronic health record data to identify existing medications that may be repurposed as PTSD treatments. METHODS: We constructed a mechanistic tree of all Food and Drug Administration-approved medications and used the tree-based scan statistic to identify medications associated with greater than expected levels of clinically meaningful improvement in PTSD symptoms using electronic health record data from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Our cohort included patients with a diagnosis of PTSD who had repeated symptom measurements using the PTSD Checklist over a 20-year period (N = 168,941). We calculated observed numbers based on patients taking each drug or mechanistically related class of drugs and the expected numbers based on the tree as a whole. RESULTS: Medications typically used to treat PTSD, such as the Food and Drug Administration-approved agent sertraline, were associated with improvement in PTSD symptoms, but the effects were small. Several, but not all, direct-acting antivirals used in the treatment of hepatitis C virus demonstrated a strong association with PTSD improvement. The finding was robust to a sensitivity analysis excluding patients who received established PTSD treatments, including trauma-focused psychotherapy, concurrent with hepatitis treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our exploratory approach both demonstrated findings that are consistent with what is known about pharmacotherapy for PTSD and uncovered a novel class of medications that may improve PTSD symptoms.
Assuntos
Hepatite C Crônica , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos , Veteranos , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Sertralina/uso terapêutico , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Objective: Fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, topiramate, and venlafaxine have previously shown efficacy for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in randomized clinical trials. Two prior studies using Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical records data show these medications are also effective in routine practice. Using an expanded retrospective cohort, we assessed the possibility of differential patterns of response based on patient and clinical factors.Methods: We identified 6,839 VA outpatients with clinical diagnoses of PTSD between October 1999 and September 2019 who initiated one of the medications and met pre-specified criteria for treatment duration and dose, combined with baseline and endpoint PTSD checklist (PCL) measurements. We compared 12-week changes in PCL score within clinical subgroups defined by sex, race and ethnicity, and military exposures, as well as comorbidities. Comorbidities were identified using International Classification of Diseases diagnostic codes and grouped according to major diagnostic classifications in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (eg, Psychotic Disorders, Depressive Disorders). We used a propensity score weighting approach to balance covariates among medication arms within each clinical subgroup. In our exploratory analyses using unweighted data for the overall cohort, we built penalized logistic regression models to identify covariates that predicted meaningful improvement.Results: There were no significant differences between medications in our weighted subgroup analyses. In unweighted exploratory analyses, higher baseline PCL scores and concurrent receipt of evidence-based psychotherapy predicted meaningful improvement, while high levels of disability predicted not realizing meaningful improvement.Conclusions: In the largest real-world study of medications for PTSD to date, we did not observe a pattern of differential response among clinical subgroups. All patients taking medications for PTSD, especially those with the highest levels of disability, should consider combined treatment with evidence-based psychotherapy.
Assuntos
Antidepressivos de Segunda Geração/uso terapêutico , Psicoterapia/métodos , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/uso terapêutico , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos , Saúde dos Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Comorbidade , Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Etnicidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prontuários Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde Militar , Seleção de Pacientes , Fatores Sexuais , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/diagnóstico , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/epidemiologia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/psicologia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Network centrality measures assign importance to influential or key nodes in a network based on the topological structure of the underlying adjacency matrix. In this work, we define the importance of a node in a network as being dependent on whether it is the only one of its kind among its neighbors' ties. We introduce linchpin score, a measure of local uniqueness used to identify important nodes by assessing both network structure and a node attribute. We explore linchpin score by attribute type and examine relationships between linchpin score and other established network centrality measures (degree, betweenness, closeness, and eigenvector centrality). To assess the utility of this measure in a real-world application, we measured the linchpin score of physicians in patient-sharing networks to identify and characterize important physicians based on being locally unique for their specialty. We hypothesized that linchpin score would identify indispensable physicians who would not be easily replaced by another physician of their specialty type if they were to be removed from the network. We explored differences in rural and urban physicians by linchpin score compared with other network centrality measures in patient-sharing networks representing the 306 hospital referral regions in the United States. We show that linchpin score is uniquely able to make the distinction that rural specialists, but not rural general practitioners, are indispensable for rural patient care. Linchpin score reveals a novel aspect of network importance that can provide important insight into the vulnerability of health care provider networks. More broadly, applications of linchpin score may be relevant for the analysis of social networks where interdisciplinary collaboration is important.