Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev Invest Clin ; 64(6 Pt 2): 641-78, 2012.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23593783

RESUMO

Patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are detected by testing for the presence of antibodies to HCV (Anti-HCV). A positive Anti-HCV test represents a true positive result only in a variable proportion of subjects (35 to 95%). The qualitative interpretation as positive or negative Anti-HCV report is associated with a general lack of understanding regarding the interpretation of results, when more specific testing should be performed, and which tests should be considered for this purpose. Therefore, a substantial variation in supplemental testing practices exists among laboratories and physicians. This guideline was developed on the basis of the best available evidence to classify positive antibody in two (low and high) or three levels (very low, low and high) according to the signal to cutoff (S/CO) ratio: the very low level of the Anti-HCV identifies false-positive results and further diagnostic testing is not necessary. The low antibody level is frequently related with false-positive results and testing with Immunoblot is recommended; only Immunoblot-positive subjects require HCV RNA testing because of a low possibility of being viremic. The high Anti-HCV level is an accurate serological marker for predicting viremia and denotes the need of routine HCV RNA testing in order to efficiently confirm hepatitis C. Cost-effectiveness analysis, based on the Anti-HCV level, recommends the use of the two or three-levels to choose the confirmatory test of positive antibody. This approach can be implemented without increasing test costs because the S/CO ratio is automatically generated in most laboratory analyzers and would provide health care professionals with useful information for counseling and evaluating patients, to eliminate unwarranted notifications in cases of false antibody reactivity, and correctly identifying those Anti-HCV-positive patients who are infected and need antiviral treatment. The written report should include the antibody level (S/CO ratio), the type of the immunoassay applied and interpretation guideline. Anti-HCV testing is performed in multiple settings including blood banks or health department facilities; adoption of this Guideline for interpretation and report of the antibody to hepatitis C virus by laboratories and its implementation by clinicians will improve the accuracy for interpreting antibody result to determine the next step on hepatitis C diagnosis.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Anti-Hepatite C/sangue , Hepatite C/diagnóstico , Testes Sorológicos/métodos , Algoritmos , Doadores de Sangue , Segurança do Sangue , Análise Custo-Benefício , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/virologia , Reações Falso-Negativas , Reações Falso-Positivas , Controle de Formulários e Registros , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepacivirus/imunologia , Hepacivirus/isolamento & purificação , Hepatite C/sangue , Hepatite C/economia , Hepatite C/epidemiologia , Hepatite C/transmissão , Humanos , Imunoensaio/métodos , Immunoblotting/métodos , México , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , RNA Viral/sangue , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Testes Sorológicos/economia
2.
Ann Hepatol ; 6(1): 48-54, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17297429

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIM: To what extent the serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) are related to histological characteristics of liver damage caused by hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) remains unclear. METHODS: Patients with a positive anti-HCV antibody titer confirmed by supplemental tests were evaluated by liver biopsy. We compared ALT levels in patients with and without renal damage, with similar histological grades and stages of inflammation and fibrosis. Results: Patients were divided into two groups: patients with ESRD (n = 25) and patients without ESRD renal damage (n = 39). RESULTS: The ALT level was 42.1 +/- 24.3 IU/L for the ESRD group, compared with 109.9 +/- 55.8 IU/L for the non-ESRD group (P < 0.001). Liver inflammation (modified Knodell grade) was 4.0 +/- 2.1 in the ESRD group versus 5.2 +/- 2.4 in the non- ESRD group; fibrosis (6-point scale) was 1.1 +/- 1.2 versus 1.7 +/- 1.5, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite histological evidence of liver inflammation, ALT levels in the ESRD group were normal, while ALT levels were significantly higher in the non-ESRD group with similar levels of liver inflammation. In conclusion, ALT levels are not a useful indicator of HCV infection in patients with ESRD and liver biopsies should be recommended for kidney transplant candidates.


Assuntos
Alanina Transaminase/metabolismo , Hepatite C , Falência Renal Crônica/complicações , Adulto , Biópsia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepacivirus/imunologia , Hepatite C/complicações , Hepatite C/enzimologia , Hepatite C/patologia , Anticorpos Anti-Hepatite C/análise , Humanos , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas , Falência Renal Crônica/enzimologia , Falência Renal Crônica/patologia , Fígado/enzimologia , Fígado/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , RNA Viral/análise , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA