[Use of clinical ultrasound in primary care: Multicenter prospective study]. / Uso de la ecografía clínica en Atención Primaria. Estudio prospectivo multicéntrico.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to describe the characteristics of the use of clinical ultrasound in two health centers (SC) of Health Area VII of the Region of Murcia (CS Murcia-Sur and CS Floridablanca). DESIGN: Observational, descriptive, longitudinal, prospective and multicenter study. SITE: CS Murcia-Sur and CS Floridablanca (Health Area VII of the Region of Murcia). PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and thirty-five patients were included. INTERVENTIONS: Performance of clinical ultrasound in the primary care (PC) consultation. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Demographic variables (age, sex), as well as clinical variables (reason for consultation, type of ultrasound, results, referrals to the second hospital level, degree of diagnostic agreement) were collected. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-five patients were included, more than 50% were female. The main reason for consultation was musculoskeletal and soft tissue symptoms (44.4%), followed by digestive symptoms (21.5%). 44.4% of the ultrasounds were classified as normal, while pathological findings were found in 55.6%. Confirmatory tests were requested in 43.7% and the findings were confirmed in 67% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ultrasound in PC allows to show the high prevalence of pathological findings in the examination of patients. In a technique that helps the clinician in his diagnostic-therapeutic process. The integration of clinical ultrasound in the PC consultation can save complementary studies and referrals to a second level of care. Its implementation in PC requires proper training of professionals.

Neuroendocrine tumor of the ampulla of Vater. Review of the literature.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) or carcinoids represent a small percentage of gastrointestinal neoplasms (2%). The ileum (41.8%), rectum (27.4%) and stomach (8.7%) are the most common locations. We present an unusual case of NET due to its origin in the ampulla of Vater, as an extremely rare cause of biliary obstruction. A bibliographic review of the current recommendations of management and treatment for this case, different from other locations of the gastrointestinal tract is carried out. The curative treatment of choice for early-stage Vater ampulla NETs is Whipple surgery with lymphadenectomy due to Its high rate of lymphatic and metastatic dissemination, regardless of size and histological grade, although there are no updated official guidelines.

Early work activities after sedation with propofol in digestive endoscopy. Reply.

We read with interest the letter by Dr. Cerezo-Ruiz and we agree in general with the commentaries and would like to add some information related to the use of propofol in deep sedation by our group.

Balanced by iron. Hereditary hemochromatosis and celiac disease.

We present the case of a healthy 14-year-old adolescent who was referred to our hospital for an incidental alteration of the iron profile (Fe 225 ug/dl, transferrin 186 mg/dl, IST 63.93 %, ferritin 253 ng/ml). The blood count, proteinogram and renal, lipid and liver function tests were in the normal range. Abdominal ultrasound was requested with no findings of interest. The genetic analysis for hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) confirmed that the patient was homozygous for the C282Y mutation.

Spanish online survey on informed consent for the performance of paracentesis. Do we have it? Do we use it?

INTRODUCTION: informed consent is necessary for invasive procedures as a document that guarantees the ethical health relationship and patient safety. AIMS: to analyze whether we have and use informed consent documents for paracentesis in our hospitals and to obtain data on the technique. METHODS: a descriptive observational study was performed during December 2019, via a cross-sectional survey disseminated through social networks, aimed at specialists and residents of gastroenterology. RESULTS: two hundred and three anonymous surveys were included (55.2 % gastroenterologist and 44.8 % residents) from 74 hospitals in 34 Spanish provinces. Ninety respondents (44.3 %) stated that they had the document in their centers. Of these, 29 (32.2 %) always provided it, 31 (34.4 %) provided it sometimes and 21 (23.3 %) never. Seventy-two professionals (35.5 %) answered that they did not have it and 41 (20.5 %) selected "unknown". Of these, 77 (68.1 %) considered it was necessary to create this document, 31 (27.4 %) did not think it was necessary and five (4.4 %) did not answer. With regards to the technique, 173 (85.2 %) performed paracentesis under direct visualization and 30 (14.8 %) were eco-guided on most occasions. One hundred and nine (53.7 %) always applied local anesthetic, 80 (39.4 %) sometimes and 14 (6.9 %) did not. One hundred and sixty-seven respondents (82.3 %) considered it to be a simple technique versus 36 (17.7 %) who thought that it was of intermediate complexity. In terms of risk, 150 (73.5 %) considered it was low and 52 (25.6 %), medium. Ninety-nine (48.8 %) experienced minor complications and 37 (18.2 %) experienced major complications. CONCLUSIONS: paracentesis is a common technique in digestive services and could be associated with complications, even though it is considered to be simple and safe. Due to the important intra- and inter-hospital variability that this technique presents, we consider standardized training in this technique is necessary, as well as the creation, spread and use of informed consents.

Encuesta nacional on-line sobre el consentimiento informado para la realización de paracentesis. ¿Lo tenemos? ¿Lo utilizamos? / No disponible

INTRODUCCIÓN: el uso del consentimiento informado es necesario en los procedimientos invasivos como documento garantizador de la relación sanitaria ética y de la seguridad del paciente. OBJETIVO: analizar si se poseen y utilizan los documentos de consentimiento informado para paracentesis en los centros sanitarios, así como obtener algunos datos de interés sobre la técnica. MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: realizamos un estudio observacional descriptivo mediante una encuesta transversal on-line difundida por redes sociales, destinada a los especialistas y residentes de aparato digestivo durante diciembre de 2019. RESULTADOS: incluimos 203 encuestas anónimas (55,2 % adjuntos y 44,8 % residentes) de 74 centros sanitarios de 34 provincias españolas. Noventa encuestados (44,3 %) tenían dicho documento en sus centros; de estos, 29 (32,2 %) lo entregaban siempre; 31 (34,4 %), algunas veces; y 21 (23,3 %), nunca. Setenta y dos profesionales (35,5 %) contestaron no tenerlo y 41 (20,5 %), ser desconocedores; de entre ellos, 77 (68,1 %) consideraban necesaria su creación, 31 (27,4 %) no lo creían así y cinco (4,4 %) no contestaron. En cuanto a la técnica, 173 facultativos (85,2 %) realizan la punción bajo visión directa y 30 (14,8 %), ecoguiada en la mayoría de las ocasiones. Ciento nueve (53,7 %) aplican siempre anestésico local, 80 (39,4 %) lo aplican en algunas ocasiones y 14 (6,9 %) no lo utilizan. Ciento sesenta y siete encuestados (82,3 %) consideraron que es una técnica sencilla, frente a 36 (17,7 %) que la consideran de complejidad intermedia. En cuanto al riesgo, 150 (73,5 %) lo consideran bajo y 52 (25,6 %), medio. Noventa y nueve de ellos (48,8 %) refieren haber tenido complicaciones menores y 37 (18,2 %), mayores. CONCLUSIONES: la paracentesis es una técnica habitual en los servicios de digestivo y, a pesar de ser considerada sencilla y segura, entraña complicaciones. Por ello consideramos necesaria la formación reglada en esta técnica, así como la creación, difusión y utilización de los consentimientos informados dada la importante variabilidad intra e interhospitalaria que presenta

No disponible