Unusual metastases from extremity soft tissue sarcomas.

The most common metastatic route for extremity soft-tissue sarcomas is via the venous system to the lungs. Metastases to other sites such as the brain, liver, and soft tissue distant from the primary tumor are rare. A tumor registry, prospectively kept since 1986, was reviewed for unusual metastatic spread. Of 3671 tumors, 346 high-grade extremity soft-tissue sarcomas were evaluated. A total of 15 patients (4.3%) presented with initial recurrence of disease that was extrapulmonary and distant from the site of the primary tumor. Four of these patients (27%) were successfully treated for their recurrence. Based on these findings, a different strategy for follow-up of patients after treatment of a high-grade extremity soft-tissue sarcoma is suggested.

Optimizing the management of Moore type I postero-medial split fracture dislocations of the tibial head: description of the Lobenhoffer approach.

SUMMARY: Moore type I tibial plateau fracture-dislocations pose a significant challenge to the treating surgeon. The displaced posteromedial fragment is difficult to reduce and adequately stabilize through traditional approaches. The Lobenhoffer approach provides the necessary access to the posterior surface of the proximal tibia but has only been described in the German-language literature. It involves a less extensive soft tissue dissection than that required by other posterior approaches. We provide the first English-language description of the technique, with 2 cases presented as illustrations of the approach.

Low-grade cartilage tumors: diagnosis and treatment.

As a result of reading this article, physicians should be able to: 1. List the features that are useful in differentiating a low-grade chondrosarcoma from an enchondroma. 2. Describe the treatment principles of low-grade cartilage tumors based on the anatomic location and stage of the tumor. 3. Discuss the characteristics of a local recurrence after initial treatment and the general consequences.

Risk of iatrogenic injury to the peroneal nerve during posterolateral femoral tunnel placement in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: There has been concern for iatrogenic injury to the peroneal nerve with posterolateral femoral tunnel placement in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. HYPOTHESIS: The common peroneal nerve and biceps tendon are at increased risk for injury by the guide wire as the knee is brought into increased extension. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: An anatomical descriptive study was performed on 10 cadaveric knees (ages 49-67 years). After the native anterior cruciate ligament was removed arthroscopically, the posterolateral femoral tunnel starting point was identified using standardized measurements from the articular cartilage rim. With the use of a low-medial accessory portal and one cortical entry point, guide pins were inserted at 120 degrees, 90 degrees, and 70 degrees of knee flexion. The guide pins were kept in situ, and the lateral structures of the knee were dissected. The distance between guide pins and the common peroneal nerve, as well as the relationship to the biceps tendon, were analyzed. RESULTS: The common peroneal nerve was not directly injured during any guide pin insertion. The mean distance from the guide pin at 120 degrees of flexion was 44.3 mm (range, 36-53 mm), compared with 28.6 mm (range, 25-32 mm) at 90 degrees of flexion and 22.8 mm (range, 20-28 mm) at 70 degrees of flexion. The differences between all 3 groups were statistically significant (P<.0001). Guide pins inserted at 70 degrees of flexion were also noted to pierce the biceps femoris tendon in all cases. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: During posterolateral femoral tunnel placement, the risk of injury to the common peroneal nerve is minimal but is increased as the knee is placed in less flexion. Guide pin placement at knee flexion of 120 degrees is recommended to ensure safety of the peroneal nerve and the biceps tendon.

Arthroscopic treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: are there any evidence-based indications?

Despite the lack of consensus guidelines and randomized control trials, the use of arthroscopy for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee has increased over the last decade. Techniques used for the arthroscopic treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee include joint lavage, joint débridement, meniscectomy, abrasion arthroplasty, and microfracture. We performed a retrospective, evidence-based review of the current literature on the arthroscopic treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee and provide insight into the study design flaws and difficulties associated with the current research on this controversial topic. Our literature search yielded 18 relevant studies. Of these, one was Level I evidence, five were Level II, six were Level III, and six were Level IV. We found limited evidence-based research to support the use of arthroscopy as a treatment method for osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthroscopic débridement of meniscus tears and knees with low-grade osteoarthritis may have some utility, but it should not be used as a routine treatment for all patients with knee osteoarthritis.

The diagnosis of meniscus tears: the role of MRI and clinical examination.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical examination are tools commonly used in the diagnosis of meniscus tears. It has been suggested routine MRI before therapeutic arthroscopy for clinically diagnosed meniscus tears will reduce the number and cost of unnecessary invasive procedures. We designed a systematic review of prospective cohort studies comparing MRI and clinical examination to arthroscopy to diagnosis meniscus tears. Thirty-two relevant studies were identified by a literature review. Careful evaluation by an experienced examiner identifies patients with surgically treatable meniscus lesions with equal or better reliability than MRI. MRI is superior when indications for arthroscopy are solely diagnostic. However, the methods by which such a clinician arrives at a conclusion have not been identified. To create an evidence-based algorithm for the diagnosis of a meniscus tear future investigations should prospectively assess the value of commonly used aspects of the patient history and meniscus tests. MRI is useful, but should be reserved for situations in which an experienced clinician requires further information before arriving at a diagnosis. Indications for arthroscopy should be therapeutic, not diagnostic in nature.

Trigger digits: principles, management, and complications.

Stenosing tenosynovitis, or trigger finger, is an entity seen commonly by hand surgeons. This problem generally is caused by a size mismatch between the flexor tendon and the first annular (A-1) pulley. Conservative management includes splinting, corticosteroid injection, and other adjuvant modalities. Surgical treatment consists of release of the A-1 pulley by open or percutaneous techniques. Complications are rare but include bowstringing, digital nerve injury, and continued triggering. Some patients require more extensive procedures to reduce the size of the flexor tendon. Comorbid conditions affect how trigger finger is treated. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis require tenosynovectomy instead of A-1 pulley release. In children trigger thumb resolves reliably with A-1 pulley release but other digits may require more extensive surgery. In diabetic patients trigger finger often is less responsive to conservative measures. An understanding of the pathomechanics, risk factors, and varied treatments for trigger finger is essential for appropriate care.