RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have displaced double-pigtail plastic stents (DPS) as the standard treatment for walled-off necrosis (WON),ß but evidence for exclusively using LAMS is limited. We aimed to assess whether the theoretical benefit of LAMS was superior to DPS. METHODS: This multicenter, open-label, randomized trial was carried out in 9 tertiary hospitals. Between June 2017, and Oct 2020, we screened 99 patients with symptomatic WON, of whom 64 were enrolled and randomly assigned to the DPS group (n = 31) or the LAMS group (n = 33). The primary outcome was short-term (4-weeks) clinical success determined by the reduction of collection. Secondary endpoints included long-term clinical success, hospitalization, procedure duration, recurrence, safety, and costs. Analyses were by intention-to-treat. CLINICALTRIALS: gov, NCT03100578. RESULTS: A similar clinical success rate in the short term (RR, 1.41; 95% CI 0.88-2.25; p = 0.218) and in the long term (RR, 1.2; 95% CI 0.92-1.58; p = 0.291) was observed between both groups. Procedure duration was significantly shorter in the LAMS group (35 vs. 45-min, p = 0.003). The hospital admission after the index procedure (median difference, - 10 [95% CI - 17.5, - 1]; p = 0.077) and global hospitalization (median difference - 4 [95% CI - 33, 25.51]; p = 0.82) were similar between both groups. Reported stent-related adverse events were similar for the two groups (36 vs.45% in LAMS vs. DPS), except for de novo fever, which was significantly 26% lower in LAMS (RR, 0.26 [0.08-0.83], p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical superiority of LAMS over DPS for WON therapy was not proved, with similar clinical success, hospital stay and similar safety profile between both groups, yet a significant reduction in procedure time was observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03100578.
Assuntos
Drenagem , Stents , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento , Stents/efeitos adversos , Drenagem/métodos , Tempo de Internação , Necrose/etiologia , Endossonografia/métodosRESUMO
Acute pancreatitis is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. It can develop complications such as fluid collections and necrosis. Infection of necrosis occurs in about 20-40% of patients with severe acute pancreatitis, and is associated with organ failure and worse prognosis. In the past years, the treatment of pancreatic collections has shifted from open surgery to minimally invasive techniques, such as endoscopic ultrasound guided drainage. These guidelines from a selection of experts among the Endoscopic Ultrasound Group from the Spanish Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (GSEED-USE) have the purpose to provide advice on the management of pancreatic collections based on a thorough review of the available scientific evidence. It also reflects the experience and clinical practice of the authors, who are advanced endoscopists or clinical pancreatologists with extensive experience in managing patients with acute pancreatitis.
RESUMO
El artículo recoge el conjunto de medidas propuestas por la SEPD, la AEEH, el GETECCU y la AEG que pretenden servir de ayuda a los servicios en su reincorporación a la actividad habitual. Hemos confeccionado una serie de recomendaciones prácticas respecto al manejo y a la reintroducción progresiva de la actividad asistencial. Estas recomendaciones están guiadas por la escasa y cambiante evidencia disponible y serán objeto de futuras actualizaciones en base a las necesidades diarias y a la disponibilidad del material fungible para adecuarse a ellas, y se podrán implementar en cada servicio en función de la incidencia acumulada de SARS-CoV-2 en cada región y de la carga que la epidemia ha ocasionado en cada uno de los hospitales. Los objetivos generales de estas recomendaciones son: a) Proteger a nuestros pacientes de los riesgos de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 y prestarles una atención de calidad. b) Proteger a todos los profesionales sanitarios de los riesgos de la infección por SARS-CoV-2. c)Recuperar el normal funcionamiento de nuestros servicios en un entorno de riesgo continuado de infección por SARS-CoV-2
The set of measures proposed by SEPD, AEEH, GETECCU and AEG are aimed to help departments in their resumption of usual activity. We have prepared a number of practical recommendations regarding patient management and the stepwise resumption of healthcare activity. These recommendations are based on the sparse, changing evidence available, and will be updated in the future according to daily needs and the availability of expendable materials to suit them; in each department they will be implemented depending upon the cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in each region, and the burden the pandemic has represented for each hospital. The general objectives of these recommendations include: (a) To protect our patients against the risks of infection with SARS-CoV-2 and to provide them with high-quality care. (b) To protect all healthcare professionals against the risks of infection with SARS-CoV-2. (c)To resume normal functioning of our departments in a setting of ongoing risk for infection with SARS-CoV-2
Assuntos
Humanos , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Gastroenterologia/organização & administração , Departamentos Hospitalares/organização & administração , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Coronavirus/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Coronavirus/transmissão , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Profissional para o Paciente/prevenção & controle , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Paciente para o Profissional/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Viral/transmissão , Telemedicina , Doenças Profissionais/prevenção & controle , Programas de Rastreamento/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
Introducción: existe evidencia de que un equipo formado por endoscopista y enfermera puede hacerse cargo de la sedación de un paciente con propofol de forma eficaz, segura y eficiente. Para ello, es fundamental una adecuada formación y entrenamiento específico que les otorgue las competencias necesarias. El objetivo principal de este estudio fue realizar, tras un año de implantación, una evaluación de la calidad del procedimiento de sedación administrada por personal no anestesiólogo en una unidad de endoscopia digestiva. Métodos: se realizó un estudio de cohortes prospectivo sobre los pacientes que recibieron sedación con propofol por personal no anestesiólogo. Posteriormente, se seleccionó una muestra aleatoria de registros clínicos para evaluar la adherencia de los profesionales a diferentes criterios de calidad, así como la aparición de eventos adversos relacionados con la sedación. Resultados: en el periodo de estudio se realizaron un total de 595 procedimientos bajo sedación con propofol. La tasa de eventos adversos fue del 2,4% (n = 507), principalmente episodios de hipotensión e hipoxemia. Los porcentajes de adherencia al procedimiento de sedación se situaron por encima del 80% en la mayoría de los criterios, aunque fue menor en la cumplimentación de la valoración del riesgo ASA. Conclusión: los resultados del estudio sugieren que el propofol puede ser administrado con seguridad y eficacia por un equipo cualificado de endoscopista y enfermera, en pacientes con un riesgo ASA I-II. Las auditorías sobre la adherencia de los profesionales al procedimiento permiten identificar necesidades de mejora para poder seguir trabajando sobre aspectos aún no consolidados
Introduction: research has shown that an endoscopist-nurse clinical team can perform sedation with propofol effectively, safely and efficiently. To do so, it is essential to provide specific and appropriate training in the necessary skills. The main aim of the present study was to evaluate the quality of the sedation procedure administered by non-anesthetists in a digestive endoscopy unit, one year after its introduction. Methods: a prospective cohort study was performed in patients given propofol sedation by non-anesthetists. Subsequently, a random sample of clinical records was selected in order to evaluate the adherence of professionals to the quality criteria and to assess the rate of adverse events related to sedation. Results: a total of 595 procedures were performed under propofol sedation during the study period. The rate of adverse events was 2.4% (n = 507), mainly involving hypotension and hypoxemia. Adherence to the sedation procedure was above 80% for most of the applicable criteria, although it was lower for the completion of ASA risk evaluation. Conclusions: the results of the study suggest that propofol can be administered safely and effectively by a qualified endoscopist-nurse team, in patients with an ASA I-II risk. Audits of adherence by medical staff to the recommended procedure facilitate the identification of areas for improvement; further work is needed on the aspects that have not yet been consolidated
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Sedação Consciente/métodos , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/métodos , Propofol/efeitos adversos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/efeitos adversos , Sedação Consciente/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Coortes , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/enfermagem , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
Este documento resume el contenido de la Guía de resección mucosa endoscópica elaborada por el grupo de trabajo de la Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva (GSEED de Resección Endoscópica) y expone las recomendaciones sobre el manejo endoscópico de las lesiones neoplásicas colorrectales superficiales (AU)
This document summarizes the contents of the Clinical Guidelines for the Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Non-Pedunculated Colorectal Lesions that was developed by the working group of the Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy (GSEED of Endoscopic Resection). This document presents recommendations for the endoscopic management of superficial colorectal neoplastic lesions (AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/métodos , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/instrumentação , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/normas , Neoplasias Colorretais/economiaRESUMO
Este documento resume el contenido de la Guía de resección mucosa endoscópica elaborada por el grupo de trabajo de la Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva (GSEED de Resección Endoscópica) y expone las recomendaciones sobre el manejo endoscópico de las lesiones neoplásicas colorrectales superficiales (AU)
This document summarizes the contents of the Clinical Guidelines for the Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Non-Pedunculated Colorectal Lesions that was developed by the working group of the Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy (GSEED of Endoscopic Resection). This document presents recommendations for the endoscopic management of superficial colorectal neoplastic lesions (AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/métodos , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/métodos , Mucosa Intestinal/patologia , Revisão por Pares , Seleção de Pacientes , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Colonoscopia/métodosRESUMO
No disponible
Assuntos
Humanos , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Paciente para o Profissional/prevenção & controle , Roupa de Proteção/normas , Proteção Pessoal , Endoscopia/normasRESUMO
El artículo recoge el conjunto de medidas propuestas por la SEPD, la AEEH, GETECCU y la AEG que pretenden servir de ayuda a los servicios en su reincorporación a la actividad habitual. Hemos confeccionado una serie de recomendaciones prácticas respecto al manejo y a la reintroducción progresiva de la actividad asistencial. Estas recomendaciones están guiadas por la escasa y cambiante evidencia disponible y serán objeto de futuras actualizaciones, en base a las necesidades diarias y la disponibilidad del material fungible para adecuarse a las mismas; y se podrán implementar en cada servicio en función de la incidencia acumulada de SARS-CoV-2 en cada región y de la carga que la epidemia ha ocasionado en cada uno de los hospitales. Los objetivos generales de estas recomendaciones son: · Proteger a nuestros pacientes de los riesgos de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 y prestarles una atención de calidad. · Proteger a todos los profesionales sanitarios de los riesgos de la infección por SARS-CoV-2. · Recuperar el normal funcionamiento de nuestros servicios en un entorno de riesgo continuado de infección por SARS-CoV-2
No disponible
Assuntos
Humanos , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Gastroenterologia/organização & administração , Departamentos Hospitalares/organização & administração , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Coronavirus/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Coronavirus/transmissão , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Profissional para o Paciente/prevenção & controle , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Paciente para o Profissional/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Viral/transmissão , Telemedicina , Doenças Profissionais/prevenção & controle , Programas de Rastreamento/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
No disponible
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Cirurgia Bariátrica/normas , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Tromboembolia/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Risco , EspanhaRESUMO
No disponible
Assuntos
Humanos , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/métodos , Dissecação/instrumentação , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Plexo Submucoso/cirurgiaRESUMO
La disección submucosa endoscópica (DSE) permite la resección curativa mediante endoscopia de lesiones malignas o premalignas superficiales digestivas en una sola pieza. Esta técnica, nacida hace algo más de 10 años en Japón, no ha experimentado una gran difusión en países occidentales por diferentes motivos. En este artículo se hace una revisión de las indicaciones y resultados de la DSE, así como una discusión de los motivos por los que todavía son escasos los centros en occidente que realizan esta técnica. Por último se hacen unas recomendaciones de formación en DSE en nuestro medio (AU)
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows endoscopic, curative, en-bloc resection of superficial malignant or premalignant lesions. This procedure was conceived over 10 years ago in Japan, but has not experienced great expansion in Western countries for different reasons. This article reviews ESD indications and outcomes, and reflects on the reasons that prevent ESD from becoming common clinical practice in Western hospitals. Finally, recommendations on ESD training in our setting are made (AU)