RESUMO
The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) opposes automatic reversal of do-not-resuscitate orders during the perioperative period, instead advocating for a goal-directed approach that aligns decision-making with patients' priorities and clinical circumstances. Implementation of ASA guidelines continues to face significant barriers including time constraints, lack of longitudinal relationships with patients, and difficulty translating goal-focused discussion into concrete clinical plans. These challenges mirror those of advance care planning more generally, suggesting a need for novel frameworks for serious illness communication and patient-centered decision-making. This review considers ASA guidelines in the context of ongoing transitions to serious illness communication and increasingly multidisciplinary perioperative care. It aims to provide practical guidance for the practicing anesthesiologist while also acknowledging the complexity of decision-making, considering limitations inherent to anesthesiologists' role, and outlining a need to conceptualize delivery of ethically informed care as a collaborative, multidisciplinary endeavor.
Assuntos
Ordens quanto à Conduta (Ética Médica) , Humanos , Ordens quanto à Conduta (Ética Médica)/ética , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Assistência Perioperatória/ética , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Assistência Perioperatória/normasRESUMO
American Society of Anesthesiologists guidelines recommend that anesthesiologists revisit do-not-resuscitate orders preoperatively and revise them if necessary based on patient preferences. In patients without do-not-resuscitate orders or other directives limiting treatment however, "full code" is the default option irrespective of clinical circumstances and patient preferences. It is time to revisit this approach based on (1) increasing understanding of the power of default options in healthcare settings, (2) changing demographics and growing evidence suggesting that an expanding subset of patients is vulnerable to poor outcomes after perioperative cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and (3) recommendations from multiple societies promoting risk assessment and goal-concordant care in older surgical patients. The authors reconsider current guidelines in the context of these developments and advocate for an expanded approach to decision-making regarding CPR, which involves identifying high-risk elderly patients and eliciting their preferences regarding CPR irrespective of existing or presumed code status.
Assuntos
Reanimação Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Tomada de Decisão Clínica/métodos , Ordens quanto à Conduta (Ética Médica) , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anestesiologia , Humanos , Participação do Paciente , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Sociedades MédicasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Preoperative goals of care (GOC) and code status (CS) discussions are important in achieving an in-depth understanding of the patient's care goals in the setting of a serious illness, enabling the clinician to ensure patient autonomy and shared decision making. Past studies have shown that anesthesiologists are not formally trained in leading these discussions and may lack the necessary skill set. We created an innovative online video curriculum designed to teach these skills. This curriculum was compared to a traditional method of learning from reading the medical literature. METHODS: In this bi-institutional randomized controlled trial at 2 major academic medical centers, 60 anesthesiology trainees were randomized to receive the educational content in 1 of 2 formats: (1) the novel video curriculum (video group) or (2) journal articles (reading group). Thirty residents were assigned to the experimental video curriculum group, and 30 were assigned to the reading group. The content incorporated into the 2 formats focused on general preoperative evaluation of patients and communication strategies pertaining to GOC and CS discussions. Residents in both groups underwent a pre- and postintervention objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) with standardized patients. Both OSCEs were scored using the same 24-point rubric. Score changes between the 2 OSCEs were examined using linear regression, and interrater reliability was assessed using weighted Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: Residents receiving the video curriculum performed significantly better overall on the OSCE encounter, with a mean score of 4.19 compared to 3.79 in the reading group. The video curriculum group also demonstrated statistically significant increased scores on 8 of 24 rubric categories when compared to the reading group. CONCLUSIONS: Our novel video curriculum led to significant increases in resident performance during simulated GOC discussions and modest increases during CS discussions. Further development and refinement of this curriculum are warranted.
Assuntos
Currículo/tendências , Tomada de Decisões Assistida por Computador , Educação a Distância/tendências , Classificação Internacional de Doenças/tendências , Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente/tendências , Assistência Perioperatória/tendências , Anestesiologia/educação , Anestesiologia/métodos , Anestesiologia/tendências , Competência Clínica , Tomada de Decisão Compartilhada , Educação a Distância/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Internato e Residência/métodos , Internato e Residência/tendências , Masculino , Assistência Perioperatória/educação , Assistência Perioperatória/métodosRESUMO
Intravenous drug abusers may incur bloodstream infections, in particular those involving the heart valves, that often require extended courses of antibiotics, commonly on the order of six weeks. Conventional wisdom has dictated that even when patients are sufficiently well to not need ongoing hospitalization, it is unsafe to complete their antibiotic course in any setting other than in a closely supervised facility, even if this is contrary to their wishes. The assumption has been that such patients would be at risk of using their indwelling intravenous catheter for illicit purposes. Recent advances in the care of patients who suffer from addiction disorders suggest that when patients receive state-of-the-art addiction treatment, many may be able to continue their intravenous antibiotic course unsupervised, at home. This represents a departure from the parentalistic model of care of impaired patients who are prone to self-harm, moving towards a model that respects autonomy and trusts patients who are in recovery to continue their care in a manner that is self-beneficial.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Injeções Intravenosas/ética , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/complicações , Hospitalização , HumanosRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The present review addresses the question of whether perioperative futility can be defined. RECENT FINDINGS: Although attempts have been made to define futility in medicine, all proposed definitions are inadequate and as a result there has been a shift to a procedural conflict de-escalation approach to addressing clinical questions of futility. Informed consent is central to the problem of deciding whether an operative procedure may be futile and the criteria for adequate consent by either a patient or surrogate decision-maker are reviewed. An adequately informed patient or surrogate may, nevertheless, desire to proceed with a procedure considered futile by some members of the medical team as a result of conflicting values. The basis for this and the 'economy of hope' in which extremely ill patients with few treatment options are invested, is explored. The particular role of the anesthesiologist in deciding whether an operative procedure may be futile is examined. Three potential positions are suggested: the anesthesiologist as service provider, consultant, or gatekeeper. SUMMARY: The present review will provide anesthesiologists with critical insight into the historical scholarship and current recommended process to address questions of perioperative futility.
Assuntos
Anestesiologia , Futilidade Médica , Assistência Perioperatória , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Papel do Médico , Encaminhamento e ConsultaRESUMO
Many US states published crisis standards of care (CSC) guidelines for allocating scarce critical care resources during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the performance of these guidelines in maximizing their population benefit has not been well tested. In 2,272 adults with COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation drawn from the Study of the Treatment and Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 (STOP-COVID) multicenter cohort, we test the following three approaches to CSC algorithms: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores grouped into ranges, SOFA score ranges plus comorbidities, and a hypothetical approach using raw SOFA scores not grouped into ranges. We find that area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves for all three algorithms demonstrate only modest discrimination for 28-day mortality. Adding comorbidity scoring modestly improves algorithm performance over SOFA scores alone. The algorithm incorporating comorbidities has modestly worse predictive performance for Black compared to white patients. CSC algorithms should be empirically examined to refine approaches to the allocation of scarce resources during pandemics and to avoid potential exacerbation of racial inequities.
Assuntos
Gestão de Recursos da Equipe de Assistência à Saúde/normas , Padrão de Cuidado/tendências , Adulto , Idoso , Algoritmos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/terapia , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Cuidados Críticos , Estado Terminal , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Escores de Disfunção Orgânica , Pandemias , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidade , Padrão de Cuidado/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients with chronic obstructive lung disease experience an increased risk of perioperative pulmonary complications. This review presents an evidence-based approach to perioperative care designed to optimize management. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent research has provided guidance regarding intraoperative and postoperative administration of oxygen and the selective use of volatile agents. The significance of preoperative malnutrition and postoperative epidural analgesia on outcomes has also been explored further. The opportunity for anesthesiologists to engage in tobacco interventions and the benefits of addressing smoking cessation have been studied. SUMMARY: Optimization for surgery includes preoperative treatment of reversible airway obstruction and respiratory infections, smoking cessation, and possibly nutritional interventions. Meticulous intraoperative monitoring combined with a sound understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms underlying air trapping will help clinicians strike a balance between permissive hypercapnia and adequate ventilation.
Assuntos
Obstrução das Vias Respiratórias/terapia , Anestesia Geral/métodos , Anestesiologia/métodos , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Obstrução das Vias Respiratórias/diagnóstico , Obstrução das Vias Respiratórias/fisiopatologia , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Monitorização Intraoperatória , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicações , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
Directed discussion about advanced care planning in the preoperative setting is often lacking. We implemented an educational intervention pilot to increase the number of high-risk patients who have health care proxy and advanced directives documents completed. We developed a novel short video describing the advanced care planning process and the intensive care setting, encouraging patients to have conversations about advanced care planning. Survey results showed that majority of patients felt the intervention increased their knowledge about advanced care planning (65%-70%) and that the video raised some topics worth discussing with family and health care providers. This intervention is scalable and could improve documentation and quality of care.
Assuntos
Planejamento Antecipado de Cuidados , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Comunicação , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Projetos Piloto , Período Pós-Operatório , Período Pré-OperatórioRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Code status discussions, goals of care discussions, and shared decision-making in the perioperative setting are of great importance. As perioperative physicians, anesthesiologists are uniquely poised to handle these discussions. Yet formal training for anesthesiology residents in how to approach these scenarios is currently lacking. METHODS: Using Kern's 6-step approach to curriculum development, we describe an innovative curriculum for anesthesiology residents designed to teach the necessary skills to successfully conduct code status and goals of care discussions and to assess its efficacy. RESULTS: Our curriculum is composed of the following educational components: (1) formal, online learning modules, (2) selected journal articles describing code status and goals of care discussions skills and communication strategies, and (3) 2 objective-structured clinical examination experiences, with 1 occurring prior to and the other occurring after completion of the educational content. The educational content focuses on evidence-based best practices content covering professional guidelines, current literature, shared decision-making, and effective communication strategies. We also describe the potential methodology to evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed educational interventions. CONCLUSION: Using Kern's framework, we developed a curriculum focusing on code status discussions, goals of care discussions, and shared decision-making in the perioperative setting which provides trainees with the opportunity to practice communication skills and receive feedback from a standardized patient through participation in an objective structured clinical examination.
RESUMO
The debate about health insurance coverage and the related issue of unequal access to health care turn on fundamental questions of justice, but for an individual patient like DM, the abstract question about who is deserving of health insurance becomes a very concrete problem that has a profound impact on care and livelihood. DM's circumstances left him stuck in the hospital. A satisfactory discharge plan remained elusive; his insurance coverage severely limited the number and type of facilities that would accept him; and his inadequate engagement in his own rehabilitation process limited discharge options even further. Despite extensive involvement with the psychiatry, social work, physical therapy, and occupational therapy teams, DM consistently made "bad" decisions. He repeatedly refused antibiotics and did not consistently work with rehab services to improve his strength and mobility. Although the clinicians wanted to provide him with the best care possible, he often seemed unwilling to do the things necessary to achieve this care-or perhaps his depression rendered him unable to do so. He also tended to take out his frustration on staff members caring for him. All of this was, in turn, very frustrating for the staff. It may be easy, however, to make too much of DM's role, to see his choices as more important than his circumstances. A major goal of the ethics consultants was to reframe DM's predicament for the staff members involved in his care.
Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Consultoria Ética , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/ética , Cobertura do Seguro/ética , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente , Compreensão , Ética Clínica , Humanos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/economia , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/ética , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Alta do Paciente , Fatores SocioeconômicosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Impaired capacity of patients necessitates the use of surrogates to make decisions on behalf of patients. Little is known about surrogate decision-making in the surgical intensive care unit, where the decline to critical illness is often unexpected. We sought to explore surrogate experiences with decision-making in the surgical intensive care unit. METHODS: This qualitative study was performed at 2 surgical intensive care units at a single, tertiary, academic hospital Surrogate decision-makers who had made a major medical decision for a patient in the surgical intensive care unit were identified and enrolled prospectively. Semistructured telephone interviews following an interview guide were conducted within 90 days after hospitalization until thematic saturation. Recordings were transcribed, coded inductively, and analyzed utilizing an interpretive phenomenologic approach. RESULTS: A major theme that emerged from interviews (N = 19) centered on how participants perceived the surrogate role, which is best characterized by 2 archetypes: (1) Preferences Advocates, who focused on patients' values; and (2) Clinical Facilitators, who focused on patients' medical conditions. The primary archetype of each surrogate influenced how they defined their role and approached decisions. Preferences Advocates framed decisions in the context of patients' values, whereas Clinical Facilitators emphasized the importance of clinical information. CONCLUSION: The experiences of surrogates in the surgical intensive care unit are related to their understanding of what it means to be a surrogate and how they fulfill this role. Future work is needed to identify and manage the informational needs of surrogate decision-makers.
Assuntos
Adesão a Diretivas Antecipadas/psicologia , Diretivas Antecipadas/psicologia , Cuidadores/psicologia , Cuidados Críticos , Tomada de Decisões , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
Renal disease and cardiovascular disease are commonly encountered in the same patient. The dynamic interactions between renal disease and cardiovascular disease have an impact on perioperative management. Renal failure is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and the link between the two disease states remains to be fully elucidated.
Assuntos
Anestesia/métodos , Cardiopatias/complicações , Nefropatias/complicações , Anestesia por Condução/métodos , Síndrome Cardiorrenal/complicações , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/complicações , Insuficiência Cardíaca/complicações , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatórios , Cuidados Pré-OperatóriosAssuntos
Broncoscopia/métodos , Hemorragia/terapia , Lesão Pulmonar , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/terapia , Adulto , Hemorragia/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemorragia/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Radiografia , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
Interventions in the intensive care unit often require that the patient be sedated. Propofol is a widely used, potent sedative agent that is popular in critical care and operating room settings. In addition to its sedative qualities, propofol has neurovascular, neuroprotective, and electroencephalographical effects that are salutory in the patient in neurocritical care. However, the 15-year experience with this agent has not been entirely unbesmirched by controversy: propofol also has important adverse effects that must be carefully considered. This article discusses and reviews the pharmacology of propofol, with specific emphasis on its use as a sedative in the neuro-intensive care unit. A detailed explanation of central nervous system and cardiovascular mechanisms is presented. Additionally, the article reviews the literature specifically pertaining to neurocritical care use of propofol.