Diagnosing Fracture-Related Infections: Where Are We Now?

Accurate diagnosis of fracture-related infection (FRI) is critical for preventing poor outcomes such as loss of function or amputation. Due to the multiple variables associated with FRI, however, accurate diagnosis is challenging and complicated by a lack of standardized diagnostic criteria. Limitations with the current gold standard for diagnosis, which is routine microbiology culture, further complicate the diagnostic and management process. Efforts to optimize the process rely on a foundation of data derived from prosthetic joint infections (PJI), but differences in PJI and FRI make it clear that unique approaches for these distinct infections are required. A more concerted effort focusing on FRI has dominated more recent investigations and publications leading to a consensus definition by the American Orthopedics (AO) Foundation and the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS). This has the potential to better standardize the diagnostic process, which will not only improve patient care but also facilitate more robust and reproducible research related to the diagnosis and management of FRI. The purpose of this minireview is to explore the consensus definition, describe the foundation of data supporting current FRI diagnostic techniques, and identify pathways for optimization of clinical microbiology-based strategies and data.

Are quadrilateral surface buttress plates comparable to traditional forms of transverse acetabular fracture fixation?

BACKGROUND: Several construct options exist for transverse acetabular fracture fixation. Accepted techniques use a combination of column plates and lag screws. Quadrilateral surface buttress plates have been introduced as potential fixation options, but as a result of their novelty, biomechanical data regarding their stabilizing effects are nonexistent. Therefore, we aimed to determine if this fixation method confers similar stability to traditional forms of fixation. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We biomechanically compared two acetabular fixation plates with quadrilateral surface buttressing with traditional forms of fixation using lag screws and column plates. METHODS: Thirty-five synthetic hemipelves with a transverse transtectal acetabular fracture were allocated to one of five groups: anterior column plate+posterior column lag screw, posterior column plate+anterior column lag screw, anterior and posterior column lag screws only, infrapectineal plate+anterior column plate, and suprapectineal plate alone. Specimens were loaded for 1500 cycles up to 2.5x body weight and stiffness was calculated. Thereafter, constructs were destructively loaded and failure loads were recorded. RESULTS: After 1500 cycles, final stiffness was not different with the numbers available between the infrapectineal (568±43 N/mm) and suprapectineal groups (602±87 N/mm, p=0.988). Both quadrilateral plates were significantly stiffer than the posterior column buttress plate with supplemental lag screw fixation group (311±99 N/mm, p<0.006). No difference in stiffness was identified with the numbers available between the quadrilateral surface plating groups and the lag screw group (423±219 N/mm, p>0.223). The infrapectineal group failed at the highest loads (5.4±0.6 kN) and this was significant relative to the suprapectineal (4.4±0.3 kN; p=0.023), lag screw (2.9±0.8 kN; p<0.001), and anterior buttress plate with posterior column lag screw (4.0±0.6 kN; p=0.001) groups. CONCLUSIONS: Quadrilateral surface buttress plates spanning the posterior and anterior columns are biomechanically comparable and, in some cases, superior to traditional forms of fixation in this synthetic hemipelvis model. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Quadrilateral surface buttress plates may present a viable alternative for the treatment of transtectal transverse acetabular fractures. Clinical studies are required to fully define the use of this new form of fixation for such fractures when accessed through the anterior intrapelvic approach.

Early Treatment of Acetabular Fractures Using an Anterior Approach Increases Blood Loss but not Packed Red Blood Cell Transfusion.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether time from hospital admission to surgery for acetabular fractures using an anterior intrapelvic (AIP) approach affected blood loss. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Three level 1 trauma centers at 2 academic institutions. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Adult (18 years or older) patients with no pre-existing coagulopathy treated for an acetabular fracture via an AIP approach. Excluded were those with other significant same day procedures (irrigation and debridement and external fixation were the only other allowed procedures). OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Multiple methods for evaluating blood loss were investigated, including estimated blood loss (EBL), calculated blood loss (CBL) by Gross and Hgb balance methods, and packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion requirement. Outcomes were evaluated based on time to surgery. RESULTS: 195 patients were studied. On continuous linear analysis, increasing time from admission to surgery was significantly associated with decreasing CBL at 24 hours (-1.45 mL per hour by Gross method, P = 0.003; -0.440 g of Hgb per hour by Hgb balance method, P = 0.003) and 3 days (-1.69 mL per hour by Gross method, P = 0.013; -0.497 g of Hgb per hour by Hgb balance method, P = 0.010) postoperative, but not EBL or PRBC transfusion. Using 48 hours from admission to surgery to define early versus delayed surgery, CBL was significantly greater in the early group compared to the delayed group (453 [IQR 277-733] mL early versus 364 [IQR 160-661] delayed by Gross method, P = 0.017; 165 [IQR 99-249] g of Hgb early versus 143 [IQR 55-238] g Hgb delayed by Hgb balance method, P = 0.035), but not EBL or PRBC transfusion. In addition, in multivariate linear regression, neither giving tranexamic acid nor administering prophylactic anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism on the morning of surgery affected blood loss at 24 hours or 3 days postoperative ( P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: There was higher blood loss with early surgery using an AIP approach, but early surgery did not affect PRBC transfusion and may not be clinically relevant. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Efficacy of Hematoma Block After Intramedullary Rod Fixation of Femoral Shaft Fractures: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of an intraoperative, postfixation fracture hematoma block on postoperative pain control and opioid consumption in patients with acute femoral shaft fractures. DESIGN: Prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Academic Level I Trauma Center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-two consecutive patients with isolated femoral shaft fractures (OTA/AO 32) underwent intramedullary rod fixation. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to receive an intraoperative, postfixation fracture hematoma injection containing 20 mL of normal saline or 0.5% ropivacaine in addition to a standardized multimodal pain regimen that included opioids. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores and opioid consumption. RESULTS: The treatment group demonstrated significantly lower VAS pain scores than the control group in the first 24-hour postoperative period (5.0 vs. 6.7, P = 0.004), 0-8 hours (5.4 vs. 7.0, P = 0.013), 8-16 hours (4.9 vs. 6.6, P = 0.018), and 16-24 hours (4.7 vs. 6.6, P = 0.010), postoperatively. In addition, the opioid consumption (morphine milligram equivalents) was significantly lower in the treatment group compared with the control group over the first 24-hour postoperative period (43.6 vs. 65.9, P = 0.008). No adverse effects were observed secondary to the saline or ropivacaine infiltration. CONCLUSIONS: Infiltrating the fracture hematoma with ropivacaine in adult femoral shaft fractures reduced postoperative pain and opioid consumption compared with saline control. This intervention presents a useful adjunct to multimodal analgesia to improve postoperative care in orthopaedic trauma patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Diagnosis of Occult Infection Using Fracture-Related Infection Criteria at the Time of Nonunion Repair.

OBJECTIVES: To apply the recently developed fracture-related infection criteria to patients presenting for repair of fracture nonunion and determine the incidence and associated organisms of occult infection in these patients. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Tertiary referral trauma center. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients presenting with fracture nonunion after operative intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Demographic variables, injury characteristics, culture results, and physical examination and laboratory values at the time of presentation. RESULTS: A total of 270 nonunion patients were identified. Sixty-eight percent (n = 184) had no clinical or laboratory signs of infection at presentation before nonunion repair. After operative intervention, 7% of these clinically negative patients (n = 12/184) had positive intraoperative cultures indicating occult infection. The most common organisms causing occult infection were low-virulence coagulase-negative Staphylococcu s (83%) and Cutibacterium acnes (17%). Thirty-two percent of patients (n = 86/270) presented with clinical and/or laboratory signs of infection at presentation before nonunion repair, with 19% of these patients (n = 16/86) having negative cultures. The most common organisms in this group of patients with positive clinical signs and intraoperative cultures were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (21%) and gram-negative rods (29%). Patients with nonunion of the tibia were significantly more likely to have high-virulence organism culture results ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Based on this analysis, occult infection occurs in 7% of patients presenting with nonunion and no clinical or laboratory signs of infection. We recommend that all patients should be carefully evaluated for infection with intraoperative cultures regardless of presentation. Organisms associated with occult infection at the time of nonunion repair were almost exclusively of low virulence ( CoNS and C. Acnes ) and were more likely to present in the upper extremity. Patients with nonunion of the tibia were more likely to have infection secondary to high-virulence organisms and demonstrate clinical or laboratory signs of infection at the time of presentation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Risk Factors and Characteristics of Recalcitrant Osteomyelitis After Initial Surgical and Antibiotic Treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the injury, patient, and microbiological characteristics that place patients at risk for recalcitrant fracture-related infection and osteomyelitis despite appropriate initial treatment. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Three level I trauma centers. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and fifty-seven patients undergoing surgical debridement and antibiotic therapy for osteomyelitis from 2003 to 2019. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Patients were categorized as having undergone serial bone debridement if they had 2 separate procedures a minimum of 6 weeks apart with a full course of appropriate antibiotics in between. Patient records were reviewed for age, injury location, body mass index, smoking status, comorbidities, and culture results including the presence of multidrug-resistant organisms and culture-negative osteomyelitis. RESULTS: A total of 257 patients were identified; 49% (n = 125) had a successful single course of treatment, and 51% (n = 132) required repeat debridement for recalcitrant osteomyelitis. At the index treatment for osteomyelitis, the most common organisms in both groups were methicillin-resistant (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). There was no significant difference in incidence of polymicrobial infection between the 2 groups (25% vs. 20%, P = 0.49). The most common organisms cultured at the time of repeat saucerization remained MRSA and MSSA; however, the same organism was cultured from both the index and repeat procedures in only 28% (n = 37) of cases. Diabetic patients, intravenous drug use status, delay to diagnosis, and open fractures of the lower leg are independent risk factors for failure of initial treatment of posttraumatic osteomyelitis. CONCLUSIONS: Successful eradication of fracture-related infection and posttraumatic osteomyelitis is difficult and fails 51% of the time despite standard surgical and antimicrobial therapy. Although MRSA and MSSA remain the most common organisms cultured, patients who fail initial treatment for osteomyelitis often do not culture the same organisms as those obtained at the index procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparative Analysis of Supplemental Medial Buttress Plate Fixation for High-Energy Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in Young Adults.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether augmenting traditional fixation with a femoral neck buttress plate (FNBP) improves clinical outcomes in young adults with high-energy displaced femoral neck fractures. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective matched cohort comparative clinical study. SETTING: Twenty-seven North American Level 1 trauma centers. PATIENTS: Adult patients younger than 55 years who sustained a high-energy (nonpathologic) displaced femoral neck fracture. INTERVENTION: Operative reduction and stabilization of a displaced femoral neck fracture with (group 1) and without (group 2) an FNBP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Complications including failed fixation, nonunion, osteonecrosis, malunion, and need for subsequent major reconstructive surgery (early revision of reduction and/or fixation), proximal femoral osteotomy, or arthroplasty. RESULTS: Of 478 patients younger than 55 years treated operatively for a displaced femoral neck fracture, 11% (n = 51) had the definitive fixation augmented with an FNBP. One or more forms of treatment failure occurred in 29% (n = 15/51) for group 1 and 49% (209/427) for group 2 ( P < 0.01). When FNBP fixation was used, mini-fragment (2.4/2.7 mm) fixation failed significantly more often than small-fragment (3.5 mm) fixation (42% vs. 5%, P < 0.01). Irrespective of plate size, anterior and anteromedial plates failed significantly more often than direct medial plates (75% and 33% vs. 9%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a femoral neck buttress plate to augment traditional fixation in displaced femoral neck fractures is associated with improved clinical outcomes, including lower rates of failed fixation, nonunion, osteonecrosis, and need for secondary reconstructive surgery. The benefits of this technique are optimized when a small-fragment (3.5 mm) plate is applied directly to the medial aspect of the femoral neck, avoiding more anterior positioning . LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Locked Plating versus Nailing for Proximal Tibia Fractures: A Multicenter RCT.

OBJECTIVES: The main 2 forms of treatment for extraarticular proximal tibial fractures are intramedullary nailing (IMN) and locked lateral plating (LLP). The goal of this multicenter, randomized controlled trial was to determine whether there are significant differences in outcomes between these forms of treatment. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: 16 academic trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: 108 patients were enrolled. 99 patients were followed for 12 months. 52 patients were randomized to IMN, and 47 patients were randomized to LLP. INTERVENTION: IMN or lateral locked plating. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Functional scoring including Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment, Bother Index, EQ-5Dindex and EQ-5DVAS. Secondary measures included alignment, operative time, range of motion, union rate, pain, walking ability, ability to manage stairs, need for ambulatory aid and number, and complications. RESULTS: Functional testing demonstrated no difference between the groups, but both groups were still significantly affected 12 months postinjury. Similarly, there was no difference in time of surgery, alignment, nonunion, pain, walking ability, ability to manage stairs, need for ambulatory support, or complications. CONCLUSIONS: Both IMN and LLP provide for similar outcomes after these fractures. Patients continue to improve over the course of the year after injury but remain impaired even 1 year later. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Effects of Technical Errors on the Outcomes of Operatively Managed Femoral Neck Fractures in Adults Less than 50 Years of Age.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of technical errors (TEs) on the outcomes after repair of femoral neck fractures in young adults. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective clinical study. SETTING: 26 North American Level 1 Trauma Centers. PATIENTS: Skeletally mature patients younger than 50 years of age with 492 femoral neck fractures treated between 2005 and 2017. INTERVENTION: Operative repair of femoral neck fracture. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The association between TE (malreduction and deviation from optimal technique) and treatment failure (fixation failure, nonunion, malunion, osteonecrosis, malunion, and revision surgery) were examined using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Overall, a TE was observed in 50% (n = 245/492) of operatively managed femoral neck fractures in young patients. Two or more TEs were observed in 10% of displaced fractures. Treatment failure in displaced fractures occurred in 27% of cases without a TE, 56% of cases with 1 TE, and 86% of cases with 2 or more TEs. TEs were encountered less frequently in treatment of nondisplaced fractures compared with displaced fractures (39% vs. 53%, P < 0.001). Although TE(s) in nondisplaced fractures increased the risk of treatment failure and/or major reconstructive surgery (22% vs. 9%, P < 0.001), they were less frequently associated with treatment failure when compared with displaced fractures with a TE (22% vs. 69% P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: TEs were found in half of all femoral neck fractures in young adults undergoing operative repair. Both the occurrence and number of TEs were associated with an increased risk for failure of treatment. Preoperative planning for thoughtful and well-executed reduction and fixation techniques should lead to improved outcomes for young patients with femoral neck fractures. This study should also highlight the need for educational forums to address this subject. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Anterior Pelvic Ring Fracture Pattern Predicts Subsequent Displacement in Lateral Compression Sacral Fractures.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if anterior pelvic fracture pattern in lateral compression (LC) sacral fractures correlates with subsequent displacement on examination under anesthesia (EUA) or follow-up in both nonoperative and operative cases. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Two hundred twenty-seven skeletally mature patients with traumatic LC (OTA/AO 61B1.1, 61B2.1-2, and 61B3.1-2) pelvic ring injuries treated nonoperatively, with EUA, or with pelvic fixation were included. INTERVENTION: The study intervention included retrospective review of patients' charts and radiographs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Displacement on EUA or follow-up radiographs (both operative and nonoperative) correlated with anterior pelvic ring fracture pattern. RESULTS: Independent of sacral fracture pattern (complete or incomplete), risk of subsequent displacement on EUA or at follow-up after both nonoperative and operative treatments correlated strongly with ipsilateral superior and inferior pubic rami fractures that were either comminuted (95.6%, P < 0.001) or oblique (100%, P < 0.001). Patients with transverse or lack of inferior pubic ramus fracture did not displace (0%, P < 0.001). Out of 21 LC injuries treated with posterior-only fixation, displacement at follow-up occurred in all 11 patients (100%) with comminuted and/or oblique superior and inferior pubic rami fractures. Nakatani zone I and II rami fractures correlated most with risk of subsequent displacement. CONCLUSIONS: Unstable anterior fracture patterns are characterized as comminuted and/or oblique fractures of ipsilateral superior and inferior pubic rami. EUA should be strongly considered in these patients to disclose occult instability, for both complete and incomplete sacral fracture patterns. Additionally, these unstable anterior fracture patterns are poor candidates for posterior-only fixation and supplemental anterior fixation should be considered. Irrespective of sacral fracture pattern (complete or incomplete), nonoperative management is successful in patients with transverse or lack of inferior pubic ramus fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Evaluation of a Novel Multidisciplinary Preoperative Workup Strategy for Geriatric Hip Fractures.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the financial and clinical impact of a standardized, multidisciplinary team for surgical clearance and optimization in geriatric hip fracture patients. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Level-1 trauma center. PATIENTS: One hundred twenty-four geriatric patients (age >65 years old) in the preprotocol group (cohort 1; January 2017-December 2018) and 98 geriatric patients in the postprotocol group (cohort 2; October 2019-January 2021) with operative hip fractures. INTERVENTION: Implementation of a multidisciplinary team protocol consisting of Anesthesiology, Internal Medicine and Orthopedic Surgery departments for the assessment of medical readiness and optimization for surgical intervention in geriatric hip fractures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rate of cardiology consultation, need for cardiac workup (echocardiography stress testing, heath catheterization), time to medical readiness (TTMR), time to surgery, case-cancellation rate, length of stay (LOS), and total hospitalization charges. RESULTS: Following implementation of the new protocol, there were significant ( P < 0.001) decreases in TTMR (19 vs. 11 hours), LOS (149 vs. 120 hours), case cancellation rate, and total hospital charges ($84,000 vs. $62,000). There were no significant differences with respect to in-hospital complications or readmission rates/mortality rates at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Following implementation of a protocolized, multidisciplinary approach to optimizing geriatric fracture patients, we were able to demonstrate a reduction in unnecessary preoperative testing, TTMR for surgery, case cancellation rate, LOS, and total hospitalization charge-without a concomitant increase in complications or mortality. This study highlights that standardization of the perioperative care for geriatric hip fracture patients can provide effective patient care while also lowering financial and logistical burden in care for these injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Evolution in the Acute Management of Open Fracture Treatment? Part 2.

INTRODUCTION: In the first installment of this two-part series, we explored the history of open fracture treatment focusing primarily on bacteriology and antibiotic selection/stewardship. In this follow-up segment, we will analyze and summarize the other aspects of open fracture care such as time to debridement, pulsatile lavage, and open wound management (including time to closure)-finishing with summative statements and recommendations based on the current most up-to-date literature. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Optimizing the Host in Fracture Surgery.

Multiple factors impact fracture healing; thus, endocrine optimization and nutritional optimization warrant investigation in the acute fracture and nonunion patient. This article presents current evidence regarding the role of the endocrinologists and the dietician in the fracture patient as well as the most recent data assessing the vitamin D axis in these populations. Similarly, the most recent information regarding the use and risks of NSAIDs in fracture healing are presented. The fracture surgeon must consider each individual patient and weigh the benefits versus the costs of host optimization.

The effect of suture pattern and tension on cutaneous blood flow as assessed by laser Doppler flowmetry in a pig model.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of various suture patterns on cutaneous blood flow (CBF) at the wound edge as increasing tension is applied through the suture. METHODS: Four different suture patterns commonly used for wound closure (simple, vertical mattress, horizontal mattress, and Allgower-Donati) were placed individually after a full-thickness incision was made in an anesthetized pig. A laser Doppler flowmeter (LDF) was placed on the skin edge after the suture was passed. Baseline CBF was recorded. Increasing tension was applied to the wound edge via the suture through a tensionometer in 0.5-lb (0.23-kg) increments from 0 to 2.5 lb (1.13 kg). CBF was then recorded as a function of tension for each suture pattern. RESULTS: The Allgower-Donati suture pattern affected CBF significantly less than the other three suture patterns did for all tensions from 0.5 to 2.0 lb (0-0.9 kg; P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between vertical mattress, horizontal mattress, and simple suture patterns. CONCLUSIONS: The Allgower-Donati suture pattern had the least effect on CBF with increasing tension in this model. Further study is warranted on the benefits of this suture pattern because it may decrease wound complications in traumatized tissues.

Minimum 1-year follow-up for patients with vertical shear sacroiliac joint dislocations treated with iliosacral screws: does joint ankylosis or anatomic reduction contribute to functional outcome?

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively analyze a homogenous group of trauma patients with pure sacroiliac (SI) joint dislocations treated with iliosacral screws (ISS), with specific attention to functional outcome and its correlation with the presence or absence of SI joint ankylosis and quality of reduction. DESIGN: Retrospective chart and radiographic review of initial injury and treatment, with prospective long-term evaluation of radiographs, computed tomography (CT) scans, and functional assessments. SETTING: Level One Regional Trauma Center. PATIENTS: Twenty-three patients who were skeletally mature with traumatic vertical shear pelvic injuries associated with a pure SI joint dislocation. INTERVENTION: Treatment consisted of closed or open reduction in the supine or prone position and insertion of a single ISS placed percutaneously for the fixation of the posterior ring injury. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Each patient was evaluated for functional outcome using version 2 of the Short-Form 36 (SF-36v2), the short version of the Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (sMFA), the Iowa Pelvic Scoring System, and the Majeed Pelvic Scoring System. Additionally, at the follow-up visit, each patient received plain radiographs of the pelvis and CT scanning of the pelvis. RESULTS: Minimum follow-up was 1 year postindex procedure (13-120 months). In this subset of patients with pure SI dislocations treated with ISS alone, anatomic reduction was the only predictor of a more favorable functional outcome (P = 0.04). Specifically, SI joint ankylosis did not affect functional outcome in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of this study, in the treatment of vertically displaced, pure SI joint dislocations, an anatomic reduction (whether closed or open), followed by ISS fixation should be the goal because this appears to be the only predictor of a more favorable functional outcome in patients with this injury. Complete SI joint ankylosis appears to have no effect, either positive or negative, on functional outcome in these patients.

Fixation Strategy Using Sequential Intraoperative Examination Under Anesthesia for Unstable Lateral Compression Pelvic Ring Injuries Reliably Predicts Union with Minimal Displacement.

BACKGROUND: Examination under anesthesia (EUA) has been used to identify pelvic instability. Surgeons may utilize percutaneous methods for posterior and anterior pelvic ring stabilization. We developed an intraoperative strategy whereby posterior fixation is performed, with reassessment using sequential EUA to determine the need for anterior fixation. Our aim in the current study was to evaluate whether this strategy reliably results in union with minimal displacement. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective study involving adult patients with closed lateral compression (LC) pelvic ring injuries treated during the period of 2013 to 2016. Included were patients who underwent percutaneous pelvic fixation based on sequential EUA. Data points included patient demographics, injury and fixation details, and displacement as observed on follow-up radiographs. RESULTS: Complete documentation was available for 74 patients (mean age, 41 years). The mean duration of follow was 11 months. Fifty-three of the patients had LC-1 injuries, 19 had LC-2 injuries, and 2 had LC-3 injuries. Twenty-five (47.2%) of the 53 patients with LC-1 and 11 (57.9%) of the 19 patients with LC-2 injuries did not undergo anterior fixation on the basis of the algorithm. The 36 LC-1 or LC-2 patients who underwent combined anterior and posterior fixation had no measurable displacement at union. Of the 36 LC-1 or LC-2 patients with no anterior fixation, 27 with unilateral rami fractures had no measurable displacement at union. The remaining 9 LC-1 or LC-2 cases with no anterior fixation had bilateral superior and inferior rami fractures; each of these patients demonstrated displacement (mean, 7.5 mm; range, 5 to 12 mm) within 6 weeks of fixation that remained until union. All patients had protected weight-bearing for 12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: A fixation strategy based on sequential intraoperative EUA reliably results in union with minimal displacement for unstable LC pelvic ring injuries. Injuries requiring combined anterior and posterior fixation healed with no displacement. Those without anterior fixation and a unilateral ramus fracture healed with no displacement. In the presence of bilateral rami fractures, even with a negative finding on sequential EUA, the pelvis healed with 7.5 mm average displacement. Surgeons may consider anterior fixation to prevent this displacement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparison of 3 Methods for Maintaining Inter-Fragmentary Compression After Fracture Reduction and Fixation.

OBJECTIVES: It is recommended that the intra-articular component of a supracondylar distal femoral fracture be stabilized by a lag screw to create interfragmental compression. Generally, it is thought that lag screw fixation should precede any positional screw or locking screw application. This study compared 3 methods of maintaining interfragmentary compression after fracture reduction with a reduction clamp. METHODS: Intra-articular vertical split fractures were created in synthetic femora. A force transducer was interposed between the medial and lateral condyles and 20 lbs of compression was applied to the fracture with a reduction clamp. 3.5-mm cortical lag screws (group 1), 3.5-mm cortical position screws (group 2), and 5.4-mm distal locking screws through a distal femur locking plate (group 3) were placed across the fracture (n = 4/group). After screw placement, the clamp was removed and the amount of residual interfragmentary compression was recorded. After 2 minutes, a final steady-state force was measured and compared across groups. RESULTS: Locking screws placed through the plate (group 3) maintained 27% of the initial force applied by the clamp (P = 0.043), whereas positional screws (group 2) maintained 90% of the initial force applied by the clamp (P = 0.431). The steady-state compression force measured with lag screws (group 1) increased by 240% (P = 0.030) relative to the initial clamp force. The steady-state force in the lag screw group was significantly greater than groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: When reducing intra-articular fractures and applying interfragmentary compression with reduction clamps, additional lag screws increase the amount of compression across the fracture interface. Compressing a fracture with reduction clamps and relying on locking screws to maintain the compression result in a loss of interfragmentary compression and should be avoided. This study lends biomechanical support that lag screws placed outside of the plate before locking screws for fracture fixation help maintain optimal interfragmentary compression.

Anterior-Inferior Plating Results in Fewer Secondary Interventions Compared to Superior Plating for Acute Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a difference in plate position for fixation of acute, displaced, midshaft clavicle fractures would affect the rate of secondary intervention. DESIGN: Retrospective Comparative Study. SETTING: Two academic Level 1 Regional Trauma Centers. PATIENTS: Five hundred ten patients treated surgically for an acutely displaced midshaft clavicle fracture between 2000 and 2013 were identified and reviewed retrospectively at a minimum of 24 months follow-up (F/U). Fractures were divided into 2 cohorts, according to plate position: Anterior-Inferior (AI) or Superior (S). Exclusion criteria included age <16 years, incomplete data records, and loss to F/U. Group analysis included demographics (age, sex, body mass index), fracture characteristics (mechanism of injury, open or closed), hand dominance, ipsilateral injuries, time between injury to surgery, time to radiographic union, length of F/U, and frequency of secondary procedures. INTERVENTION: Patients were treated either with AI or S clavicle plating at the treating surgeon's discretion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rate and reason for secondary intervention. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Fisher exact test, t test. and odds ratio were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Final analysis included 252 fractures/251 patients. One hundred eighteen (47%) were in group AI; 134 (53%) were in group S. No differences in demographics, fracture characteristics, time to surgery, time to union, or length of F/U existed between groups. Seven patients/7 fractures (5.9%) in Group AI underwent a secondary surgery whereas 30 patients/30 fractures (22.3%) in group S required a secondary surgery. An additional intervention secondary to superior plate placement was highly statistically significant (P < 0.001). Furthermore, because 80% of these subsequent interventions were a result of plate irritation with patient discomfort, the odds ratio for a second procedure was 5 times greater in those fractures treated with a superior plate. CONCLUSIONS: This comparative analysis indicates that AI plating of midshaft clavicle fractures seems to lessen clinical irritation and results in significantly fewer secondary interventions. Considering patient satisfaction and a reduced financial burden to the health care system, we recommend routine AI plate application when open reduction internal fixation of the clavicle is indicated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Institutional and Seasonal Variations in the Incidence and Causative Organisms for Posttraumatic Infection following Open Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: The current literature focuses on wound severity, time to debridement, and antibiotic administration with respect to risk of infection after open fracture. The purpose of this analysis was to determine if either the incidence of posttraumatic infection or causative organism varies with treating institution or the season in which the open fracture occurred. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Seven level 1 regional referral trauma centers located in each of the 7 climatic regions of the continental United States (Northwest, High Plains, Midwest/Ohio Valley, New England/Mid-Atlantic, Southeast, South, and Southwest). PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Five thousand one hundred twenty-seven skeletally mature patients with open extremity fractures treated between 2008 and 2012 at one of the 7 institutions. INTERVENTION: Open reduction and internal fixation of fracture following institutional protocol for antibiotic prophylaxis, debridement, and soft-tissue management. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Seasonal variation on the incidence of infection and the causative organism after treatment for open fracture as recorded by each individual treating institution. Charts were analyzed to extract information regarding date of injury, Gustilo-Anderson type of open fracture, subsequent treatment for a posttraumatic wound infection, and the causative organisms. Patients were placed into one of the 4 groups based on the time of year that the injury occurred: spring (March-May), summer (June-August), fall (September-November), and winter (December-February). Univariate/multivariate analyses and Fisher test were used to assess whether any observed differences were of statistical significance. RESULTS: The overall incidence of infection for all open fractures across the 7 different institutions was 7.6% and this did not vary significantly by season. There were, however, significant differences in overall infection rates between the different institutions: Southeast 4.3%, Northwest 13%, Northeast 7.7%, Southwest 9.3%, Midwest/Ohio Valley 5.5%, High Plains 14.6%, and South 7.4%. The following institutions demonstrated a significant seasonal variation in the incidence of infection: Northwest = fall 11% versus winter 18.5%, Southwest = winter 1.5% and fall 17.3%, Northeast = winter 5.2% and spring 9.7%, and Southeast = fall 2.8% and spring 6.0%. The High Plains, Midwest/Ohio Valley, and Southern institutions did not demonstrate a significant seasonal variation in infection rates. Finally, the most commonly encountered causative organism varied not only by region, but by season as well. Staphylococcus aureus (both methicillin sensitive and resistant) continues to be the most prevalent organism in the continental United States. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial seasonal and institutional variation exists regarding the incidence of infection and causative organisms for posttraumatic wound infection after open fractures. Although this may represent a difference in treatment regimens between individual surgeons and institutions, a decades-old general nation-wide empiric antibiotic prophylaxis regimen for all open fractures may in fact be outdated and suboptimal. We recommend that surgeons consult with their infectious disease colleagues to better understand the seasonal variation of infection and causative organism for their individual hospital, and adjust their prophylactic and treatment regimens accordingly. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Contemporary management of pelvic fractures.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic fractures occur when there is high kinetic energy transfer to the patient such as would be expected in motor vehicle crashes, auto-pedestrian collisions, motorcycle crashes, falls, and crush injuries. High-force impact implies an increased risk for associated injuries to accompany the pelvic fracture, as well as significant mortality and morbidity risks. Choosing the optimum course of diagnosis and treatment for these patients can be challenging. The purpose of this review is to supply a contemporary view of the diagnosis and therapy of patients with this important group of injuries. METHODS: A comprehensive review of the medical literature, focusing on publications produced in the last 10 years, was undertaken. The principal sources were found in surgical, orthopedic, and radiographic journals. CONCLUSIONS: The central challenge for the clinician evaluating and managing a patient with a pelvic fracture is to determine the most immediate threat to life and control this threat. Treatment approaches will vary depending on whether the main threat arises from pelvic fracture hemorrhage, associated injuries, or both simultaneously. Functional outcomes in the long-term depend on the quality of the rigid fixation of the fracture, as well as associated pelvic neural and visceral injuries.