Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 29(6): 375-382, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28914654

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Infection with Chlamydia trachomatis in pregnancy is linked to increased risk of miscarriage, stillbirth, and preterm birth. Currently, PCR or DNA-based tests are the gold standard when detecting the infection; however, they are costly and require access to specialist equipment. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the accuracy of available tests to detect infection in an asymptomatic pregnant population. RECENT FINDINGS: There was evidence of the superior accuracy of nucleic acid amplification tests to cell culture in nonpregnant asymptomatic women; however, there are multiple commercial nucleic acid amplification tests with varying sensitivities and specificities. There is a gap in current literature on accuracy studies in an asymptomatic pregnant population, particularly within routine antenatal settings. SUMMARY: There is a need for a point-of-care test for Chlamydia in pregnancy. Future test accuracy studies for this population should aim to use a universally established reference standard. Further research should provide relevant evidence to guide practice.


Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Chlamydia trachomatis/isolamento & purificação , Técnicas e Procedimentos Diagnósticos/normas , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Técnicas de Amplificação de Ácido Nucleico/normas , Testes Imediatos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Gravidez , Cuidado Pré-Natal/normas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA