Mini-fragment Plate Fixation after Olecranon Osteotomy for Distal Humerus Fractures.

PURPOSE: While olecranon osteotomies are helpful for distal humerus visualization, traditional methods of fixation are commonly irritating for patients and require hardware removal. Recent studies have shown lower hardware removal rates for medullary screw constructs and 3.5-mm plates, but no studies have investigated the use of 2.7-mm plates for olecranon osteotomy fixation. The purpose of this study is to report on the outcomes of single 2.7-mm mini-fragment plate fixation of olecranon osteotomies for distal humerus intra-articular fractures. METHODS: Patients who sustained an intra-articular distal humerus fracture, as identified by CPT codes, were reviewed retrospectively over a 5-year study period (2016-2020) at a single Level I trauma center after IRB approval. Only patients who underwent an olecranon osteotomy for distal humerus visualization during their definitive operation and that was subsequently fixed with a single 2.7-mm plate were included. Primary outcomes were implant removal and osteotomy union. Secondary outcomes included indications for implant removal, implant failure, infection, and revision surgery. Hardware removal rates were compared to historically reported rates in the literature. χ2 versus Fisher's exact tests were used to compare fixation groups based on number of patients in each cohort (5 or less was used for the cut-off for Fisher's exact test). RESULTS: 38 patients were included in the final analysis. The average age was 50 years (standard deviation [SD] 18), 58% (22 patients) were female, and there was an average follow-up time of 9.7 months (SD 5). All patients with mini-fragment plate fixation went on to union of their olecranon osteotomy. Three (7.8%) patients had their olecranon hardware removed for all causes: one for revision open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), one for irritation, and one removal during concomitant capsulectomy and manipulation. There was a 21% (8 patients) revision surgery rate in the cohort but only 3 of those were for issues related to the olecranon osteotomy. One patient required revision ORIF of the olecranon osteotomy for hardware loosening. Compared to other fixation constructs, mini-fragment plates had a lower removal rate than tension band wiring (P = 0.0002) and 3.5-mm plates (P = 0.05) and similar among medullary screws ± wires. Nonunion rates were similar between all constructs (P = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Single 2.7-mm mini-fragment plate fixation of olecranon osteotomies for distal humerus fractures is safe and effective with low rates of revision, hardware removal, and nonunion. This type of fixation should be considered when treating intra-articular distal humerus fractures that require an olecranon osteotomy.

Rates of interlock screw back-out are high with the retrograde femoral nailing advanced system for distal femur fractures.

PURPOSE: The retrograde femoral nailing advanced (RFNA) system (DePuy synthes) is a commonly used implant for the fixation of low distal femur and periprosthetic fractures. There is concern that the rate of distal interlock screw back-out may be higher for the RFNA compared to other nails (ON). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of interlock screw back-out and associated screw removal for RFNA versus ON, along with associated risk factors. METHODS: A retrospective comparative study of patients who underwent retrograde nailing for a distal femur fracture at an academic level one trauma center was performed. The incidence of distal interlock screw back-out and need for screw removal were compared for RFNA versus a propensity score matched cohort who received other nails. RESULTS: One hundred and ten patients underwent retrograde nailing with the RFNA for a distal femur fracture from 2015 to 2022 (average age: 66, BMI: 32, 52.7% smokers, 54.5% female, 61.8%). There was a significantly higher rate of interlock back-out in the RFNA group compared to the ON (27 patients, 24.5% vs 12 patients, 10.9%, p = 0.01), which occurred 6.3 weeks postoperatively. Screw removal rates for back-out were not significantly different for the RFNA group versus ON (8 patients, 7.3% vs 3 patients, 2.7%, p = 0.12). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective comparative study of distal femur fractures treated with retrograde nailing, the RFNA implant was associated with an increased risk of distal interlock screw back-out compared to other nails.

Posterior rim loading of a low-conforming tibial insert in unrestricted kinematic alignment is caused by rotational alignment of an asymmetric baseplate designed for mechanical alignment.

PURPOSE: Because different targets are used for internal-external rotation, an asymmetric baseplate designed for mechanical alignment may lead to under-coverage and concomitant posterior rim loading in the lateral compartment following unrestricted kinematic alignment (KA) TKA. Recognizing that such loading can lead to premature wear and/or subsidence, our aim was to determine the cause(s) so that occurrence could be remedied. Our hypothesis was that baseplate design features such as asymmetric shape when aligned in KA would consistently contribute to posterior rim loading in the lateral compartment. METHODS: Based on analysis of fluoroscopic images of 50 patients performing dynamic, weight bearing deep knee bend and step up and of postoperative CT images, five possible causes were investigated. Causes included internal rotation of the baseplate when positioned in KA; posterior position of the lateral femoral condyle at extension; internal tibial rotation with flexion; internal rotational deviation of the baseplate from the KA rotation target; and posterior slope. RESULTS: The incidence of posterior rim loading was 18% (9 of 50 patients). When positioned in KA, the asymmetric baseplate left 15% versus 10% of the AP depth of the lateral compartment uncovered posteriorly for posterior rim loading and non-posterior rim loading groups, respectively (p = 0.009). The lateral femoral condyle at extension was more posterior by 4 mm for the posterior rim loading group (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Posterior rim loading in the lateral compartment was caused in part by the asymmetric design of the tibial baseplate designed for mechanical alignment which was internally rotated when positioned in KA thus under-covering a substantial percentage of the posterior lateral tibia. This highlights the need for new, asymmetric baseplates designed to maximize coverage when used in KA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Assessment of sacral osseous fixation pathways for same-level dual transiliac-transsacral screw insertion.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to (1) describe a pre-operative planning technique using non-reformatted CT images for insertion of multiple transiliac-transsacral (TI-TS) screws at a single sacral level, (2) define the parameters of a sacral osseous fixation pathway (OFP) that will allow for insertion of two TI-TS screws at a single level, and (3) identify the incidence of sacral OFPs large enough for dual-screw insertion in a representative patient population. METHODS: Retrospective review at a level-1 academic trauma center of a cohort of patients with unstable pelvic injuries treated with two TI-TS screws in the same sacral OFP, and a control cohort of patients without pelvic injuries who had CT scans for other reasons. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients had two TI-TS screws at S1. Eleven patients, all with dysmorphic osteology, had two TI-TS screws at S2. The average pathway size in the sagittal plane at the level the screws were placed was 17.2 mm in S1 vs 14.4 mm in S2 (p = 0.02). Twenty-one patients (42%) had screws that were intraosseous and 29 (58%) had part of a screw that was juxtaforaminal. No screws were extraosseous. The average OFP size of intraosseous screws was 18.1 mm vs. 15.5 mm for juxtaforaminal screws (p = 0.02). Fourteen millimeters was used as a guide for the lower limit of the OFP for safe dual-screw fixation. Overall, 30% of S1 or S2 pathways were ≥ 14 mm in the control group, with 58% of control patients having at least one of the S1 or S2 pathways ≥ 14 mm. CONCLUSIONS: OFPs ≥ 7.5 mm in the axial plane and 14 mm in the sagittal plane on non-reformatted CT images are large enough for dual-screw fixation at a single sacral level. Overall, 30% of S1 and S2 pathways were ≥ 14 mm and 58% of control patients had an available OFP in at least one sacral level.

Oblique anterior pelvic external fixator for intraoperative reduction of rotationally unstable pelvic ring injuries.

Incomplete sacroiliac joint injuries are often associated with external rotation and extension deformities on the injured hemipelvis. To appropriately correct this deformity, an oblique reduction force from caudal to cranial and lateral to medial is helpful. These injuries are often associated with traumatic disruption of the pubic symphysis. However, in injuries without traumatic disruption to the pubic symphysis, a two-pin oblique anterior external fixator can be used to obtain and maintain reduction of the sacroiliac joint, while percutaneous fixation is subsequently placed. Through a small case series and three specific patient examples, we demonstrate that the oblique anterior external fixator frame is a simple and effective strategy with the reduction and stabilization process of these multiplanar hemipelvis deformities.

Percutaneous sacral screw fixation alone sufficient for mildly displaced U-type sacral fractures with preserved osseous fixation pathways.

PURPOSE: To describe U-type sacral fracture characteristics amenable to percutaneous sacral screw fixation. METHODS: U-type sacral fractures were identified from a trauma registry at a level 1 trauma center from 2014 to 2020. Patient demographics, injury mechanism, fracture characteristics, and fixation construct were retrospectively retrieved. Associations between fracture pattern and surgical fixation were identified. RESULTS: 82 U-type sacral fractures were reviewed. Six treated with lumbopelvic fixation (LPF) and 76 were treated with percutaneous sacral screws (PSS) alone. Patients receiving LBF had greater sacral fracture displacement in coronal, sagittal, and axial planes compared to patients receiving PSS alone (P < 0.05), negating osseous fixation pathways. All patients went onto sacral union and there were no implant failures or unplanned reoperations for either group. CONCLUSION: If osseous fixation pathways are present, U-type sacral fractures can be successfully treated with percutaneous sacral screws. LPF may be indicated in more displaced fractures with loss of spinopelvic alignment. Both techniques for U-type sacral fractures result in reliable fixation and healing without reoperations.

The Biomechanical Effects of Simulated Radioscapholunate Fusion With Distal Scaphoidectomy, 4-Corner Fusion With Complete Scaphoidectomy, and Proximal Row Carpectomy Compared to the Native Wrist.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of simulated radioscapholunate fusion with distal scaphoid excision (RSLF+DSE), 4-corner fusion with scaphoidectomy (4-CF), and proximal row carpectomy (PRC) on the wrist's range of motion (ROM), contact pressure, and contact force in a cadaveric model. METHODS: Ten freshly frozen cadaveric wrists were tested under 4 sequential conditions: native wrist, RSLF+DSE, 4-CF, and PRC. The simulated fusions were performed using two 1.6-mm Kirschner wires. The ROM in the flexion-extension and radioulnar deviation planes was evaluated. Contact area, contact pressure, and contact force were measured at the scaphocapitolunate joint for the RSLF+DSE simulation and radiocarpal joint for the 4-CF and PRC simulations. Mechanical testing was performed using a 35-N uniaxial load and pressure-sensitive film. RESULTS: The RSLF+DSE and 4-CF groups had a decreased wrist arc ROM compared with the native wrist. The PRC group had a greater wrist arc ROM compared with the RSLF+DSE and 4-CF groups, but compared to the native wrist, it demonstrated a mildly decreased wrist arc ROM. The carpal pressure and contact force were significantly increased in the RSLF+DSE, 4-CF, and PRC groups compared with those in the native wrist. The RSLF+DSE group had the smallest increase in the carpal pressure and contact force, whereas the PRC group had the greatest increase. CONCLUSIONS: Our study validates previous findings that PRC is motion-conserving but has the greatest contact force, whereas RSLF-DSE and 4-CF may cause a decrease in the ROM but have lower contact forces. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Understanding the underlying native wrist biomechanics and alterations following different surgical treatments may assist hand surgeons in their clinical decision making for the treatment of stage II scapholunate advanced collapse.

Opportunistic muscle measurements on staging chest CT for extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma are associated with survival.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Computed tomography (CT) measurements of sarcopenia have been proposed as biomarkers associated with outcomes in various cancers and have typically been evaluated at the L3 vertebral level. However, staging imaging for patients with extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma (STS) often only includes chest CT imaging which precludes evaluation at L3. Therefore, we sought to evaluate muscle metrics at T12 on standard staging chest CT scans and evaluate for correlation with overall and event-free survival in patients with STS. METHODS: CT chest imaging for 89 patients with intermediate and high-grade STS (53 male, 36 female; 58.5 ± 19.0 years old, follow-up 37.4 ± 27.1 months) was reviewed on PACS at T12 for skeletal muscle density (SMD) and skeletal muscle index (SMI). RESULTS: Overall survival increased with increased SMD on univariate (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61 [0.43, 0.86]) and age-adjusted analysis (HR = 0.65 [0.42, 0.89]. Event-free survival also increased with increased SMD in univariate analyses (HR = 0.68 [0.49, 0.95]) but did not maintain significance after adjusting for age (HR = 0.68 [0.43, 1.07]). SMI was not a predictor of overall or event-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Higher SMD measured on routinely obtained staging chest CTs in STS patients is associated with improved survival.

Kinematically aligned TKA restores physiological patellofemoral biomechanics in the sagittal plane during a deep knee bend.

PURPOSE: Although patellofemoral complications after kinematically aligned (KA) TKA are infrequent, the patellar flexion angle and proximal-distal patellar contact location through flexion, and incidence of patellar loss of contact at full extension are unknown. The present study determined whether the patellar flexion angle and proximal-distal patellar contact location of a KA TKA performed with anatomic, fixed-bearing, posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR) components differed from those of the native contralateral knee during a deep knee bend, and determined the incidence of patellar loss of contact at full extension for KA TKA only. METHODS: During a deep knee bend from full extension to maximum flexion, both knees were imaged in a lateral view using single-plane fluoroscopy for 25 patients with a calipered KA TKA and a healthy native knee in the contralateral limb. The patellar flexion angle and proximal-distal patellar contact location were measured on images from full extension to maximum flexion in 30° increments. Paired t tests at each flexion angle determined the significance of the difference between the KA TKA knees and the native contralateral knees. In the KA TKA knees, the incidence of patellar loss of contact at full extension was determined. Patient-reported outcome scores also were recorded including the Oxford Knee Score. RESULTS: Mean patellar flexion angles were not different between the KA TKA knees and the native contralateral knees throughout the motion arc. The largest statistically significant difference in the mean proximal-distal patellar contact locations was 4 mm. The incidence of patellar loss of contact in the KA TKA knees at full extension was 8% (2 of 25 patients). The median Oxford Knee Score was 46 out of 48. CONCLUSIONS: Calipered KA TKA performed with anatomic, fixed-bearing, PCR components restored patellar flexion angles to native and largely restored the proximal-distal patellar contact locations, which at most differed from the native contralateral knee by approximately 10% of the mean proximal-distal patellar length. In the KA TKA knees, the incidence of patellar loss of contact was infrequent. These objective biomechanical results are consistent with the relatively high subjective patient-reported outcome scores herein and support the low incidence of patellofemoral complications following KA TKA previously reported. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level III.

Small differences in tibial contact locations following kinematically aligned TKA from the native contralateral knee.

PURPOSE: Kinematically aligned (KA) TKA strives to restore native limb and knee alignments without ligament release with the premise that knee function likewise will be closely restored to native to the extent enabled by the components used. This study determined differences in anterior-posterior (AP) tibial contact locations of a KA TKA performed with asymmetric, fixed bearing, posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR) components from those of the native contralateral knee and also determined the incidence of posterior rim contact of the tibial insert during a deep knee bend and a step-up. METHODS: Both knees were imaged using single-plane fluoroscopy for 25 patients with a calipered KA TKA and a native knee in the contralateral limb. AP tibial contact locations in each compartment were determined following 3D model-to-2D image registration. Differences in mean AP tibial contact locations in each compartment between the KA TKA knees and the native contralateral knees were analysed. Contact locations either on or beyond the most posterior point of the tibial insert determined the occurrence of posterior rim contact. RESULTS: Mean AP tibial contact locations for both native and KA TKA knees remained relatively centred in the medial compartment but moved posterior in the lateral compartment during flexion. In both the medial and lateral compartments, differences in mean AP tibial contact locations between the KA TKA knees and the native contralateral knees were more posterior and greatest at 0° flexion for both activities (4 mm, p = 0.0009 and 7 mm, p < 0.0001 for deep knee bend and 6 mm, p < 0.0001 and 8 mm, p < 0.0001 for step-up in the medial and lateral compartments, respectively). The incidence of posterior rim contact of the tibial insert was 16% (4 of 25 patients) but the lowest Oxford Knee Score was 43 for these patients. The median Oxford Knee Score for all patients was 46 (out of 48). CONCLUSIONS: Calipered KA TKA with asymmetric, fixed bearing, PCR components resulted in mean AP tibial contact locations which were relatively centred in the compartments and differed at most from those of the native contralateral knee by approximately 15% of the AP dimension of a mid-sized tibial baseplate. Although posterior rim contact occurred in some patients, all such patients had high patient-reported outcome scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level III.

Food insecurity and cardiovascular health: Findings from a statewide population health survey in Wisconsin.

BACKGROUND: The social and economic environment has become a major area of interest regarding the determinants of cardiovascular health. Among markers of economic distress, food insecurity has been found associated with metabolic disorders, dyslipidemia, and obesity, but no previous studies have examined its association with overall cardiovascular health. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis among 2935 participants in the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin (SHOW), a statewide population-based representative sample. The presence of food insecurity was determined by an affirmative answer to the question "In the last 12months, have you been concerned about having enough food for you or your family?" Cardiovascular health (CVH) was defined based on the American Heart Association Life's Simple 7 criteria and classified as "poor," "intermediate," or "ideal" using previously published criteria. "Good" CVH was defined as having no poor in any of the seven criteria (any amount of intermediate or ideal). Crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) of good CVH according to presence of food insecurity were calculated using logistic regression models. Overall, food insecurity was associated with a decreased likelihood of good CVH (OR 0.53; 95% Confidence Interval 0.31 to 0.92; p=0.02). This association persisted in models controlling for age, gender, race, and urbanization. CONCLUSIONS: Participants who were food insecure were significantly less likely to have good CVH compared to participants who were food secure. Even though this study cannot confirm causality, these results suggest that food insecurity might be one of several socio-economic barriers contributing to poor CVH.

The critical impact of traumatic muscle loss on fracture healing: Basic science and clinical aspects.

Musculoskeletal trauma, specifically fractures, is a leading cause of patient morbidity and disability worldwide. In approximately 20% of cases with fracture and related traumatic muscle loss, bone healing is impaired leading to fracture nonunion. Over the past few years, several studies have demonstrated that bone and the surrounding muscle tissue interact not only anatomically and mechanically but also through biochemical pathways and mediators. Severe damage to the surrounding musculature at the fracture site causes an insufficiency in muscle-derived osteoprogenitor cells that are crucial for fracture healing. As an endocrine tissue, skeletal muscle produces many myokines that act on different bone cells, such as osteoblasts, osteoclasts, osteocytes, and mesenchymal stem cells. Investigating how muscle influences fracture healing at cellular, molecular, and hormonal levels provides translational therapeutic solutions to this clinical challenge. This review provides an overview about the contributions of surrounding muscle tissue in directing fracture healing. The focus of the review is on describing the interactions between bone and muscle in both healthy and fractured environments. We discuss current progress in identifying the bone-muscle molecular pathways and strategies to harness these pathways as cues for accelerating fracture healing. In addition, we review the existing challenges and research opportunities in the field.

High energy trans-cuboid Chopart dislocation: From closed reduction to secondary double arthrodesis.

Case report: Chopart joint fracture-dislocations are rare injuries. The purpose of this report is to present the management of a high energy trans-cuboid Chopart dislocation. This fracture-dislocation dislocation was treated with closed reduction, provisional fixation, and definitively with a combination of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and a lateral column external fixator. Due to persistent pain and Chopart joint collapse, the patient ultimately required a double arthrodesis. Conclusion: While rare, Chopart joint fracture-dislocations are impactful injuries that require prompt diagnosis and specialized management. The description of this high energy trans-cuboid Chopart dislocation and the stepwise approach for its management may be useful for other surgeons who encounter similar injuries.

Clinical differences between periprosthetic and native distal femur fractures: a comparative observational study.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of periprosthetic distal femur fractures (PDFF) is increasing as the number of total knee replacements becomes more common. This study compared the demographics, fracture characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of periprosthetic versus native distal femur fractures (NDFF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients ≥ 18 who underwent surgical fixation of NDFF or PDFF from 2012 to 2020 at a level-1 trauma center. The main variables collected included demographics, AO/OTA fracture classification, fixation construct, concomitant fractures, polytrauma rates, bone density, and reduction quality. Primary outcomes were unexpected return to the operating room (UROR), hospital length of stay, and quality of reduction. T-tests, Fisher's exact tests, and multivariate analyses were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: 209 patients were identified, including 70 PDFF and 139 NDFF. PDFF patients were elderly females (81%) with isolated (80%) and comminuted (85%) 33 A.3 (71%) fractures. NDFF patients included 53% females, were commonly middle-aged, and displayed comminuted (92%) 33 C.2 fractures. 48% of NDFF patients had concomitant fractures. Intramedullary nailing was the primary fixation for both groups, followed by nail-plate combination (37%) for PDFF and lateral locking plates (21%) for NDFF. NDFF patients experienced significantly longer hospital stays, higher UROR rates, and worse quality of reduction (p < 0.05). PDFF patients had a significantly greater prevalence of low bone density (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: PDFF occur as isolated injuries with significant metaphyseal comminution in elderly females with low bone quality. NDFF commonly occurs in younger patients with less metaphyseal comminution and concomitant fractures. Intramedullary nailing was the most common treatment for both groups, although preference for nail-plate combination fixation is increasing. NDFF type 33 C fractures are at greater risk of UROR.

Trifocal femur fracture with intracapsular femoral neck, open diaphyseal, and distal complete articular fractures.

We describe a trifocal femur injury with intracapsular femoral neck fracture, diaphyseal fracture with bone loss, and distal complete articular (AO/OTA C type) fracture, an injury rarely described in the literature. Surgical management utilized a not-yet-reported implant combination: screw-side plate device for the intracapsular femoral neck, retrograde nail for the diaphysis, and lag screws plus mini fragment buttress plating for the distal fracture. The patient had uneventful fracture union with no changes in alignment. Given the rarity and complexity of this injury, there is little consensus on surgical technique and implant choice. This case demonstrates a modernized approach that may be useful for surgeons who encounter similar fracture patterns in their practice.

Ipsilateral Femoral Neck and Shaft Fractures: Complex Injuries With High Rates of Femoral Shaft Nonunion.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate nonunion rates and risk factors in patients with ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Two Level I trauma centers. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Two hundred seven patients treated for ipsilateral femoral neck (AO/OTA 31-B) and shaft (AO/OTA 32A-C) fractures from 2013 to 2022. Patients with less than 6 months of follow-up were excluded. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: The primary outcome of this study was femoral shaft nonunion. Risk factors for nonunion were evaluated, including smoking, open fracture, delay to full weight-bearing, blood transfusions, and AO/OTA classification. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-seven patients were initially identified, but only 154 patients had sufficient follow-up and were included in final analysis. The mean age was 38.9 years (SD = 15.3), and injury severity score was 19.5 (9.7). One hundred ten patients (71%) were male and 69 (45%) required intensive care unit care. Thirty-eight patients (25%) experienced an open fracture, and 44 fractures (29%) were AO/OTA Type C. Thirty patients (20%) underwent initial external fixation, and 88 patients (57%) received a perioperative transfusion. Thirty-four patients (22%) developed a femoral shaft nonunion, and 5 (3%) experienced a surgical site infection. Nonunion was associated with perioperative blood transfusion, AO/OTA Type C fracture, postoperative non-weight-bearing, and delay to full weight-bearing ≥12 weeks. Multivariable regression identified perioperative blood transfusion ≥3 (risk ratio [RR] = 1.91; CI, 1.12-2.72; P = 0.02) and AO/OTA Type C fracture (RR = 2.45; CI, 1.50-3.34; P = 0.001) as independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures remain difficult injuries to treat. Much attention is given to diagnosis and treatment of the femoral neck component. These results suggest that successful treatment of the femoral shaft component presents its own challenges with high nonunion rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III.

Comparing Multipin Clamps With Outriggers With Standard Clamps for Lower Extremity Periarticular External Fixation: Similar Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Staged treatment of high-energy periarticular tibia fractures involves temporization with closed reduction and external fixation, aiming to provide early reduction and stabilization while mitigating soft-tissue complications. Various external fixator configurations exist, including those that use a "multipin" clamp capable of holding multiple pins but limiting pin placement to a single plane. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes and associated costs of standard and multipin outrigger clamp constructs in tibial plateau and pilon fractures treated with temporary external fixation. We hypothesized that use of the multipin clamp may be associated with poorly aligned reductions and increased complication rates. METHODS: A retrospective review of 100 patients with periarticular tibial plateau (AO/OTA: 41B/C) or pilon (43B/C) fracture at a Level 1 trauma center from 2014 to 2023 was conducted. Patient, injury, and complication characteristics were collected. Patients were categorized based on the external fixator clamp used: multipin (MP) or standard (S). Clinical outcomes and complication rates were assessed. Radiographic alignment was evaluated by the change in anterior and lateral distal tibial angles, and sagittal plane translation for pilon fractures, and medial and posterior proximal tibial angles for plateau fractures. RESULTS: 70 patients underwent standard (25 pilon, 45 plateau) and 30 multipin (10 pilon, 20 plateau) external fixation. MP and S groups showed no notable differences in demographics or injury characteristics. Both groups demonstrated comparable complication rates and radiological alignment outcomes, with no notable differences observed. MP constructs were more costly than standard systems. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study of 100 patients, there was no difference in radiographic or clinical outcomes between the standard frame and multipin frame groups. Typical costs for the multipin frame constructs were $635 to $1249 more than the standard frame constructs.

Generative Artificial Intelligence Performs at a Second-Year Orthopedic Resident Level.

Introduction Artificial intelligence (AI) models using large language models (LLMs) and non-specific domains have gained attention for their innovative information processing. As AI advances, it's essential to regularly evaluate these tools' competency to maintain high standards, prevent errors or biases, and avoid flawed reasoning or misinformation that could harm patients or spread inaccuracies. Our study aimed to determine the performance of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) by OpenAI and Google BARD (BARD) in orthopedic surgery, assess performance based on question types, contrast performance between different AIs and compare AI performance to orthopedic residents. Methods We administered ChatGPT and BARD 757 Orthopedic In-Training Examination (OITE) questions. After excluding image-related questions, the AIs answered 390 multiple choice questions, all categorized within 10 sub-specialties (basic science, trauma, sports medicine, spine, hip and knee, pediatrics, oncology, shoulder and elbow, hand, and food and ankle) and three taxonomy classes (recall, interpretation, and application of knowledge). Statistical analysis was performed to analyze the number of questions answered correctly by each AI model, the performance returned by each AI model within the categorized question sub-specialty designation, and the performance of each AI model in comparison to the results returned by orthopedic residents classified by their respective post-graduate year (PGY) level. Results BARD answered more overall questions correctly (58% vs 54%, p<0.001). ChatGPT performed better in sports medicine and basic science and worse in hand surgery, while BARD performed better in basic science (p<0.05). The AIs performed better in recall questions compared to the application of knowledge (p<0.05). Based on previous data, it ranked in the 42nd-96th percentile for post-graduate year ones (PGY1s), 27th-58th for PGY2s, 3rd-29th for PGY3s, 1st-21st for PGY4s, and 1st-17th for PGY5s. Discussion ChatGPT excelled in sports medicine but fell short in hand surgery, while both AIs performed well in the basic science sub-specialty but performed poorly in the application of knowledge-based taxonomy questions. BARD performed better than ChatGPT overall. Although the AI reached the second-year PGY orthopedic resident level, it fell short of passing the American Board of Orthopedic Surgery (ABOS). Its strengths in recall-based inquiries highlight its potential as an orthopedic learning and educational tool.

Biomechanical Analysis of a Modified Triangular Osteosynthesis Technique for Treatment of Spinopelvic Dissociation.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical stability of a modified triangular osteosynthesis construct with S1 pedicle screws compared with other described lumbopelvic fixation constructs in a U-type sacral fracture model. METHODS: U-type sacral fractures were created in validated fourth-generation spinopelvic models. Four different constructs were cyclically loaded with displacement measured in all planes: (1) bilateral L5 pedicle screws with rods attached to iliac bolts, (2) bilateral L5 and S1 pedicle screws with rods attached to iliac bolts, (3) bilateral L5 pedicle screws with rods attached to iliac bolts with a transsacral-transiliac screw, and (4) bilateral L5 and S1 pedicle screws with rods attached to iliac bolts with a transsacral-transiliac screw. RESULTS: The bilateral L5 and S1 pedicle screws with rods attached to iliac bolts with a transsacral-transiliac screw construct had significantly decreased horizontal, vertical, and angular displacement compared with all other constructs. CONCLUSIONS: From a biomechanical perspective, a modified triangular osteosynthesis construct with S1 pedicle screws improves stability in fixation of U-type sacral fractures.

Can Artificial Intelligence Fool Residency Selection Committees? Analysis of Personal Statements by Real Applicants and Generative AI, a Randomized, Single-Blind Multicenter Study.

Introduction: The potential capabilities of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools have been relatively unexplored, particularly in the realm of creating personalized statements for medical students applying to residencies. This study aimed to investigate the ability of generative AI, specifically ChatGPT and Google BARD, to generate personal statements and assess whether faculty on residency selection committees could (1) evaluate differences between real and AI statements and (2) determine differences based on 13 defined and specific metrics of a personal statement. Methods: Fifteen real personal statements were used to generate 15 unique and distinct personal statements from ChatGPT and BARD each, resulting in a total of 45 statements. Statements were then randomized, blinded, and presented to a group of faculty reviewers on residency selection committees. Reviewers assessed the statements by 14 metrics including if the personal statement was AI-generated or real. Comparison of all metrics was performed. Results: Faculty correctly identified 88% (79/90) real statements, 90% (81/90) BARD, and 44% (40/90) ChatGPT statements. Accuracy of identifying real and BARD statements was 89%, but this dropped to 74% when including ChatGPT. In addition, the accuracy did not increase as faculty members reviewed more personal statements (area under the curve [AUC] 0.498, p = 0.966). BARD performed poorer than both real and ChatGPT across all metrics (p < 0.001). Comparing real with ChatGPT, there was no difference in most metrics, except for Personal Interests, Reasons for Choosing Residency, Career Goals, Compelling Nature and Originality, and all favoring the real personal statements (p = 0.001, p = 0.002, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: Faculty members accurately identified real and BARD statements, but ChatGPT deceived them 56% of the time. Although AI can craft convincing statements that are sometimes indistinguishable from real ones, replicating the humanistic experience, personal nuances, and individualistic elements found in real personal statements is difficult. Residency selection committees might want to prioritize these particular metrics while assessing personal statements, given the growing capabilities of AI in this arena. Clinical Relevance: Residency selection committees may want to prioritize certain metrics unique to the human element such as personal interests, reasons for choosing residency, career goals, compelling nature, and originality when evaluating personal statements.