RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome (PIMS) is a rare condition temporally associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Using national surveillance data, we compare presenting features and outcomes among children hospitalized with PIMS by SARS-CoV-2 linkage, and identify risk factors for intensive care (ICU). METHODS: Cases were reported to the Canadian Paediatric Surveillance Program by a network of >2800 pediatricians between March 2020 and May 2021. Patients with positive versus negative SARS-CoV-2 linkages were compared, with positive linkage defined as any positive molecular or serologic test or close contact with confirmed COVID-19. ICU risk factors were identified with multivariable modified Poisson regression. RESULTS: We identified 406 children hospitalized with PIMS, including 49.8% with positive SARS-CoV-2 linkages, 26.1% with negative linkages, and 24.1% with unknown linkages. The median age was 5.4 years (IQR 2.5-9.8), 60% were male, and 83% had no comorbidities. Compared to cases with negative linkages, children with positive linkages experienced more cardiac involvement (58.8% vs. 37.4%; p < 0.001), gastrointestinal symptoms (88.6% vs. 63.2%; p < 0.001), and shock (60.9% vs. 16.0%; p < 0.001). Children aged ≥6 years and those with positive linkages were more likely to require ICU. CONCLUSIONS: Although rare, 30% of PIMS hospitalizations required ICU or respiratory/hemodynamic support, particularly those with positive SARS-CoV-2 linkages. IMPACT: We describe 406 children hospitalized with paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome (PIMS) using nationwide surveillance data, the largest study of PIMS in Canada to date. Our surveillance case definition of PIMS did not require a history of SARS-CoV-2 exposure, and we therefore describe associations of SARS-CoV-2 linkages on clinical features and outcomes of children with PIMS. Children with positive SARS-CoV-2 linkages were older, had more gastrointestinal and cardiac involvement, and hyperinflammatory laboratory picture. Although PIMS is rare, one-third required admission to intensive care, with the greatest risk amongst those aged ≥6 years and those with a SARS-CoV-2 linkage.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Masculino , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/terapia , Canadá/epidemiologia , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Rhabdomyolysis, the breakdown of skeletal muscles following an insult or injury, has been established as a possible complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Despite being highly effective in preventing COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality, several cases of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination-induced rhabdomyolysis have been identified. We provide the second description of a pediatric case of severe rhabdomyolysis presenting after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. CASE: DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT: A 16-year-old male reported to the emergency department with a 2-day history of bilateral upper extremity myalgias and dark urine 2 days after his first dose of COVID-19 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNtech). The initial blood work showed an elevated creatinine kinase (CK) of 141,300 units/L and a normal creatinine of 69 umol/L. The urinalysis was suggestive of myoglobinuria, with the microscopy revealing blood but no red blood cells. Rhabdomyolysis was diagnosed, and the patient was admitted for intravenous hydration, alkalinization of urine, and monitoring of kidney function. CK levels declined with supportive care, while his kidney function remained normal, and no electrolyte abnormalities developed. The patient was discharged 5 days after admission as his symptoms resolved. CONCLUSION: While vaccination is the safest and most effective way to prevent morbidity from COVID-19, clinicians should be aware that rhabdomyolysis could be a rare but treatable adverse event of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. With early recognition and diagnosis and supportive management, rhabdomyolysis has an excellent prognosis.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Rabdomiólise , Masculino , Humanos , Adolescente , Criança , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Creatinina , SARS-CoV-2 , Rabdomiólise/etiologia , Rabdomiólise/terapia , RNA Mensageiro , Vacinas de mRNARESUMO
BACKGROUND: Risk factors for severe outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection are not well established in children. We sought to describe pediatric hospital admissions associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in Canada and identify risk factors for more severe disease. METHODS: We conducted a national prospective study using the infrastructure of the Canadian Paediatric Surveillance Program (CPSP). Cases involving children who were admitted to hospital with microbiologically confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were reported from Apr. 8 to Dec. 31 2020, through weekly online questionnaires distributed to the CPSP network of more than 2800 pediatricians. We categorized hospital admissions as related to COVID-19, incidental, or for social or infection control reasons and determined risk factors for disease severity in hospital. RESULTS: Among 264 hospital admissions involving children with SARS-CoV-2 infection during the 9-month study period, 150 (56.8%) admissions were related to COVID-19 and 100 (37.9%) were incidental infections (admissions for other reasons and found to be positive for SARS-CoV-2 on screening). Infants (37.3%) and adolescents (29.6%) represented most cases. Among hospital admissions related to COVID-19, 52 (34.7%) had critical disease, 42 (28.0%) of whom required any form of respiratory or hemodynamic support, and 59 (39.3%) had at least 1 underlying comorbidity. Children with obesity, chronic neurologic conditions or chronic lung disease other than asthma were more likely to have severe or critical COVID-19. INTERPRETATION: Among children who were admitted to hospital with SARS-CoV-2 infection in Canada during the early COVID-19 pandemic period, incidental SARS-CoV-2 infection was common. In children admitted with acute COVID-19, obesity and neurologic and respiratory comorbidities were associated with more severe disease.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/etiologia , COVID-19/terapia , Teste para COVID-19 , Canadá/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Achados Incidentais , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Fever is a common reason for an emergency department visit and misconceptions abound. We assessed the effectiveness of an interactive Web-based module (WBM), read-only Web site (ROW), and written and verbal information (standard of care [SOC]) to educate caregivers about fever in their children. METHODS: Caregivers in the emergency department were randomized to a WBM, ROW, or SOC. Primary outcome was the gain score on a novel questionnaire testing knowledge surrounding measurement and management of fever. Secondary outcome was caregiver satisfaction with the interventions. RESULTS: There were 77, 79, and 77 participants in the WBM, ROW, and SOC groups, respectively. With a maximum of 33 points, Web-based interventions were associated with a significant mean (SD) pretest to immediate posttest gain score of 3.5 (4.2) for WBM (P < 0.001) and 3.5 (4.1) for ROW (P < 0.001) in contrast to a nonsignificant gain score of 0.1 (2.7) for SOC. Mean (SD) caregiver satisfaction scores (out of 32) for the WBM, ROW, and SOC groups were 22.6 (3.2), 20.7 (4.3), and 17 (6.2), respectively. All groups were significantly different from one another in the following rank: WBM > ROW > SOC (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Web-based interventions are associated with significant improvements in caregiver knowledge about fever and high caregiver satisfaction. These interventions should be used to educate caregivers pending the demonstration of improved patient-centered outcomes.
Assuntos
Cuidadores/educação , Febre/enfermagem , Educação em Saúde/métodos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Internet , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
The role of class IA phosphoinositide 3 kinases (PI3Ks) in immune function and regulation continues to expand with the identification of greater numbers of genetic variants. This case report is the second reported case of a homozygous premature stop codon within the PIK3R1 gene leading to autosomal recessive agammaglobulinemia. The proband, born to consanguineous parents, presented at 10 months of age with a history of oropharyngeal petechiae and bleeding from the mouth, gums, and tear ducts. Initial investigations revealed thrombocytopenia, neutropenia and the absence of B cells. Further genetic testing via a custom next-generation sequencing panel confirmed the presence of a homozygous mutation in PIK3R1, c.901 C>T, a premature stop codon at amino acid position 301. Given their many roles in immune regulation, recessive mutations in the PlK3R1 gene should be considered in infants presenting with hypogammaglobulinemia or agammaglobulinemia, particularly in the setting of parental consanguinity.
Assuntos
Agamaglobulinemia/diagnóstico , Mutação/genética , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinases/genética , Agamaglobulinemia/genética , Classe Ia de Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinase , Consanguinidade , Feminino , Hemorragia , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Homozigoto , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Linhagem , PúrpuraRESUMO
PURPOSE: Parents influence the foods their children consume and often provide proxy reports of this intake. One way parents exert this influence is by providing home-packed lunches. This study compared parental reports of foods packed in children's lunches with what was actually packed and identified parental barriers and facilitators to packing lunches. METHODS: Grade 3 and 4 student-parent dyads (n = 321) in 19 elementary schools in Ontario participated. Parental reports and actual packed lunch contents were collected via self-administered surveys and direct observation, respectively. Parental barriers and facilitators were obtained through open and closed survey questions. RESULTS: Median portions packed were significantly higher for sugar-sweetened beverages and snacks and significantly lower for fruits, fruit juice, vegetables, milk/alternatives, and meat/alternatives than parents reported. Packing a healthy lunch was "important/very important/of the utmost importance" for 95.9% of respondents, and 97.5% perceived their nutrition knowledge as "adequate/good/very good". Barriers to packing a lunch included: child's food preferences, time, finances, allergy policies, and food safety. Nutrition resources, observing other children's lunches, child's input, and planning ahead were identified as facilitators. CONCLUSIONS: Strategies to improve packed lunches should move beyond parental nutrition knowledge and importance of lunch packing to address parental barriers and facilitators.
Assuntos
Alimentos , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Almoço , Pais/psicologia , Autorrelato/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudantes , Adulto , Bebidas , Criança , Dieta Saudável/psicologia , Açúcares da Dieta/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Preferências Alimentares , Frutas , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Nutritivo , Ontário , Instituições Acadêmicas , Lanches , VerdurasRESUMO
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is known to cause genital warts, cervical cancer, penile cancer, anal cancer and oropharyngeal cancer. In North America, the lifetime cumulative incidence of HPV infection is estimated at more than 70% for all HPV types combined. A safe and effective vaccine against nine HPV types is available. HPV vaccine should be administered routinely to all girls and boys between the ages of 9 and 13 years of age. All youth who have not received the vaccine in a routine program should receive the vaccine in a 'catch-up' program. Physicians caring for children and youth should advocate for funding and implementation of universal HPV vaccine programs.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To assess the type and quantity of foods children brought and consumed at school in the balanced school day (BSD), with two 20-minute eating periods, versus the traditional schedule (TS), with one 20-minute lunch. METHODS: Direct observation identified food items and amounts in BSD and TS lunches of grade 3 and 4 students (n = 321). RESULTS: The mean (SD) servings of foods packed in BSD lunches were significantly higher than the TS lunches for milk and alternatives (0.69 (0.70) vs 0.47 (0.49), P = 0.02), sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs; 0.91 (1.24) vs 0.57 (0.99), P = 0.01), and snacks (2.74 (1.55) vs 2.24 (1.48), P < 0.01). Regardless of schedule, only 40.8% of students had vegetables packed in their lunch, whereas 92.8% had snacks. When comparing foods eaten, SSBs and snacks remained significantly higher in the BSD (0.75 (1.02) vs 0.48 (0.83), P = 0.03; 2.37 (1.44) vs 1.93 (1.36), P = 0.01, respectively). The proportion of children (%) whose consumption met one-third of Canada's Food Guide recommendations for vegetables and fruit was low (27.5% BSD, 31.0% TS). CONCLUSIONS: The BSD may have unintended negative consequences on the type and amount of foods packed in school lunches. Support for families should focus on encouraging more vegetables and fruit and fewer SSBs and snacks in packed lunches.
Assuntos
Dieta , Almoço , Instituições Acadêmicas , Estudantes , Bebidas , Canadá , Criança , Feminino , Qualidade dos Alimentos , Frutas , Humanos , Masculino , Política Nutricional , Adoçantes Calóricos/administração & dosagem , Fatores de Tempo , VerdurasRESUMO
CONTEXTE: Les facteurs de risque de complications graves de l'infection par le SRAS-CoV-2 n'ont pas été bien établis chez les enfants. Nous avons voulu décrire les hospitalisations pédiatriques associées au SRAS-CoV-2 au Canada et identifier les facteurs de risque de maladie grave. MÉTHODES: Nous avons procédé à une étude prospective nationale en utilisant l'infrastructure du Programme canadien de surveillance pédiatrique (PCSP). Les hospitalisations d'enfants ayant contracté une infection par le SRAS-CoV-2 confirmée en laboratoire de microbiologie ont été rapportées du 8 avril au 31 décembre 2020 au moyen de questionnaires hebdomadaires en ligne distribués au réseau du PCSP, qui compte plus de 2800 pédiatres. Nous avons catégorisé les hospitalisations comme suit : liées à la COVID-19, infections découvertes fortuitement, ou hospitalisations pour des raisons sociales ou de contrôle des infections, et dégagé les facteurs de risque associés à la gravité de la maladie chez les patients hospitalisés. RÉSULTATS: Sur les 264 hospitalisations d'enfants ayant contracté le SRAS-CoV-2 au cours de la période de l'étude de 9 mois, 150 (56,8 %) ont été associées à la COVID-19 et 100 (37,9 %) étaient des cas découverts fortuitement (admission pour d'autres raisons et découverte fortuite du SRAS-CoV-2 par dépistage positif). Les nourrissons (37,3 %) et les adolescents (29,6 %) représentaient la majorité des cas. Parmi les hospitalisations liées à la COVID-19, 52 patients (34,7 %) étaient atteints d'une forme grave de la maladie, dont 42 (28,0 % des cas liés à la COVID-19) ont eu besoin d'une forme d'assistance respiratoire ou hémodynamique, et 59 (39,3 %) présentaient au moins 1 comorbidité sous-jacente. Les enfants atteints d'obésité, de maladies neurologiques chroniques ou de maladies pulmonaires chroniques, à l'exclusion de l'asthme, étaient plus susceptibles de présenter une forme grave ou critique de la COVID-19. INTERPRÉTATION: Parmi les enfants hospitalisés au Canada chez lesquels on a diagnostiqué une infection par le SRAS-CoV-2 au début de la pandémie de COVID-19, la découverte fortuite du SRAS-CoV-2 a été fréquente. Chez les enfants hospitalisés pour une COVID-19 aiguë, l'obésité et les comorbidités neurologiques et respiratoires ont été associées à une gravité accrue.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticorpos Antivirais , Canadá , Criança , Hospitalização , HumanosRESUMO
Children with asplenia or hyposplenia are at risk of developing overwhelming sepsis. Health care providers caring for children with asplenia should ensure the best outcomes by using preventive strategies that focus on parent and patient education, immunization, antibiotic prophylaxis and aggressive management of suspected infection. The present position statement offers current guidance on each of these issues and replaces a previous CPS statement, 'Prevention and therapy of bacterial infections for children with asplenia or hyposplenia', published in 1999.
Les enfants présentant une asplénie ou une hyposplénie sont vulnérables à un sepsis fulgurant. Les dispensateurs de soins qui s'occupent d'enfants présentant une asplénie devraient s'assurer des meilleurs résultats cliniques possible grâce à des stratégies préventives axées sur l'éducation des parents et des patients, la vaccination, la prophylaxie antibiotique et la prise en charge vigoureuse de l'infection présumée. Le présent document de principes, qui propose des conseils à jour sur chacun de ces sujets, remplace le document de la SCP intitulé « La prévention et le traitement des infections bactériennes chez les enfants aspléniques ou hypospléniques ¼, publié en 1999.
RESUMO
Background: Current National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) guidance recommends human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines be administered as a two or three-dose schedule. Recently, several large clinical trials have reported the clinical benefit of a single HPV vaccine dose. As a result, the World Health Organization released updated guidance on HPV vaccines in 2022, recommending a two-dose schedule for individuals aged 9-20 years, and acknowledging the use of an alternative off-label single dose schedule. Objective: The objective of this overview is to provide a detailed account of the available evidence comparing HPV vaccination schedules, which was considered by NACI when updating recommendations on HPV vaccines. Methods: To identify relevant evidence, existing systematic reviews were leveraged where possible. Individual studies were critically appraised, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the certainty of evidence. Results: Available evidence suggests that a one, two, or three-dose HPV vaccine schedule may provide similar protection from HPV infection. While antibody levels against HPV vaccine types were statistically significantly lower with a single dose schedule compared to two or three doses, titres were sustained for up to 16 years. The clinical significance of lower antibody titres is unknown, as there is no established immunologic correlate of protection. Conclusion: While the available evidence on single-dose HPV vaccination schedules shows a one-dose schedule is highly effective, continued follow-up of single-dose cohorts will be critical to understanding the relative duration of protection for reduced dose schedules and informing future NACI guidance on HPV vaccines.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and long-term quality of life (QoL). METHODS: Prospective cohort study with 6- and 12-month follow-up conducted in 14 Canadian institutions. Children tested for SARS-CoV-2 between August 2020 and February 2022 were eligible. QoL was measured using PedsQLTM-4.0, overall health status scores 6- and 12-months after testing. RESULTS: Among SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative participants eligible for long-term follow-up, 74.8% (505/675) and 71.8% (1106/1541) at 6- and 59.0% (727/1233) and 68.1% (2520/3699) at 12-months, completed follow-up, respectively. Mean ± SD PedsQL™ scores did not differ between positive and negative groups; difference: -0.86 (95%CI: -2.33, 0.61) at 6- and -0.48 (95%CI: -1.6, 0.64) at 12-months, respectively. SARS-CoV-2 test-positivity was associated with higher social subscale scores. Although in bivariate analysis, overall health status at 6-month was higher among SARS-CoV-2 cases [difference: 2.16 (95%CI: 0.80, 3.53)], after adjustment for co-variates, SARS-CoV-2 infection was not independently associated with total PedsQL™ or overall health status at either time point. Parental perception of recovery did not differ based on SARS-CoV-2 test-status at either time point. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 infection was not associated with QoL, overall health status, or parental perception of recovery 6- and 12-months following infection. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION (IF ANY): N/A.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 vaccination has been associated with anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity reactions. Infectious disease physicians and allergists in the Canadian Special Immunization Clinic (SIC) Network developed guidance for evaluating patients with adverse events following immunization (AEFI) including suspected hypersensitivity. This study evaluated management and adverse event recurrence following subsequent COVID-19 vaccinations. METHODS: Individuals aged 12 years and older enrolled at participating SICs before February 28, 2023 who were referred for suspected or diagnosed hypersensitivity reaction following COVID-19 vaccination, or for prevaccination assessment of suspected allergy to a COVID-19 vaccine component were included. De-identified clinical assessments and revaccination data, captured in a centralized database, were analyzed. The Brighton Collaboration case definition (BCCD) for anaphylaxis (2023 version) was applied. RESULTS: The analysis included 206 participants from 13 sites: 26 participants referred for pre-vaccination assessment and 180 participants referred for adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination (15/180 [8.3%] with BCCD confirmed anaphylaxis, 84 [46.7%] with immediate hypersensitivity symptoms not meeting BCCD, 33 [18.3%] with other diagnosed hypersensitivity reactions, and 48 [26.7%] participants with a final diagnosis of non-hypersensitivity AEFI). Among participants referred for AEFIs following COVID-19 vaccination, 166/180 (92.2%) were recommended for COVID-19 revaccination after risk assessment, of whom 158/166 (95.2%) were revaccinated (all with a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine). After revaccination, 1/15 (6.7%) participants with prior anaphylaxis, 1/77 (1.3%) with immediate hypersensitivity not meeting criteria for anaphylaxis and 1/24 (4.2%) with other physician diagnosed hypersensitivity developed recurrent AEFI symptoms that met the BCCD for anaphylaxis. All 26 participants referred pre-vaccination, including 9 (34.6%) with history of polyethylene glycol-asparaginase reactions, were vaccinated without occurrence of immediate hypersensitivity symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Most individuals in this national cohort who experienced a hypersensitivity event following COVID-19 vaccination and were referred for specialist review were revaccinated without AEFI recurrence, suggesting that specialist evaluation can facilitate safe revaccination.