Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
BMC Psychiatry ; 17(1): 1, 2017 01 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28049496

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Quantitative indicators are needed in order to define priorities, plan policies and evaluate public health interventions in mental health. The aim of this study was to assess the contribution of a large and exhaustive French national administrative database to study and monitor treated depression by comparing the prevalence and characteristics of the population using significant healthcare resources for depression as identified by different estimation methods and sources and to discuss the advantages and drawbacks of these methods. METHODS: This study included the French population covered by the main health insurance scheme in 2012 (Régime général, 86% of the insured French population). Data were extracted from the French health insurance claim database (SNIIRAM), which contains information on all reimbursements, including treatments and hospital stays in France. The following distinct sources of the SNIIRAM were used to select persons with depression: diagnoses of long-term or costly conditions, data from national hospital claims and data concerning all national health insurance reimbursements for drugs. RESULTS: In 2012, we included 58,753,200 individuals covered by the main health insurance scheme; 271,275 individuals had full coverage for depression; 179,470 individuals had been admitted to a psychiatric hospital and 66,595 individuals admitted to a general hospital with a diagnosis of depression during a 2-year timeframe and 144,670 individuals had more than three reimbursements for antidepressants during the study year (with a history of hospitalisation for depression during the past 5 years). Only 16% of individuals were selected by more than one source. CONCLUSIONS: We propose an algorithm that includes persons recently hospitalised for depression, or with a history of hospitalisation for depression and still taking antidepressants, or with full coverage for depression as a specific long-term or costly condition, yielding a prevalence estimate of 0.93% or 544,105 individuals. Changes in the case selection methodology have major consequences on the frequency count and characteristics of the selected population, and consequently on the conclusions that can be drawn from the data, emphasizing the importance of defining the characteristics of the target population before the study in order to produce relevant results.


Assuntos
Bases de Dados Factuais , Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão/epidemiologia , Serviços de Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Algoritmos , Bases de Dados Factuais/tendências , Depressão/terapia , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Hospitalização/tendências , Hospitais Psiquiátricos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Psiquiátricos/tendências , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Masculino , Serviços de Saúde Mental/tendências , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/tendências , Prevalência , Adulto Jovem
2.
Int J Clin Pract ; 70(9): 744-51, 2016 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27484351

RESUMO

AIMS: Previous studies have shown that the recommended minimum 6-month period for antidepressant treatment is actually observed for only a minority of patients. The objectives of this study were to characterise patients with newly prescribed antidepressant treatment in France and identify factors possibly associated with insufficient duration of treatment or the occurrence of certain events such as sick leave, hospitalisations and suicide attempts. METHODS: Data were extracted from the French health insurance database (SNIIRAM) and the national hospitalisation database (PMSI) for patients covered by the main French health insurance scheme representing 75% of the French population. Patients were included if they had a newly prescribed antidepressant in 2011, but no prior psychiatric diagnosis identified in the databases and no significant psychiatric medication (such as antipsychotic or mood stabiliser) in 2009-2010. RESULTS: A total of 998 710 patients (2% of the overall population), with a mean age of 50 years and 66% of females, initiated an antidepressant in 2011, which was prescribed by a general practitioner in 89% of cases. Five generic names, including three selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, accounted for 75% of first prescriptions. Only one reimbursement was observed for 40% of patients. Treatment duration was less than 6 months for more than 80% of patients, more frequently for low income earners, and varied according to age, gender and region. The median time lag between first visit and antidepressant initiation was 27 days. Hospitalisation related to a psychiatric disease over the following 12 months was observed for 3% of patients. CONCLUSION: Duration of treatment and follow-up were both insufficient for the majority of French patients initiating antidepressant treatment in 2011, which may reflect poor quality of care for people with mood or anxiety disorders, possibly because of overdiagnosis and inappropriate drug treatment, or poor adherence and side effects, or poor follow-up.


Assuntos
Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Depressivo/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Transtorno Depressivo/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , França/epidemiologia , Medicina Geral/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Psiquiatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Licença Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
3.
BMC Urol ; 14: 48, 2014 Jun 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24927850

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This very large population-based study investigated outcomes after a diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) in terms of mortality rates, treatments and adverse effects. METHODS: Among the 11 million men aged 40 years and over covered by the general national health insurance scheme, those with newly managed PCa in 2009 were followed for two years based on data from the national health insurance information system (SNIIRAM). Patients were identified using hospitalisation diagnoses and specific refunds related to PCa and PCa treatments. Adverse effects of PCa treatments were identified by using hospital diagnoses, specific procedures and drug refunds. RESULTS: The age-standardised two-year all-cause mortality rate among the 43,460 men included in the study was 8.4%, twice that of all men aged 40 years and over. Among the 36,734 two-year survivors, 38% had undergone prostatectomy, 36% had been treated by hormone therapy, 29% by radiotherapy, 3% by brachytherapy and 20% were not treated. The frequency of treatment-related adverse effects varied according to age and type of treatment. Among men between 50 and 69 years of age treated by prostatectomy alone, 61% were treated for erectile dysfunction and 24% were treated for urinary disorders. The frequency of treatment for these disorders decreased during the second year compared to the first year (erectile dysfunction: 41% vs 53%, urinary disorders: 9% vs 20%). The frequencies of these treatments among men treated by external beam radiotherapy alone were 7% and 14%, respectively. Among men between 50 and 69 years with treated PCa, 46% received treatments for erectile dysfunction and 22% for urinary disorders. For controls without PCa but treated surgically for benign prostatic hyperplasia, these frequencies were 1.5% and 6.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We report high survival rates two years after a diagnosis of PCa, but a high frequency of PCa treatment-related adverse effects. These frequencies remain underestimated, as they are based on treatments for erectile dysfunction and urinary disorders and do not reflect all functional outcomes. These results should help urologists and general practitioners to inform their patients about outcomes at the time of screening and diagnosis, and especially about potential treatment-related adverse effects.


Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil/mortalidade , Prostatectomia/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Radioterapia/mortalidade , Taxa de Sobrevida , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comorbidade , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol ; 42(1): 57-63, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28648494

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Only a few epidemiological studies on the incidence and prevalence of Wilson's disease (WD) have been performed to date, and the results vary widely according to the reports. The aim of the study was to investigate the prevalence, ambulatory care and treatments of patients with WD in France. METHODS: Among the 58 million general health scheme beneficiaries (86% of the French population), people managed for WD in 2013 were identified using hospitalisation diagnosis in 2011-2013 or specific long-term disease status with a 100% reimbursement for specific healthcare in 2013. Data were derived from the Sniiram (National Health Insurance Information System database). Prevalence by age and sex were calculated. RESULTS: In 2013, 906 prevalent cases were identified, yielding a crude prevalence of 1.5 cases per 100,000; 1.65 per 100,000 in males and 1.44 per 100,000 in females. This prevalence is comparable to that reported in other population-based studies in European countries and to a study using a similar method. Almost 40% of patients were treated by D-penicillamine and 14.3% were treated by zinc acetate. Trientine, delivered on a compassionate basis, was not available in the reimbursement database. In 2013, 1.3% of patients underwent liver transplantation and 4% had already undergone liver transplantation in previous years. Fifteen per cent of patients received antidepressants, a higher rate than in general population. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first French population-based epidemiological study of WD in a comprehensive population based on administrative data and constitutes an important step to understand the impact of WD and to study quality of care.


Assuntos
Degeneração Hepatolenticular/epidemiologia , Degeneração Hepatolenticular/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Assistência Ambulatorial , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Adulto Jovem
5.
Bull Cancer ; 104(6): 524-537, 2017 Jun.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28285755

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The national health insurance information system (Sniiram) can be used to estimate the national medical and economic burden of cancer. This study reports the annual rates, characteristics and expenditure of people reimbursed for cancer. METHODS: Among 57 million general health scheme beneficiaries (86% of the French population), people managed for cancer were identified using algorithms based on hospital diagnoses and full refund for long-term cancer. The reimbursed costs (euros) related to the cancer, paid off by the health insurance, were estimated. RESULTS: In 2014, 2.491 million people (4.4%) covered by the general health scheme had a cancer managed (men 1.1 million, 5.1%; women 1.3 million, 4.9%). The annual (2012-2014) average growth rate of patients was 0.8%. The spending related to the cancer was 13.5 billion: 5 billion for primary health care (drugs 2.3 billion), 7.5 billion for the hospital (drugs 1.3 billions) and 900 million for sick leave and invalidity pensions. Spending annual average growth rate (2012-2014) was 4% (drugs 2%). The rates of patients and the relative spending were 1.8% and 2.5 billion for the breast cancer (women), 1.5% and 1.0 billion for prostate cancer, 0.9% and 1.5 billion for the colon cancer, and 0.19% and 1.3 billion for lung cancer. DISCUSSION: Cancers establish one of the first groups of chronic diseases pathologies in terms of patients and spending. If the numbers of patients remain stables, the spending increases, mainly for medicines.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/economia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Preços Hospitalares , Neoplasias/economia , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Algoritmos , Neoplasias da Mama/economia , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo/economia , Neoplasias do Colo/epidemiologia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Preços Hospitalares/tendências , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/economia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/economia , Neoplasias da Próstata/economia , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Distribuição por Sexo , Licença Médica/economia
6.
Presse Med ; 41(11): e568-76, 2012 Nov.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22795870

RESUMO

AIM: To measure the seasonal influenza vaccination coverage rate (VCR) in France in 2010, one year after the A(H1N1) influenza pandemic, and 2011 by age and target disease and to identify risk factors associated with a lack of vaccination in 2010 for those previously vaccinated in 2009. METHODS: At the beginning of each vaccination campaign, the National Health Insurance, covering 86% of the French population, sends free influenza vaccination vouchers to at-risk beneficiaries aged under 65 suffering from diverse target diseases and to all individuals aged 65 and over (around 11.5 million). RESULTS: The global VCR (50.4%), except people with asthma identified by drug refunds, decreased in 2010 compared with the previous three years when it was close to 60% (51.0% in 2011). For people under 65 years old, it fell from 40.3% in 2009 to 31.6% in 2010 (33.1% in 2011) and those aged 65 years and over from 63.3% to 53.8% (54.0% in 2011). The VCR of each target disease also decreased, especially for asthma, but not for HIV infection with campaign modification in 2010. It decreased among those aged 65 years and over with target disease (72.3% in 2009, 60.4% in 2010, 60.7% in 2011). Vaccination lack in 2010 was found to be associated with younger age, low number of drug deliveries and consultations with a general practitioner or a specialist, hospitalisation and the residence in a region of South of France or in overseas regions. CONCLUSION: An important decline of the VCR was observed in France since 2010 while the recommended VCR is 75%. Efforts must be led to improve the confidence of the insurant, especially towards the most fragile groups.


Assuntos
Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Asma/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Doença Crônica , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Lactente , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Estações do Ano , Adulto Jovem
7.
J Eval Clin Pract ; 18(3): 623-9, 2012 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21276142

RESUMO

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To test the agreement between guidelines for the management of hypertension and medical practices while avoiding frequent limitations such as the use of non-representative samples of practitioners and self-reporting of their practices over a short period of time. METHODS: The characteristics of initial antihypertensive drug treatment in a large representative sample of the French population aged 50-80 (n = 17 855) were collected from a national health care reimbursement database and compared with national guidelines over a 5-year period. RESULTS: Major discrepancies are observed including the use of non-recommended drug classes such as loop and potassium sparing diuretics alone or in association and the absence of distinction between patients according to their age. More minor discrepancies are the preferential use of mono-therapies over drug combinations and of some bi-therapies among those recommended. Some degree of concordance with the guidelines is also observed including the specific characteristics of the treatment of diabetics compared with other categories of patients and the preferential use of long-acting dihydropyridine calcium antagonists and of low-dose thiazide diuretics when these drug classes are chosen. Several of these discrepancies or concordances, which mainly reflect general practitioner (GP) activity, show time trends over the entire follow-up period with no significant effect of the guideline released during this period. CONCLUSIONS: At the French national level, the agreement between initial antihypertensive drug treatment and guidelines varies considerably depending on the characteristics of the treatment that are considered. The GPs who delivered the treatment do not seem to have been influenced by the guidelines released over the last decade.


Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bases de Dados como Assunto , Feminino , França , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/tendências , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
8.
Bull Cancer ; 99(5): 521-7, 2012 May.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22525252

RESUMO

This study evaluated the rate of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) dosage in men age 40 or older, affiliated to the general social security system in France between 2008 and 2010: 10.9 million men, excluding those with known prostate cancer. In 2010, 30.7% of this male population had at least one dosage of PSA, i.e. 12.3% of those between 40 and 54, 47.7% of those between 55 and 74, and 47.6% of those 75 years old or older. Percentages of men who had at least one dosage in the three-year period were 26.2%, 77.3% and 75.6% for the same age brackets, respectively. Overall, 13% of men age 40 or older, and in particular 21% of men 75 years old or older had more than three PSA dosages during the three-year time period. Eighty-eight percent of PSA dosages performed in 2010 were prescribed by a general practitioner and 3.2% by an urologist. Conflicting with French and internationally published recommendations regarding PSA dosage, the present results demonstrate a shift toward chaotic mass screening of prostate cancer particularly in men aged 75 or older.


Assuntos
Mau Uso de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , França/epidemiologia , Medicina Geral/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Urologia/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA