RESUMO
The aim of this review was to highlight why the use of master protocols trial design is particularly useful for radiotherapy intervention trials where complex setup pathways (including quality assurance, user training, and integrating multiple modalities of treatment) may hinder clinical advances. We carried out a systematic review according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, reviewing the findings using a landscape analysis. Results were summarized descriptively, reporting on trial characteristics highlighting the benefits, limitations, and challenges of developing and implementing radiotherapy master protocols, with three case studies selected to explore these issues in more detail. Twelve studies were suitable for inclusion (4 platform trials, 3 umbrella trials, and 5 basket trials), evaluating a mix of solid tumor sites in both curative and palliative settings. The interventions were categorized into 1) novel agent and radiotherapy combinations; 2) radiotherapy dose personalization; and 3) device evaluation, with a case study provided for each intervention. Benefits of master protocol trials for radiotherapy intervention include protocol efficiency for implementation of novel radiotherapy techniques; accelerating the evaluation of novel agent drug and radiotherapy combinations; and more efficient translational research opportunities, leading to cost savings and research efficiency to improve patient outcomes. Master protocols offer an innovative platform under which multiple clinical questions can be addressed within a single trial. Due to the complexity of radiotherapy trial setup, cost and research efficiency savings may be more apparent than in systemic treatment trials. Use of this research approach may be the change needed to push forward oncological innovation within radiation oncology.
Assuntos
Neoplasias , Projetos de Pesquisa , Humanos , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Radioterapia/métodos , Radioterapia/economia , Protocolos de Ensaio Clínico como Assunto , Radioterapia (Especialidade)/normasRESUMO
Given the rapidly progressing COVID-19 pandemic, this report on a US cohort of 54 COVID-19 patients from Stanford Hospital and data regarding risk factors for severe disease obtained at initial clinical presentation is of high importance and is immediately clinically relevant. We identified low presenting oxygen saturation as predictive of severe disease outcomes, such as diagnosis of pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and admission to the ICU, and also replicated data from China suggesting a link between hypertension and disease severity. Clinicians will benefit by tools to rapidly risk stratify patients at presentation by likelihood of progression to severe disease.