Real-world clinical profile, treatment patterns and patient-reported outcomes for thyroid cancer in Japan.

Aim: To provide a real-world snapshot of the clinical profile, management, and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) for advanced medullary and papillary thyroid cancer prior to the availability of rearranged during transfection (RET) inhibitors in Japan. Materials & methods: Physicians completed patient-record forms for eligible patients seen during routine clinical practice. Physicians were also surveyed about their routine practice and patients were asked to provide PRO data. Results: RET testing patterns varied by hospital type; no therapeutic relevance was a commonly cited reason to not carry out testing. Multikinase inhibitors were the main systemic therapies prescribed, although timing to start multikinase inhibitors varied; adverse events were reported as challenges. PROs revealed high disease/treatment burden. Conclusion: More effective and less toxic systemic treatment targeting genomic alterations is needed to improve long-term outcomes of thyroid cancer.

This survey, conducted in Japan in 2020, included doctors who treat thyroid cancer and their patients. It is called a real-world survey because it provides information such as the types of tests and treatments used for thyroid cancer management in everyday clinical practice. The survey focused on two types of thyroid cancer: papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), a common type, and medullary thyroid cancer (MTC), an uncommon type. About 10­20% of people with PTC and most people with MTC have alterations in a gene called RET, which caused the cancer. Laboratory tests can identify these gene alterations, fusions (joining the parts of two different genes) or mutations (changes to a gene's DNA sequence) and results can help guide treatment decisions. The survey showed that testing for RET gene alterations was less than optimal and varied by the type of hospital/center. Common reasons provided by doctors for not testing for RET alterations were, "no therapeutic relevance for patient management" and "specific targeted therapies not available". However, the survey was conducted before the availability in Japan of the treatment selpercatinib, which selectively targets/inhibits tumors with RET alterations. Most patients in the survey, including those with RET alterations, received treatment with a type of inhibitor called multikinase inhibitors, as per available guidelines. Doctors considered side effects due to inhibition of multiple targets by multikinase inhibitors to be among areas for improvement needed. People with PTC and MTC also reported substantial burdens (i.e., negative impact on their lives) from the disease/treatment. The researchers concluded that barriers to RET testing need to be overcome, and more effective and less toxic treatments targeting gene alterations are needed to improve long-term outcomes.

Real-world clinical profile, RET mutation testing, treatments, and PROs for MTC in Europe.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe real-world patient and physician characteristics, rearranged during transfection (RET) mutation testing and results, treatment patterns, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in advanced or metastatic medullary thyroid cancer (aMTC) across five populous European countries. METHODS: Cross-sectional physician and patient surveys were used to collect quantitative and qualitative data in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK from July to December 2020, prior to the introduction of selective RET inhibitors in Europe. Physicians completed patient record forms and a survey about their specialty and practice site. Patients were asked to provide PRO data using four validated instruments, including the EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire. RESULTS: The physician-reported sample included 275 patients with aMTC, including 79 patients with RET mutation-positive disease; median age was 60 and 56 years, respectively. Overall, 75% were tested for RET mutation (35% germline only, 21% somatic only, 44% both). Common physician-cited barriers to RET mutation testing included high cost, difficulty accessing latest tests, and time delay for results. First-line systemic therapy (most commonly vandetanib or cabozantinib) was prescribed for 69% of patients overall and 82% of the RET mutation-positive subgroup. Second-line therapy was prescribed for 12% of patients who received first-line therapy; most patients remained on first-line therapy at data capture. PROs revealed substantial disease/treatment burden. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with aMTC report substantial disease/treatment burden. Outcomes could be improved by identifying patients eligible for treatment with selective RET inhibitors through more optimal RET mutation testing.

Real-world evaluation of health-related quality of life in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma based on a multinational survey.

Background: Real-world health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are scarce. This study is to compare patient-reported outcomes in patients with DLBCL across therapy lines and countries. Methods: Data were derived from the Adelphi DLBCL Disease Specific Programme™ from January 2021 to May 2021, a survey of physicians and their DLBCL patients in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom (UK), and the United States (US). Results: Overall, analysis was conducted on 441 patients with DLBCL across Europe and the US (mean age 64.6 years, 64% male); 68% had an Ann Arbor stage III and 69% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 to 1. The mean overall GHS/QoL was 54.1; patients on their 3L+ therapy had a lower mean GHS/QoL compared with patients on 1L/2L (P = 0.0033). Further to this, mean EQ-5D-5L utility score was reduced from 0.73 for patients on 1L therapy to 0.66 for patients on 3L+ therapies (P = 0.0149). Mean percentages of impairment while working and overall work impairment were lower for patients receiving 3L+ therapy (12.5% and 17.7%; respectively) than those on 1L therapy (35.6% and 33.8%; respectively). When comparing region, patients in the US had significantly better scores for all functioning and symptomatic scales (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and work impairment (per WPAI) vs. patients with DLBCL in Europe. WPAI scores indicate that the overall activity impairment in the US was 36.6% and in Europe ranged from 42.4% in the UK to 54.9% in Germany. Mean EQ-5D-5L utility score for the US was 0.80, compared to 0.60 - 0.80 across the countries in Europe. Regression analysis showed patients who relapsed after more than one year of treatment were associated with better patient reported outcomes than those who relapse after less than one year. Conclusion: Patient-reported outcomes of DLBCL patients remain poor and patients continue to experience considerable morbidity.