Perceptions of trained laypersons in end-of-life or advance care planning conversations: a qualitative meta-synthesis.

BACKGROUND: Laypersons including volunteers, community health navigators, or peer educators provide important support to individuals with serious illnesses in community or healthcare settings. The experiences of laypersons in communication with seriously ill peers is unknown. METHODS: We performed an ENTREQ-guided qualitative meta-synthesis. We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and AMED to include qualitative studies with data regarding communication and laypersons in advance care planning, palliative care, or end-of-life settings. Study quality was appraised using a standardized tool. The analysis identified key domains and associated themes relating specifically to laypersons' perspectives on communication. RESULTS: Of 877 articles, nine studies provided layperson quotations related to layperson-to-peer communication associated with advance care planning (n = 4) or end-of-life conversations (n = 5). The studies were conducted in United Kingdom (n = 4) or United States settings (n = 5). The synthesis of layperson perspectives yielded five main domains: 1) layperson-to-peer communication, focusing on the experience of talking with peers, 2) layperson-to-peer interpersonal interactions, focusing on the entire interaction between the layperson and peers, excluding communication-related issues, 3) personal impact on the layperson, 4) layperson contributions, and 5) layperson training. Laypersons described using specific communication skills including the ability to build rapport, discuss sensitive issues, listen and allow silence, and respond to emotions. CONCLUSIONS: Published studies described experiences of trained laypersons in conversations with peers related to advance care planning or end-of-life situations. Based on these layperson perspectives related to communication, programs should next evaluate the potential impact of laypersons in meaningful conversations.

Heart rate characteristics predict risk of mortality in preterm infants in low and high target oxygen saturation ranges.

Background: The Neonatal Oxygenation Prospective Meta-analysis found that in infants <28 weeks gestational age, targeting an oxygen saturation (S pO2 ) range of 85-89% versus 91-95% resulted in lower rates of retinopathy of prematurity but increased mortality. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the heart rate characteristics index (HRCi) in assessing the dynamic risk of mortality among infants managed with low and high target S pO2 ranges. Methods: We linked the SUPPORT and HRCi datasets from one centre in which the randomised controlled trials overlapped. We examined the maximum daily HRCi (MaxHRCi24) to predict mortality among patients randomised to the lower and higher target S pO2 groups by generating predictiveness curves and calculating model performance metrics, including area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) at prediction windows from 1-60 days. Cox proportional hazards models tested whether MaxHRCi24 was an independent predictor of mortality. We also conducted a moderation analysis. Results: There were 84 infants in the merged dataset. MaxHRCi24 predicted mortality in infants randomised to the lower target S pO2 (AUROC of 0.79-0.89 depending upon the prediction window) and higher target S pO2 (AUROC 0.82-0.91). MaxHRCi24 was an important additional predictor of mortality in multivariable modelling. In moderation analysis, in a model that also included demographic predictor variables, the individual terms and the interaction term between MaxHRCi24 and target S pO2 range all predicted mortality. Conclusions: Associations between HRCi and mortality, at low and high S pO2 target ranges, suggest that future research may find HRCi metrics helpful to individually optimise target oxygen saturation ranges for hospitalised preterm infants.

Caregiver Experiences of Care Coordination for Recently Discharged Patients: A Qualitative Metasynthesis.

Caregivers of patients often provide key support for patients after hospitalization. This qualitative metasynthesis describes caregiver perspectives about care coordination for patients discharged from the hospital. A literature search of Ovid Medline and CINAHL completed on May 23, 2018, identified 1,546 studies. Twelve articles were included in the final metasynthesis. Caregiver perspectives about care coordination were compiled into overall themes. A subanalysis of studies in which patients were discharged with home health services was completed. Five main themes emerged related to caregiver perspectives on care coordination after hospitalization: (a) Suboptimal access to clinicians after discharge, (b) Feeling disregarded by clinicians, (c) Need for information and training at discharge, (d) Overwhelming responsibilities to manage appointments and medications, and (e) Need for emotional support.Findings from this metasynthesis suggest the need for clinicians to engage with caregivers to provide support, training, and communication after hospital discharge.