Visualization of the Anal Dimple by Fetal MRI: Is It Feasible?

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of fetal MRI in identifying the normal anal dimple (AD) and compare it with prenatal ultrasound (US). METHODS: Retrospective review of 130 patients with both fetal MRI and US. The gestational age (GA) was stratified into four groups: (1) 16 to 21 weeks-6 days; (2) 22 to 27 weeks-6 days; (3) 28 to 33 weeks-6 days; and (4) 34 weeks and beyond. Steady-state free precession (SSFP) and single shot fast spin echo (SSFSE) axial T2 MRI and transverse US images of the fetal perineum were analyzed, and visualization of the AD was determined. Clinical indication, gender, single versus multiple gestation, best MRI sequence where it was seen, and postnatal AD information were recorded. RESULTS: The AD was visualized in 125/130 fetal MRIs, and visualization was independent of GA (p 0.230). US visualized the AD in 67/130 cases, and the best GA for visualization was in group 3 (p < 0.001). There was no difference in AD visualization between SSFSE and SSFP sequences (p 0.167). CONCLUSION: Prenatal visualization of the AD by MRI is feasible and superior to US, independent of GA. Adding AD visualization to routine screening prenatal US and MRI may increase recognition of anorectal malformation.

Visualization of the fetal anus by prenatal ultrasound for the diagnosis of anorectal malformations: is it feasible?

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to determine the feasibility of identifying the anal dimple (AD) on routine prenatal ultrasound. Using the presence, absence, appearance, and location of the anal dimple as an indirect sign for possible underlying anorectal malformations (ARM), we hypothesize that evaluation of the anal dimple as part of the fetal anatomic survey may increase the sensitivity in detecting less severe ARMs. METHODS: In a prospective longitudinal observational study, pregnant women who underwent prenatal ultrasound (US) at the Colorado Fetal Care Center between January 2019 and 2020 were enrolled. The variables recorded included gestational age, singleton versus multiple pregnancy, gender of the fetus, visualization of the AD, and reason for non-visualization of the AD. RESULTS: A total of 900 ultrasounds were performed, evaluating 1044 fetuses, in 372 different pregnant women. Gestational ages ranged from 16 to 38 weeks. The AD was visualized in 612 fetuses (58.6%) and not seen in 432 (41.4%). The two most common reasons for non-visualization were extremes in gestational age (n = 155; 36%) and fetal position (n = 152; 35.3%). The optimal gestational age range for AD visualization was 28-33 weeks + 6 days, with 78.1% visualization rate. CONCLUSION: Visualization of the anal dimple by ultrasound is feasible and may aid in the detection of less severe ARMs, ultimately impacting pregnancy management and family counseling. The optimal timing for anal dimple visualization is late second and third trimester.

Efficacy and safety of an abbreviated perioperative care bundle versus standard perioperative care in children undergoing elective bowel anastomoses: A randomized, noninferiority trial.

PURPOSE: The aim was to evaluate if an abbreviated perioperative care bundle (APCB) is noninferior to the standard care, in terms of efficacy and safety, in pediatric patients undergoing bowel anastomoses. METHODS: A randomized, open, noninferiority trial with two parallel groups of equal size was carried out at the National Institute of Pediatrics in Mexico City, Mexico, from April 2016 to July 2018. The total number analyzed was 74 (37 per group). The APCB comprised same day admission, avoidance of mechanical bowel preparation, optimized antibiotic prophylaxis, and early feeding. Statistical analysis was done with Fisher's exact test or Chi2, and Student's T test. RESULTS: No significant differences were found for demographic variables and type of disease, either for the safety (anastomotic leakage, p 0.753; organ/space surgical site infection, p 0.500) or for some efficacy outcomes (ileus or bowel obstruction, p 0.693). Other efficacy outcomes were better in the study group, with shorter median times for feeding tolerance (19 h vs. 92 h, p < 0.001), for first bowel movement (15 h vs. 36 h, p < 0.001), and for discharge (1 vs. 6 days, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The abbreviated care bundle was proven to be as safe but more efficacious than the standard care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I - randomized controlled trial with adequate statistical power.