Long-Term Effectiveness of a Drug-Eluting Stent for Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis: Subanalysis of the Zilver PTX Japan Post-Market Surveillance Study.

PURPOSE: To present a subgroup analysis of patients from a large real-world study evaluating the safety and effectiveness of the Zilver PTX drug-eluting stent (DES) for treating femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis (ISR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study examined patients enrolled in the Zilver PTX Japan Post-Market Surveillance Study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02254837), a prospective, multicenter registry of 904 symptomatic patients with 1082 femoropopliteal lesions treated with the DES at 95 institutions in Japan. Five-year outcomes, including mortality, stent radiography, freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR), and clinical benefit, were evaluated for 177 patients (mean age 74.2±8.3 years; 118 men) with 204 ISR lesions treated with the Zilver DES. Over half of the patients (108, 61.0%) were diabetic. Mean lesion length was 17.8±10.4 cm, and a third (72, 35.3%) were total occlusions. Outcome measures were all-cause mortality, thrombosis, freedom from TLR, and clinical benefit, defined as freedom from persistent or deteriorating ischemic symptoms. RESULTS: No device-related or procedure-related deaths or paclitaxel-related adverse events were reported. All-cause mortality was 25.1% at 5 years. Stent fracture was observed in 5 stents through 5 years. The 5-year rate of freedom from clinically-driven TLR was 73.4%, and the rate of clinical benefit was 63.6%. Improvement in Rutherford category and ankle-brachial index was sustained through 5 years. CONCLUSION: The safety and effectiveness of the Zilver PTX stent for the treatment of femoropopliteal ISR lesions demonstrated that this device provides a favorable treatment option in this difficult-to-treat subgroup.

Final results from a postmarket registry of an iliac leg graft with a continuous, spiral nitinol stent.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical outcomes from a postmarket registry of the Zenith Spiral-Z abdominal aortic aneurysm iliac leg graft with a continuous, spiral nitinol stent that was designed for improved conformability, kink, and migration resistance. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter registry was designed to evaluate physician-reported outcomes of the Spiral-Z leg graft in up to 600 patients who underwent endovascular repair of abdominal aortic or aortoiliac aneurysms at up to 30 investigative sites in the United States and Canada. Study outcomes were focused on iliac limb occlusion, limb-related reintervention, limb-related endoleak, component separation, and device integrity. Short-term data were collected during an interval of 1 to 6 months, with longer term data collected at 12 months. RESULTS: Between March 2012 and March 2015, 599 patients (mean age 74 ± 8 years; 87% male; 26% with aortoiliac aneurysm) were treated, with Spiral-Z iliac leg grafts placed in 564 left iliac arteries and 559 right iliac arteries. The mean iliac inner diameters (both left and right) were 9 ± 3 mm; moderate/severe occlusive disease, calcification, and vessel tortuosity were present in 14%, 25%, and 36% and 15%, 25%, and 34% of the left and right iliac arteries, respectively. Iliac artery adjunctive procedures (iliac artery angioplasty and/or stent placement) were performed intraoperatively in 112 patients (19%; bilateral in 52 patients). Mortality within 30 days was 1.7% (10/599); cumulative mortality at 1 year was 6.2% (37/599). There were no aortic ruptures and only one open conversion (0.2%). Limb occlusions occurred in 11 of 599 patients (2%; 3 within 30 days and 8 after 30 days, all unilateral, none had received procedural iliac artery adjuncts at implantation); of these, 7 patients underwent reinterventions. Other limb-related reinterventions were performed on eight patients for nonocclusive kink, compression, or thrombus (six within 30 days and three after 30 days). In total, 13 patients (2%) underwent 15 limb-related reinterventions (7 for occlusions and 8 for nonocclusive causes). In one patient, a distal type I endoleak and device migration (>10 mm) involving a right iliac leg was noted at the 12-month follow-up visit. No other limb-related endoleak, migration, component separation, or stent fracture was reported during a mean follow-up of 11 ± 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The Spiral-Z leg graft demonstrated excellent patency and required infrequent limb-related reinterventions in routine clinical care in a postmarket registry.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair with stent grafts alone or with a composite device design in patients with acute type B aortic dissection in the setting of malperfusion.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare short-term outcomes in patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with stent grafts alone or with a composite device design (stent graft plus bare-metal aortic stent) for acute type B aortic dissection in the setting of malperfusion. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included patients with acute (≤14 days of symptom onset) complicated type B dissection in the setting of malperfusion who were treated with stent grafts alone (TEVAR cohort) at two European institutions vs those who underwent TEVAR with a composite device design (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) in the investigational STABLE I feasibility study and STABLE II pivotal study (STABLE cohort). Preoperative characteristics and 30-day outcomes (including mortality, malperfusion-related mortality, morbidity, and secondary interventions) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The TEVAR cohort (41 patients; mean age, 58.8 ± 12.7 years; 78.0% male) and the STABLE cohort (84 patients; mean age, 57.8 ± 11.7 years; 71.4% male) were largely similar in preoperative medical characteristics, with more STABLE patients presenting with a history of hypertension (79.8% vs 58.5%; P = .018). The TEVAR and STABLE groups had similar lengths of dissection (451.8 ± 112.7 mm vs 411.8 ± 116.4 mm; P = .10) and similar proximal and distal extent of dissection. At presentation, the two groups exhibited comparable organ system involvement in malperfusion: renal (53.7% TEVAR, 57.1% STABLE), gastrointestinal (41.5% TEVAR, 44.0% STABLE), lower extremities (34.1% TEVAR, 52.4% STABLE), and spinal cord (9.8% TEVAR, 2.4% STABLE). The 30-day rate of all-cause mortality was 17.1% (7/41) in the TEVAR group and 8.3% (7/84) in the STABLE group (P = .22). The 30-day rate of malperfusion-related mortality (deaths from bowel/mesenteric ischemia or multiple organ failure) was 12% (5/41) in the TEVAR group and 2.4% (2/84) in the STABLE group (P = .038). The 30-day morbidity, for the TEVAR and STABLE groups, respectively, included bowel ischemia (9.8% [4/41] vs 2.4% [2/84]; P = .09), renal failure requiring dialysis (7.3% [3/41] vs 9.5% [8/84]; P > .99), paraplegia or paraparesis (4.9% [2/41] vs 3.6% [3/84]; P = .66), and stroke (2.4% [1/41] vs 10.7% [9/84]; P = .16). The occurrence of 30-day secondary intervention was similar in the TEVAR and STABLE groups (7.3% [3/41] vs 7.1% [6/84]; P > .99). True lumen expansion in the abdominal aorta was significantly greater in the STABLE group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute type B aortic dissection in the setting of branch vessel malperfusion, the use of a composite device with proximal stent grafts and distal bare aortic stent appeared to result in lower malperfusion-related mortality than the use of stent grafts alone. The 30-day rates of morbidity and secondary interventions were similar between the groups.

Long-Term Effectiveness of the Zilver PTX Drug-Eluting Stent for Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease in Patients with No Patent Tibial Runoff Vessels-Results from the Zilver PTX Japan Post-Market Surveillance Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate 2-year results of the Zilver PTX (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Indiana) drug-eluting stent (DES) for femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease (PAD) in patients with no continuous patent infrapopliteal runoff arteries compared with patients with ≥ 1 continuous patent runoff vessels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with femoropopliteal PAD enrolled in the Zilver PTX Post-Market Surveillance Study in Japan was performed. There were no exclusion criteria. Outcomes, including freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR), patency, and clinical benefit, for the no-runoff group (n = 54) were compared with the runoff group (n = 846). RESULTS: The 2 groups were similar in terms of demographics, lesion characteristics, and comorbidities (P > .05). There was a higher incidence of critical limb ischemia in the no-runoff group compared with the runoff group (44.8% vs 19.7%; P < .01). There were 3 amputations (5.6%) in the no-runoff group versus 7 amputations (0.8%) in the runoff group (P = .02). At 2 years, freedom from TLR rates were 81.3% versus 83.8% (P = .87), patency rates were 68.4% versus 70.7% (P = .95), and clinical benefit rates were 73.7% versus 80.0% (P = .16) in the no-runoff versus runoff group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Results in patients with no continuous patent tibial runoff were favorable through 2 years and similar to results for patients with ≥ 1 continuous patent runoff vessels, indicating that the Zilver PTX DES may be a valid treatment option for patients with these difficult-to-treat lesions.

Analgesic effect of bupivacaine eluting porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) in ferrets undergoing acute abdominal hernia defect surgery.

BACKGROUND: Porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) is used as a biological implant for abdominal wall hernia repair to facilitate wound healing and augment local tissue strength. This prospective, randomized, blinded study evaluated local pain control provided by bupivacaine adsorbed to SIS for repair of acutely created abdominal wall full thickness muscle/fascial defects in ferrets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen healthy ferrets were randomly and equally assigned to three groups: (1) SIS with bupivacaine subjected to surgery, (2) SIS with no bupivacaine subjected to surgery, and (3) anesthesia only control group. Ferrets in groups 1 and 2 were anesthetized with butorphanol and sevoflurane for the surgery. Control ferrets were anesthetized in the same fashion for the same duration without surgery. Behavior and pain were evaluated in all ferrets by behavioral observation, algometer, and palpometer measurements, and heart and respiratory rates each obtained before surgery and at various intervals for 96 h after surgery. When pain reached a predetermined threshold, buprenorphine was used as a rescue analgesic. The serum and combined tissue concentrations of bupivacaine were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, the palpometer testing was better tolerated in the bupivacaine treated SIS group than by the untreated SIS group (P = 0.04). There was an observed physiologically significant difference in algometer and other palpometer readings as well as heart and respiratory rates. All ferrets in the untreated SIS group were rescued while 33% of the SIS-bupivacaine groups were rescued (P < 0.01). Peak serum concentrations of bupivacaine were in the range of 0.7 µg/mL with tissue level below detection levels and no clinical signs of toxicity were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Bupivacaine adsorbed to SIS provided some degree of pain relief over 2-4 days with no clinical adverse effects observed in the ferrets.

Paclitaxel-Coated Zilver PTX Drug-Eluting Stent Treatment Does Not Result in Increased Long-Term All-Cause Mortality Compared to Uncoated Devices.

PURPOSE: Patient-level data from two large studies of the Zilver PTX drug-eluting stent (DES) with long-term follow-up and concurrent non-drug comparator groups were analyzed to determine whether there was an increased mortality risk due to paclitaxel. METHODS: Data from the Zilver PTX randomized controlled trial (RCT) and Zilver PTX and bare metal stent (BMS) Japan post-market surveillance studies were analyzed. Five-year follow-up is complete in both DES studies; follow-up for the BMS study was limited to 3 years and is complete. Kaplan-Meier analyses assessed mortality. A Cox proportional hazards model identified significant factors related to mortality. RESULTS: In the RCT, there were 336 patients treated with the DES and 143 patients treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) or BMS. In Japan, there were 904 DES patients and 190 BMS patients. There was no difference in all-cause mortality for the DES compared to PTA/BMS in the RCT (19.1% DES versus 17.1% PTA/BMS through 5 years, p = 0.60) or Japan (15.8% DES versus 15.3% BMS through 3 years, p = 0.89). Cox proportional hazard models revealed that age, tissue loss, and congestive heart failure were significantly associated with mortality in the RCT, and critical limb ischemia, age, renal failure, and gender were significantly associated with mortality in Japan (all p < 0.05). Neither treatment with Zilver PTX (p = 0.46 RCT, p = 0.49 Japan) nor paclitaxel dose (p = 0.86 RCT, p = 0.07 Japan) was associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: Analyses of the Zilver PTX patient-level data demonstrated no increase in long-term all-cause mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Zilver PTX RCT: Level 1, randomized controlled trial; Japan PMS studies: Level 3, post-market surveillance study.

Impact of Chronic Renal Failure on Safety and Effectiveness of Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease: Subgroup Analysis from Zilver PTX Post-Market Surveillance Study in Japan.

PURPOSE: Favorable long-term outcomes of the Zilver PTX drug-eluting stent (DES) in femoropopliteal lesions have been demonstrated. Chronic renal failure (CRF) has been shown to be a risk factor for restenosis and decreased limb salvage. The results of the DES in patients with CRF have not previously been reported. This study compares the results with the DES in patients with CRF and those without CRF. METHODS: This retrospective analysis from the Zilver PTX Japan Post-Market Surveillance Study included 321 patients with CRF and 584 patients without CRF. Outcomes included freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) and patency. RESULTS: Of the patients included in this subgroup analysis, 2-year data were available for 209 patients in the CRF group and 453 patients in the non-CRF group. The two groups were similar in terms of lesion length and the frequency of in-stent restenosis. Critical limb ischemia, severe calcification, and diabetes were more common in patients with CRF, whereas total occlusion was more common in patients without CRF. Freedom from TLR rates were 81.4 versus 84.9% (p = 0.24), and patency rates were 70.7 versus 70.3% (p = 0.95) in patients with and without CRF at 2 years, respectively. CONCLUSION: This is the first comparative study of the DES in femoropopliteal artery lesions in patients with and without CRF. These results indicate that the DES placed in femoropopliteal artery lesions of CRF patients is safe and effective with similar patency and TLR rates to patients without CRF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, Post-Market Surveillance Study.

Chronic hernia repair in a rat model using small intestinal submucosa.

BACKGROUND. Small intestinal submucosa (SIS) body wall defect repair in preclinical studies results in host tissue that resembles original host tissue histologically and has adequate strength to maintain repair integrity. However, these studies have been performed using acute hernia models that may not represent healing in a naturally occurring hernia. METHODS. Fifty-four male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into nine groups (n = 6) and fascia/muscle/peritoneal abdominal wall defects were created. One control group had no surgery. Four surgery groups had defects repaired immediately by (1) fascia suture apposition, (2) polypropylene mesh (PPM) peritoneal onlay, (3) SIS inlay, or (4) SIS peritoneal onlay. After defect creation, chronic hernias matured for 28 days, and then were similarly repaired. Follow-up after hernia repair for all groups was 28 days. Gross evaluation for hernia recurrence, infection, and adhesions was followed by histopathology and tensile testing of the repair. RESULTS. There were no recurrent hernias or infection. Adhesions covered all implants. Histopathologic findings of inflammation and fibrosis were similar between all groups. There were no significant differences in tensile strength between SIS and PPM healing/incorporation or between acute and chronic hernia groups. Normal body wall was stronger than all repairs. Fascia closure in chronic hernias was stronger than acute fascia closure (p < .01). CONCLUSIONS. We found no significant differences between SIS and PPM healing/incorporation as determined by gross and histopathology and tensile strength testing. The study suggests that preclinical testing of abdominal body wall reconstruction in the rat may be adequately performed in acute studies.