Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 121(15): e2313866121, 2024 Apr 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38564639

RESUMO

Transposable element invasions have a profound impact on the evolution of genomes and phenotypes. It is thus an important open question how often such TE invasions occur. To address this question, we utilize the genomes of historical specimens, sampled about 200 y ago. We found that the LTR retrotransposons Blood, Opus, and 412 spread in Drosophila melanogaster in the 19th century. These invasions constitute second waves, as degraded fragments were found for all three TEs. The composition of Opus and 412, but not of Blood, shows a pronounced geographic heterogeneity, likely due to founder effects during the invasions. Finally, we identified species from the Drosophila simulans complex as the likely origin of the TEs. We show that in total, seven TE families invaded D. melanogaster during the last 200y, thereby increasing the genome size by up to 1.2Mbp. We suggest that this high rate of TE invasions was likely triggered by human activity. Based on the analysis of strains and specimens sampled at different times, we provide a detailed timeline of TE invasions, making D. melanogaster the first organism where the invasion history of TEs during the last two centuries could be inferred.


Assuntos
Drosophila melanogaster , Retroelementos , Animais , Humanos , Drosophila melanogaster/genética , Retroelementos/genética , Genoma , Elementos de DNA Transponíveis , Evolução Molecular
2.
PLoS Genet ; 20(3): e1011201, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38530818

RESUMO

During the last few centuries D. melanogaster populations were invaded by several transposable elements, the most recent of which was thought to be the P-element between 1950 and 1980. Here we describe a novel TE, which we named Spoink, that has invaded D. melanogaster. It is a 5216nt LTR retrotransposon of the Ty3/gypsy superfamily. Relying on strains sampled at different times during the last century we show that Spoink invaded worldwide D. melanogaster populations after the P-element between 1983 and 1993. This invasion was likely triggered by a horizontal transfer from the D. willistoni group, much as the P-element. Spoink is probably silenced by the piRNA pathway in natural populations and about 1/3 of the examined strains have an insertion into a canonical piRNA cluster such as 42AB. Given the degree of genetic investigation of D. melanogaster it is perhaps surprising that Spoink was able to invade unnoticed.


Assuntos
Drosophila melanogaster , Retroelementos , Animais , Drosophila melanogaster/genética , RNA de Interação com Piwi , Drosophila/genética , Elementos de DNA Transponíveis
3.
Genetics ; 225(4)2023 Dec 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37819004

RESUMO

According to the prevailing view, the trap model, the activity of invading transposable elements (TEs) is greatly reduced when a TE copy jumps into a piRNA cluster, which triggers the emergence of piRNAs that silence the TE. One crucial component in the host defence are paramutations. Mediated by maternally deposited piRNAs, paramutations convert TE insertions into piRNA producing loci, thereby transforming selfish TEs into agents of the host defence. Despite this significant effect, the impact of paramutations on the dynamics of TE invasions remains unknown. To address this issue, we performed extensive forward simulations of TE invasions with piRNA clusters and paramutations. We found that paramutations significantly affect TE dynamics, by accelerating the silencing of TE invasions, reducing the number of insertions accumulating during the invasions and mitigating the fitness cost of TEs. We also demonstrate that piRNA production induced by paramutations, an epigenetically inherited trait, may be positively selected. Finally, we show that paramutations may account for three important open problems with the trap model. Firstly, paramutated TE insertions may compensate for the insufficient number of insertions in piRNA clusters observed in previous studies. Secondly, paramutations may explain the discrepancy between the observed and the expected abundance of different TE families in Drosophila melanogaster. Thirdly, piRNA clusters may be crucial to trigger the host defence, but paramutations render the clusters dispensable once the defence has been established. This could account for the lack of TE activation when three major piRNA clusters were deleted in a previous study.


Assuntos
Elementos de DNA Transponíveis , Drosophila melanogaster , Humanos , Animais , Elementos de DNA Transponíveis/genética , Drosophila melanogaster/genética , RNA Interferente Pequeno/genética , RNA de Interação com Piwi
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA