Three-year clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with certolizumab pegol: results from the observational ECLAIR study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the long-term effectiveness and safety of certolizumab pegol in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a real-world setting in France. METHODS: ECLAIR was a 3-year longitudinal, prospective, observational, multicentre study. The primary objective was to describe the EULAR response after 1 year of certolizumab pegol treatment. Other endpoints included DAS28, clinical disease activity index, health assessment questionnaire disability index, fatigue assessment scale, patient's assessment of arthritis pain, patient and physician global assessments of disease activity, patient quality of life, and long-term safety. RESULTS: A total of 792 patients were enrolled, of whom 776 comprised the safety set, and 733 the full analysis set. In the full analysis set, 559, 469 and 430 patients had a 12-, 24- and 36-month visit, respectively. This included 378, 296 and 246 patients still receiving certolizumab pegol at these visits. The percentage of EULAR responders was 75.3% (305/405 patients with an available EULAR response) at 12, 76.5% (261/341) at 24, and 79.6% (226/284) at 36 months. Among those still receiving certolizumab pegol, the percentage of EULAR responders was 81.7% (237/290) at 12, 81.1% (185/228) at 24, and 87.3% (158/181) at 36 months. Sustained improvements were observed in other effectiveness outcomes. Overall, 45.1% (350/776) of patients experienced 776 adverse drug reactions. No new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first prospective, observational study of an anti-TNF treatment in France. The results confirm the effectiveness and safety profile of certolizumab pegol treatment in patients with RA in a real-world setting.

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Risk Minimization Measures of Sodium Oxybate in the European Union.

BACKGROUND: Sodium oxybate (Xyrem®), approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for narcolepsy with cataplexy, is only available through risk mitigation programs due to potential adverse effects including respiratory and central nervous system depression, neuropsychiatric events, and misuse. OBJECTIVE: We report findings from a survey evaluating effectiveness of the European Union Xyrem® Risk Management Plan (RMP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional, online, multiple-choice survey was distributed to randomly selected healthcare professionals (HCPs) from six European countries (April 2016-May 2018). Eligibility criteria: current/potential Xyrem® prescriber and/or sleep disorder specialist; contact information available; on the Xyrem® RMP educational materials mailing list. PRIMARY OUTCOME: proportion of respondents answering each question correctly (< 50% responses correct = unsatisfactory comprehension, 50% to < 70% = satisfactory, ≥ 70% = excellent), with precision assessed using 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Of the 709 HCPs contacted, 601 did not agree to take part, 108 were screened with 35/108 eligible for inclusion; 31 HCPs completed the survey. Of the 31 respondents, 29 (93.5%; 95% CI 84.4-100.0) reported receiving Xyrem® safety information, commonly from a sales representative, EMA Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC), or educational meeting; only 9/31 (31.0%; 14.3-50.0) recalled receiving mailed educational materials. The number of HCPs answering dosing-related questions correctly ranged from 24/31 to 31/31. All Xyrem® contraindications were correctly identified by 26/31 (83.9%; 70.0-96.7) respondents. All respondents 'always' or 'sometimes' completed SmPC recommended activities upon treatment initiation. The majority indicated signs of abuses/misuse/diversion (23/31; 74.2%; 58.6-88.0) and criminal use (23/31; 74.2%; 59.4-89.3) should be monitored at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate the importance of providing a range of educational materials. However, the low sample size limits interpretation; increased HCP engagement would improve understanding of how best to develop educational materials. EUROPEAN POST-AUTHORIZATION STUDY (PAS) REGISTER NUMBER: EUPAS15024.

A noninterventional study evaluating the effectiveness of rotigotine and levodopa combination therapy in younger versus older patients with Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: PD0013 was a 6-month noninterventional study in clinical practice comparing effectiveness/tolerability of rotigotine+levodopa in younger (<70 years) vs. older (≥70 years) Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. METHODS: Patients previously received levodopa for ≥6 months as monotherapy/in combination with another dopamine-agonist (DA). Primary variable: Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part-II change from baseline to end-of-observation-period (EOP). RESULTS: 91 younger/99 older patients started rotigotine; 68 younger/62 older patients completed the study. Most switched from levodopa+another DA. Addition of rotigotine as first DA was more common in older patients (20.2% vs.15.4%). Mean ± SD rotigotine-exposure: 6.1 ± 3.4 mg/24h younger vs. 4.9 ± 2.4 mg/24h older. Eleven patients changed levodopa dose. At EOP, improvement in mean UPDRS-II was greater in younger patients (p = 0.0289). UPDRS-II responder-rate (≥20% decrease in UPDRS-II score) was higher in younger patients (42.3% vs. 25.9%). Improvement across age groups was similar on PD Sleep Scale-2 and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and discontinuations because of ADRs, were more common among older patients. There were no new safety signals. CONCLUSIONS: Despite low rotigotine doses, when added to levodopa/switched from levodopa+another DA, rotigotine led to greater improvement in UPDRS-II in younger patients (<70 years). Individual patient data revealed clinically meaningful improvements in UPDRS-II in both groups.