A randomized controlled trial to assess operator radiation exposure from cardiac catheterization procedures using RAD BOARD® with standard pelvic shielding versus standard pelvic shielding alone.

OBJECTIVE: To study radiation exposure to the primary operator during diagnostic cardiac catheterizations using a radio-dense RAD BOARD® radial access arm board. BACKGROUND: The use of radial access for catheterization in the United States has increased from 1% in 2007 to 41% in 2018. Compared to femoral access, operator radiation exposure from radial access is similar or higher. The RAD BOARD radio-dense radial access arm board has been marketed as reducing radiation to operators by 44%. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We randomized 265 patients undergoing catheterization via right radial access to standard pelvic lead drape shielding (nonboard group) versus RAD BOARD in addition to pelvic drape (board group). Operator radiation exposure was measured using Landauer Microstar nanoDot™ badges worn by the operator. RESULTS: Board and nonboard groups were similar with respect to demographic and procedural variables. Mean operator dose per case was higher in the board group (.65mSieverts) than in the nonboard group (.56mSieverts, P < 0.0001). In sub-group analyses, radiation doses were higher in the board group compared to the nonboard group in patients across all body mass index groups (P < 0.03). In multivariate analysis, operator dose correlated with use of the RAD BOARD more closely than any other variable (P < 0.001). Post hoc analysis of the table setup with RAD BOARD revealed that use of RAD BOARD prevented placement of a shield normally inserted into the top of the standard below-table shield. CONCLUSION: RAD BOARD with the pelvic shield was associated with higher radiation exposure to the operator compared with pelvic shield alone, likely due to inability to use standard radiation shielding along with the RAD BOARD.

Impact of pre-hospital electrocardiograms on time to treatment and one year outcome in a rural regional ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction network.

BACKGROUND: Pre-hospital electrocardiograms (ECGs) are believed to reduce time to reperfusion in ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) patients. Little is known of their impact on clinical outcomes in a rural setting. Geisinger regional STEMI network provides percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) care to over a 100-mile radius in rural central Pennsylvania. METHODS: A retrospective analysis identified 280 consecutive STEMI patients treated with PCI between 1/1/09 and 8/31/11. Comparison between two STEMI groups was performed: 205 patients who were taken by the emergency medical system (EMS) to the nearest hospital (a non-PCI center), underwent an ECG revealing a STEMI, and were transported immediately to Geisinger Medical Center (GMC) for PCI (transfer group) versus 75 patients in whom a pre-hospital ECG was obtained and who were transported by EMS directly to Geisinger for PCI, bypassing the nearest hospital that did not perform PCI (the pre-hospital ECG group). RESULTS: Analysis of baseline characteristics revealed that the pre-hospital ECG cohort was older (65 vs. 60 years); had a higher percentage of previous myocardial infarctions (MI) (28% vs. 15%), heart failure (11% vs. 4%), and prior PCI (23% vs. 13%; p < 0.05 all comparisons). Median time from EMS contact to pre-hospital ECG in the pre-hospital ECG group was 5 minutes; from pre-hospital ECG to the GMC ED was 34 minutes. Median time from first medical contact (EMS contact) to reperfusion (device activation) was 79 versus 157 minutes (P < 0.001), respectively in pre-hospital ECG vs. transfer groups. Mortality in the two groups at 1 year was 4.1% in the pre-hospital ECG group versus 8.3% in the transfer group (P-value = 0.34). After adjusting for the difference in age between the two groups, the 62% reduction in 1 year mortality associated with having obtained a pre-hospital ECG was still not statistically significant (P-value = 0.19). CONCLUSION: In a rural regional STEMI network, pre-hospital ECGs decreased time from first medical contact to reperfusion by 50% and were associated with an excellent clinical outcome at 1 year. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Does Preoperative Platelet Function Predict Bleeding in Patients Undergoing Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery?

OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the relationship between preoperative platelet function and perioperative bleeding in patients undergoing CABG. BACKGROUND: There are many ways to measure platelet aggregability. Little is known about their correlations with one another, or with bleeding. METHODS: We prospectively studied 50 patients undergoing a first isolated off-pump CABG. Thirty-four were exposed to a thienopyridine prior to surgery; 16 were not. Preoperative platelet function was measured by VerifyNow®, TEG®, AggreGuide™, Plateletworks®, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation, and light transmission aggregometry. Bleeding was assessed 2 ways: drop from pre- to nadir postoperative hematocrit, and chest tube drainage. Correlation coefficients were calculated using Spearman's rank-order correlation. RESULTS: Mean age was 62 years. Patient characteristics and surgical details were similar between the thienopyridine-exposed and non-exposed patients. The correlation coefficients between the 4 point-of-care platelet function measurements and hematocrit change ranged from -0.2274 to 0.2882. Only Plateletworks® correlated with drop in hematocrit (r = 0.2882, P = 0.0470). The correlation coefficients between each of the 4 point-of-care platelet function tests and the chest tube drainage were also poor, ranging from -0.3073 to 0.2272. Both AggreGuide™ (r = -0.3073, P = 0.0317) and VASP (r = -0.3187, P = 0.0272) were weakly but significantly correlated with chest tube drainage. The correlation among the 4 point-of-care platelet function measurements was poor, with coefficients ranging from -0.2504 to 0.1968. CONCLUSIONS: We observed little correlation among 4 platelet function tests, and between those assays and perioperative bleeding defined 2 different ways. Whether any of these assays should be used to guide decision making in individual patients is unclear.

Safety of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the radial versus femoral route in patients on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with warfarin.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate access site and other bleeding complications associated with radial versus femoral access in patients receiving oral anticoagulation (OAC) with warfarin. BACKGROUND: Patients receiving OAC with warfarin undergoing coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may have OAC continued despite the risk of bleeding. To what extent arterial access site impacts bleeding in such patients is not well studied. METHODS: Over 6 years, we identified 255 consecutive patients in whom warfarin was continued who underwent coronary angiography with an international normalized ratio >1.8. A total of 97 patients also underwent PCI at the same setting (27% femoral vs 73% radial). The primary outcome was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeds; a secondary end point was frequency of access site complications in the 72 hours post-PCI. Complications were evaluated based on the initial access site attempted. RESULTS: Minimal baseline clinical characteristics differences existed between the groups. International normalized ratio was significantly higher in the radial group (2.42 ± 0.67 vs 2.24 ± 0.49, P = .02). Bivalirudin use was greater during radial PCI than femoral (76% vs 42%, P < .05), whereas unfractionated heparin alone was greater during femoral PCI than radial (46% vs 18%, P < .05). No significant difference was seen in the primary end point between femoral (2.8%) and radial (1.6%, P = .54) during coronary angiography alone. However, PCI via the femoral artery had significantly more Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding (19.2% vs 1.4%, P = .005) and transfusions (15% vs 0%, P = .004) than via the radial artery. Patients who underwent PCI using radial access were less likely to have any vascular or bleeding complications (1% vs 23%, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent coronary angiography during uninterrupted OAC had similar bleeding rates regardless of access site. However, when PCI was performed, radial access was associated with fewer bleeding and vascular complications than the femoral approach. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: We retrospectively identified 255 consecutive patients on warfarin who underwent coronary angiography, 97 of whom underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention. The data reveal a reduction in Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeds (1.6% vs 8.1%, P = .02) with radial versus femoral access. The radial approach was associated with an overall lower rate of any vascular or bleeding complication than the femoral approach during percutaneous coronary intervention (1% vs 23%, P = .001).

Frequency of coronary angiography and revascularization among men and women with myocardial infarction and their relationship to mortality at one year: an analysis of the Geisinger myocardial infarction cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To determine sex bias in the selection of strategies to evaluate patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and determine if the choice of strategy influences survival. BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding the role of female sex in the use of invasive evaluation for AMI and its possible effect on adverse outcomes. METHODS: Electronic health record data from the Geisinger Acute Myocardial Infarction Cohort (GAMIC) was analyzed which included 1,968 men and 1,047 women admitted to the Geisinger Medical Center between January 2001 and December 2006 with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine independent correlates of an invasive evaluation. Multivariate logistic regression modeling stratified on sex was used to determine when invasive evaluation was done and whether there was a correlation with mortality. RESULTS: In unadjusted analyses, male sex was a significant predictor for the use of invasive evaluation (odds ratio = 1.71, 95% CI = [1.46, 2.00]). Adjusted for baseline differences (like age, renal function, co-morbid conditions) multivariate analyses found no significant relationship between male sex and invasive evaluation (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = [0.82, 1.23]). Females in the STEMI group were found to be less revascularized. No difference was observed in the one-year mortality between women and men regardless of invasive evaluation or revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: Sex was not independently associated with the occurrence of an invasive evaluation of a MI. Females in the STEMI group were less revascularized. There was no strong gender effect on survival irrespective of the performance on an invasive evaluation or revascularization.

Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization After a Three-Day Holiday Weekend Versus a Two-Day Weekend.

OBJECTIVES: The study aim is to determine whether invasive cardiac procedures following a 3-day (holiday) weekend have worse outcomes compared with procedures following a 2-day (normal) weekend. BACKGROUND: Catheterization laboratory schedules after 3-day holiday weekends tend to be overloaded with urgent procedures for patients who have waited up to 3 days. We hypothesized that this would be reflected by more procedural complications in patients undergoing procedures after a 3-day weekend. METHODS: Invasive cardiac procedures that occurred after a weekend at Geisinger Medical Center from July 2012 to December 2019 were included. Baseline characteristics, presentation, periprocedural variables, adverse events, and clinical outcomes were compared between catheterizations on the day following a 2-day weekend and catheterizations following a 3-day weekend. Independent correlates of adverse events were identified by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: We identified 13,704 invasive cardiac procedures performed after a weekend, of which 722 occurred after a 3-day (holiday) weekend. Baseline demographics, presentation, and case volumes were similar between the 2 groups. Procedures after a 3-day weekend were not associated with any differences in in-hospital mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke compared with those after a standard 2-day weekend. By univariate analysis, procedural complications were more frequent after a 3-day weekend (15.1% vs 12.3%; P=.03), but this difference was not significant on multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 1.22; P=.30). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac catheterization procedures performed after a 3-day weekend were not associated with differences in in-patient mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, or procedural complications.

Prognostic implications of prior contrast reaction in patients with emergency premedication before undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Patients with iodinated contrast material (ICM) adverse reactions are at increased risk for breakthrough reactions. Previous studies suggest that the severity of a prior ICM adverse reaction corresponds to the severity of a repeat reaction. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether the severity of prior ICM adverse reactions in patients receiving emergency premedication therapy prior to PCI predicts outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective observational study of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) encounters between January 1, 2005, and May 30, 2018, was conducted at Geisinger Medical Center. Patients with ICM adverse reactions premedicated with an emergency premedication regimen prior to PCI were included in the study. PCIs were stratified based on the severity of the index ICM adverse reactions; PCIs with a prior severe reaction were compared to PCIs with a prior mild-moderate reaction. RESULTS: We evaluated 604 PCI, of these, 144 (23.8%) had prior severe reactions and 460 (76.2%) had mild-to-moderate reactions. Nine patients had breakthrough reactions, of which seven were of the same or decreased severity in comparison to the index reactions. The overall breakthrough reactions occurred in 1 of 144 patients (0.7%) with an initial severe reaction and in 8 of 460 (1.7%) with an initial mild/moderate reaction (p = 0.69). Outcomes including length of hospital stay and 30-day mortality were similar for PCI with or without severe index ICM reactions. CONCLUSION: Frequency and severity of breakthrough reaction and clinical outcomes in patients treated with emergency premedication regimen prior to PCI were independent of the severity of index ICM reactions.

ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients can be enrolled in randomized trials before emergent coronary intervention without sacrificing door-to-balloon time.

BACKGROUND: Multicenter trials are necessary to compare the effectiveness of new drugs and devices for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, enrollment of STEMI patients in clinical trials could be detrimental to patients if it significantly delayed reperfusion therapy. We sought to determine whether STEMI patients treated with PCI could be enrolled in clinical trials without prolonging door-to-balloon times. METHODS: At a single PCI center between October 17, 2004, and December 31, 2007, patients were enrolled in 1 of 4 trials requiring central enrollment and informed consent if (1) a study was actively enrolling, (2) the patient met inclusion/exclusion criteria, (3) and a study nurse was available. Median door-to-balloon times were compared for patients enrolled in clinical trials compared to those not enrolled. RESULTS: Of 581 STEMI patients treated with PCI, 123 were enrolled in clinical trials and 458 were not. For patients transferred for PCI, community hospital door-to-balloon times were similar for research and nonresearch patients (104 vs 108 minutes, P = .4). For patients presenting directly to the PCI center, median door-to-balloon times were similar for research (55 minutes) and nonresearch patients (44 minutes, P = .5) after adjustment for age, culprit artery, and operator. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with STEMI may be enrolled in clinical trials with no significant delay in achieving reperfusion. For patients presenting directly to the PCI center, median door-to-balloon times well under 90 minutes can be achieved even with enrollment into clinical trials.

Readmission in the 30 days after percutaneous coronary intervention.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to identify the frequency and etiology of readmission within 30 days of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a large integrated healthcare system. BACKGROUND: One-fifth of Medicare patients are readmitted within 30 days of hospitalization. Identifying the causes of readmission may help identify strategies to prevent readmission. METHODS: All patients undergoing PCI (elective, urgent, and emergent) at our center between January 1, 2007, and April 12, 2010, were prospectively entered into the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Patients readmitted to any hospital within 30 days of the index procedure were identified using an administrative database and telephone follow-up. Individual charts were reviewed independently by 2 investigators; disagreements regarding the cause for readmission were resolved by a third investigator. RESULTS: During the study period, 3,255 PCI were performed, and 262 patients (8.0%) were readmitted within 30 days. Of these, 261 (99.6%) had medical records available for review. Reasons for readmission included: complications related to the PCI (n = 31, 11.9%); non-PCI cardiac causes related to index admission (n = 93, 35.6%); noncardiac causes related to index admission (n = 34, 13%); causes unrelated to the index admission (n = 103, 39.5%). Multivariable logistic regression modeling revealed that female sex, advanced age, peripheral arterial disease, prior valvular surgery, and PCI complications during the index procedure were associated with 30-day readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Readmissions within 30 days due to complications related to PCI performed on index admission are rare (0.9% of all PCI) and are an infrequent cause of readmission (<12% of readmissions). Thirty-day readmission after PCI should not be used as a quality metric of PCI performance.

Door-to-balloon times under 90 min can be routinely achieved for patients transferred for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction percutaneous coronary intervention in a rural setting.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of routine transfer of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients to achieve percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in less than 90 min from presentation. BACKGROUND: Many PCI hospitals have achieved routine door-to-balloon times under 90 min for patients with STEMI presenting directly to the hospital. However, few patients transferred from a non-PCI center undergo PCI within 90 min of presentation. METHODS: Our rural PCI hospital implemented a program in 2005 for rapid triage, transfer, and treatment of STEMI patients and made additional improvements in 2006 and 2007. Intervals between milestones in the STEMI triage/transfer/treatment process were assessed before and after implementation of the program. RESULTS: During the 5-year study period, 676 patients with 687 STEMIs were transferred from 19 community hospitals and underwent PCI. Median door-to-balloon time decreased from 189 min to 88 min (p < 0.001). The time intervals reflecting efficiency of the referring hospitals, transfer services, and PCI hospital all significantly improved. In 2008, median door-to-balloon times were <90 min for 6 of the 7 most frequently referring hospitals. Delays during off-hours presentation in 2004 were abolished after the program was implemented in 2005. In-hospital mortality decreased from 6% before to 3% after implementation of the program. In multivariate modeling, presentation before initiation of the STEMI program predicted increased risk of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio: 3.74, 95% confidence interval: 1.22 to 11.51, p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: A program of rapid triage, transfer, and treatment of STEMI patients presenting to non-PCI hospitals can reduce in-hospital mortality and produce progressive improvements in door-to-balloon time such that median door-to-balloon times under 90 min are feasible.

Manual aspiration of iatrogenic embolization through a left internal mammary artery graft.

Embolization during diagnostic catheterization is rare. When it occurs, angiographers need to recognize and treat it immediately. Mechanical removal of the embolized material may help restore flow promptly and salvage myocardium. We describe two cases of iatrogenic embolization into the internal mammary artery grafts resulting in left anterior descending artery occlusion, and describe how prompt intervention by catheter aspiration prevented anterior myocardial infarction.

Predictors of reperfusion delay in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention from the HORIZONS-AMI trial.

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the optimal method of reperfusion when performed expeditiously. Factors contributing to delays in PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have not been thoroughly characterized or quantified. We sought to identify the factors associated with the delays to reperfusion in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. Primary PCI was performed in 3,340 patients with STEMI in the international, multicenter Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction trial. Multivariate analysis was used to identify independent predictors of delay in achieving reperfusion from 38 baseline and procedural variables. A total of 905 patients (27.1%) presented to non-PCI hospitals and were subsequently transferred; the remainder presented to PCI hospitals. The most powerful independent predictor of the interval from symptom onset to arrival at the PCI hospital and the first door-to-balloon time was an initial presentation at a non-PCI hospital (median incremental 58- and 54-minute delay, respectively, both p < 0.001). Other independent predictors of prolonged door-to-balloon times included presentation with respiratory failure (42-minute incremental delay, p = 0.003), presentation during off-work hours (11-minute incremental delay, p < 0.001), and co-morbid conditions such as diabetes and heart failure. In conclusion, among patients undergoing primary PCI, presentation to a non-PCI hospital was the variable associated with the greatest delay to reperfusion. Systems of care that encourage ambulance diagnosis and direct delivery of patients with STEMI to a PCI hospital might shorten the overall door-to-balloon times and improve the clinical outcomes.

Feasibility and safety of ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention in the modern era.

BACKGROUND: The frequency of ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) varies among institutions and regions of the country. It is unclear what factors limit use of the ad hoc strategy. OBJECTIVE: To define factors which limit the use of the ad hoc strategy. METHODS: All patients who underwent PCI at our center in 2004 were reviewed. Patients who had emergent PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (n = 188), those who had undergone diagnostic coronary angiography at a referring facility (n = 54), and those who had a repeat PCI after a previous ad hoc PCI (n = 19) were excluded. PCIs performed the same day as diagnostic angiography were considered "ad hoc"; all others were designated "staged". Demographic and procedural factors through hospital discharge were prospectively recorded. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify correlates of ad hoc PCI, PCI success, and PCI complications. RESULTS: Of the 580 PCI procedures eligible for analysis, 557 (96%) were ad hoc and 23 (4%) were staged. Patients undergoing staged PCI had more lesions treated, a higher rate of no-reflow and periprocedural myocardial infarction, and higher contrast volumes and fluoroscopic times. Logistic regression analysis revealed that patients with history of heart failure, renal insufficiency and a recent myocardial infarction were more likely to undergo a staged PCI. Patients undergoing a staged PCI and those who had previous bypass surgery were more likely to have an unsuccessful PCI procedure. CONCLUSION: Most PCI procedures can be performed safely and effectively on the same day as diagnostic coronary angiography.

Emergency pretreatment for contrast allergy before direct percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Patients with previous adverse contrast reactions occasionally present with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Whether they can undergo catheterization safely using current contrast and medications is unknown. We reviewed catheterization laboratory records of all 501 patients (January 2005 to December 2006) presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent emergency coronary angiography. Six patients (1.2%) reported a previous contrast reaction including rash, acute bronchospasm, or anaphylaxis. All received a combination of intravenous steroids and H1 and H2 blockers in the emergency department or catheterization laboratory before catheterization. None of these had complications or evidence of allergy in any patient. In conclusion, some patients with previous contrast reaction may undergo emergency catheterization without adverse consequences, although the safety of this approach has not been proved.

Interactive effects of high stocking density and triiodothyronine-administration on aspects of the in vivo intermediary metabolism and in vitro hepatic response to catecholamine and pancreatic hormone stimulation in brook charr, Salvelinus fontinalis.

Brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis) were maintained at one of two stocking densities (SD) (30 or 120 kg/m3) and fed either a control or a T3-supplemented (20 mg/kg) diet for 30 days in order to investigate possible interactive effects of SD and T3-administration on growth, feeding rate, food conversion efficiency, and hepatic and dark muscle enzyme activity. In addition, liver slices were incubated in vitro for 6 h with epinephrine, norepinephrine, isoproterenol, propranolol, insulin, glucagon, or somatostatin to evaluate possible SD-T3 interactive effects on hepatic responses to hormonal stimulation. Maintaining the fish at high SD appeared to increase the clearance rate of T3 from the T3-supplemented group. There was no clear evidence of SD-T3 interactive effects on growth rate, feeding rate, or food conversion efficiency, although T3-administration decreased food conversion efficiency, and high SD decreased growth and feeding rates. Of the hepatic enzymes studied, HOAD, malic enzyme, G6PDH, CS, PFK, HK, and GDH activities all showed changes suggestive of interactive SD-T3 effects. Although hepatic FBPase was stimulated by both high SD and T3-administration, there was no evidence of interactive SD-T3 effects. Dark muscle HOAD, CS, and PFK also showed SD-T3-related responses; dark muscle malic enzyme, G6PDH, HK, and GDH were unaffected by either altered SD or T3-administration. Prior treatment of the fish with T3 and high SD had significant effects on free fatty acid (ffa) release to the medium and on hepatic lipid content, but had no effect on the responses to the various endocrine agents used. Glucose release from liver slices of fish stocked at high density (both T3-supplemented and controls) was higher than that of the fish stocked at low density; with the exception of insulin and glucagon, glucose release was similar in all pre-treatment groups. The insulin- and glucagon-stimulated changes in glucose release seen in the fish fed non-supplemented diets were not found in the two groups of fish fed the T3-supplemented diets. High SD and/or T3-administration induced significant lowering of hepatic glycogen content, but there was no effect of pre-treatment on the response to any of the endocrine agents used. The data show a marked effect of SD on energy partitioning processes in brook charr and the animal's ability to respond to T3-stimulation, but provided no evidence of such effects on the liver response to the various agents used.