RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Psychiatric problems, such as stress and anxiety disorders, are encountered amongst healthcare professionals fighting epidemics. Considering that COVID-19 suddenly became a pandemic and healthcare professionals have not had access to sufficient information, it is a fact that healthcare professionals have been affected on a large scale. Heavy workloads, insufficient equipment and anxiety over families increase this impact. We aimed to investigate the extent to which healthcare professionals have been psychologically affected by COVID-19 and related factors. METHODOLOGY: Data obtained through questionnaires completed by 348 healthcare professionals working during the COVID-19 pandemic and 350 participants who are in the control group were investigated. The Impact of Event Scale-revised (IES-R) for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and the Severity Index (ISI) for insomnia were used. Differences regarding gender, occupation, age group, marital status and sub-groups were statistically analysed. RESULTS: Of the 348 healthcare professionals, 176 (50.6%) were women and 172 (49.4%) men, while 190 (54.6%) were doctors and 158 (45.4%) nurses. The incidence of PTSD was statistically significantly higher in the healthcare professionals group than in the control group (P < .001). The incidence of PTSD was statistically significantly higher amongst nurses (P = .001), women (P = .002) and those who were married (P = .007). Both PTSD and insomnia were found to be statistically significantly higher amongst those working in the "area of final diagnosis" (P = .016 and P = .002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The determination of the groups most affected amongst professionals working in epidemics is important for the planning of in-service training and psychological support studies. If the fight against pandemics includes health teams with strong psychological grounding, it leads to qualified medical care for patients.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Ansiedade , Atenção à Saúde , Depressão , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Quarentena , SARS-CoV-2 , Turquia/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The current study aimed to investigate the frequency of hepatic steatosis in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients and determine the possible risk factors associated with its presence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study retrospectively evaluated the medical records of 255 adult CHB patients visiting an infectious disease outpatient clinic. Patients with hepatitis B surface antigen positivity for >6 months and those who did not receive antiviral therapy were included in the study. The presence and stage of hepatic steatosis were determined through hepatobiliary ultrasonography. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 40.6 ± 12.7 years. Hepatic steatosis was detected in 44.4 % of the patients through ultrasound imaging. Our findings showed that the detected steatosis prevalence in our patients with CHB was significantly higher compared to the highest prevalence of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis found in the general Turkish population (19.9 %) [RR 2.23 (1.75-2.86), p < 0.001]. CHB patients with steatosis had significantly higher age, triglyceride, and gamma-glutamyl transferase levels than those without steatosis (p < 0.05). No significant association was found between the presence of steatosis, sex, liver function test results, and platelet, alkaline phosphatase, cholesterol, alpha fetoprotein, or HBV-DNA levels. No significant relationship was found between aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/platelet ratio index (APRI) and steatosis was examined (p > 0.05). Post-hoc analysis showed a significant relationship between HBV-DNA levels and ALT, AST, and APRI scores. CONCLUSION: Our data showed that hepatic steatosis is more common in CHB patients than in the general population. Older age and high triglyceride levels increased the risk of hepatic steatosis in CHB patients, consequently increasing GGT levels, which are indicative of liver damage, in these patients.
Assuntos
Hepatite B Crônica , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica , Adulto , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hepatite B Crônica/complicações , Hepatite B Crônica/epidemiologia , Vírus da Hepatite B/genética , DNA Viral , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Transversais , Triglicerídeos , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica/epidemiologia , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica/complicações , Cirrose Hepática/complicaçõesRESUMO
Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is a viral zoonotic infectious disease transmitted by ticks, accompanied by fever, bleeding, myalgia, weakness and similar non-specific symptoms, and can have an acute and serious course. In this article, two CCHF cases seen during the Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in a non-endemic province are described. The common feature of both cases; contact with animals in the endemic region during the feast of sacrifice, non-specific symptoms, liver function test, lactate dehydrogenase and creatine phosphokinase elevation, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. Especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, tick and livestock contact of patients with non-specific symptoms should be questioned.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vírus da Febre Hemorrágica da Crimeia-Congo , Febre Hemorrágica da Crimeia , Leucopenia , Trombocitopenia , Animais , Humanos , Febre Hemorrágica da Crimeia/diagnóstico , PandemiasRESUMO
Background: Broad-spectrum empirical antimicrobials are frequently prescribed for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) despite the lack of evidence for bacterial coinfection. Aims: We aimed to cross-sectionally determine the frequency of antibiotics use, type of antibiotics prescribed, and the factors influencing antibiotics use in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 confirmed by polymerase chain reaction. Study Design: The study was a national, multicenter, retrospective, and single-day point prevalence study. Methods: This was a national, multicenter, retrospective, and single-day point-prevalence study, conducted in the 24-h period between 00:00 and 24:00 on November 18, 2020, during the start of the second COVID-19 peak in Turkey. Results: A total of 1500 patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of COVID-19 were included in the study. The mean age ± standard deviation of the patients was 65.0 ± 15.5, and 56.2% (n = 843) of these patients were men. Of these hospitalized patients, 11.9% (n = 178) were undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO. It was observed that 1118 (74.5%) patients were receiving antibiotics, of which 416 (37.2%) were prescribed a combination of antibiotics. In total, 71.2% of the patients had neither a clinical diagnosis nor microbiological evidence for prescribing antibiotics. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, hospitalization in a state hospital (p < 0.001), requiring any supplemental oxygen (p = 0.005), presence of moderate/diffuse lung involvement (p < 0.001), C-reactive protein > 10 ULT coefficient (p < 0.001), lymphocyte count < 800 (p = 0.007), and clinical diagnosis and/or confirmation by culture (p < 0.001) were found to be independent factors associated with increased antibiotic use. Conclusion: The necessity of empirical antibiotics use in patients with COVID-19 should be reconsidered according to their clinical, imaging, and laboratory findings.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Turquia/epidemiologiaRESUMO
We aimed to explore factors for optimizing antimicrobial treatment in emergency departments. A single-day point prevalence survey was conducted on January 18, 2020, in 53 referral/tertiary hospitals in 22 countries. 1957 (17%) of 11557 patients presenting to EDs had infections. The mean qSOFA score was 0.37 ± 0.74. Sepsis (qSOFA ≥ 2) was recorded in 218 (11.1%) patients. The mean qSOFA score was significantly higher in low-middle (1.48 ± 0.963) compared to upper-middle (0.17 ± 0.482) and high-income (0.36 ± 0.714) countries (P < 0.001). Eight (3.7%) patients with sepsis were treated as outpatients. The most common diagnoses were upper-respiratory (n = 877, 43.3%), lower-respiratory (n = 316, 16.1%), and lower-urinary (n = 201, 10.3%) infections. 1085 (55.4%) patients received antibiotics. The most-commonly used antibiotics were beta-lactam (BL) and BL inhibitors (n = 307, 15.7%), third-generation cephalosporins (n = 251, 12.8%), and quinolones (n = 204, 10.5%). Irrational antibiotic use and inappropriate hospitalization decisions seemed possible. Patients were more septic in countries with limited resources. Hence, a better organizational scheme is required.