The direct anterior approach provokes varus stem alignment when using a collarless straight tapered stem.

INTRODUCTION: Inaccurate stem implantation can cause unsatisfactory offset reconstruction and may result in insufficient gluteal muscle function or aseptic loosening. In this study, stem alignment of a collarless straight tapered HA-coated stem was retrospectively analyzed during the learning phase of the direct anterior approach (DAA) for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: From Jan 2013 to Jun 2015, a total of 93 cementless THA were implanted in patients with unilateral coxarthrosis via the DAA in a two surgeon setting using the Corail® or Trendhip® stem (DePuy Synthes or Aesculap). Varus(+)/Valgus(-) stem alignment was analyzed in postoperative anteroposterior pelvic radiographs. Effects on femoral offset reconstruction and correlation to patient's individual clinical and radiological parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: 55 stems were implanted in varus (59%), 32 in neutral (34%) and 6 in valgus alignment (7%). Mean stem alignment in varus position was + 2.2° (SD ± 1.4°). Varus alignment was associated with male gender and preoperative coxa vara deformity: low CCD, high femoral offset and long thigh neck (p ≤ 0.001). Alignment was not correlated to femoral offset restoration, BMI or leg length difference. Mean cup inclination was 44° (SD ± 4.7°) and 90% matched the coronal Lewinnek safe zone. CONCLUSION: In the learning curve, the DAA can be associated with a high incidence of varus stem alignment when using a straight tapered stem, especially in men with coxa vara deformity: low CCD, high femoral offset and long thigh neck. An insufficient capsule release makes femur exposure more difficult and might be an additional factor for this finding. We recommend intraoperative X-ray in the learning phase of the DAA to verify correct implant positioning and to adjust offset options.

Parameters affecting baseline hip function in patients with cam-derived femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: data analysis from the German Cartilage Registry.

BACKGROUND: Using the database of the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU), this study aims to present patient- and joint-related baseline data in a large cohort of patients with cam-derived femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI) and to detect symptom-determining factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Requiring cam morphology as the primary pathology, 362 patients were found to be eligible for inclusion in the study. The assessment of preoperative baseline data was performed using the patient-reported outcome measure-International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33). Descriptive statistics were performed to present baseline data. Univariate and multiple regression with post hoc testing were used to identify patient- and joint-related factors that might affect the preoperative iHOT-33 and its subscores, respectively. RESULTS: The study collective's mean age was 36.71 ± 10.89 years, with 246 (68%) of them being male. The preoperative mean iHOT-33 total was 46.31 ± 20.33 with the subsection "sports and recreational activities" presenting the strongest decline (26.49 ± 20.68). The parameters "age," "sex," "body mass index" (BMI), and the confirmation of "previous surgery on the affected hip" were identified to statistically affect the preoperative iHOT-33. In fact, a significantly lower mean baseline score was found in patients aged > 40 years (p < 0.001), female sex (p < 0.001), BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (p = 0.002) and in patients with previous surgery on the affected hip (p = 0.022). In contrast, the parameters defect grade and size, labral tears, and symptom duration delivered no significant results. CONCLUSIONS: A distinct reduction in the baseline iHOT-33, with mean total scores being more than halved, was revealed. The parameters "age > 40 years," "female sex," "BMI ≥ 25," and confirmation of "previous surgery on the affected hip" were detected as significantly associated with decreased preoperative iHOT-33 scores. These results help to identify symptom-defining baseline characteristics of cam-derived FAI syndrome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The German Cartilage Registry is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and registered at germanctr.de (DRKS00005617). Registered 3 January 2014-retrospectively registered. The registration of data was approved by the local ethics committees of every participating institution. Primary approval was given by the ethics committee at the University of Freiburg (No. 105/13). https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00005617.

Outcome-Affecting Parameters of Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement with Concomitant Cartilage Damage-Data Analysis from the German Cartilage Registry.

This study aims to report on a prospectively collected, multicenter database of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI) and concomitant cartilage damage (according to the International Cartilage Repair Society) and to assess the outcome-affecting parameters. In the study, 353 hips with up to 24 months' follow-up were assessed by iHOT-33 scoring and achievement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) levels. Multiple and binary regression analyses were performed to identify factors related to (un-) favorable outcomes and to assess their clinical relevance with regard to achieving the MCID and PASS. Multiple regression yielded the parameters of male sex (p = 0.022) and lower body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.019) at 6 months, lower BMI (p = 0.022) and younger age (p = 0.022) at 12 months, and younger age at 24 months (p = 0.039) to be significantly associated with higher iHOT scoring. Male sex (p = 0.019) and lower BMI (p = 0.018) were significantly correlated with achievement of the PASS in binary regression at 6 months, whereas at 12 (p = 0.010) and at 24 (p = 0.003) only younger age was shown to be significantly correlated. None of the parameters was statistically associated with achievement of the MCID. As the parameters of younger age, male sex, and lower BMI were identified as temporarily correlated with a preferable outcome in general and with achievement of the PASS in particular, these findings help to preoperatively identify factors associated with (un-) favorable therapy results.

Arthroscopic assessment of concomitant intraarticular pathologies in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

This study's purpose is to arthroscopically assess the occurrence of intraarticular pathologies in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (OFNH) and to compare arthroscopic with radiologic findings. In a retrospective cohort analysis of ONFH patients undergoing combined core decompression (CD) and hip arthroscopy, concomitant intraarticular pathologies were qualitatively and quantitatively assessed by means of arthroscopy. Intraoperative findings were compared with preoperative radiodiagnostics. Descriptive statistics were performed with results displaying type, degree and prevalence of co-pathologies. Based on a cohort of 27 hips with ONFH at ARCO stages II and III, 26 (96.3%) presented with concomitant intraarticular findings. Cam-deformity (n = 22; 81.5%), labral defects (n = 23; 85.2%) and chondral defects (n = 20; 74.1%) were the most frequent. Four hips (14.8%) had foveal ligament anomalies. Intraoperative detection of cam-deformity positively correlated with radiologically assessed pathologic α angles (p = 0.09). Radiologic evaluation of the acetabular labrum distinctly differed from arthroscopic findings. Reliable statements concerning the cartilage status were not possible due to the great difference in quality of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs). The results of this study revealed an arthroscopically proven prevalence of co-pathologies in >95% of patients with ONFH. Cam-type deformity, labral anomalies and chondral defects were the most frequent. Comparison of arthroscopic and radiologic findings showed coherent results regarding cam-deformity but revealed distinct difficulties in the assessment of the labral and chondral status emphasizing the need for standardization of preoperative radiodiagnostics. Moreover, it still has to be evaluated whether combined CD and arthroscopy can improve on the overall outcomes achieved by performance of CD only.

Results of advanced core decompression in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head depending on age and sex-a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Core decompression is a common surgical technique to treat osteonecrosis of the femoral head. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of the parameters "age" and "sex" on the outcome of this type of treatment. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed. Eighty-six osteonecrotic hips with a mean follow-up of 32.5 months (± 24.8) after advanced core decompression were analysed regarding age- and sex-dependent treatment failure. Additionally, the modified Harris Hip Score and Numeric Rating Scale were compared regarding the parameters age and sex. RESULTS: The mean hip survival of the male participants was 51.3 months (39.4% treatment failure), whereas females presented a longer, thus not significant, mean survival of 61.4 months (30% therapy failure; p = 0.48). The further evaluation revealed significantly better survival in the patients aged < 40 years (mean survival 66.09 months, 16% treatment failure) in comparison to those aged ≥ 40 years (mean survival 50.14 months, 46% therapy failure; p = 0.03). The modified Harris Hip Score and Numeric Rating Scale results of patients whose treatment did not fail during the study period were similar, irrespective of the patient's sex or age. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that the number of therapy failures is significantly higher in older patients, with 40 years of age marking the borderline. Patients' sex does not seem to affect the outcome of treatment, and postoperative clinical scores appear to be identical with individuals not affected by therapy failure. Since age and sex are unalterable parameters, the study helps to provide valuable predictions regarding the chances of long-term hip survival after treatment of osteonecrosis.

Evaluation of intra- and interobserver reliability in the assessment of the 'critical trochanter angle'.

BACKGROUND: The recently described 'critical trochanter angle' (CTA) is a novel parameter in the preoperative risk assessment of stem malalignment in total hip arthroplasty. As its reproducibility needs to be evaluated, the given study aims to investigate intra- and interobserver reliability. It is hypothesized that both analyses justify the clinical use of the CTA. METHODS: A total of 100 pelvic radiographs obtained prior to total hip arthroplasty were retrospectively reviewed by four observers with different levels of clinical experience. The CTA was measured twice by each observer at different occasions in the previously described technique. Intra- and interobserver reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with confidence intervals (CI) and the Bland-Altman approach. RESULTS: The mean CTA in both measuring sequences was 20.58° and 20.78°. The observers' means ranged from 17.76° to 25.23°. Intraobserver reliability showed a mean difference of less than 0.5° for all four observers (95% limit of agreement: - 7.70-6.70). Intraobserver ICCs ranged from 0.92 to 0.99 (CI 0.88-0.99). For interobserver variation analysis, ICCs of 0.83 (CI 0.67-0.90) and 0.85 (CI 0.68-0.92) were calculated. CONCLUSION: Analyses concerning intra- and interobserver reliability in the assessment of the CTA showed 'very good' and 'good' results, respectively. In view of these findings, the use of the CTA as an additional preoperative parameter to assess the risk of intraoperative stem malalignment seems to be justified.

Smartphone and App Usage in Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery: Survey Study of Physicians Regarding Acceptance, Risks, and Future Prospects in Germany.

BACKGROUND: In the course of digitization, smartphones are affecting an increasing number of areas of users' lives, giving them almost ubiquitous access to the internet and other web applications. Mobile health (mHealth) has become an integral part of some areas of patient care. In contrast to other disciplines, routine integration of mobile devices in orthopedics and trauma surgery in Germany is still in its infancy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate physicians' current state of opinion regarding acceptance, future prospects, and risks of medical apps in the field of orthopedics and trauma surgery in Germany. METHODS: A web-based survey among orthopedics and trauma surgeons in German university hospitals on the use of medical apps in everyday clinical practice was conducted between September 2018 and February 2019. The survey consisted of 13 open- and closed-ended or multiple-choice questions. A logistic regression analysis was performed to ascertain the effects of interindividual characteristics on the likelihood of participants' app and smartphone usage behavior. RESULTS: A total of 206 physicians participated in the survey. All of the participants (206/206, 100%) owned a smartphone, and 79.1% (159/201) used the device, while 64.7% (130/201) used apps regularly in everyday clinical practice. Medical apps were perceived as beneficial, given their substantial future promise, by 90.1% (181/201) of the participants. However, 62.5% (120/192) of the participants were not satisfied with the current supply of medical apps in app stores. Desired specifications for future apps were "intuitive usability" (167/201, 83.1%), "no advertising" (145/201, 72.1%), and "free apps" (92/201, 45.8%). The attributes "transparent app development and app sponsoring" (75/201, 37.3%) and the existence of an "easy-to-understand privacy statement" (50/201, 24.9%) were of minor relevance. The majority of the participants (162/194, 83.5%) considered that future apps in the field of "medical research" would provide the greatest benefit. The greatest predicted risks were "data misuse" (147/189, 77.8%), "usage of untrustworthy apps" (135/189, 71.4%), and "alienation from patients" (51/189, 27.0%). Increasing age was significantly associated with a reduction in the likelihood of regular smartphone (odds ratio [OR] 0.91, 95% CI 0.86-0.97; P=.002) and app (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.96; P=.001) usage, while the medical profession grade had no significant impact on the usage behavior. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that young German doctors in orthopedics and trauma surgery already use smartphones and apps in everyday clinical practice. Medical apps are considered to play an important role in the future. However, a significant discrepancy exists between the supply and demand of mHealth applications, which creates a legal and ethical vacuum with regard to data protection.

Analysis of Secure Apps for Daily Clinical Use by German Orthopedic Surgeons: Searching for the "Needle in a Haystack".

BACKGROUND: It is undeniable that appropriate smartphone apps offer enormous opportunities for dealing with future challenges in orthopedic surgery and public health, in general. However, it is still unclear how the apps currently available in the two major app stores can be used in daily clinical routine by German orthopedic surgeons. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to gain evidence regarding the quantity and quality of apps available in the two major app stores and their suitability for use by orthopedic surgeons in Germany. METHODS: We conducted a systematic, keyword-based app store screening to obtain evidence concerning the quantity and quality of commercially available apps. Apps that met the inclusion criteria were evaluated using the app synopsis-checklist for users and the German Mobile App Rating Scale for secure use, trustworthiness, and quality. RESULTS: The investigation revealed serious shortcomings regarding legal and medical aspects. Furthermore, most apps turned out to be useless and unsuitable for the clinical field of application (4242/4249, 99.84%). Finally, 7 trustworthy and high-quality apps (7/4249, 0.16%) offering secure usage in the daily clinical routine of orthopedists were identified. These apps mainly focused on education (5/7). None of them were CE (Conformité Européenne) certified. Moreover, there are no studies providing evidence that these apps have any positive use whatsoever. CONCLUSIONS: The data obtained in our study suggest that the number of trustworthy and high-quality apps on offer is extremely low. Nowadays, finding appropriate apps in the fast-moving, complex, dynamic, and rudimentarily controlled app stores is most challenging. Promising approaches, for example, systematic app store screenings, app-rating developments, reviews or app libraries, and the creation of consistent standards have been established. However, further efforts are necessary to ensure that these innovative mobile health apps not only provide the correct information but are also safe to use in daily clinical practice.

Correction: Analysis of Secure Apps for Daily Clinical Use by German Orthopedic Surgeons: Searching for the "Needle in a Haystack".

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.2196/17085.].

Prevalence of CAM deformity and its influence on therapy success in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) and CAM-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) present two different pathologies of the hip joint. The aim of this study is to describe the prevalence of CAM-FAI in a collective of ONFH hips and to evaluate its influence on ONFH therapy outcome. A cohort of 86 ONFH hips with a mean follow-up of 46.7 months (±20.5) after advanced core decompression (ACD) was evaluated regarding CAM deformity by measuring the alpha angle (α) and head-neck offset. The influence of CAM-type FAI was investigated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and the Cox regression model. The mean α was 60.4° (±13.8) with 41 hips (47.7%) being ≥60°. The mean head-neck offset was 4.5 mm (±3.2), with 78 hips (90.7%) being ≤9 mm. Survival analysis indicated noticeably better ACD results for α < 60° versus α ≥ 60° (p = 0.07). Treatment failure within the first 2 years was statistically estimated as 27.7% for α < 60° versus 40.7% for α ≥ 60°: The hazard ratio for α ≥ 60° was 1.94. Head-neck offset-dependent survival showed better, though not significant, results for offset >9 mm (p = 0.38, hazard ratio 1.89 for offsets ≤9 mm). The prevalence of CAM-type deformity is greatly increased in patients with concomitant ONFH. There is a strong indication that CAM-type FAI has a negative influence on ONFH therapy outcome. The risk that ONFH treatment will fail seems to be twice as high for α ≥ 60° as for α < 60°. We recommend cotreatment of pathological head-neck offset in patients with ONFH.

The 'critical trochanter angle': a predictor for stem alignment in total hip arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Stem malalignment can affect offset reconstruction and may result in gluteal muscle insufficiency. In this retrospective study, a novel geometric angle named 'critical trochanter angle' (CTA) is described and investigated towards the risk of malposition of a collarless straight tapered hydroxyapatite-coated stem in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 100 cementless THA were implanted in patients with unilateral coxarthrosis via the direct anterior (n = 50) or direct lateral Hardinge approach (n = 50) in a two surgeon setting using the Corail® or Trendhip® stem (DePuy Synthes or Aesculap). Stem alignment was analysed in postoperative AP pelvic radiographs and correlated to the CTA: the angle crest was defined by the intersection of the femoral shaft and neck axis and the angle was measured between the shaft axis and a leg intersecting the vertex between the lateral and superoposterior facet of the trochanter. RESULTS: Forty-seven stems were implanted in varus (≥ + 1°), 42 in neutral (< + 1°/> - 1°) and 11 in valgus position (≤ - 1°). The mean critical trochanter angle was 25.0° (SD ± 7.5°), and there was a negative and statistically significant correlation to stem alignment (r = - 0.52; p ≤ 0.001) independent from the surgical approach. For stem malposition of 2° and above (n = 23), mean CTA was 17.2° for varus (n = 20) and 31.6° for valgus (n = 3). A CTA lesser or equal to 22.75° had a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 80% for varus stem position of 2° or greater. Specificity raised to 100% with a cutoff CTA of 12.5° or lesser. CONCLUSION: Varus stem alignment in THA is associated with coxa vara deformity and a radiological low CTA. In preoperative planning, the critical trochanter angle can help to evaluate the risk for intraoperative stem malpositioning. If navigation or robotic assistance is not available when using this stem design, we recommend an intraoperative x-ray to verify correct implant positioning in patients with a CTA under 20° or above 30°.