Trends in the incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer in all 50 United States from 2001 through 2017.

BACKGROUND: The rate of change in the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) among persons younger than 50 years in the United States appears to vary by demographics, tumor location, and geography. This study analyzed data from all 50 states to examine recent changes in the incidence of CRC among persons younger than 50 years and to identify key subgroups with disproportionate risk. METHODS: Annual incidence rates for CRC, colon cancer, and rectal cancer in persons aged 20 to 49 years were extracted from the US Cancer Statistics for the period 2001-2017. Secular trends were examined overall and by age group, sex, race/ethnicity, stage, and state. Joinpoint regression was used to compute annual percent changes and average annual percent changes (AAPCs) as well as corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS: The incidence of CRC increased by 1.27% (95% CI, 0.95%-1.60%) annually from 2001 to 2012 and by 3.00% (95% CI, 2.06%-3.95%) annually from 2012 to 2017. AAPCs for the period 2001-2017 were higher among persons aged 20 to 24 years (AAPC, 6.62%; 95% CI, 3.86%-9.45%) in comparison with other age groups and higher among non-Hispanic Whites (AAPC, 2.38%; 95% CI, 1.98%-2.79%) in comparison with other racial/ethnic groups. In 2001-2002, only 1 state had an age-standardized incidence rate > 13.0 per 100,000, but this number increased to 32 states by 2016-2017. CONCLUSIONS: CRC rates among US adults aged 20 to 49 years increased from 2001 to 2017, with the fastest increases observed from 2012 to 2017. Increases were observed among the youngest age groups, among non-Hispanic Whites, and in states in the West, Midwest, and Rocky Mountain regions. Increasing rates across all tumor stages suggest a real increase in CRC incidence.

Diagnostic dilemma in hyperechoic breast masses.

Hyperechoic breast lesions are relatively uncommon, constituting only 0.6-6% of all breast masses and 0.6% of all biopsied lesions. The majority of these lesions are benign. There are rare malignancies that can present as hyperechoic masses and careful ultrasonographic assessment must be employed to avoid misdiagnosis.[1] We discuss the case of a 67-year-old female patient with a strong family history of breast and ovarian cancer, who presented with one such rare breast cancer in a hyperechoic mass.

Diagnostic dilemma in hyperechoic breast masses

Hyperechoic breast lesions are relatively uncommon, constituting only 0.6–6% of all breast masses and 0.6% of all biopsied lesions. The majority of these lesions are benign. There are rare malignancies that can present as hyperechoic masses and careful ultrasonographic assessment must be employed to avoid misdiagnosis.[1] We discuss the case of a 67-year-old female patient with a strong family history of breast and ovarian cancer, who presented with one such rare breast cancer in a hyperechoic mass.

Comparison of plain radiographs with CT scan to evaluate interbody fusion following the use of titanium interbody cages and transpedicular instrumentation.

The availability of lumbar interbody cages has fuelled renewed interest in interbody fusion. Despite this, there is no consensus regarding the best non-invasive method for evaluation of interbody fusion, especially where cages have been used. The purpose of this study was to determine whether high-quality thin-slice (1- to 3-mm) computed tomography (CT) scans allow proper evaluation of interbody fusion through titanium cages. Patients undergoing lumbar interbody fusion were prospectively evaluated with CT scan and plain radiographs 6 months following surgery. These images were blindly and independently evaluated by a consultant radiologist and a spine research fellow, for bridging bony trabeculation both through and surrounding the cages as well as for changes at the cage endplate interface. Fifty-three patients (156 cages) undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion using titanium interbody cages were evaluated. Posterior elements were used to pack the cages and no graft was packed outside the cages. The outcome data were analysed using the Kappa co-efficient and chi-squared analysis. On CT scan, both observers noted bridging trabeculation in 95% of the cages (Kappa 0.85), while on radiographs this was present in only 4% (Kappa 0.74). Both observers also identified bridging trabeculation surrounding the cages on CT scan in 90% of cages (Kappa 0.82), while on the radiographs this was 8% (Kappa 0.86). Radiographs also failed to demonstrate all the loose cages. The results of the study show that high-quality CT scans show images suggesting bridging bony trabeculae following the use of titanium interbody cages. They also appear to show consistent bone outside the cages in spite of no bone graft having been used, and they appear to be better than plain radiographs in the early detection of cage loosening.

Radiologic evaluation of adjacent superior segment facet joint violation following transpedicular instrumentation of the lumbar spine.

STUDY DESIGN: The location of pedicle screws in relation to adjacent superior segment facet joints in 106 patients after lumbar spinal fusion was assessed using computed tomography and plain radiographs. OBJECTIVES: To document the incidence of adjacent superior segment facet joint violation following transpedicular instrumentation in the lumbar spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Review of the literature failed to show any documented study examining this incidence. METHODS: A total of 106 patients (212 top-level facet screws) undergoing lumbar spinal fusion surgery using transpedicular instrumentation between 1996 and 1999 were prospectively evaluated with a computed tomography scan and plain radiographs at 6 months following surgery. These were blindly and independently evaluated by a consultant radiologist and a spinal research fellow to document the incidence of superior segment facet joint violation. Calculation of the kappa coefficient and chi2 analysis were carried out. RESULTS: The spinal research fellow noted the incidence of facet joint violation on the computed tomography scan to be present in 20% of the screws and 32% of the patients, whereas the consultant radiologist noted this to be the case in 23% and 35%, respectively. The kappa coefficient for computed tomography scan was 0.88, whereas for the plain radiographs it was 0.39. The incidence of facet joint violation was noted to be independent of the sex, level, and diagnosis. There was also an almost uniform incidence in each of the years from 1996 to 1999. CONCLUSION: Facet joint violation occurred in just >30% of the patients and 20% of the screws in this study. This, therefore, raises the theoretical possibility of long-term deterioration in the clinical results following the use of transpedicular instrumentation.