Tuftelin's involvement in embryonic development.

Little is known about tuftelin expression in the developing embryo, previously it was thought to play a role in tooth enamel mineralization. In this study we show tuftelin's spatio-temporal expression in mineralizing and nonmineralizing tissues of the craniofacial complex in the developing mouse embryo. Embryos aged E10.5-E18.5 and newborns aged P3 were used in this study. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR), Real-time PCR, sequencing, and in-situ hybridization were used to detect and quantify messenger RNA (mRNA) expression in different developmental stages. We applied indirect immunohistochemistry and western-blot analyses to investigate protein expression. Two tuftelin mRNA transcripts and a single 64KDa protein were detected throughout embryonic development. Tuftelin was detected in tissues which develop from different embryonic origins; ectoderm, ectomesenchyme, and mesoderm. Tuftelin mRNA and protein were expressed already at E10.5, before the initiation of tooth formation and earlier than previously described. The expression pattern of tuftelin mRNA and protein exhibits dynamic spatio-temporal changes in various tissues. Tuftelin is expressed in neuronal tissues, thus fitting with its described correlation to nerve growth factor. A shift between cytoplasmatic and perinuclear/nuclear expression implies a possible role in regulation of transcription. Recent studies showed tuftelin is induced under hypoxic conditions in-vitro and in-vivo, through the hypoxia-inducible factor 1-α pathway. These results led to the hypothesis that tuftelin is involved in adaptation to hypoxic conditions. The fact that much of mammalian embryogenesis occurs at O 2 concentrations of 1-5%, raises the possibility that tuftelin expression throughout development is due to its role in the adaptive mechanisms in response to hypoxia.

Skeletal ligament healing using the recombinant human amelogenin protein.

Injuries to ligaments are common, painful and debilitating, causing joint instability and impaired protective proprioception sensation around the joint. Healing of torn ligaments usually fails to take place, and surgical replacement or reconstruction is required. Previously, we showed that in vivo application of the recombinant human amelogenin protein (rHAM(+)) resulted in enhanced healing of the tooth-supporting tissues. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether amelogenin might also enhance repair of skeletal ligaments. The rat knee medial collateral ligament (MCL) was chosen to prove the concept. Full thickness tear was created and various concentrations of rHAM(+), dissolved in propylene glycol alginate (PGA) carrier, were applied to the transected MCL. 12 weeks after transection, the mechanical properties, structure and composition of transected ligaments treated with 0.5 µg/µl rHAM(+) were similar to the normal un-transected ligaments, and were much stronger, stiffer and organized than control ligaments, treated with PGA only. Furthermore, the proprioceptive free nerve endings, in the 0.5 µg/µl rHAM(+) treated group, were parallel to the collagen fibres similar to their arrangement in normal ligament, while in the control ligaments the free nerve endings were entrapped in the scar tissue at different directions, not parallel to the axis of the force. Four days after transection, treatment with 0.5 µg/µl rHAM(+) increased the amount of cells expressing mesenchymal stem cell markers at the injured site. In conclusion application of rHAM(+) dose dependently induced mechanical, structural and sensory healing of torn skeletal ligament. Initially the process involved recruitment and proliferation of cells expressing mesenchymal stem cell markers.

The immunogenic radiation and new players in immunotherapy and targeted therapy for head and neck cancer.

Although treatment modalities for head and neck cancer have evolved considerably over the past decades, survival rates have plateaued. The treatment options remained limited to definitive surgery, surgery followed by fractionated radiotherapy with optional chemotherapy, and a definitive combination of fractionated radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Lately, immunotherapy has been introduced as the fourth modality of treatment, mainly administered as a single checkpoint inhibitor for recurrent or metastatic disease. While other regimens and combinations of immunotherapy and targeted therapy are being tested in clinical trials, adapting the appropriate regimens to patients and predicting their outcomes have yet to reach the clinical setting. Radiotherapy is mainly regarded as a means to target cancer cells while minimizing the unwanted peripheral effect. Radiotherapy regimens and fractionation are designed to serve this purpose, while the systemic effect of radiation on the immune response is rarely considered a factor while designing treatment. To bridge this gap, this review will highlight the effect of radiotherapy on the tumor microenvironment locally, and the immune response systemically. We will review the methodology to identify potential targets for therapy in the tumor microenvironment and the scientific basis for combining targeted therapy and radiotherapy. We will describe a current experience in preclinical models to test these combinations and propose how challenges in this realm may be faced. We will review new players in targeted therapy and their utilization to drive immunogenic response against head and neck cancer. We will outline the factors contributing to head and neck cancer heterogeneity and their effect on the response to radiotherapy. We will review in-silico methods to decipher intertumoral and intratumoral heterogeneity and how these algorithms can predict treatment outcomes. We propose that (a) the sequence of surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy should be designed not only to annul cancer directly, but to prime the immune response. (b) Fractionation of radiotherapy and the extent of the irradiated field should facilitate systemic immunity to develop. (c) New players in targeted therapy should be evaluated in translational studies toward clinical trials. (d) Head and neck cancer treatment should be personalized according to patients and tumor-specific factors.

Immunotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a narrative review.

Objective: Provide a narrative review of the literature describing immunological concepts and novel approaches in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Background: In 2016, two anti-PD1 antibodies, nivolumab and pembrolizumab, were shown to improve overall survival in patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC and were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in the second line, cisplatin-resistant setting, although the overall response rates were only about 15%. More recently, pembrolizumab was approved for use in the first-line R/M setting as monotherapy in patients with CPS >1 or in combination with chemotherapy regardless of PD-L1 expression. Interestingly, while response rates with combination therapy were increased compared to pembrolizumab alone, the duration of response was shorter than might be expected. Based on a growing amount of evidence in other types of cancer treated with various combinations of immunotherapy, similar concepts are being studied in HNSCC, both in pre-clinical models and in clinical trials. Methods: A review of the literature was conducted using the Medline-PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Main topics were selected for review, including basic immunology background, checkpoint inhibition, neoadjuvant immunotherapy, the combination of immunotherapy with radiation therapy and chemotherapy, intratumoral immunotherapy, and future prospects. Conclusions: There is an ongoing effort, which is supported by an increasing body of evidence, to enhance response rates with combinations of immunotherapy with other immunotherapy agents, targeted small molecules, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery. The clinician and the scientist should be familiarized with basic immunologic concepts, key findings in recent clinical trials, and current indications for administering immunotherapy.

Overcoming resistance to EGFR monotherapy in HNSCC by identification and inhibition of individualized cancer processes.

Therapeutic strategies for advanced head and neck squamous carcinoma (HNSCC) consist of multimodal treatment, including Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) inhibition, immune-checkpoint inhibition, and radio (chemo) therapy. Although over 90% of HNSCC tumors overexpress EGFR, attempts to replace cytotoxic treatments with anti-EGFR agents have failed due to alternative signaling pathways and inter-tumor heterogeneity. Methods: Using protein expression data obtained from hundreds of HNSCC tissues and cell lines we compute individualized signaling signatures using an information-theoretic approach. The approach maps each HNSCC malignancy according to the protein-protein network reorganization in every tumor. We show that each patient-specific signaling signature (PaSSS) includes several distinct altered signaling subnetworks. Based on the resolved PaSSSs we design personalized drug combinations. Results: We show that simultaneous targeting of central hub proteins from each altered subnetwork is essential to selectively enhance the response of HNSCC tumors to anti-EGFR therapy and inhibit tumor growth. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the PaSSS-based drug combinations lead to induced expression of T cell markers and IFN-γ secretion, pointing to higher efficiency of the immune response. Conclusion: The PaSSS-based approach advances our understanding of how individualized therapies should be tailored to HNSCC tumors.

A platform for locoregional T-cell immunotherapy to control HNSCC recurrence following tumor resection.

Surgical resection of head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is associated with high rates of local and distant recurrence, partially mitigated by adjuvant therapy. A pre-existing immune response in the patient's tumor is associated with better outcomes following treatment with conventional therapies, but improved options are needed for patients with poor anti-tumor immunity. We hypothesized that local delivery of tumor antigen-specific T-cells into the resection cavity following surgery would direct T-cells to residual antigens in the margins and draining lymphatics and present a platform for T-cell-targeted immunotherapy. We loaded T-cells into a biomaterial that conformed to the resection cavity and demonstrated that it could release T-cells that retained their functional activity in-vitro, and in a HNSCC model in-vivo. Locally delivered T-cells loaded in a biomaterial were equivalent in control of established tumors to intravenous adoptive T-cell transfer, and resulted in the systemic circulation of tumor antigen-specific T-cells as well as local accumulation in the tumor. We demonstrate that adjuvant therapy with anti-PD1 following surgical resection was ineffective unless combined with local delivery of T-cells. These data demonstrate that local delivery of tumor-specific T-cells is an efficient option to convert tumors that are unresponsive to checkpoint inhibitors to permit tumor cures.

Explant Modeling of the Immune Environment of Head and Neck Cancer.

Patients exhibit distinct responses to immunotherapies that are thought to be linked to their tumor immune environment. However, wide variations in outcomes are also observed in patients with matched baseline tumor environments, indicating that the biological response to treatment is not currently predictable using a snapshot analysis. To investigate the relationship between the immune environment of tumors and the biological response to immunotherapies, we characterized four murine head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) models on two genetic backgrounds. Using tumor explants from those models, we identified correlations between the composition of infiltrating immune cells and baseline cytokine profiles prior to treatment. Following treatment with PD-1 blockade, CTLA-4 blockade, or OX40 stimulation, we observed inter-individual variability in the response to therapy between genetically identical animals bearing the same tumor. These distinct biological responses to treatment were not linked to the initial tumor immune environment, meaning that outcome would not be predictable from a baseline analysis of the tumor infiltrates. We similarly performed the explant assay on patient HNSCC tumors and found significant variability between the baseline environment of the tumors and their response to therapy. We propose that tumor explants provide a rapid biological assay to assess response to candidate immunotherapies that may allow matching therapies to individual patient tumors. Further development of explant approaches may allow screening and monitoring of treatment responses in HNSCC.

Using Preclinical Data to Design Combination Clinical Trials of Radiation Therapy and Immunotherapy.

Immunotherapies are rapidly entering the clinic as approved treatments for diverse cancer pathologies. Radiation therapy is an integral partner in cancer therapy, commonly as part of complicated multimodality approaches that optimize patient outcomes. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that the success of radiation therapy in tumor control is due in part to immune mechanisms, and that outcomes following radiation therapy can be improved through combination with a range of immunotherapies. However, preclinical models of cancer are very different from patient tumors, and the way these preclinical tumors are treated is often very different from standard of care treatment of patients. This review examines the preclinical and clinical data for the role of the immune system in radiation therapy outcomes, and how to integrate preclinical findings into clinical trials, using ongoing studies as examples.

Tuftelin Is Required for NGF-Induced Differentiation of PC12 Cells.

Nerve growth factor (NGF) promotes pleiotropic gene transcription-dependent biological effects, in neuronal and non-neuronal cells, including survival, proliferation, differentiation, neuroprotection, pain, and angiogenesis. It is hypothesized that during odontogenesis, NGF may be implicated in morphogenetic and mineralization events by affecting proliferation and/or differentiation of dental cells. Tuftelin belongs to the enamel associated teeth proteins and is thought to play a role in enamel mineralization. We previously reported that tuftelin transcript and protein, which are ubiquitously expressed in various tissues of embryos, adults, and tumors, were significantly upregulated during NGF-induced PC12 differentiation. To further confirm the involvement of tuftelin in the differentiation process, we established a tuftelin-knockdown neuronal PC12 cell model, using a non-cytotoxic siRNA directed towards sequences at the 3' UTR of the tuftelin gene. Using real-time PCR, we quantified tuftelin mRNA expression and found that tuftelin siRNA, but not scrambled siRNA or transfection reagents, efficiently depleted about 60% of NGF-induced tuftelin mRNA transcripts. The effect of tuftelin siRNA was quantified up to 6 days of NGF-induced differentiation. Using immunofluorescence and western blot analyses, we also found a direct correlation between reduction of 60-80% in tuftelin protein expression and inhibition of about 50-70% in NGF-induced differentiation of the cells, as was detected after 3-6 days of treatment. These results demonstrate an important role for tuftelin in NGF-induced differentiation of PC12 cells. Tuftelin could be a useful target for drug development in disease where neurotrophin therapy is required.