RESUMO
Background and aims: The therapeutic strategy for the treatment of known sequelae of COVID-19 has shifted from reactive to preventative. In this study, we aim to evaluate the effects of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), and anticoagulants on COVID-19 related morbidity and mortality. Methods: This record-based analytical cross-sectional study targeted 539 COVID-19 patients in a single United States medical center between March and December 2020. Through a random stratified sample, we recruited outpatient (n = 206) and inpatient (n = 333) cases from three management protocols, including standard care (SC) (n = 399), low-dose ASA only (ASA) (n = 112), and anticoagulation only (AC) (n = 28). Collected data included demographics, comorbidities, and clinical outcomes. The primary outcome measure was inpatient admission. Exploratory secondary outcome measures included length of stay, 30-day readmission rates, medical intensive care unit (MICU) admission, need for mechanical ventilation, the occurrence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), bleeding events, clotting events, and mortality. The collected data were coded and analyzed using standard tests. Results: Age, mean number of comorbidities, and all individual comorbidities except for asthma, and malignancy were significantly lower in the SC compared to ASA and AC. After adjusting for age and comorbidity via binary logistic regression models, no statistical differences were found between groups for the studied outcomes. When compared to the SC group, ASA had lower 30-day readmission rates (odds ration [OR] 0.81 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-1.88, p = 0.63), MICU admission (OR 0.63 95% CI 0.34-1.17, p = 0.32), ARDS (OR 0.71 95% CI 0.33-1.52, p = 0.38), and death (OR 0.85 95% CI 0.36-1.99, p = 0.71). Conclusion: Low-dose ASA has a nonsignificant but potentially protective role in reducing the risk of COVID-19 related morbidity and mortality. Our data suggests a trend toward reduced 30-day readmission rates, ARDS, MICU admissions, need for mechanical ventilation, and mortality compared to the standard management protocol. Further randomized control trials are needed to establish causal effects.
RESUMO
The objective of this study was to improve the quality of chest compressions after the introduction of a metronome during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). A retrospective analysis of Zoll® compression data of 219 in-hospital adult participants who received CPR from January 2017 to December 2018 was done. A metronome was introduced during chest compressions in January 2018, and the 2017 data served as the control. The main outcome measure compared the overall quality of chest compressions measured by the rate (100 to 120 compressions per minute), depth (2.0 to 2.4 inches), and mean release velocity (≥400 mm/sec) on chest recoil. Compared to control, the metronome group had a statistically significant improvement of the mean percent compression rate within 100 to 120 beats per minute: 28.16% vs. 71.14% (P < 0.001) and a statistically significant improvement of the mean percent compression depth within 2.0 to 2.4 inches: 29.35% vs. 34.84% (P = 0.03). However, there was no statistically significant improvement of mean percent release velocity ≥400 mm/second: 47.41% vs. 51.09% (P = 0.38). Our data suggest that an inexpensive and widely available intervention may improve the quality of CPR. We suggest that further research be conducted to measure patient clinical outcomes.