Repair, Reconstruct, or Divert: Fate of the Perforated Esophagus.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine differences in esophageal perforation populations undergoing different advanced interventions for perforated esophagus and identify predictors of treatment outcomes. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Contained esophageal perforation can often be managed expectantly, but uncontained perforation is uniformly fatal without invasive intervention. Treatment options for the latter range from simple endoscopic control through advanced intervention. Clinical presentation varies greatly and directs which intervention is most appropriate. METHODS: From 1996 to 2017, 335 patients were treated for esophageal perforation, and 166 for advanced interventions: 74 primary repair with tissue flap (repair), 26 esophagectomy and gastric pull-up (resection), and 66 esophagectomy and immediate diversion with planned delayed reconstruction (resection-diversion). Patient characteristics, clinical presentation, operative outcomes, and survival were abstracted. Pittsburgh Severity Scores (PSS) were retrospectively calculated. Random survival forest analysis was performed for 90-day mortality and competing risks for reconstruction after resection-diversion. RESULTS: Repair and resection patients had lower PSS than resection-diversion patients (3 vs 3 vs 6, respectively). Ninety-day mortality for repair, resection, and resection-diversion was 11% vs 7.7% vs 23%, and 5-year survival was 71% vs 63% vs 47%. Risk of death after resection-diversion was highest within 1 year, but 52% of patients had reconstruction of the upper alimentary tract within 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Several advanced interventions exist for critically ill patients with uncontained esophageal perforation. Repair and organ preservation are always preferred; however, patients at extremes of illness might best be treated with resection-diversion, with the understanding that the competing risk of death may preclude eventual reconstruction.

Signet Ring Cell Histology Confers Worse Overall Survival in Treated Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Signet ring cell (SRC) histology is regarded as a poor prognostic indicator for esophageal cancer. The objectives of this study were to understand the clinical presentation and stage-specific survival outcomes of patients with SRC and nonsignet adenocarcinoma (AC). METHODS: From 2004 to 2016, 140,324 patients were diagnosed with esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers in the National Cancer Database. Demographics, tumor variables, and treatment were studied. Overall survival was shown by the Kaplan-Meier method, and random survival forest identified important predictors. RESULTS: SRC patients (N = 3825) comprised roughly 3% of esophageal cancers per year. SRC patients were less likely to present at early stage disease (cStage I: 10.2% vs 17.8% for AC; P < .001) and more likely to have pathologic upstaging (28% vs 16%, P < .001) and less pathologic downstaging after neoadjuvant therapy (36% vs 48%, P < .001). More SRC patients had positive margins after resection (15% vs 6.0%, P < .001). In a stage-matched comparison median survival for SRC patients was worse than for AC patients (cStage I: 60 vs 113 months; cStage II: 31 vs 40 months; cStage III: 22 vs 30 months). Clinical tumor and nodal stage, chemotherapy sequence, and age were important predictors of survival. CONCLUSIONS: SRC patients had worse survival than their AC counterparts. Worse biology and higher rates of incomplete resection in SRC should steer patients away from undergoing limited resection, such as endoscopic submucosal dissection, even when identified at very early stages. In future esophageal cancer staging iterations, separating SRC from AC appears to be indicated because of their different clinical behavior and response to therapy.

Natural History of Pleural Complications After Lung Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in lung transplantation, 5-year survival remains at 56%. Although the focus has been on chronic lung allograft dysfunction and infection, pleural complications in some may contribute to adverse outcomes. Therefore, we determined (1) the prevalence of, and risk factors for, pleural complications after lung transplantation and (2) their association with allograft function and mortality. METHODS: From 2006 to 2017, 1039 adults underwent primary lung transplantation at Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland, Ohio. Multivariable analyses were performed in the multiphase mixed longitudinal and hazard function domains to identify risk factors associated with allograft function and survival. RESULTS: A total of 468 patients (45%) had pleural complications, including pleural effusion in 271 (26%), pneumothorax in 152 (15%), hemothorax in 128 (12%), empyema in 47 (5%), and chylothorax in 9 (1%). Risk factors for pleural complications within the first 3 months included higher recipient-to-donor weight ratio, lower recipient albumin, and recipient-to-donor race mismatch; risk factors extending beyond 3 months included older age, hypertension, smoking history, lower lung allocation score, and donor death from anoxia. Cardiopulmonary bypass and previous thoracic interventions were not risk factors in patients with pleural effusions who were treated with thoracentesis only, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second improved after drainage; however, repeat percutaneous or surgical interventions did not impart a similar benefit. Pleural complications were associated with worse survival. CONCLUSIONS: Pleural complications are common after lung transplantation and are associated with worse allograft function and survival. These complications are likely secondary to other underlying clinical problems. Malnourishment and size mismatch are modifiable risk factors.

Pleural space management after lung transplant: Early and late outcomes of pleural decortication.

BACKGROUND: Pleural complications after lung transplant may restrict allograft expansion, requiring decortication. However, its extent, indications, risk factors, and effect on allograft function and survival are unclear. METHODS: From January 2006 to January 2017, 1,039 patients underwent primary lung transplant and 468 had pleural complications, 77 (16%) of whom underwent 84 surgical decortications for pleural space management. Multivariable time-related analysis was performed to identify risk factors for decortication. Mixed-effect longitudinal modeling was used to assess allograft function before and after decortication. RESULTS: Cumulative number of decortications per 100 transplants was 1.8, 7.8, and 8.8 at 1 month, 1 year, and 3 years after transplant, respectively. Indications for the 84 decortications were complex effusion in 47 (56%), fibrothorax in 17 (20%), empyema in 11 (13%), and hemothorax in 9 (11%). Thoracoscopic operations were performed in 52 (62%) and full lung re-expansion was achieved in 76 (90%). Complications occurred after 30 (36%) decortications, with 15 pulmonary complications (18%), including 2 patients requiring extracorporeal support due to worsening function. Ten reinterventions occurred via thoracentesis (2), tube thoracostomy (1), and reoperation (7). In-hospital and 30-day mortality was 5.2% (n = 4/77). Forced expiratory volume in 1 second increased from 50% to 60% within the first year after decortication, followed by a slow decline to 55% at 5 years. Postdecortication survival was 87%, 68%, and 48% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite high risk of reoperative surgery, decortication after lung transplant allows salvage of pleural space and graft function with a reasonable morbidity profile.

Safety and Efficacy of Nitazoxanide-Based Regimen for the Eradication of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori (HP) is the most common cause of gastritis worldwide. Clarithromycin-based triple therapy or bismuth-based quadruple therapy is usually considered the first-line treatment, however with around 30% failure rate for both regimens. Drug resistance of clarithromycin and metronidazole is a growing concern in some parts of the world. Therefore, there is a need for effective eradication regimen for HP. Nitazoxanide, a bactericidal thiazolide antibiotic, has been shown to be effective in HP infection. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of nitazoxanide-based regimen for the eradication of HP. METHODS: We have searched PubMed, Embase, Ovid Medline and Cochrane library database from inception to December 9, 2020 to identify studies that utilized nitazoxanide in the treatment regimen for HP eradication. Our primary outcome was pooled eradication rate of HP. RESULTS: Thirteen studies including 1,028 patients met our inclusion criteria and were analyzed in a meta-analysis. HP eradication was successful in 867 patients with a pooled eradication rate of 86% (95% confidence interval (CI): 79-90%) with 84% heterogeneity. A subgroup analysis that included 230 patients who failed other prior eradication regimens revealed a pooled eradication rate of 85% (95% CI: 69-94%) without heterogeneity. In a subgroup analysis, highest eradication rates were achieved with levofloxacin, doxycycline, nitazoxanide and proton pump inhibitor with a pooled eradication rate of 92% (88-95%). CONCLUSION: Nitazoxanide-based regimen is safe and effective in the eradication of HP infection. It is also successful as a salvage therapy in patients who have failed prior treatments.