Assuntos
Úlcera da Córnea/diagnóstico , Infecções Oculares Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecções Oculares Fúngicas/diagnóstico , Metagenômica , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estreptocócicas/diagnóstico , Úlcera da Córnea/microbiologia , DNA Bacteriano/genética , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina , Infecções Oculares Bacterianas/microbiologia , Infecções Oculares Fúngicas/microbiologia , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Humanos , Metagenoma , RNA Bacteriano/genética , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus/genética , Staphylococcus/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Estreptocócicas/microbiologia , Streptococcus/genética , Streptococcus/isolamento & purificaçãoRESUMO
PURPOSE: The purpose of this article was to evaluate the impact of sample collection order on the diagnostic yield of metagenomic deep sequencing (MDS) for determining the causative pathogen in infectious keratitis. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional diagnostic test evaluation among subjects with infectious keratitis at Aravind Eye Hospital in Madurai, India. All subjects underwent corneal scrapings of the affected eye to obtain potassium hydroxide smear, Gram stain, bacterial culture, and fungal culture, in this order. The order of MDS specimen collection relative to smear and culture samples was randomized and served as the primary predictor. Outcomes included the normalized copy number of pathogenic RNA detected by MDS, the proportion of MDS samples that were diagnostic, and the agreement of MDS results with cultures. RESULTS: MDS samples from 46 subjects with corneal ulcers were evaluated. MDS was positive in 33 subjects (76%) and had 74% overall agreement with culture results. There was no association between order of MDS sample collection and normalized copy number of genetic material detected (P = 0.62) or the likelihood of MDS positivity (P = 0.46). However, the likelihood of agreement between MDS and cultures decreased when MDS corneal swabs were collected after other diagnostic corneal scrapings (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The overall yield of MDS for detecting the cause of infectious keratitis was not affected by sample collection order. However, diagnostic agreement between MDS and cultures decreased when MDS samples were collected after other specimens. Additional investigation is warranted to determine whether this represents increased sensitivity of MDS compared with cultures or higher susceptibility to contaminants.
Assuntos
Córnea/microbiologia , DNA Bacteriano/análise , DNA Fúngico/genética , Infecções Oculares Bacterianas/microbiologia , Infecções Oculares Fúngicas/microbiologia , Ceratite/microbiologia , Metagenoma/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bactérias/genética , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Estudos Transversais , Infecções Oculares Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecções Oculares Bacterianas/genética , Infecções Oculares Fúngicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Oculares Fúngicas/genética , Feminino , Fungos/genética , Fungos/isolamento & purificação , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Humanos , Ceratite/diagnóstico , Ceratite/genética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
We report two cases of keratitis caused by a rare fungus Myrothecium species. Clinical presentation, identification, and management were studied. Both fungi were grown from corneal scraping and identified as M. verrucaria and M. gramineum based on the microbiological techniques and DNA sequencing analysis. Both patients were treated with topical natamycin and or voriconazole/econazole. In the first patient, there was total healing of the with scar formation, however, the prognosis was poor in the second patient.