RESUMO
A meta-analysis of 63 studies showed a significant negative association between intelligence and religiosity. The association was stronger for college students and the general population than for participants younger than college age; it was also stronger for religious beliefs than religious behavior. For college students and the general population, means of weighted and unweighted correlations between intelligence and the strength of religious beliefs ranged from -.20 to -.25 (mean r = -.24). Three possible interpretations were discussed. First, intelligent people are less likely to conform and, thus, are more likely to resist religious dogma. Second, intelligent people tend to adopt an analytic (as opposed to intuitive) thinking style, which has been shown to undermine religious beliefs. Third, several functions of religiosity, including compensatory control, self-regulation, self-enhancement, and secure attachment, are also conferred by intelligence. Intelligent people may therefore have less need for religious beliefs and practices.
Assuntos
Inteligência , Religião , Pensamento , Fatores Etários , Escolaridade , Feminino , Humanos , Testes de Inteligência , Masculino , Fatores Sexuais , EspiritualidadeRESUMO
Dozens of frameworks have been proposed to assess evidence for digital health interventions (DHIs), but existing frameworks may not facilitate DHI evidence reviews that meet the needs of stakeholder organizations including payers, health systems, trade organizations, and others. These organizations may benefit from a DHI assessment framework that is both rigorous and rapid. Here we propose a framework to assess Evidence in Digital health for EFfectiveness of INterventions with Evaluative Depth (Evidence DEFINED). Designed for real-world use, the Evidence DEFINED Quick Start Guide may help streamline DHI assessment. A checklist is provided summarizing high-priority evidence considerations in digital health. Evidence-to-recommendation guidelines are proposed, specifying degrees of adoption that may be appropriate for a range of evidence quality levels. Evidence DEFINED differs from prior frameworks in its inclusion of unique elements designed for rigor and speed. Rigor is increased by addressing three gaps in prior frameworks. First, prior frameworks are not adapted adequately to address evidence considerations that are unique to digital health. Second, prior frameworks do not specify evidence quality criteria requiring increased vigilance for DHIs in the current regulatory context. Third, extant frameworks rarely leverage established, robust methodologies that were developed for non-digital interventions. Speed is achieved in the Evidence DEFINED Framework through screening optimization and deprioritization of steps that may have limited value. The primary goals of Evidence DEFINED are to a) facilitate standardized, rapid, rigorous DHI evidence assessment in organizations and b) guide digital health solutions providers who wish to generate evidence that drives DHI adoption.
RESUMO
Asthma self-management can improve symptom control, but adherence to established self-management behaviors is often poor. With adult asthma uncontrolled in over 60% of U.S. cases, there is a need for scalable, cost-effective tools to improve asthma outcomes. Here we describe a protocol for the Asthma Digital Study, a 24-month, decentralized, pragmatic, open-label, randomized controlled trial investigating the impact of a digital asthma self-management (DASM) program on asthma outcomes in adults. The program leverages consumer-grade devices with a smartphone app to provide "smart nudges," symptom logging, trigger tracking, and other features. Participants are recruited (target N = 900) from throughout the U.S., and randomized to a DASM or control arm (1:1). Co-primary outcomes at one year are a) asthma-associated costs for acute care and b) change from baseline in Asthma Control Test™ scores. Findings may inform decisions around adoption of digital tools for asthma self-management. Trial registration:clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04609644. Registered: Oct 30, 2020.
Assuntos
Asma , Aplicativos Móveis , Autogestão , Adulto , Humanos , Asma/terapia , Cuidados Críticos , Monitorização Fisiológica , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Autogestão/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Pragmáticos como AssuntoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate components of the family-physician relationship that affect the likelihood of self-reported physician follow-up with bereaved families. DESIGN: Randomized, split-sample, national survey. SUBJECTS: Two hundred four pediatric critical care attending physicians in the United States (54% response rate). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Subjects were randomly assigned to respond to differing versions of three clinical vignettes varying in each instance in: 1) the patient's length of stay in the intensive care unit; 2) the depiction of the degree of trust of the family toward medical staff; or 3) the depiction of the family's emotional reactions. Subjects then reported their likelihood of following-up with the family after the patient's death. Physicians were more likely to report they would contact families depicted as having a trusting relationship with staff (p = .01). Variations in depicted length of patient stay (p = .5) and in the nature of the family's emotional reaction (p = .9) were not associated with self-reported likelihood of follow-up (p = .5). The only difference observed regarding the method of contacting families after a death was that participants were more likely to say they would attend the funeral of the patient with a trustful family (p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric critical care attending physicians were more likely to report following-up with a bereaved family and attend a funeral in a vignette portraying a trustful relationship between the family and staff.
Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos , Morte , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar , Relações Profissional-Família , Luto , Estudos Transversais , Emoções , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Confiança , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Some guidelines state that in-person weight management interventions are more efficacious than those delivered digitally. However, digital programs are more scalable and accessible. We hypothesized that one-on-one health coaching via app-based video chat would simulate an in-person experience and help achieve outcomes comparable to those of in-person interventions. METHODS: A 12-month digital weight management intervention was provided to overweight or obese adults recruited from a large technology company. One-on-one health coaching sessions were offered during a 24-week intensive phase as well as subsequent maintenance phase. Focused on sustainable changes in activity and diet, the intervention incorporates SMART goals, in-app food and activity logs, Fitbit integration, as well as optional sleep and stress modules. Self-Determination Theory and the Transtheoretical Model are incorporated to drive behavior change. Multilevel mixed-effects models were used to analyze weight changes retrospectively. RESULTS: Six hundred eighty-three participants reported 29,051 weights. At 12 months, mean percent changes in body weight were -7.2% and -7.6% for overweight and obese groups, respectively. A weight change of -5% is commonly targeted for in-person weight management interventions. Observed weight loss exceeded this target by 2.2% (95% CI, 0.7% to 3.8%; P < .01) for the overweight group and 2.6% (95% CI, 1.4% to 3.9%; P < .01) for the obese group. CONCLUSIONS: Further research is needed with randomization to in-person or digital interventions. Though limited by an observational, retrospective design, preliminary results suggest that some digital weight management programs with one-on-one coaching may achieve outcomes comparable to those of robust, in-person interventions.
Assuntos
Peso Corporal/fisiologia , Adulto , Dieta , Exercício Físico/fisiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Tutoria/métodos , Aplicativos Móveis , Obesidade/fisiopatologia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Research of positive psychology interventions (PPIs) has expanded dramatically in recent years, and many novel PPIs may be useful in couples therapy. The present work identifies, summarizes, and suggests adaptations of PPIs that may improve couples therapy outcomes. Each intervention is presented as part of a larger organizational framework that may help couples therapists determine how and when each intervention can be effectively applied. Finally, a case illustration demonstrates how these methods can complement traditional therapeutic approaches.
Assuntos
Terapia de Casal/métodos , Emoções , Relações Interpessoais , Terapia Conjugal/métodos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Satisfação Pessoal , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Psicoterapia/métodos , Autoimagem , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Effective treatments can be rendered useless by poor patient recall of treatment instructions. Studies suggest that patients forget a great deal of important information and that recall can be increased through recall-promoting behaviors (RPBs) like repetition or summarization. OBJECTIVE: To assess how frequently RPBs are used in primary care, and to reveal how they might be applied more effectively. DESIGN: Recordings of 49 unannounced standardized patient (SP) visits were obtained using hidden audiorecorders. All SPs presented with typical gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms. Transcripts were coded for treatment recommendations and RPBs. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-nine primary care physicians. RESULTS: Of 1,140 RPBs, 53.7% were repetitions, 28.2% were communication of the rationale for a treatment, 11.7% were categorizations of treatments (i.e., stating that a treatment could be placed into a treatment category, such as medication-related or lifestyle-related categories), and 3.8% were emphasis of a recommendation's importance. Physicians varied substantially in their use of most RPBs, although no physicians summarized or asked patients to restate recommendations. The number of RPBs was positively correlated with visit length. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care physicians apply most RPBs inconsistently, do not utilize several RPBs that are particularly helpful, and may use RPBs inefficiently. Simple principles guiding RPB use may help physicians apply these communication tools more effectively.
Assuntos
Rememoração Mental , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Comportamento Verbal , Humanos , Visita a Consultório Médico , Simulação de Paciente , Relações Médico-PacienteRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The ways in which patients' requests for antidepressants affect physicians' prescribing behavior are poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To describe physicians' affective and cognitive responses to standardized patients' (SPs) requests for antidepressants, as well as the attitudinal and contextual factors influencing prescribing behavior. DESIGN: Focus group interviews and brief demographic questionnaires. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-two primary care physicians in 6 focus groups; all had participated in a prior RCT of the influence of patients' requests on physicians' prescribing. MEASUREMENTS: Iterative review of interview transcripts, involving qualitative coding and thematic analysis. RESULTS: Physicians participating in the focus groups were frequently unaware of and denied the degree to which their thinking was biased by patient requests, but were able to recognize such biases after facilitated reflection. Common affective responses included annoyance and empathy. Common cognitive reactions resulted in further diagnostic inquiry or in acquiescing to the patient's demands to save time or build the patient-clinician relationship. Patients' requests for medication prompted the participants to err on the side of overtreating versus careful review of clinical indications. Lack of time and participants' attitudes--toward the role of the patient and the pharmaceutical ads--also influenced their responses, prompting them to interpret patient requests as diagnostic clues or opportunities for efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a taxonomy of affective and cognitive responses to patients' requests for medications and the underlying attitudes and contextual factors influencing them. Improved capacity for moment-to-moment self-awareness during clinical reasoning processes may increase the appropriateness of prescribing.
Assuntos
Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Participação do Paciente , Relações Médico-Paciente , Médicos de Família/psicologia , Padrões de Prática Médica , Publicidade , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Estudos de Coortes , Grupos Focais , HumanosRESUMO
Recent literature has described how the capacity for concurrent self-assessment-ongoing moment-to-moment self-monitoring-is an important component of the professional competence of physicians. Self-monitoring refers to the ability to notice our own actions, curiosity to examine the effects of those actions, and willingness to use those observations to improve behavior and thinking in the future. Self-monitoring allows for the early recognition of cognitive biases, technical errors, and emotional reactions and may facilitate self-correction and development of therapeutic relationships. Cognitive neuroscience has begun to explore the brain functions associated with self-monitoring, and the structural and functional changes that occur during mental training to improve attentiveness, curiosity, and presence. This training involves cultivating habits of mind such as experiencing information as novel, thinking of "facts" as conditional, seeing situations from multiple perspectives, suspending categorization and judgment, and engaging in self-questioning. The resulting awareness is referred to as mindfulness and the associated moment-to-moment self-monitoring as mindful practice-in contrast to being on "automatic pilot" or "mindless" in one's behavior. This article is a preliminary exploration into the intersection of educational assessment, cognitive neuroscience, and mindful practice, with the hope of promoting ways of improving clinicians' capacity to self-monitor during clinical practice, and, by extension, improve the quality of care that they deliver.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica/normas , Educação Médica Continuada , Autoavaliação (Psicologia) , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The value of physician self-disclosure (MD-SD) in creating successful patient-physician partnerships has not been demonstrated. METHODS: To describe antecedents, delivery, and effects of MD-SD in primary care visits, we conducted a descriptive study using sequence analysis of transcripts of 113 unannounced, undetected, standardized patient visits to primary care physicians. Our main outcome measures were the number of MD-SDs per visit; number of visits with MD-SDs; word count; antecedents, timing, and effect of MD-SD on subsequent physician and patient communication; content and focus of MD-SD. RESULTS: The MD-SDs included discussion of personal emotions and experiences, families and/or relationships, professional descriptions, and personal experiences with the patient's diagnosis. Seventy-three MD-SDs were identified in 38 (34%) of 113 visits. Ten MD-SDs (14%) were a response to a patient question. Forty-four (60%) followed patient symptoms, family, or feelings; 29 (40%) were unrelated. Only 29 encounters (21%) returned to the patient topic preceding the disclosure. Most MD-SDs (n=62; 85%) were not considered useful to the patient by the research team. Eight MD-SDs (11%) were coded as disruptive. CONCLUSIONS: Practicing primary care physicians disclosed information about themselves or their families in 34% of new visits with unannounced, undetected, standardized patients. There was no evidence of positive effect of MD-SDs; some appeared disruptive. Primary care physicians should consider when self-disclosing whether other behaviors such as empathy might accomplish their goals more effectively.
Assuntos
Visita a Consultório Médico , Satisfação do Paciente , Relações Médico-Paciente , Médicos de Família/normas , Autorrevelação , Adulto , Competência Clínica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New YorkRESUMO
Human urine samples are ideal for proteomic profiling and have tremendous potential as sources of biomarkers. Multi-dimensional protein identification technology (MudPIT) is an effective approach to analyzing human urine or other fluids dominated by diverse metabolites. MudPIT analysis was used to identify 87 proteins in just 15 ml of human urine. A high throughput, reproducible, and sensitive technology, MudPIT may soon be used for more proteomic analyses of metabolites.
Assuntos
Proteinúria/metabolismo , Proteoma , HumanosRESUMO
Multi-dimensional protein identification technology (MudPIT) is becoming a prevalent proteomic approach due to its high-throughput separations and accurate mass detection. Prior to MudPIT analysis, complicated samples required in-solution digestion. Unlike in-gel digestion, in which enzymes work on just a few proteins, in-solution digestion involves simultaneous digestion of hundreds or thousands of proteins. In-solution digestion protocols must therefore be very efficient. Few investigations have evaluated the efficiency of in-solution digestion protocols. The present research compared three such protocols. Results suggest that a protocol utilizing trifluoroethanol (TFE) as denaturant is most efficient.
Assuntos
Proteoma , Proteínas Sanguíneas/genética , Proteínas Sanguíneas/isolamento & purificação , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Humanos , SoluçõesRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To examine how primary care physicians respond to ambiguous patient symptom presentations. DESIGN: Observational study, using thematic analysis within a larger cross-sectional study employing standardized patients (SPs), to describe physician responses to ambiguous patient symptoms and patterns of physician-patient interaction. SETTING: Community-based primary care offices within a metropolitan area. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-three primary care physicians (internists and family physicians). METHOD: Participating physicians had 2 unannounced SP visits randomly inserted into their daily practice schedules and the visits were audiotaped and transcribed. A coding system focusing on physician responses to concerned patients presenting with ambiguous symptoms was developed through an inductive process. Thematic analyses were then applied to coded data. RESULTS: Physicians' responses to ambiguous symptoms were categorized into 2 primary patterns: high partnering (HP) and usual care (UC). HP was characterized by greater responsiveness to patients' expression of concern, positivity, sensitivity to patients' clues about life circumstances, greater acknowledgment of symptom ambiguity, and solicitation of patients' perspectives on their problems. UC was characterized by denial of ambiguity and less inclusion of patients' perspectives on their symptoms. Neither HP physicians nor UC physicians actively included patients in treatment planning. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care physicians respond to ambiguity by either ignoring the ambiguity and becoming more directive (UC) or, less often, by acknowledging the ambiguity and attempting to explore symptoms and patient concerns in more detail (HP). Future areas of study could address whether physicians can learn HP behaviors and whether HP behaviors positively affect health outcomes.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Comunicação , Pacientes/psicologia , Relações Médico-Paciente , Médicos/psicologia , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Incerteza , Empatia , Medicina de Família e Comunidade , Humanos , Medicina Interna , Visita a Consultório Médico , Satisfação do Paciente , Simulação de PacienteRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The compression of morbidity model posits a breakpoint in the adult lifespan that separates an initial period of relative health from a subsequent period of ever increasing morbidity. Researchers often assume that such a breakpoint exists; however, this assumption is hitherto untested. PURPOSE: To test the assumption that a breakpoint exists--which we term a morbidity tipping point--separating a period of relative health from a subsequent deterioration in health status. An analogous tipping point for healthcare costs was also investigated. METHODS: Four years of adults' (N = 55,550) morbidity and costs data were retrospectively analyzed. Data were collected in Pittsburgh, PA between 2006 and 2009; analyses were performed in Rochester, NY and Ann Arbor, MI in 2012 and 2013. Cohort-sequential and hockey stick regression models were used to characterize long-term trajectories and tipping points, respectively, for both morbidity and costs. RESULTS: Morbidity increased exponentially with age (P<.001). A morbidity tipping point was observed at age 45.5 (95% CI, 41.3-49.7). An exponential trajectory was also observed for costs (P<.001), with a costs tipping point occurring at age 39.5 (95% CI, 32.4-46.6). Following their respective tipping points, both morbidity and costs increased substantially (Ps<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the existence of a morbidity tipping point, confirming an important but untested assumption. This tipping point, however, may occur earlier in the lifespan than is widely assumed. An "avalanche of morbidity" occurred after the morbidity tipping point-an ever increasing rate of morbidity progression. For costs, an analogous tipping point and "avalanche" were observed. The time point at which costs began to increase substantially occurred approximately 6 years before health status began to deteriorate.
Assuntos
Modelos Estatísticos , Morbidade/tendências , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Michigan , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New York , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
When asked to randomly select answer choices on easy multiple choice questions, people select more correct answers than expected by chance. Sparrow and Wegner showed that this tendency was eliminated if participants answered questions correctly before answering randomly. They argued that answering a question correctly unprimes the tendency to choose the correct answer, thereby reducing the correct response rate close to the chance level of.5. An alternative explanation, consistent with these results, is that answering questions correctly provides a baseline, which allows participants to strategize, i.e., to match and mismatch equal numbers of their purportedly random responses to the baseline response. Three studies showed that the presence of a baseline, even when unpriming is not feasible, led to lower correct response rates than those obtained in a condition in which no baseline was available. Furthermore, the presence of a baseline led to more nonrandom sequences of correct and incorrect responses. One specific sequence-alternating correct and incorrect answers-mediated the relation between the presence of a baseline and lower correct response rate. These findings suggest that strategizing, not unpriming, accounts for Sparrow and Wegner's results.
Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões/fisiologia , Objetivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Feminino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess changes in employee productivity impairment observed after the implementation of several Web-based health promotion programs. METHODS: Health risk assessments and self-report measures of productivity impairment were administered on-line to more than 43,000 participants of Web-based health promotion programs. RESULTS: Reductions in productivity impairment were observed after 1 month of program utilization. Productivity impairment at 90- and 180-day follow-ups also decreased relative to baseline. Improvements in employee health were associated with reductions in employee productivity impairment. CONCLUSION: The use of Web-based health promotion programs was associated with reductions in productivity impairment and improvements in employee health. After the implementation of Web-based health promotion programs, reductions in productivity impairment may be observed before reductions in direct health care costs.
Assuntos
Eficiência , Promoção da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Internet , Local de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Depressão/epidemiologia , Depressão/etnologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Saúde Ocupacional/etnologia , Saúde Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Dor/epidemiologia , Dor/etnologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/epidemiologia , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/etnologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that hopeful patterns of thoughts and emotions of parents of pediatric patients receiving palliative care consultative services are related to subsequent decisions, specifically regarding limit of intervention (LOI) orders. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Children's hospital and surrounding region. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-three pediatric patients receiving palliative care consultative services who did not have LOI orders at time of cohort entry and their 43 parental adults. MAIN EXPOSURES: Parental levels at time of cohort entry of hopeful patterns of thinking and emotions, in conjunction with perceptions about patients' health trajectories. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Enactment of an LOI order after entry into the cohort. RESULTS: During the 6 months of observation, 14 patients (42.4%) had an LOI order enacted. In adjusted analyses, higher levels of parental hopeful patterns of thinking were significantly associated with increased odds of enactment of an LOI order (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-7.22). Increased odds of LOI enactment were associated to nonsignificant degrees with lower levels of parental positive affect (AOR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.17-1.12), higher levels of parental negative affect (AOR, 2.02; 95% CI, 0.98-4.16), and parental perceptions of worsening health over time (AOR, 1.72; 95% CI, 0.73-4.07). CONCLUSION: For pediatric patients receiving palliative care consultative services, higher levels of parents' hopeful patterns of thinking are associated with subsequent enactment of LOI orders, suggesting that emotional and cognitive processes have a combined effect on medical decision making.
Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Cuidados Paliativos/psicologia , Pais , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Emoções , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pais/psicologia , Estudos Prospectivos , PensamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: This study evaluated the economic impact of an online disease management program within a broader population health management strategy. DESIGN: A retrospective, quasi-experimental, cohort design evaluated program participants and a matched cohort of nonparticipants on 2003-2007 claims data in a mixed model. SAMPLE: The study was conducted through Highmark Inc, Blue Cross Blue Shield, covering 4.8 million members in five regions of Pennsylvania. Overall, 413 online self-management program participants were compared with a matched cohort of 360 nonparticipants. MEASURES: The costs and claims data were measured per person per calendar year. Total payments were aggregated from inpatient, outpatient, professional services, and pharmacy payments. The costs of the online program were estimated on a per-participant basis. All dollars were adjusted to 2008 values. INTERVENTION: The online intervention, implemented in 2006, was a commercially available, tailored program for chronic condition self management, nested within the Blues on Call(SM) condition management strategy. ANALYSIS: General linear modeling (with covariate adjustment) was used. Data trends were also explored using second-order polynomial regressions. RESULTS: Health care costs per person per year were $757 less than predicted for participants relative to matched nonparticipants, yielding a return on investment of $9.89 for every dollar spent on the program. CONCLUSIONS: This online intervention showed a favorable and cost-effective impact on health care cost.
Assuntos
Planos de Seguro Blue Cross Blue Shield/economia , Gerenciamento Clínico , Gastos em Saúde , Autocuidado/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Internet , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pennsylvania , Estudos Retrospectivos , Autocuidado/métodos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Although research with bereaved families has shown that they appreciate contact with clinicians after the child's death, this realm of clinical practice remains empirically uncharted. The objective of this study was to describe pediatric critical care practitioners' attitudes and self-reported practices regarding contacting families after a patient's death. METHODS: A total of 376 board-certified members of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section of Critical Care received e-mail invitations to complete a Web-based questionnaire; 204 members responded (effective response rate: 54.3%). RESULTS: Most (95%) participants reported 0 to 1 patient deaths per week. A total of 79% of the respondents reported contacting families at least sometimes, 71.9% had attended funerals, and only 2.5% thought that it was inappropriate for clinicians to attend funerals. A total of 75.9% agreed that follow-up contact helps the family, whereas 47.3% agreed that follow-up contact helps the physicians. The most common methods of follow-up contact included the passive measures of providing contact information; active methods such as meeting with the family, calling them by telephone, or writing a letter or note were used less often. In multivariable analysis, respondents were more likely to report contact with a family after the death of a child when they affirmed the belief that such contact was useful to the family or to the physician or when they were female physicians. Regarding reported funeral attendance after the death of a patient, multivariable analysis revealed similar patterns of association but to an attenuated and nonstatistically significant degree. CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of pediatric critical care physicians have contacted bereaved families and attended funerals after the death of a child patient. These practices were consistently associated with the belief that such follow-up contact helps the family or the practitioner.