Patient reported outcome for physical function in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy.

OBJECTIVES: There is an unmet need to develop patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures for Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies (IIM). To investigate the feasibility, compliance, and psychometric properties of NIH's Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function-20 (PF-20) in a large U.S. IIM population. METHODS: "Myositis Patient Centered Tele-Research" (My PACER) is a multicentre prospective observational study of IIM patients, competitively recruited through traditional in-person clinic visits (Center-Based Cohort [CBC]), and remotely using smartphone and web-based technology (Tele-Research Cohort [TRC]). The CBC was further randomly divided (1:1 ratio) into a traditional local sub-cohort, and a remote sub-cohort. Data collected included PRO and other patient self-assessments monthly for 6 months. Clinician-reported outcomes were obtained at baseline and 6 months. RESULTS: 120 IIM patients were enrolled (82 TRC/38 CBC, mean age 55 ± 13.4, 75% females, 81% Caucasians), with similar demographics and mean PROMIS PF-20 score between cohorts. The PROMIS PF-20 score was not associated with age, sex or race. The compliance and completion rates were similar between TRC and CBC as well as sub-cohorts. PROMIS PF-20 showed strong test-retest reliability at 1 month. PROMIS PF-20 was significantly associated with all core set measures except extra-muscular global and CK, as well as with most of symptoms, function and physical activity measures. PROMIS PF-20 illustrated concordant change with myositis response criteria and patient assessment, with a large effect size. CONCLUSIONS: PROMIS PF-20 demonstrates favorable psychometric properties including reliability, validity and responsiveness in a large cohort of myositis patients, with similar adherence in local or remotely enrolled patients.

Current perspective on infections and mitigation strategies in primary systemic vasculitis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to summarize and evaluate most recent evidence on the epidemiology of infections and associated risk factors in patients with primary systemic vasculitides (PSV), as well as discuss mitigation strategies including the risk of antibiotic prophylaxis. RECENT FINDINGS: Infections remain one of the leading causes of mortality in patients with PSV, with rates of severe infection ranging from 16 to 40% in different cohorts. Older age, frailty, renal and pulmonary involvement, and higher burden of comorbidities have been recognized as important patient-associated risk factors. Treatments including higher cumulative doses of glucocorticoids are associated with an increased risk of infections, and recent studies show the potential benefit of interventions such as reduced-dose glucocorticoid regimens. Existing mitigation strategies include screening, vaccination, and infection prophylaxis. The latter remains particularly important for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia; however, the benefit-risk ratio seems to be less clear outside of induction phase (i.e., high dose of glucocorticoids) and optimal treatment duration remains less clear. Patients with PSV are at increased risk of infections, due to disease itself, comorbidities, and treatment side effects. Awareness of the timing and types of infection, as well as mitigation strategies are imperative to ensure treatment success and survival for patients.

Differentiation of Patients with Symptomatic Low von Willebrand Factor from Those with Asymptomatic Low von Willebrand Factor.

BACKGROUND: Accurate diagnosis of symptomatic low von Willebrand factor (VWF) remains a major challenge in von Willebrand disease (VWD). However, present tests do not adequately take into account flow forces that, at very high shear rates, reveal a weakness in the VWF-platelet glycoprotein glycoprotein Ib bond in normal subjects. The degree of this weakness is greater in symptomatic, but not asymptomatic, low VWF. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to distinguish patients with symptomatic low VWF (levels in the 30-50 IU/dL range) from those with asymptomatic low VWF and normal subjects. METHODS: We measured platelet adhesion (PA)/aggregation in our novel microfluidic flow system that permits real-time assessment of PA (surface coverage) and PA/aggregation (V, aggregate volume) using epifluorescence digital videomicroscopy in flowing noncitrated whole blood at 4,000 second-1. Blood samples from 24 low VWF patients and 15 normal subjects were collected into plastic tubes containing 4 U/mL enoxaparin. MetaMorph software was used to quantify rates of PA and V increase. RESULTS: Rates of PA increase showed a bimodal distribution, with values for 16/24 patients (Group I) all below the 2.5th percentile of normal, and values for 8/24 patients (Group II) similar to controls. Bleeding scores (mean ± standard error) were 5.50 ± 0.45 versus 2.75 ± 0.45 (p = 0.00077), and 10 clinically significant bleeding events were observed in seven versus zero (p = 0.0295) Group I and Group II subjects, respectively. CONCLUSION: The present approach may offer a definitive means to distinguish symptomatic low VWF from either asymptomatic low VWF or normal controls.